OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
draft-ietf-pce-disco-proto-ospf-08
Yes
(Ross Callon)
No Objection
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Sam Hartman)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Ross Callon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-06-19)
Unknown
I would like to salute the authors of the document and the PCE WG for the Manageability Considerations section. This section could be used as a reference for the type of information that should be included in a protocol document.
David Ward Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-06-19)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-07-11)
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-06-20)
Unknown
From the Gen-ART review by Robert Sparks... The introduction claims that this draft does not define any new OSPF elements of procedure, but section 5 is titled "Elements of Procedure" and does appear to contain some significant behavioral requirements. Should the introduction be modified?
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown