Long-term Viability of Protocol Extension Mechanisms
draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (iab) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Martin Thomson | ||
| Last updated | 2020-02-08 (latest revision 2019-08-07) | ||
| Replaces | draft-thomson-use-it-or-lose-it | ||
| Stream | IAB | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | IAB state | (None) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it-00.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-use-it-or-lose-it-00.txt
Abstract
The ability to change protocols depends on exercising the extension and version negotiation mechanisms that support change. Protocols that don't use these mechanisms can find that deploying changes can be difficult and costly.
Authors
Martin Thomson (mt@lowentropy.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)