Hybrid home network prefix for multihoming in PMIPv6
draft-hong-netext-hybrid-hnp-03
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Yong-Geun Hong , Joo-Sang Youn | ||
| Last updated | 2010-10-25 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) supports multihoming where a mobile node can connect to a PMIPv6 domain through multiple interfaces for simultaneous access or inter-technology handoff. However, for an inter-technology handoff, PMIPv6 does not allow simultaneous access since all the home network prefixes associated with one interface are delivered to another interface of a mobile node. In addition, if we assume that the flow is classified by home network prefix, then the PMIPv6 cannot support flow mobility since it requires moving just some home network prefixes between interfaces. In this document, we propose a hybrid home network prefix assignment (HHNPA) scheme where both the static prefix model and the dynamic prefix model are used. By using these two different home network prefix models, it can support flow mobility that some home network prefixes are moved to another interface and some home network prefixes are remained at existing interface.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)