Skip to main content

EVPN Multi-Homing Extensions for Split Horizon Filtering
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-05

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
Authors Jorge Rabadan , Kiran Nagaraj , Wen Lin , Ali Sajassi
Last updated 2023-10-09 (Latest revision 2023-04-07)
Replaces draft-nr-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state Waiting for WG Chair Go-Ahead
Document shepherd Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus boilerplate Yes
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to slitkows.ietf@gmail.com, mankamis@cisco.com, zzhang@juniper.net

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

Ethernet Virtual Private Network (EVPN) is commonly used along with Network Virtualization Overlay (NVO) tunnels, as well as MPLS and Segment Routing tunnels. The EVPN multi-homing procedures may be different depending on the tunnel type used in the EVPN Broadcast Domain. In particular, there are two multi-homing Split Horizon procedures to avoid looped frames on the multi-homed CE: ESI Label based and Local Bias. ESI Label based Split Horizon is used for MPLSoX tunnels, E.g., MPLSoUDP, whereas Local Bias is used for other tunnels, E.g., VXLAN tunnels. The existing specifications do not allow the operator to decide which Split Horizon procedure to use for tunnel encapsulations that could support both. Examples of tunnels that may support both procedures are MPLSoGRE, MPLSoUDP, GENEVE or SRv6. This document updates the EVPN Multi-Homing procedures so that an operator can decide the Split Horizon procedure for a given tunnel depending on their own requirements.

Authors

Jorge Rabadan
Kiran Nagaraj
Wen Lin
Ali Sajassi

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)