Issues with multiple stateful DHCPv6 options
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-04

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (dhc WG)
Last updated 2013-11-14 (latest revision 2013-05-13)
Replaces draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Reviews
Additional URLs
- Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd None
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-04.txt

Abstract

Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) was not written with the expectation that additional stateful DHCPv6 options would be developed. IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6 shoe-horned the new options for Prefix Delegation into DHCPv6. Implementation experience of the CPE model described in [RFC6204] has shown multiple issues with the DHCPv6 protocol in supporting multiple stateful options.

Authors

Ole Trøan (ot@cisco.com)
Bernie Volz (volz@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)