DHCPv4 Lease Query by Relay Agent Remote ID
draft-ietf-dhc-leasequery-by-remote-id-09

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

Comment (2010-11-30 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
Section 1., paragraph 1:
>    active lease informations associated with a given connection/circuit,

  Nit: s/informations/information/


Section 4.8., paragraph 2:
>    To generate replies for a lease query by Remote ID effeciently, a

  Nit: s/effeciently,/efficiently,/

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2010-12-02 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
In section 4.1

   The DHCPLEASEQUERY message is typically sent by an access
   concentrator.

I really hate this type of language :-)

We can assume that you do not mean that most messages sent by an access
concentrator are DHCPLEASEQUERY messages.

You mean that most DHCPLEASEQUERY messages are sent by access
concentrators (not just by "an access concentrator" - I have an image of
some poor box in the Internet responsible for sending all the messages)

But missing from the description is a statement of who sends the other
(atypical) DHCPLEASEQUERY messages.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2010-12-02 for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info
#1) I support Tim's discuss.

#2) I can't parse this sentence in the abstract:

   RFC 4388 defines a mechanism for relay
   agents to retrieve the lease information from the DHCP server as and
   when this information is lost.

remove "as and"?

#3) Expand DSLAM.

#4) Section 4.7/8/9: Should the shoulds be SHOULDs?

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -** No value found for 'p.get_dochistory.rev' **)
No email
send info

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info