Review request
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-02 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | 02 (document currently at 18) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-09-30 | |
Requested | 2021-08-04 | |
Requested by | Joe Clarke | |
Authors | Eliot Lear , Scott Rose | |
WG chairs | Henk Birkholz , Joe Clarke | |
I-D last updated | 2023-10-10 | |
IESG document state | Became RFC 9472 (Proposed Standard) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -09
by Christian Huitema
(diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Ebben Aries (diff) Genart Early review of -03 by Russ Housley (diff) Opsdir Early review of -03 by Niclas Comstedt (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Christian Huitema (diff) |
|
Comments |
The authors have requested a specific review from SEC DIR and YANG Doctors. On the security side, a look at veracity of the SBOM vulnerability proposal in additional to its general usefulness. On the YANG Doctors side, Eliot has said he regularly makes YANG mistakes so guidance would be appreciated. |
|
Assignments | Reviewer | Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) |
State | No response | |
Reviewer | Christian Huitema | |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-09-secdir-early-huitema-2022-09-15
|
|
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/OVSLCz3EZhHGH1XOCYCxB3zxUu0 | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 18) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2022-09-15 |
History
Date | By | Description |
---|---|---|
2022-09-15 | Christian Huitema | Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Christian Huitema. |
2022-09-15 | Christian Huitema | Assignment for Christian Huitema accepted |
2022-09-07 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Christian Huitema |
2021-08-05 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou |
2021-08-04 | Joe Clarke | Requested Early review by SECDIR |