Review request
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ct |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 33) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-07-21 | |
| Requested | 2023-06-26 | |
| Requested by | Susan Hares | |
| Authors | Kaliraj Vairavakkalai , Natrajan Venkataraman | |
| WG chairs | Susan Hares , Keyur Patel , Jeffrey Haas | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-04-26 | |
| IESG document state | Publication Requested | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -18
by Jonathan Hardwick
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -18 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Opsdir Early review of -19 by Bo Wu (diff) Secdir Early review of -19 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Tsvart Early review of -27 by Olivier Bonaventure (diff) Secdir Early review of -30 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -09 by Mohamed Boucadair (diff) Opsdir Early review of -12 by Bo Wu (diff) |
|
| Comments |
The IDR WG is doing a WG LC in parallel (6/26 to 7/24). You may find reading the discussion helpful. Security reviews should consider whether enough security text exists to describe the normal deployment as a "walled garden". It is also important to know if something goes outside the "walled-garden". This is an experimental draft because we have two similar methods with no clear consensus. Please review this with the depth of review of a proposed standard. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Nancy Cam-Winget |
| State | No response |
History
| Date | By | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-15 | Tero Kivinen | Closed request for Early review by SECDIR with state 'Overtaken by Events' |
| 2023-12-15 | Tero Kivinen | Assignment of request for Early review by SECDIR to Nancy Cam-Winget was marked no-response |
| 2023-06-29 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Nancy Cam-Winget |
| 2023-06-26 | Susan Hares | Requested Early review by SECDIR |