TCP-AO Protection for BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
draft-hmntsharma-bmp-tcp-ao-03

GROW                                                           H. Sharma
Internet-Draft                                                  Vodafone
Updates: 7854 (if approved)                                      J. Haas
Intended status: Informational                          Juniper Networks
Expires: 13 October 2024                                   11 April 2024

          TCP-AO Protection for BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)
                     draft-hmntsharma-bmp-tcp-ao-03

Abstract

   This document outlines the utilization of the TCP Authentication
   Option (TCP-AO), as specified in RFC5925, for the authentication of
   BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) sessions, as specified in RFC7854.
   TCP-AO provides for the authentication of BMP sessions established
   between routers and BMP stations at the TCP layer.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/hmntsharma/draft-hmntsharma-bmp-tcp-ao.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 October 2024.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

Sharma & Haas            Expires 13 October 2024                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               TCP-AO for BMP                   April 2024

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.

Table of Contents

   1.  Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  TCP-AO Protection for BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) . . . . .   3
     3.1.  Operational Recommendations for BMP . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

2.  Introduction

   The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP), as specified in [RFC7854],
   recommends the use of IPsec [RFC4303] to address security
   considerations concerning the BMP session between a router and the
   BMP station managing BGP route collection.  This document suggests
   the use of the TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) as an
   authentication mechanism to ensure end-to-end authentication of BMP
   sessions between the routers and the BMP stations.  TCP-AO is also
   the choice of authentication for TCP-based network protocols such as
   BGP and LDP.  A comprehensive discussion of TCP-AO is provided in
   [RFC5925].

Sharma & Haas            Expires 13 October 2024                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft               TCP-AO for BMP                   April 2024

3.  TCP-AO Protection for BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)

   The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP), defined in [RFC7854], plays a
   crucial role in network management by allowing routers to share
   information about their BGP RIBs.  This helps operators monitor and
   troubleshoot their networks effectively.  However, the security
   considerations associated with BMP have become increasingly critical
   in light of evolving threats.  This document proposes that these
   threats be addressed by utilizing TCP-AO to safeguard BMP sessions.

   TCP-AO provides protection against spoofed TCP segments and helps
   protect the integrity of the TCP session.  Further, it provides for
   the authentication of session endpoints.  Similar to BGP, BMP can
   benefit from these security properties.

   TCP-AO helps protect the integrity of BMP session liveness at the TCP
   layer.  As outlined in Section 3.2 of [RFC7854], BMP operates as a
   unidirectional protocol, meaning no BMP messages are transmitted from
   the monitoring station to the monitored router.  BMP relies on the
   underlying TCP session, supported by TCP keepalives [RFC1122], to
   prevent session timeouts from the station to the monitored router.

3.1.  Operational Recommendations for BMP

   The implementation and use of TCP-AO to protect BMP session is
   RECOMMENDED in circumstances where the session might not otherwise be
   protected by alternative mechanisms such as IPsec.

4.  Security Considerations

   TCP-AO is not intended as a direct substitute for IPsec, nor is it
   suggested as such in this document.  The Security Considerations for
   TCP-AO in Section 11 of [RFC7854] all apply to its application for
   BMP.

   TCP-AO may inhibit connectionless resets when session keys have been
   lost or changed.  This may cause BMP sessions to linger in some
   circumstances; however, BGP shares this consideration.

   In the presence of NAT, TCP-AO requires additional support as defined
   in [RFC6978].

   TCP-AO does not provide for privacy for the BMP protocol's contents.
   When this is desired, IPsec with Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
   can help provide for such privacy.

Sharma & Haas            Expires 13 October 2024                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft               TCP-AO for BMP                   April 2024

5.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no IANA actions.

6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.

   [RFC5925]  Touch, J., Mankin, A., and R. Bonica, "The TCP
              Authentication Option", RFC 5925, DOI 10.17487/RFC5925,
              June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5925>.

   [RFC7854]  Scudder, J., Ed., Fernando, R., and S. Stuart, "BGP
              Monitoring Protocol (BMP)", RFC 7854,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC7854, June 2016,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7854>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

6.2.  Informative References

   [RFC1122]  Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
              Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC1122, October 1989,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1122>.

   [RFC4303]  Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
              RFC 4303, DOI 10.17487/RFC4303, December 2005,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4303>.

   [RFC6978]  Touch, J., "A TCP Authentication Option Extension for NAT
              Traversal", RFC 6978, DOI 10.17487/RFC6978, July 2013,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6978>.

Acknowledgments

   This document is an outcome of the experiences gained through
   implementing BMP.  While TCP-AO safeguards other TCP protocols, BMP
   currently lacks the same level of protection.

Sharma & Haas            Expires 13 October 2024                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft               TCP-AO for BMP                   April 2024

Authors' Addresses

   Hemant Sharma
   Vodafone
   Email: hemant.sharma@vodafone.com

   Jeffrey Haas
   Juniper Networks
   Email: jhaas@juniper.net

Sharma & Haas            Expires 13 October 2024                [Page 5]