Support for Multiple Clock Rates in an RTP Session
draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-11
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2014-04-10
|
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2014-03-11
|
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2014-03-11
|
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2014-01-21
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2014-01-21
|
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2014-01-21
|
11 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2014-01-21
|
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2014-01-21
|
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2014-01-21
|
11 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup |
2014-01-21
|
11 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2014-01-21
|
11 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-01-21
|
11 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-11-23
|
11 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed |
2013-11-23
|
11 | Glen Zorn | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2013-11-23
|
11 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-11.txt |
2013-11-21
|
10 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation |
2013-11-21
|
10 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2013-11-21
|
10 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot comment] In this text: 3.2.2. Non-monotonic timestamps The advantage with this method is that it works with the jitter calculation described in … [Ballot comment] In this text: 3.2.2. Non-monotonic timestamps The advantage with this method is that it works with the jitter calculation described in RFC 3550, as long as the correct clock rates are used. It seems that this is what most implementations are using. Is there a pointer you can include for "what most implementations are using"? I see that you mention SIPit later in the document - if this statement is based on Robert's summary from a specific SIPit, for example, I'd be fine with that. |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR Completed. Reviewer: Fred Baker. |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Fred Baker |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Telechat review by OPSDIR is assigned to Fred Baker |
2013-11-20
|
10 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2013-11-19
|
10 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2013-11-19
|
10 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] - The secdir review [1] raised a question that wasn't afaik answered. I'm not sure if there's any change needed but be good … [Ballot comment] - The secdir review [1] raised a question that wasn't afaik answered. I'm not sure if there's any change needed but be good to see an answer to that just in case. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg04299.html |
2013-11-19
|
10 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2013-11-18
|
10 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2013-11-18
|
10 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2013-11-15
|
10 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot comment] Should the abstract say another few words about *what* clarification is being made? Please expand "SSRC" and "SR packets" on first use. -- … [Ballot comment] Should the abstract say another few words about *what* clarification is being made? Please expand "SSRC" and "SR packets" on first use. -- Section 3.1 -- This is not different than what happen at the beginning of the RTP session but it can be more annoying for the end-user. Can you say this a different way, so that it's more usefully explanatory? Or perhaps even omit it, if it doesn't really add anything. -- Sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2, and 4.2 -- I found myself looking for the tables. If you really don't want to include them in the sections that cite them, it would help to explicit say, "Table 2 in Appendix A" and so on. Though, as a reader, I'd rather see them inline, so I can refer to them without having to scroll to the bottom of the document and back. -- Section 4.1 -- To accelerate lip synchronization, the next compound RTCP packet sent Checking: is "accelerate" really the right word here? Just thinking in plain English, I don't thinking of lip synch happening at a rate of speed. "Facilitate", maybe? |
2013-11-15
|
10 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2013-11-06
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | Set of documents this document replaces changed to draft-petithuguenin-avt-multiple-clock-rates, draft-petithuguenin-avtext-multiple-clock-rates from draft-petithuguenin-avtext-multiple-clock-rates |
2013-10-30
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2013-10-30
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-11-21 |
2013-10-30
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Ballot has been issued |
2013-10-30
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2013-10-30
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Created "Approve" ballot |
2013-10-30
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-10-24
|
10 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: David Harrington. |
2013-10-22
|
10 | Pearl Liang | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon … IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon as possible. We received the following comments/questions from the IANA's reviewer: We understand that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions that need completion. IANA requests that the IANA Considerations section of the document remain in place upon publication. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. |
2013-10-22
|
10 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-22
|
10 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call (ends 2013-10-22) |
2013-10-10
|
10 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad |
2013-10-10
|
10 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Wassim Haddad |
2013-10-10
|
10 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David Harrington |
2013-10-10
|
10 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David Harrington |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Support for Multiple Clock Rates … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Support for Multiple Clock Rates in an RTP Session) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Audio/Video Transport Extensions WG (avtext) to consider the following document: - 'Support for Multiple Clock Rates in an RTP Session' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-10-22. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document clarifies the RTP specification when different clock rates are used in an RTP session. It also provides guidance on how to interoperate with legacy RTP implementations that use multiple clock rates. It updates RFC 3550. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Last call was requested |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Ballot writeup was generated |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested |
2013-10-08
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Last call announcement was generated |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | State Change Notice email list changed to avtext-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates@tools.ietf.org |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | Responsible AD changed to Gonzalo Camarillo |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | IESG state set to Publication Requested |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2013-09-20
|
10 | Jonathan Lennox | Changed document writeup |
2013-09-15
|
10 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10.txt |
2013-09-04
|
09 | Jonathan Lennox | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2013-09-04
|
09 | Jonathan Lennox | Document shepherd changed to Jonathan Lennox |
2013-09-04
|
09 | Jonathan Lennox | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2013-09-04
|
09 | Jonathan Lennox | This document completed WGLC several months ago; apologies from the WG chairs for being lax about updating the data tracker. |
2013-09-04
|
09 | Jonathan Lennox | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2013-09-04
|
09 | Jonathan Lennox | Annotation tag Other - see Comment Log cleared. |
2013-04-21
|
09 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-09.txt |
2012-11-20
|
08 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-08.txt |
2012-11-15
|
07 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-07.txt |
2012-10-22
|
06 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-06.txt |
2012-05-10
|
05 | Magnus Westerlund | WG last call was requested. Magnus Westerlund did a review and found what he believes is significant issues that needs to be resolved prior to … WG last call was requested. Magnus Westerlund did a review and found what he believes is significant issues that needs to be resolved prior to WG last call. |
2012-05-10
|
05 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-05.txt |
2012-04-23
|
04 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-04.txt |
2012-04-22
|
03 | Glen Zorn | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-03.txt |
2012-01-03
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-02.txt |
2011-07-11
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-01.txt |
2011-06-10
|
02 | Magnus Westerlund | Needing Reviews from the WG participants so it can develop |
2011-06-10
|
02 | Magnus Westerlund | Annotation tag Other - see Comment Log set. |
2011-06-01
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-00.txt |