Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) Mode
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2017-08-17
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2017-08-09
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from EDIT |
2017-06-28
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2017-06-28
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2017-06-28
|
04 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2017-06-28
|
04 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2017-06-28
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2017-06-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2017-06-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2017-06-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2017-06-28
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup was changed |
2017-06-28
|
04 | Deborah Brungard | Ballot approval text was changed |
2017-06-03
|
04 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2017-06-03
|
04 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-04.txt |
2017-06-03
|
04 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-06-03
|
04 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, Jeong-dong Ryoo , Guangjuan Weng , Huub van Helvoort , Tae-sik Cheung , Italo Busi |
2017-06-03
|
04 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | Uploaded new revision |
2017-05-25
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2017-05-24
|
03 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2017-05-24
|
03 | Warren Kumari | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari |
2017-05-24
|
03 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2017-05-24
|
03 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2017-05-24
|
03 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2017-05-23
|
03 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2017-05-23
|
03 | Adam Roach | [Ballot comment] The acronym table lists two one-letter acronyms, which appear to actually be keys to codes in a table instead of actual acronyms. I … [Ballot comment] The acronym table lists two one-letter acronyms, which appear to actually be keys to codes in a table instead of actual acronyms. I would propose moving the definition of "i" and "N" from section 3 into section 4.2. Also, section 3 contains expansions for "PF:DW:R," "PF:W:L," and "PF:W:R," but not "SA:MP:R," and "SA:MW:R." This seems oddly inconsistent; I would suggest adding entries for the two "SA:..." acronyms. |
2017-05-23
|
03 | Adam Roach | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adam Roach |
2017-05-23
|
03 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2017-05-23
|
03 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2017-05-23
|
03 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2017-05-22
|
03 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2017-05-22
|
03 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2017-05-21
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2017-05-21
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Ballot has been issued |
2017-05-21
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2017-05-21
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Created "Approve" ballot |
2017-05-21
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Ballot writeup was changed |
2017-05-19
|
03 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2017-05-16
|
03 | Christian Huitema | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Christian Huitema. Sent review to list. |
2017-05-15
|
03 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2017-05-15
|
03 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Services Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-03.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We … (Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: The IANA Services Operator has reviewed draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-03.txt, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any registry actions. While it's often helpful for a document's IANA Considerations section to remain in place upon publication even if there are no actions, if the authors strongly prefer to remove it, we do not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal IANA Services Specialist PTI |
2017-05-14
|
03 | Jürgen Schönwälder | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder. Sent review to list. |
2017-05-11
|
03 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Christian Huitema |
2017-05-11
|
03 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Christian Huitema |
2017-05-10
|
03 | Roni Even | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Roni Even. Sent review to list. |
2017-05-10
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2017-05-10
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Roni Even |
2017-05-10
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2017-05-10
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Meral Shirazipour |
2017-05-10
|
03 | Robert Sparks | Assignment of request for Last Call review by GENART to Robert Sparks was rejected |
2017-05-09
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Robert Sparks |
2017-05-09
|
03 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Robert Sparks |
2017-05-09
|
03 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder |
2017-05-09
|
03 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: mpls@ietf.org, db3546@att.com, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, Loa Andersson , … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: mpls@ietf.org, db3546@att.com, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates@ietf.org, Loa Andersson , loa@pi.nu Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) Mode) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) Mode' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-05-19. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document contains updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) linear protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) mode defined in RFC 7271. The updates provide rules related to the initialization of the Protection State Coordination (PSC) Control Logic, in which the state machine resides, when operating in APS mode, and clarify some operation related to state transition table lookup. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2017-05-25 |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Last call was requested |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Ballot approval text was generated |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Ballot writeup was generated |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from Expert Review |
2017-05-05
|
03 | Deborah Brungard | Last call announcement was generated |
2017-02-21
|
03 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-03.txt |
2017-02-21
|
03 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-02-21
|
03 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: mpls-chairs@ietf.org, Jeong-dong Ryoo , Guangjuan Weng , Huub van Helvoort , Tae-sik Cheung , Italo Busi |
2017-02-21
|
03 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | Uploaded new revision |
2017-01-23
|
02 | Min Ye | Request for Last Call review by RTGDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Russ White. |
2017-01-10
|
02 | Deborah Brungard | Routing Directorate Review - Russ White |
2017-01-10
|
02 | Deborah Brungard | IESG state changed to Expert Review from Publication Requested |
2017-01-09
|
02 | Xian Zhang | Request for Last Call review by RTGDIR is assigned to Russ White |
2017-01-09
|
02 | Xian Zhang | Request for Last Call review by RTGDIR is assigned to Russ White |
2017-01-09
|
02 | Xian Zhang | Requested Last Call review by RTGDIR |
2017-01-08
|
02 | Loa Andersson | The MPLS Working Group requests that Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection in Automatic Protection … The MPLS Working Group requests that Updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) Mode draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates is published as a RFC on the standards track. (1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? Is this type of RFC indicated in the title page header? We request that the document is published as a Standard Track RFC since it updates RFC 7271 (another Standard Track RFC) and since it specifies new (earlier unspecified) necessary rules for the initialization of the PSC Control Logic. Proposed Standard is the right type of RFC. (2) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up. Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary The document contains updates to MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) linear protection in Automatic Protection Switching (APS) mode defined in RFC 7271. The updates provide rules related to the initialization of the Protection State Coordination (PSC) Control Logic. When PSC operates in APS mode, the state machine is part of the control logic. The document also clarifies some operations related to state transition table lookup. Working Group Summary The interest in MPLS-TP is slightly waning, however there is a rather strong group within the working group working on the last MPLS-TP documents. The MPLS WG is also committed to complete the MPLS-TP project. This document has been greatly improved in the reviews during the working group process. Document Quality Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? Are there any reviewers that merit special mention as having done a thorough review, e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a conclusion that the document had no substantive issues? If there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type or other expert review, what was its course (briefly)? In the case of a Media Type review, on what date was the request posted? We know of a several vendors that intend to implement this specification, we actually expect every implementor that did implement RFC 7271 to implement. Several vendors have said that they will implement "as soon as it is an RFC". Personnel Who is the Document Shepherd? Who is the Responsible Area Director? Loa Andersson is the document shepherd. Deborah Brungard is the responsible AD. (3) Briefly describe the review of this document that was performed by the Document Shepherd. If this version of the document is not ready for publication, please explain why the document is being forwarded to the IESG. This document has been through a normal working group process, the level of review is good. (4) Does the document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No such concerns. (5) Do portions of the document need review from a particular or from broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, AAA, DNS, DHCP, XML, or internationalization? If so, describe the review that took place. No such review necessary. (6) Describe any specific concerns or issues that the Document Shepherd has with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. No such concerns. (7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why. All the authors and contributors have stated on the MPLS WG mailing list that they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs. (8) Has an IPR disclosure been filed that references this document? If so, summarize any WG discussion and conclusion regarding the IPR disclosures. There are no IPR disclosures against this document. (9) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? As we said earlier the interest in MPLS-TP is somewhat waning, this does not mean that the working group support is low. The working group is committed to complete the MPLS-TP project, and the support for the document is good. (10) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is publicly available.) No such threats. (11) Identify any ID nits the Document Shepherd has found in this document. (See https://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/ and the Internet-Drafts Checklist). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. The document passes the nits-tool cleanly. There is a comment that the abstract does not say directly that this document updates RFC 7271, but the first sentence in the abstract does say this. (12) Describe how the document meets any required formal review criteria, such as the MIB Doctor, media type, and URI type reviews. No such reviews necessary. (13) Have all references within this document been identified as either normative or informative? Yes - the references are correctly split into normative and informative. (14) Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the plan for their completion? All the normative references are to existing Standards Track RFCs. (15) Are there downward normative references references (see RFC 3967)? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure. There are no down refs in the document. (16) Will publication of this document change the status of any existing RFCs? Are those RFCs listed on the title page header, listed in the abstract, and discussed in the introduction? If the RFCs are not listed in the Abstract and Introduction, explain why, and point to the part of the document where the relationship of this document to the other RFCs is discussed. If this information is not in the document, explain why the WG considers it unnecessary. The publication will not change the status of any existing RFC. (17) Describe the Document Shepherd's review of the IANA considerations section, especially with regard to its consistency with the body of the document. Confirm that all protocol extensions that the document makes are associated with the appropriate reservations in IANA registries. Confirm that any referenced IANA registries have been clearly identified. Confirm that newly created IANA registries include a detailed specification of the initial contents for the registry, that allocations procedures for future registrations are defined, and a reasonable name for the new registry has been suggested (see RFC 5226). There are no IANA actions required by this documents. (18) List any new IANA registries that require Expert Review for future allocations. Provide any public guidance that the IESG would find useful in selecting the IANA Experts for these new registries. No such registries. (19) Describe reviews and automated checks performed by the Document Shepherd to validate sections of the document written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc. No such checks are necessary. |
2017-01-08
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Responsible AD changed to Deborah Brungard |
2017-01-08
|
02 | Loa Andersson | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up |
2017-01-08
|
02 | Loa Andersson | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2017-01-08
|
02 | Loa Andersson | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2017-01-08
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Changed document writeup |
2017-01-06
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Changed document writeup |
2017-01-05
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Changed document writeup |
2017-01-05
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2017-01-05
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2017-01-05
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Notification list changed to "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> |
2017-01-05
|
02 | Loa Andersson | Document shepherd changed to Loa Andersson |
2017-01-03
|
02 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-02.txt |
2017-01-03
|
02 | (System) | New version approved |
2017-01-03
|
02 | (System) | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Italo Busi" , "Guangjuan Weng" , mpls-chairs@ietf.org, "Jeong-dong Ryoo" , "Tae-sik Cheung" , "Huub van Helvoort" |
2017-01-03
|
02 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | Uploaded new revision |
2016-12-03
|
01 | Loa Andersson | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from WG Document |
2016-09-15
|
01 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-01.txt |
2016-09-15
|
01 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | New version approved |
2016-09-15
|
01 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: "Italo Busi" , "Guangjuan Weng" , mpls-chairs@ietf.org, "Jeong-dong Ryoo" , "Tae-sik Cheung" , "Huub van Helvoort" |
2016-09-15
|
01 | (System) | Uploaded new revision |
2016-03-27
|
00 | Loa Andersson | This document now replaces draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates instead of None |
2016-03-19
|
00 | Jeong-dong Ryoo | New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-00.txt |