Extensions to OSPF to Support Mobile Ad Hoc Networking
draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-03
Yes
(David Ward)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Lars Eggert)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
David Ward Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2009-01-15)
Unknown
> Note that the active overlapping relays selection algorithm is > implementation specific, and the above is simply a suggested > algorithm. However, the behavior of the overlapping relays MUST > follow that specified in the "Flooding and Relay Decisions" Section. > Moreover, the same selection algorithm MUST be used by all nodes > within an area. This should be raised earlier in the document. As written, the spec does not provide an interoperable solution. This may not be required for an experimental specification, but at the very least the reader should know about this after reading the introduction. > attached to the broadcast network. Such desginated routers must be typo Thomas Narten's quick review reaction was this: When you do incremental updates, there are all sorts of failure edge cases. Its a lot like how to correctly do a sliding window protocol. Just skimming the document, its not presented in a way that explains the basic idea behind the details. For correctness, you need equivalent of 3 way handshake to be sure both sides are synchronized w.r.t. shared state.
Ross Callon Former IESG member
(was No Objection)
Yes
Yes
(2009-01-15)
Unknown
I think that it is very unfortunate that we can't agree on one single standards track approach for supporting MANET networks with OSPF. However, I understand the difficulty here, and under the circumstances probably the least bad approach is to progress all three as experimental, and then hope to sort out differences with the aid of operational experience.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-01-12)
Unknown
1.2 Motivation for extending OSPF to support MANETs The second motivation is that OSPF is a well understand and widely s/understand/understood deployed routing protocol. 3.2.2 State Check Sequence TLV (SCS TLV) o SCS Number: A circular two octet unsigned integer indicating the This should say that it is in network byte order.
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-08-26)
Unknown
It's only necessary to cite the reference for a citation to a doc on first mention; reading, e.g., "...modifications to [OSPFv3] to support..." throughout the doc is distracting.
Acronym expansion for LSA?
Are there some links missing or other typos in this network map?
+---+I11 I21+---+I23 |
|RT1|-+----------+-|RT2|------|N1
+---+ | | +---+ |
| | VI22
| | +
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | +
| | ^I41
+---+ | +---+
|RT3|-+ +-|RT4|
+---+I31 I42+---+
E.g., should the leftmost vertical bars be shifter right 6 or so spaces?
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown