Interactions between Low Latency, Low Loss, Scalable Throughput (L4S) and Differentiated Services
draft-briscoe-tsvwg-l4s-diffserv-02
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2019-05-08 (latest revision 2018-11-04) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-l4s-diffserv-02.txt
Abstract
L4S and Diffserv offer somewhat overlapping services (low latency and low loss), but bandwidth allocation is out of scope for L4S. Therefore there is scope for the two approaches to complement each other, but also to conflict. This informational document explains how the two approaches interact, how they can be arranged to complement each other and in which cases one can stand alone without needing the other.
Authors
Bob Briscoe (ietf@bobbriscoe.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)