Segment Routing Architecture
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (spring WG)
Last updated 2017-11-08 (latest revision 2017-10-28)
Replaces draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text xml pdf html bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication (wg milestones: Dec 2015 - Specification of a h..., Dec 2015 - One or more control ..., Apr 2016 - Requirements for mod... )
Document shepherd Martin Vigoureux
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2017-02-21)
IESG IESG state In Last Call (ends 2017-11-30)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date On agenda of 2017-12-14 IESG telechat
Responsible AD Alvaro Retana
Send notices to aretana.ietf@gmail.com
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - No Actions Needed
IANA action state None
Network Working Group                                   C. Filsfils, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                           S. Previdi, Ed.
Intended status: Standards Track                     Cisco Systems, Inc.
Expires: May 1, 2018                                         L. Ginsberg
                                                      Cisco Systems, Inc
                                                             B. Decraene
                                                            S. Litkowski
                                                                  Orange
                                                               R. Shakir
                                                            Google, Inc.
                                                        October 28, 2017

                      Segment Routing Architecture
                  draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-13

Abstract

   Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source routing paradigm.  A node
   steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called
   segments.  A segment can represent any instruction, topological or
   service-based.  A segment can have a semantic local to an SR node or
   global within an SR domain.  SR allows to enforce a flow through any
   topological path while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress
   nodes to the SR domain.

   Segment Routing can be directly applied to the MPLS architecture with
   no change on the forwarding plane.  A segment is encoded as an MPLS
   label.  An ordered list of segments is encoded as a stack of labels.
   The segment to process is on the top of the stack.  Upon completion
   of a segment, the related label is popped from the stack.

   Segment Routing can be applied to the IPv6 architecture, with a new
   type of routing header.  A segment is encoded as an IPv6 address.  An
   ordered list of segments is encoded as an ordered list of IPv6
   addresses in the routing header.  The active segment is indicated by
   the Destination Address of the packet.  The next active segment is
   indicated by a pointer in the new routing header.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

Filsfils, et al.           Expires May 1, 2018                  [Page 1]
Internet-Draft               Segment Routing                October 2017

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on May 1, 2018.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   3.  Link-State IGP Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
     3.1.  IGP-Prefix Segment, Prefix-SID  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.1.1.  Prefix-SID Algorithm  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       3.1.2.  SR-MPLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
       3.1.3.  SRv6  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.2.  IGP-Node Segment, Node-SID  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     3.3.  IGP-Anycast Segment, Anycast SID  . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
       3.3.1.  Anycast SID in SR-MPLS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
     3.4.  IGP-Adjacency Segment, Adj-SID  . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
Show full document text