Additional Units for Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML)
draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-06
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
(Deborah Brungard)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Martin Vigoureux)
Abstain
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Warren Kumari
No Objection
Comment
(2020-02-19 for -05)
Not sent
No objection, but the inability to use '%' makes me sad.... :-(
Éric Vyncke
No Objection
Comment
(2020-02-16 for -04)
Sent
Short, simple, and easy to read while being useful. Just a nit, please use a section on its own for acknowledgments (at least the HTML version does not show it was a section) Thank you for the time writing this doc -éric
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2020-02-19 for -05)
Sent
You have a typo in section 4: "obove", where "above" is meant. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The following are comments from Murray Kucherawy, incoming ART AD. Murray is getting an early start on doing reviews, and I’m including his comments into my ballots during the overlap period before he’s officially an Area Director. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Section 2: Just out of curiosity, why are some of the newly registered "VA"s all-caps and some all-lowercase? Section 4: I'm a bit uneasy about saying the rules for this new registry are the same as for that older registry, with exceptions. That means if the rules for the old registry change, someone needs to remember to consider whether the rules for the new registry should change in parallel, or whether something else should happen. But if there's precedent for doing that, or the result is unambiguous, then we're probably fine. Also, "six columns" followed by five bullets... I think I'd rather coax the scale/offset line apart. Seems to me that Section 2 and all but the last two paragraphs of Section 4 should be in Section 7. I've never seen an "IANA Considerations" section be a complete indirection like that. But if we allow that, then OK.
Adam Roach Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-19 for -05)
Not sent
Balloting "No Objection" in the sense of "I trust the sponsoring AD, and have no time this ballot cycle to read the document." I have skimmed the document for typical ART-area gotchas, and found none.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-19 for -05)
Not sent
I support Alissa's DISCUSS.
Benjamin Kaduk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-19 for -05)
Sent for earlier
Thank you for addressing my Discuss and Comment points!
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Not sent
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Not sent
Martin Vigoureux Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Not sent
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-18 for -04)
Sent
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2020-02-18 for -04)
Sent
I could not read the normative references to IEC-80000-6 and 13 as I do not have access . I trust the sponsoring AD to have gone through them and verified that the item number references are correct.
Also the following text in Section 3 seems very handwavy and not particularly helpful. Is this necessary?
" It is not presently known to this author how
the upcoming revision of IEC 80000-6 will update this, but it has
became clear that there is strong interest in using this unit
specifically for the imaginary content of complex power, reactive
power [IEEE-1459]"
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Abstain
Abstain
(2020-03-19 for -05)
Sent
With everything going on I'm not going to have time to dig into this again before the new IESG is seated, so I've changed my ballot position to abstain. I do not think it is sound to publish this as-is with the reliance on a versioning scheme specified in an individual draft that does not have consensus, but I seem to be the only person who thinks that, so I will not stand in the way of publication.