Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Specification Errata and Issues
draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-16

[Ballot comment]
I'd recommend removing this from the abstract:

  Because some text is changed several times the last delta in the text
  is the one which should be applied.

The write-up and document make clear that this document will inform the creation of
a -bis document, but that statement in the abstract looks to be instructions for creating
a bis from this document.  Given the discussion summarized in the write-up, that seems
like something worth changing or removing.  I'd suggest that the following:

  Note that when reading this document one must use care to assure that
  a field or item is not updated further on within the document.  Each
  section should be applied in sequence to the original RFC2960 [7]
  since this document is a historical record of the sequential changes
  that have been found necessary at various inter-op events and through
  discussion on the list.

may need revision along the same lines.

[Note]: 'See writeup for brief explanation about why Info, and text for more - was LC''d for PS in case.
PROTO shepherd James Polk jmpolk@cisco.com' added by Allison Mankin

IANA Last Call Comments:
We understand that this document itself does not have any IANA Actions.
We understand the RFC2960 BIS document will make any requested changes to IANA Actions.