IETF conflict review for draft-irtf-nwcrg-network-coding-taxonomy
conflict-review-irtf-nwcrg-network-coding-taxonomy-02

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -00)
No email
send info

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -00)
No email
send info

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2018-04-04 for -00)
No email
send info
I agree this needs the additional WGs that Spencer mentioned.

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2018-04-04 for -00)
No email
send info
I'm a Yes on this conflict response, but I'm thinking the list of related IETF work is missing the former FECFRAME working group, and the current TSVWG working group that's extending the FECFRAME framework to include sliding window coding.

And I'm also glad that NWCRG done this work, but that's not one of the possible conflict review responses :-)

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -00)
No email
send info

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -00)
No email
send info

(Mirja K├╝hlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -00)
No email
send info

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -01)
No email
send info

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -00)
No email
send info