RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Requirements on TCP/IP Header Compression
draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-08
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2005-02-24
|
08 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2005-02-23
|
08 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2005-02-23
|
08 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2005-02-23
|
08 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2005-02-22
|
08 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Allison Mankin |
2005-02-22
|
08 | Allison Mankin | Note field has been cleared by Allison Mankin |
2005-02-18
|
08 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-02-17 |
2005-02-17
|
08 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-02-17
|
08 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: We understand this document to have NO IANA ACTIONS. Per the IANA Considerations section, a protocol that meets the requirements in this document … IANA Comments: We understand this document to have NO IANA ACTIONS. Per the IANA Considerations section, a protocol that meets the requirements in this document will require the IANA to assign various numbers, but these would need to be defined in other documents or via defined registration procedures. |
2005-02-17
|
08 | Harald Alvestrand | Review from Michael Patton, Gen-ART Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC I am moved to say that this is one … Review from Michael Patton, Gen-ART Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC I am moved to say that this is one of the best documents I've ever reviewed. It's complete, concise and very readable. I didn't even notice any typos (and as my other GenART reviews can attest, I usually pick up a fair number). I only noticed one improvement that I thought it could use [next paragraph], but not something important enough to delay publication at this point. As I was reading Section 2.3 Item 3 which describes the decompressor noting that an error occurred, it struck me that in a similar way the compressor should note if the incoming TCP is already damaged... It's probably not too important for this document to mention that, and, of course, algorithms and/or implementations might include it anyway, but it might have been useful to mention it for completeness. On the other hand, at this stage I do not recommend making such a change to the document since that would require re-review by many. I only mention it to bring it to your attention in case the document does undergo a rewrite where it could be included. |
2005-02-17
|
08 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART Review in document log; quote: "I am moved to say that this is one of the best documents … [Ballot comment] Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART Review in document log; quote: "I am moved to say that this is one of the best documents I've ever reviewed. It's complete, concise and very readable." |
2005-02-17
|
08 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand |
2005-02-17
|
08 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2005-02-16
|
08 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-02-16
|
08 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-02-16
|
08 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'Authors are engaged on a fix to the IPR paragraph' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-02-16
|
08 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin |
2005-02-16
|
08 | Allison Mankin | Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin |
2005-02-16
|
08 | Allison Mankin | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-02-16
|
08 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-02-16
|
08 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-02-16
|
08 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-02-16
|
08 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin |
2005-02-10
|
08 | Allison Mankin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-02-17 by Allison Mankin |
2004-12-01
|
08 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin |
2004-11-01
|
08 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested |
2004-09-14
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-08.txt |
2004-06-09
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-07.txt |
2003-06-13
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-06.txt |
2002-10-23
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-05.txt |
2002-05-28
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-04.txt |
2002-02-15
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-03.txt |
2001-11-29
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-02.txt |
2001-06-20
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-01.txt |
2001-02-23
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-rohc-tcp-requirements-00.txt |