Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy and Certification Practices Framework
draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-02
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2003-07-30
|
02 | Natalia Syracuse | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Natalia Syracuse |
|
2003-07-25
|
02 | Michael Lee | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2003-07-25
|
02 | Michael Lee | IESG has approved the document |
|
2003-07-25
|
02 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2003-07-25
|
02 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2003-07-10
|
02 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Vezza, Amy |
|
2003-07-07
|
02 | Russ Housley | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation :: AD Followup by Housley, Russ |
|
2003-04-25
|
02 | Russ Housley | Jeff asked for two sections to be added: Changes since RFC 2527 and Security Considerations. Both are present in the -02 draft. The introduction in … Jeff asked for two sections to be added: Changes since RFC 2527 and Security Considerations. Both are present in the -02 draft. The introduction in the -02 draft points out that the document is a result of a collaborative effort between the PKIX working group and the American Bar Association. I think this resolves the concerns raised by Harald. This resolves all of the issues that I know about. |
|
2003-04-25
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-02.txt |
|
2003-03-21
|
02 | Russ Housley | Shepherding AD has been changed to Housley, Russ from Schiller, Jeff |
|
2003-01-23
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | Have requested that a "Changes since 2527" Section be considered as well as a Security Considerations section. |
|
2003-01-23
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | State Changes to IESG Evaluation :: AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Schiller, Jeff |
|
2002-11-05
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | This document does not tell us where it came from. It appears to have had a good deal of legal review (presumably under US law). … This document does not tell us where it came from. It appears to have had a good deal of legal review (presumably under US law). My best guess is that it is "here's what the lawyers told us was a good idea in a language the techies can understand" - that it has been worked out between the ABA and the PKIX WG somehow. If the intro/abstract was clear that this is an attempt to capture non-IETF, non-technical advice on how to run PKIX-based infrastructures, I would be happier with it. |
|
2002-11-05
|
02 | Harald Alvestrand | by Alvestrand, Harald |
|
2002-10-28
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-01.txt |
|
2002-09-19
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | Very legal looking document, draft template for writing legal agreements and policies having to do with Certificate Management. |
|
2002-09-19
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | A new comment added by schiller |
|
2002-09-19
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by schiller |
|
2002-09-19
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | responsible has been changed to Responsible AD from Jeff |
|
2002-09-19
|
02 | Jeffrey Schiller | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Pre AD Evaluation by schiller |
|
2002-08-11
|
02 | Stephen Coya | Draft Added by scoya |
|
2001-07-23
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-ipki-new-rfc2527-00.txt |