Guidelines for Extending the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP)
draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-guidelines-04
Yes
(Robert Sparks)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-05-20)
Unknown
Congratulations on the reference to RFC 1925.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-05-20)
Unknown
I have just one small comment on this well written document. Even though the Guidelines section immediately follows the Issues section, I think it would be good to state explicitly "Don't do anything mentioned as an Issue in the previous section" as a Guideline. For example, "Commands are issued, rather than hints given" is an Issue, while I don't think any of the Guidelines warn against creating an extension that requires a command-action architecture.
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown