INTERNET-DRAFT Clifford Neuman
John Kohl
Theodore Ts'o
Tom Yu
Sam Hartman
Ken Raeburn
February 22, 2002
Expires 22 August, 2002
The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00.txt
STATUS OF THIS MEMO
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all
provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026. Internet-Drafts are working documents
of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working
groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as
Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and
may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is
inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them
other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
To learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
"1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow
Directories on ftp.ietf.org (US East Coast), nic.nordu.net (Europe),
ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast), or munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim).
The distribution of this memo is unlimited. It is filed as
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00.txt, and expires August 22,
2002. Please send comments to: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
ABSTRACT
This document provides an overview and specification of Version 5 of the
Kerberos protocol, and updates RFC1510 to clarify aspects of the protocol
and its intended use that require more detailed or clearer explanation than
was provided in RFC1510. This document is intended to provide a detailed
description of the protocol, suitable for implementation, together with
descriptions of the appropriate use of protocol messages and fields within
those messages.
This document contains a subset of the changes considered and discussed in
the Kerberos working group and is intended as an interim description of
Kerberos. Additional changes to the Kerberos protocol have been proposed and
will appear in a subsequent extensions document.
This document is not intended to describe Kerberos to the end user, system
administrator, or application developer. Higher level papers describing
Version 5 of the Kerberos system [NT94] and documenting version 4 [SNS88],
are available elsewhere.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
OVERVIEW
This INTERNET-DRAFT describes the concepts and model upon which the Kerberos
network authentication system is based. It also specifies Version 5 of the
Kerberos protocol.
The motivations, goals, assumptions, and rationale behind most design
decisions are treated cursorily; they are more fully described in a paper
available in IEEE communications [NT94] and earlier in the Kerberos portion
of the Athena Technical Plan [MNSS87]. The protocols have been a proposed
standard and are being considered for advancement for draft standard through
the IETF standard process. Comments are encouraged on the presentation, but
only minor refinements to the protocol as implemented or extensions that fit
within current protocol framework will be considered at this time.
Requests for addition to an electronic mailing list for discussion of
Kerberos, kerberos@MIT.EDU, may be addressed to kerberos-request@MIT.EDU.
This mailing list is gatewayed onto the Usenet as the group
comp.protocols.kerberos. Requests for further information, including
documents and code availability, may be sent to info-kerberos@MIT.EDU.
BACKGROUND
The Kerberos model is based in part on Needham and Schroeder's trusted
third-party authentication protocol [NS78] and on modifications suggested by
Denning and Sacco [DS81]. The original design and implementation of Kerberos
Versions 1 through 4 was the work of two former Project Athena staff
members, Steve Miller of Digital Equipment Corporation and Clifford Neuman
(now at the Information Sciences Institute of the University of Southern
California), along with Jerome Saltzer, Technical Director of Project
Athena, and Jeffrey Schiller, MIT Campus Network Manager. Many other members
of Project Athena have also contributed to the work on Kerberos.
Version 5 of the Kerberos protocol (described in this document) has evolved
from Version 4 based on new requirements and desires for features not
available in Version 4. The design of Version 5 of the Kerberos protocol was
led by Clifford Neuman and John Kohl with much input from the community. The
development of the MIT reference implementation was led at MIT by John Kohl
and Theodore T'so, with help and contributed code from many others. Since
RFC1510 was issued, extensions and revisions to the protocol have been
proposed by many individuals. Some of these proposals are reflected in this
document. Where such changes involved significant effort, the document cites
the contribution of the proposer.
Reference implementations of both version 4 and version 5 of Kerberos are
publicly available and commercial implementations have been developed and
are widely used. Details on the differences between Kerberos Versions 4 and
5 can be found in [KNT92].
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
1. Introduction
Kerberos provides a means of verifying the identities of principals, (e.g. a
workstation user or a network server) on an open (unprotected) network. This
is accomplished without relying on assertions by the host operating system,
without basing trust on host addresses, without requiring physical security
of all the hosts on the network, and under the assumption that packets
traveling along the network can be read, modified, and inserted at
will[1.1]. Kerberos performs authentication under these conditions as a
trusted third-party authentication service by using conventional (shared
secret key [1.2]) cryptography. Kerberos extensions (outside the scope of
this document) can provide for the use of public key cryptography during
certain phases of the authentication protocol [@RFCE: if PKINIT advances
concurrently include reference to the RFC here]. Such extensions support
Kerberos authentication for users registered with public key certification
authorities and provide certain benefits of public key cryptography in
situations where they are needed.
The basic Kerberos authentication process proceeds as follows: A client
sends a request to the authentication server (AS) requesting "credentials"
for a given server. The AS responds with these credentials, encrypted in the
client's key. The credentials consist of a "ticket" for the server and a
temporary encryption key (often called a "session key"). The client
transmits the ticket (which contains the client's identity and a copy of the
session key, all encrypted in the server's key) to the server. The session
key (now shared by the client and server) is used to authenticate the
client, and may optionally be used to authenticate the server. It may also
be used to encrypt further communication between the two parties or to
exchange a separate sub-session key to be used to encrypt further
communication.
Implementation of the basic protocol consists of one or more authentication
servers running on physically secure hosts. The authentication servers
maintain a database of principals (i.e., users and servers) and their secret
keys. Code libraries provide encryption and implement the Kerberos protocol.
In order to add authentication to its transactions, a typical network
application adds one or two calls to the Kerberos library directly or
through the Generic Security Services Application Programming Interface,
GSSAPI, described in separate document [ref to GSSAPI RFC]. These calls
result in the transmission of the necessary messages to achieve
authentication.
The Kerberos protocol consists of several sub-protocols (or exchanges).
There are two basic methods by which a client can ask a Kerberos server for
credentials. In the first approach, the client sends a cleartext request for
a ticket for the desired server to the AS. The reply is sent encrypted in
the client's secret key. Usually this request is for a ticket-granting
ticket (TGT) which can later be used with the ticket-granting server (TGS).
In the second method, the client sends a request to the TGS. The client uses
the TGT to authenticate itself to the TGS in the same manner as if it were
contacting any other application server that requires Kerberos
authentication. The reply is encrypted in the session key from the TGT.
Though the protocol specification describes the AS and the TGS as separate
servers, they are implemented in practice as different protocol entry points
within a single Kerberos server.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Once obtained, credentials may be used to verify the identity of the
principals in a transaction, to ensure the integrity of messages exchanged
between them, or to preserve privacy of the messages. The application is
free to choose whatever protection may be necessary.
To verify the identities of the principals in a transaction, the client
transmits the ticket to the application server. Since the ticket is sent "in
the clear" (parts of it are encrypted, but this encryption doesn't thwart
replay) and might be intercepted and reused by an attacker, additional
information is sent to prove that the message originated with the principal
to whom the ticket was issued. This information (called the authenticator)
is encrypted in the session key, and includes a timestamp. The timestamp
proves that the message was recently generated and is not a replay.
Encrypting the authenticator in the session key proves that it was generated
by a party possessing the session key. Since no one except the requesting
principal and the server know the session key (it is never sent over the
network in the clear) this guarantees the identity of the client.
The integrity of the messages exchanged between principals can also be
guaranteed using the session key (passed in the ticket and contained in the
credentials). This approach provides detection of both replay attacks and
message stream modification attacks. It is accomplished by generating and
transmitting a collision-proof checksum (elsewhere called a hash or digest
function) of the client's message, keyed with the session key. Privacy and
integrity of the messages exchanged between principals can be secured by
encrypting the data to be passed using the session key contained in the
ticket or the sub-session key found in the authenticator.
The authentication exchanges mentioned above require read-only access to the
Kerberos database. Sometimes, however, the entries in the database must be
modified, such as when adding new principals or changing a principal's key.
This is done using a protocol between a client and a third Kerberos server,
the Kerberos Administration Server (KADM). There is also a protocol for
maintaining multiple copies of the Kerberos database. Neither of these
protocols are described in this document.
1.1. Cross-realm operation
The Kerberos protocol is designed to operate across organizational
boundaries. A client in one organization can be authenticated to a server in
another. Each organization wishing to run a Kerberos server establishes its
own "realm". The name of the realm in which a client is registered is part
of the client's name, and can be used by the end-service to decide whether
to honor a request.
By establishing "inter-realm" keys, the administrators of two realms can
allow a client authenticated in the local realm to prove its identity to
servers in other realms[1.3]. The exchange of inter-realm keys (a separate
key may be used for each direction) registers the ticket-granting service of
each realm as a principal in the other realm. A client is then able to
obtain a ticket-granting ticket for the remote realm's ticket-granting
service from its local realm. When that ticket-granting ticket is used, the
remote ticket-granting service uses the inter-realm key (which usually
differs from its own normal TGS key) to decrypt the ticket-granting ticket,
and is thus certain that it was issued by the client's own TGS. Tickets
issued by the remote ticket-granting service will indicate to the
end-service that the client was authenticated from another realm.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
A realm is said to communicate with another realm if the two realms share an
inter-realm key, or if the local realm shares an inter-realm key with an
intermediate realm that communicates with the remote realm. An
authentication path is the sequence of intermediate realms that are
transited in communicating from one realm to another.
Realms are typically organized hierarchically. Each realm shares a key with
its parent and a different key with each child. If an inter-realm key is not
directly shared by two realms, the hierarchical organization allows an
authentication path to be easily constructed. If a hierarchical organization
is not used, it may be necessary to consult a database in order to construct
an authentication path between realms.
Although realms are typically hierarchical, intermediate realms may be
bypassed to achieve cross-realm authentication through alternate
authentication paths (these might be established to make communication
between two realms more efficient). It is important for the end-service to
know which realms were transited when deciding how much faith to place in
the authentication process. To facilitate this decision, a field in each
ticket contains the names of the realms that were involved in authenticating
the client.
The application server is ultimately responsible for accepting or rejecting
authentication and should check the transited field. The application server
may choose to rely on the KDC for the application server's realm to check
the transited field. The application server's KDC will set the
TRANSITED-POLICY-CHECKED flag in this case. The KDC's for intermediate
realms may also check the transited field as they issue
ticket-granting-tickets for other realms, but they are encouraged not to do
so. A client may request that the KDC's not check the transited field by
setting the DISABLE-TRANSITED-CHECK flag. KDC's are encouraged but not
required to honor this flag.
1.2. Choosing a principal with which to communicate
The Kerberos protocol provides the means for verifying (subject to the
assumptions in 1.4) that the entity with which one communicates is the same
entity that was registered with the KDC using the claimed identity
(principal name). It is still necessary to determine whether that identity
corresponds to the entity with which one intends to communicate.
When appropriate data has been exchanged in advance, this determination may
be performed syntactically by the application based on the application
protocol specification, information provided by the user, and configuration
files. For example, the server principal name (including realm) for a telnet
server might be derived from the user specified host name (from the telnet
command line), the "host/" prefix specified in the application protocol
specification, and a mapping to a Kerberos realm derived syntactically from
the domain part of the specified hostname and information from the local
Kerberos realms database.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
One can also rely on trusted third parties to make this determination, but
only when the data obtained from the third party is suitably integrity
protected wile resident on the third party server and when transmitted.
Thus, for example, one should not rely on an unprotected domain name system
record to map a host alias to the primary name of a server, accepting the
primary name as the party one intends to contact, since an attacker can
modify the mapping and impersonate the party with which one intended to
communicate.
1.3. Authorization
As an authentication service, Kerberos provides a means of verifying the
identity of principals on a network. Authentication is usually useful
primarily as a first step in the process of authorization, determining
whether a client may use a service, which objects the client is allowed to
access, and the type of access allowed for each. Kerberos does not, by
itself, provide authorization. Possession of a client ticket for a service
provides only for authentication of the client to that service, and in the
absence of a separate authorization procedure, it should not be considered
by an application as authorizing the use of that service.
Such separate authorization methods may be implemented as application
specific access control functions and may utilize files on the application
server, or on separately issued authorization credentials such as those
based on proxies [Neu93], or on other authorization services. Separately
authenticated authorization credentials may be embedded in a tickets
authorization data when encapsulated by the kdc-issued authorization data
element.
Applications should not accept the mere issuance of a service ticket by the
Kerberos server (even by a modified Kerberos server) as granting authority
to use the service, since such applications may become vulnerable to the
bypass of this authorization check in an environment if they interoperate
with other KDCs or where other options for application authentication (e.g.
the PKTAPP proposal) are provided.
1.4. Extending Kerberos Without Breaking Interoperability
As the deployed base of Kerberos implementations grows, extending Kerberos
becomes more important. Unfortunately some extensions to the existing
Kerberos protocol create interoperability issues because of uncertainty
regarding the treatment of certain extensibility options by some
implementations. This section includes guidelines that will enable future
implementations to maintain interoperability.
Kerberos provides a general mechanism for protocol extensibility. Some
protocol messages contain typed holes -- sub-messages that contain an
octet-string along with an integer that defines how to interpret the
octet-string. The integer types are registered centrally, but can be used
both for vendor extensions and for extensions standardized through the IETF.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
1.4.1. Compatibility with RFC 1510
It is important to note that existing Kerberos message formats can not be
readily extended by adding fields to the ASN.1 types. Sending additional
fields often results in the entire message being discarded without an error
indication. Future versions of this specification will provide guidelines to
ensure that ASN.1 fields can be added without creating an interoperability
problem.
In the meantime, all new or modified implementations of Kerberos that
receive an unknown message extension should preserve the encoding of the
extension but otherwise ignore the presence of the extension. Recipients
MUST NOT decline a request simply because an extension is present.
There is one exception to this rule. If an unknown authorization data
element type is received by a server either in an AP-REQ or in a ticket
contained in an AP-REQ, then authentication SHOULD fail. Authorization data
is intended to restrict the use of the ticket. If the service cannot
determine whether the restriction applies to that service then a security
weakness may result if the ticket can be used for that service.
Authorization elements that are optional can be enclosed in AD-IF-RELEVANT
element.
Implementation note: Many RFC 1510 implementations ignore unknown
authorization data elements. Depending on these implementations to honor
authorization data restrictions may create a security weakness.
1.4.2. Sending Extensible Messages
Care must be taken to ensure that old implementations can understand
messages sent to them even if they do not understand an extension that is
used. Unless the sender knows an extension is supported, the extension
cannot change the semantics of the core message or previously defined
extensions.
For example, an extension including key information necessary to decrypt the
encrypted part of a KDC-REP could only be used in situations where the
recipient was known to support the extension. Thus when designing such
extensions it is important to provide a way for the recipient to notify the
sender of support for the extension. For example in the case of an extension
that changes the KDC-REP reply key, the client could indicate support for
the extension by including a padata element in the AS-REQ sequence. The KDC
should only use the extension if this padata element is present in the
AS-REQ. Even if policy requires the use of the extension, it is better to
return an error indicating that the extension is required than to use the
extension when the recipient may not support it; debugging why
implementations do not interoperate is easier when errors are returned.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
1.6. Environmental assumptions
Kerberos imposes a few assumptions on the environment in which it can
properly function:
* "Denial of service" attacks are not solved with Kerberos. There are
places in the protocols where an intruder can prevent an application
from participating in the proper authentication steps. Detection and
solution of such attacks (some of which can appear to be not-uncommon
"normal" failure modes for the system) is usually best left to the
human administrators and users.
* Principals must keep their secret keys secret. If an intruder somehow
steals a principal's key, it will be able to masquerade as that
principal or impersonate any server to the legitimate principal.
* "Password guessing" attacks are not solved by Kerberos. If a user
chooses a poor password, it is possible for an attacker to successfully
mount an offline dictionary attack by repeatedly attempting to decrypt,
with successive entries from a dictionary, messages obtained which are
encrypted under a key derived from the user's password.
* Each host on the network must have a clock which is "loosely
synchronized" to the time of the other hosts; this synchronization is
used to reduce the bookkeeping needs of application servers when they
do replay detection. The degree of "looseness" can be configured on a
per-server basis, but is typically on the order of 5 minutes. If the
clocks are synchronized over the network, the clock synchronization
protocol must itself be secured from network attackers.
* Principal identifiers are not recycled on a short-term basis. A typical
mode of access control will use access control lists (ACLs) to grant
permissions to particular principals. If a stale ACL entry remains for
a deleted principal and the principal identifier is reused, the new
principal will inherit rights specified in the stale ACL entry. By not
re-using principal identifiers, the danger of inadvertent access is
removed.
1.7. Glossary of terms
Below is a list of terms used throughout this document.
Authentication
Verifying the claimed identity of a principal.
Authentication header
A record containing a Ticket and an Authenticator to be presented to a
server as part of the authentication process.
Authentication path
A sequence of intermediate realms transited in the authentication
process when communicating from one realm to another.
Authenticator
A record containing information that can be shown to have been recently
generated using the session key known only by the client and server.
Authorization
The process of determining whether a client may use a service, which
objects the client is allowed to access, and the type of access allowed
for each.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Capability
A token that grants the bearer permission to access an object or
service. In Kerberos, this might be a ticket whose use is restricted by
the contents of the authorization data field, but which lists no
network addresses, together with the session key necessary to use the
ticket.
Ciphertext
The output of an encryption function. Encryption transforms plaintext
into ciphertext.
Client
A process that makes use of a network service on behalf of a user. Note
that in some cases a Server may itself be a client of some other server
(e.g. a print server may be a client of a file server).
Credentials
A ticket plus the secret session key necessary to successfully use that
ticket in an authentication exchange.
KDC
Key Distribution Center, a network service that supplies tickets and
temporary session keys; or an instance of that service or the host on
which it runs. The KDC services both initial ticket and ticket-granting
ticket requests. The initial ticket portion is sometimes referred to as
the Authentication Server (or service). The ticket-granting ticket
portion is sometimes referred to as the ticket-granting server (or
service).
Kerberos
Aside from the 3-headed dog guarding Hades, the name given to Project
Athena's authentication service, the protocol used by that service, or
the code used to implement the authentication service.
Plaintext
The input to an encryption function or the output of a decryption
function. Decryption transforms ciphertext into plaintext.
Principal
A named client or server entity that participates in a network
communication, with one name that is considered canonical.
Principal identifier
The canonical name used to uniquely identify each different principal.
Seal
To encipher a record containing several fields in such a way that the
fields cannot be individually replaced without either knowledge of the
encryption key or leaving evidence of tampering.
Secret key
An encryption key shared by a principal and the KDC, distributed
outside the bounds of the system, with a long lifetime. In the case of
a human user's principal, the secret key may be derived from a
password.
Server
A particular Principal which provides a resource to network clients.
The server is sometimes referred to as the Application Server.
Service
A resource provided to network clients; often provided by more than one
server (for example, remote file service).
Session key
A temporary encryption key used between two principals, with a lifetime
limited to the duration of a single login "session".
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Sub-session key
A temporary encryption key used between two principals, selected and
exchanged by the principals using the session key, and with a lifetime
limited to the duration of a single association.
Ticket
A record that helps a client authenticate itself to a server; it
contains the client's identity, a session key, a timestamp, and other
information, all sealed using the server's secret key. It only serves
to authenticate a client when presented along with a fresh
Authenticator.
2. Ticket flag uses and requests
Each Kerberos ticket contains a set of flags which are used to indicate
attributes of that ticket. Most flags may be requested by a client when the
ticket is obtained; some are automatically turned on and off by a Kerberos
server as required. The following sections explain what the various flags
mean and give examples of reasons to use them. With the exception of the
ANONYMOUS and INVALID flags clients MUST ignore ticket flags that are not
recognized. KDCs MUST ignore KDC options that are not recognized. Some
implementations of RFC 1510 are known to reject unknown KDC options, so
clients may need to resend a request without KDC new options absent if the
request was rejected when sent with option added since RFC 1510.
Since new KDCs will ignore unknown options, clients MUST confirm that the
ticket returned by the KDC meets their needs. For example, as discussed in
section 2.8, a client requiring anonymous communication needs to make sure
that the ticket is actually anonymous. A KDC that prohibits issuing of
anonymous tickets or that does not understand the anonymous option would not
return an anonymous ticket.
Note that it is not in general possible to determine whether an option was
not honored because it was not understood or because it was rejected either
through configuration or policy. When adding a new option to the Kerberos
protocol, designers should consider whether the distinction is important for
their option. In cases where it is, a mechanism for the KDC to return an
indication that the option was understood but rejected needs to be provided
in the specification of the option. Often in such cases, the mechanism needs
to be broad enough to permit an error or reason to be returned.
2.1. Initial, pre-authenticated, and hardware authenticated tickets
The INITIAL flag indicates that a ticket was issued using the AS protocol
and not issued based on a ticket-granting ticket. Application servers that
want to require the demonstrated knowledge of a client's secret key (e.g. a
password-changing program) can insist that this flag be set in any tickets
they accept, and thus be assured that the client's key was recently
presented to the application client.
The PRE-AUTHENT and HW-AUTHENT flags provide additional information about
the initial authentication, regardless of whether the current ticket was
issued directly (in which case INITIAL will also be set) or issued on the
basis of a ticket-granting ticket (in which case the INITIAL flag is clear,
but the PRE-AUTHENT and HW-AUTHENT flags are carried forward from the
ticket-granting ticket).
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
2.2. Invalid tickets
The INVALID flag indicates that a ticket is invalid. Application servers
must reject tickets which have this flag set. A postdated ticket will
usually be issued in this form. Invalid tickets must be validated by the KDC
before use, by presenting them to the KDC in a TGS request with the VALIDATE
option specified. The KDC will only validate tickets after their starttime
has passed. The validation is required so that postdated tickets which have
been stolen before their starttime can be rendered permanently invalid
(through a hot-list mechanism) (see section 3.3.3.1).
2.3. Renewable tickets
Applications may desire to hold tickets which can be valid for long periods
of time. However, this can expose their credentials to potential theft for
equally long periods, and those stolen credentials would be valid until the
expiration time of the ticket(s). Simply using short-lived tickets and
obtaining new ones periodically would require the client to have long-term
access to its secret key, an even greater risk. Renewable tickets can be
used to mitigate the consequences of theft. Renewable tickets have two
"expiration times": the first is when the current instance of the ticket
expires, and the second is the latest permissible value for an individual
expiration time. An application client must periodically (i.e. before it
expires) present a renewable ticket to the KDC, with the RENEW option set in
the KDC request. The KDC will issue a new ticket with a new session key and
a later expiration time. All other fields of the ticket are left unmodified
by the renewal process. When the latest permissible expiration time arrives,
the ticket expires permanently. At each renewal, the KDC may consult a
hot-list to determine if the ticket had been reported stolen since its last
renewal; it will refuse to renew such stolen tickets, and thus the usable
lifetime of stolen tickets is reduced.
The RENEWABLE flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by the
ticket-granting service (discussed below in section 3.3). It can usually be
ignored by application servers. However, some particularly careful
application servers may wish to disallow renewable tickets.
If a renewable ticket is not renewed by its expiration time, the KDC will
not renew the ticket. The RENEWABLE flag is reset by default, but a client
may request it be set by setting the RENEWABLE option in the KRB_AS_REQ
message. If it is set, then the renew-till field in the ticket contains the
time after which the ticket may not be renewed.
2.4. Postdated tickets
Applications may occasionally need to obtain tickets for use much later,
e.g. a batch submission system would need tickets to be valid at the time
the batch job is serviced. However, it is dangerous to hold valid tickets in
a batch queue, since they will be on-line longer and more prone to theft.
Postdated tickets provide a way to obtain these tickets from the KDC at job
submission time, but to leave them "dormant" until they are activated and
validated by a further request of the KDC. If a ticket theft were reported
in the interim, the KDC would refuse to validate the ticket, and the thief
would be foiled.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
The MAY-POSTDATE flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by the
ticket-granting service. It can be ignored by application servers. This flag
must be set in a ticket-granting ticket in order to issue a postdated ticket
based on the presented ticket. It is reset by default; it may be requested
by a client by setting the ALLOW-POSTDATE option in the KRB_AS_REQ message.
This flag does not allow a client to obtain a postdated ticket-granting
ticket; postdated ticket-granting tickets can only by obtained by requesting
the postdating in the KRB_AS_REQ message. The life (endtime-starttime) of a
postdated ticket will be the remaining life of the ticket-granting ticket at
the time of the request, unless the RENEWABLE option is also set, in which
case it can be the full life (endtime-starttime) of the ticket-granting
ticket. The KDC may limit how far in the future a ticket may be postdated.
The POSTDATED flag indicates that a ticket has been postdated. The
application server can check the authtime field in the ticket to see when
the original authentication occurred. Some services may choose to reject
postdated tickets, or they may only accept them within a certain period
after the original authentication. When the KDC issues a POSTDATED ticket,
it will also be marked as INVALID, so that the application client must
present the ticket to the KDC to be validated before use.
2.5. Proxiable and proxy tickets
At times it may be necessary for a principal to allow a service to perform
an operation on its behalf. The service must be able to take on the identity
of the client, but only for a particular purpose. A principal can allow a
service to take on the principal's identity for a particular purpose by
granting it a proxy.
The process of granting a proxy using the proxy and proxiable flags is used
to provide credentials for use with specific services. Though conceptually
also a proxy, user's wishing to delegate their identity for ANY purpose must
use the ticket forwarding mechanism described in the next section to forward
a ticket granting ticket.
The PROXIABLE flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by the
ticket-granting service. It can be ignored by application servers. When set,
this flag tells the ticket-granting server that it is OK to issue a new
ticket (but not a ticket-granting ticket) with a different network address
based on this ticket. This flag is set if requested by the client on initial
authentication. By default, the client will request that it be set when
requesting a ticket granting ticket, and reset when requesting any other
ticket.
This flag allows a client to pass a proxy to a server to perform a remote
request on its behalf, e.g. a print service client can give the print server
a proxy to access the client's files on a particular file server in order to
satisfy a print request.
In order to complicate the use of stolen credentials, Kerberos tickets are
usually valid from only those network addresses specifically included in the
ticket[2.1]. When granting a proxy, the client must specify the new network
address from which the proxy is to be used, or indicate that the proxy is to
be issued for use from any address.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
The PROXY flag is set in a ticket by the TGS when it issues a proxy ticket.
Application servers may check this flag and at their option they may require
additional authentication from the agent presenting the proxy in order to
provide an audit trail.
2.6. Forwardable tickets
Authentication forwarding is an instance of a proxy where the service
granted is complete use of the client's identity. An example where it might
be used is when a user logs in to a remote system and wants authentication
to work from that system as if the login were local.
The FORWARDABLE flag in a ticket is normally only interpreted by the
ticket-granting service. It can be ignored by application servers. The
FORWARDABLE flag has an interpretation similar to that of the PROXIABLE
flag, except ticket-granting tickets may also be issued with different
network addresses. This flag is reset by default, but users may request that
it be set by setting the FORWARDABLE option in the AS request when they
request their initial ticket-granting ticket.
This flag allows for authentication forwarding without requiring the user to
enter a password again. If the flag is not set, then authentication
forwarding is not permitted, but the same result can still be achieved if
the user engages in the AS exchange specifying the requested network
addresses and supplies a password.
The FORWARDED flag is set by the TGS when a client presents a ticket with
the FORWARDABLE flag set and requests a forwarded ticket by specifying the
FORWARDED KDC option and supplying a set of addresses for the new ticket. It
is also set in all tickets issued based on tickets with the FORWARDED flag
set. Application servers may choose to process FORWARDED tickets differently
than non-FORWARDED tickets.
2.7 Transited Policy Checking
In Kerberos, the application server is ultimately responsible for accepting
or rejecting authentication and should check that only suitably trusted
KDC's are relied upon to authenticate a principal. The transited field in
the ticket identifies which KDC's were involved in the authentication
process and an application server would normally check this field. While the
end server ultimately decides whether authentication is valid, the KDC for
the end server's realm may apply a realm specific policy for validating the
transited field and accepting credentials for cross-realm authentication.
When the KDC applies such checks and accepts such cross-realm authentication
it will set the TRANSITED-POLICY-CHECKED flag in the service tickets it
issues based on the cross-realm TGT. A client may request that the KDC's not
check the transited field by setting the DISABLE-TRANSITED-CHECK flag. KDC's
are encouraged but not required to honor this flag.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
2.8 Anonymous Tickets
When policy allows, a KDC may issue anonymous tickets for the purpose of
enabling encrypted communication between a client and server without
identifying the client to the server. Such anonymous tickets are issued with
a generic principal name configured on the KDC (e.g. "anonymous@") and will
have the ANONYMOUS flag set. A server accepting such a ticket may assume
that subsequent requests using the same ticket and session key originate
from the same user. Requests with the same username but different tickets
are likely to originate from different users. Users request anonymous ticket
by setting the REQUEST-ANONYMOUS option in an AS or TGS request.
If a client requires anonymous communication then the client should check to
make sure that the resulting ticket is actually anonymous. A KDC that does
not understand the anonymous-requested flag will not return an error, but
will instead return a normal ticket.
2.9. Other KDC options
There are three additional options which may be set in a client's request of
the KDC.
2.9.1 Renewable-OK
The RENEWABLE-OK option indicates that the client will accept a renewable
ticket if a ticket with the requested life cannot otherwise be provided. If
a ticket with the requested life cannot be provided, then the KDC may issue
a renewable ticket with a renew-till equal to the the requested endtime. The
value of the renew-till field may still be adjusted by site-determined
limits or limits imposed by the individual principal or server.
2.9.2 ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY
In its basic form the Kerberos protocol supports authentication in a client
server setting and is not well suited to authentication in a peer-to-peer
environment because the long term key of the user does not remain on the
workstation after initial login. Authentication of such peers may be
supported by Kerberos in its user-to-user variant. The ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY
option supports user-to-user authentication by allowing the KDC to issue a
service ticket encrypted using the session key from another ticket granting
ticket issued to another user. The ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY option is honored only by
the ticket-granting service. It indicates that the ticket to be issued for
the end server is to be encrypted in the session key from the additional
second ticket-granting ticket provided with the request. See section 3.3.3
for specific details.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3. Message Exchanges
The following sections describe the interactions between network clients and
servers and the messages involved in those exchanges.
3.1. The Authentication Service Exchange
Summary
Message direction Message type Section
1. Client to Kerberos KRB_AS_REQ 5.4.1
2. Kerberos to client KRB_AS_REP or 5.4.2
KRB_ERROR 5.9.1
The Authentication Service (AS) Exchange between the client and the Kerberos
Authentication Server is initiated by a client when it wishes to obtain
authentication credentials for a given server but currently holds no
credentials. In its basic form, the client's secret key is used for
encryption and decryption. This exchange is typically used at the initiation
of a login session to obtain credentials for a Ticket-Granting Server which
will subsequently be used to obtain credentials for other servers (see
section 3.3) without requiring further use of the client's secret key. This
exchange is also used to request credentials for services which must not be
mediated through the Ticket-Granting Service, but rather require a
principal's secret key, such as the password-changing service[3.1]. This
exchange does not by itself provide any assurance of the the identity of the
user[3.2].
The exchange consists of two messages: KRB_AS_REQ from the client to
Kerberos, and KRB_AS_REP or KRB_ERROR in reply. The formats for these
messages are described in sections 5.4.1, 5.4.2, and 5.9.1.
In the request, the client sends (in cleartext) its own identity and the
identity of the server for which it is requesting credentials. The response,
KRB_AS_REP, contains a ticket for the client to present to the server, and a
session key that will be shared by the client and the server. The session
key and additional information are encrypted in the client's secret key. The
KRB_AS_REP message contains information which can be used to detect replays,
and to associate it with the message to which it replies.
Without pre-authentication, the authentication server does not know whether
the client is actually the principal named in the request. It simply sends a
reply without knowing or caring whether they are the same. This is
acceptable because nobody but the principal whose identity was given in the
request will be able to use the reply. Its critical information is encrypted
in that principal's key. However, an attacker can send a KRB_AS_REQ message
to get known plaintext in order to attack the principal's key. Especially if
the key is based on a password, this may create a security exposure. So, the
initial request supports an optional field that can be used to pass
additional information that might be needed for the initial exchange. This
field should be used for pre-authentication as described in section 3.1.1.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Various errors can occur; these are indicated by an error response
(KRB_ERROR) instead of the KRB_AS_REP response. The error message is not
encrypted. The KRB_ERROR message contains information which can be used to
associate it with the message to which it replies. The contents of the
KRB_ERROR message are not integrity-protected. As such, the client cannot
detect replays, fabrications or modifications. A solution to this problem
will be included in a future version of the protocol.
3.1.1. Generation of KRB_AS_REQ message
The client may specify a number of options in the initial request. Among
these options are whether pre-authentication is to be performed; whether the
requested ticket is to be renewable, proxiable, or forwardable; whether it
should be postdated or allow postdating of derivative tickets; whether the
client requests an anonymous ticket; and whether a renewable ticket will be
accepted in lieu of a non-renewable ticket if the requested ticket
expiration date cannot be satisfied by a non-renewable ticket (due to
configuration constraints; see section 4).
The client prepares the KRB_AS_REQ message and sends it to the KDC.
3.1.2. Receipt of KRB_AS_REQ message
If all goes well, processing the KRB_AS_REQ message will result in the
creation of a ticket for the client to present to the server. The format for
the ticket is described in section 5.3.1. The contents of the ticket are
determined as follows.
3.1.3. Generation of KRB_AS_REP message
The authentication server looks up the client and server principals named in
the KRB_AS_REQ in its database, extracting their respective keys. If the
requested client principal named in the request is not known because it
doesn't exist in the KDC's principal database, then an error message with a
KDC_ERR_C_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN is returned.
If required, the server pre-authenticates the request, and if the
pre-authentication check fails, an error message with the code
KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED is returned. If pre-authentication is required, but
was not present in the request, an error message with the code
KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED is returned and the PA-ETYPE-INFO
pre-authentication field will be included in the KRB-ERROR message. If the
server cannot accommodate an encryption type requested by the client, an
error message with code KDC_ERR_ETYPE_NOSUPP is returned. Otherwise the KDC
generates a 'random' session key[3.3].
When responding to an AS request, if there are multiple encryption keys
registered for a client in the Kerberos database , then the etype field from
the AS request is used by the KDC to select the encryption method to be used
to protect the encrypted part of the KRB_AS_REP message which is sent to the
client. If there is more than one supported strong encryption type in the
etype list, the first valid etype for which an encryption key is available
is used. The encryption method used to protect the encrypted part of the
KRB_TGS_REP message is the keytype of the session key found in the ticket
granting ticket presented in the KRB_TGS_REQ.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
When the user's key is generated from a password or pass phrase, the
string-to-key function for the particular encryption key type is used, as
specified in [KCRYPTO]. The salt value and additional parameters for the
string-to-key function have default values (specified by section 6 and by
the encryption mechanism specification, respectively) that may be overridden
by preauthentication data (PA-PW-SALT, PA-AFS3-SALT, PA-ETYPE-INFO,
PA-S2K-PARAMS, etc). Since the KDC is presumed to store a copy of the
resulting key only, these values should not be changed for password-based
keys except when changing the principal's key.
It is not possible to reliably generate a user's key given a pass phrase
without contacting the KDC, since it will not be known whether alternate
salt or parameter values are required.
When the etype field is present in a KDC request, whether an AS or TGS
request, the KDC will attempt to assign the type of the random session key
from the list of methods in the etype field. The KDC will select the
appropriate type using the list of methods provided together with
information from the Kerberos database indicating acceptable encryption
methods for the application server. The KDC will not issue tickets with a
weak session key encryption type.
If the requested start time is absent, indicates a time in the past, or is
within the window of acceptable clock skew for the KDC and the POSTDATE
option has not been specified, then the start time of the ticket is set to
the authentication server's current time. If it indicates a time in the
future beyond the acceptable clock skew, but the POSTDATED option has not
been specified then the error KDC_ERR_CANNOT_POSTDATE is returned. Otherwise
the requested start time is checked against the policy of the local realm
(the administrator might decide to prohibit certain types or ranges of
postdated tickets), and if acceptable, the ticket's start time is set as
requested and the INVALID flag is set in the new ticket. The postdated
ticket must be validated before use by presenting it to the KDC after the
start time has been reached.
The expiration time of the ticket will be set to the earlier of the
requested endtime and a time determined by local policy, possibly determined
using realm or principal specific factors. For example, the expiration time
may be set to the minimum of the following:
* The expiration time (endtime) requested in the KRB_AS_REQ message.
* The ticket's start time plus the maximum allowable lifetime associated
with the client principal from the authentication server's database
(see section 4).
* The ticket's start time plus the maximum allowable lifetime associated
with the server principal.
* The ticket's start time plus the maximum lifetime set by the policy of
the local realm.
If the requested expiration time minus the start time (as determined above)
is less than a site-determined minimum lifetime, an error message with code
KDC_ERR_NEVER_VALID is returned. If the requested expiration time for the
ticket exceeds what was determined as above, and if the 'RENEWABLE-OK'
option was requested, then the 'RENEWABLE' flag is set in the new ticket,
and the renew-till value is set as if the 'RENEWABLE' option were requested
(the field and option names are described fully in section 5.4.1).
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
If the RENEWABLE option has been requested or if the RENEWABLE-OK option has
been set and a renewable ticket is to be issued, then the renew-till field
is set to the minimum of:
* Its requested value.
* The start time of the ticket plus the minimum of the two maximum
renewable lifetimes associated with the principals' database entries.
* The start time of the ticket plus the maximum renewable lifetime set by
the policy of the local realm.
The flags field of the new ticket will have the following options set if
they have been requested and if the policy of the local realm allows:
FORWARDABLE, MAY-POSTDATE, POSTDATED, PROXIABLE, RENEWABLE, ANONYMOUS. If
the new ticket is post-dated (the start time is in the future), its INVALID
flag will also be set.
If all of the above succeed, the server will encrypt ciphertext part of the
ticket using the encryption key extracted from the server principal's record
in the Kerberos database using the encryption type associated with the
server principal's key (this choice is NOT affected by the etype field in
the request). It then formats a KRB_AS_REP message (see section 5.4.2),
copying the addresses in the request into the caddr of the response, placing
any required pre-authentication data into the padata of the response, and
encrypts the ciphertext part in the client's key using an acceptable
encryption method requested in the etype field of the request, or in some
key specified by pre-authentication mechanisms being used.
3.1.4. Generation of KRB_ERROR message
Several errors can occur, and the Authentication Server responds by
returning an error message, KRB_ERROR, to the client, with the error-code,
e-text, and optional e-cksum fields set to appropriate values. The error
message contents and details are described in Section 5.9.1.
3.1.5. Receipt of KRB_AS_REP message
If the reply message type is KRB_AS_REP, then the client verifies that the
cname and crealm fields in the cleartext portion of the reply match what it
requested. If any padata fields are present, they may be used to derive the
proper secret key to decrypt the message. The client decrypts the encrypted
part of the response using its secret key, verifies that the nonce in the
encrypted part matches the nonce it supplied in its request (to detect
replays). It also verifies that the sname and srealm in the response match
those in the request (or are otherwise expected values), and that the host
address field is also correct. It then stores the ticket, session key, start
and expiration times, and other information for later use. The
key-expiration field from the encrypted part of the response may be checked
to notify the user of impending key expiration (the client program could
then suggest remedial action, such as a password change).
Proper decryption of the KRB_AS_REP message is not sufficient for the host
to verify the identity of the user; the user and an attacker could cooperate
to generate a KRB_AS_REP format message which decrypts properly but is not
from the proper KDC. If the host wishes to verify the identity of the user,
it must require the user to present application credentials which can be
verified using a securely-stored secret key for the host. If those
credentials can be verified, then the identity of the user can be assured.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3.1.6. Receipt of KRB_ERROR message
If the reply message type is KRB_ERROR, then the client interprets it as an
error and performs whatever application-specific tasks are necessary to
recover.
3.2. The Client/Server Authentication Exchange
Summary
Message direction Message type Section
Client to Application server KRB_AP_REQ 5.5.1
[optional] Application server to client KRB_AP_REP or 5.5.2
KRB_ERROR 5.9.1
The client/server authentication (CS) exchange is used by network
applications to authenticate the client to the server and vice versa. The
client must have already acquired credentials for the server using the AS or
TGS exchange.
3.2.1. The KRB_AP_REQ message
The KRB_AP_REQ contains authentication information which should be part of
the first message in an authenticated transaction. It contains a ticket, an
authenticator, and some additional bookkeeping information (see section
5.5.1 for the exact format). The ticket by itself is insufficient to
authenticate a client, since tickets are passed across the network in
cleartext[3.4], so the authenticator is used to prevent invalid replay of
tickets by proving to the server that the client knows the session key of
the ticket and thus is entitled to use the ticket. The KRB_AP_REQ message is
referred to elsewhere as the 'authentication header.'
3.2.2. Generation of a KRB_AP_REQ message
When a client wishes to initiate authentication to a server, it obtains
(either through a credentials cache, the AS exchange, or the TGS exchange) a
ticket and session key for the desired service. The client may re-use any
tickets it holds until they expire. To use a ticket the client constructs a
new Authenticator from the the system time, its name, and optionally an
application specific checksum, an initial sequence number to be used in
KRB_SAFE or KRB_PRIV messages, and/or a session subkey to be used in
negotiations for a session key unique to this particular session.
Authenticators may not be re-used and will be rejected if replayed to a
server[3.5]. If a sequence number is to be included, it should be randomly
chosen so that even after many messages have been exchanged it is not likely
to collide with other sequence numbers in use.
The client may indicate a requirement of mutual authentication or the use of
a session-key based ticket by setting the appropriate flag(s) in the
ap-options field of the message.
The Authenticator is encrypted in the session key and combined with the
ticket to form the KRB_AP_REQ message which is then sent to the end server
along with any additional application-specific information.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3.2.3. Receipt of KRB_AP_REQ message
Authentication is based on the server's current time of day (clocks must be
loosely synchronized), the authenticator, and the ticket. Several errors are
possible. If an error occurs, the server is expected to reply to the client
with a KRB_ERROR message. This message may be encapsulated in the
application protocol if its 'raw' form is not acceptable to the protocol.
The format of error messages is described in section 5.9.1.
The algorithm for verifying authentication information is as follows. If the
message type is not KRB_AP_REQ, the server returns the KRB_AP_ERR_MSG_TYPE
error. If the key version indicated by the Ticket in the KRB_AP_REQ is not
one the server can use (e.g., it indicates an old key, and the server no
longer possesses a copy of the old key), the KRB_AP_ERR_BADKEYVER error is
returned. If the USE-SESSION-KEY flag is set in the ap-options field, it
indicates to the server that the ticket is encrypted in the session key from
the server's ticket-granting ticket rather than its secret key [3.6].
Since it is possible for the server to be registered in multiple realms,
with different keys in each, the srealm field in the unencrypted portion of
the ticket in the KRB_AP_REQ is used to specify which secret key the server
should use to decrypt that ticket. The KRB_AP_ERR_NOKEY error code is
returned if the server doesn't have the proper key to decipher the ticket.
The ticket is decrypted using the version of the server's key specified by
the ticket. If the decryption routines detect a modification of the ticket
(each encryption system must provide safeguards to detect modified
ciphertext; see section 6), the KRB_AP_ERR_BAD_INTEGRITY error is returned
(chances are good that different keys were used to encrypt and decrypt).
The authenticator is decrypted using the session key extracted from the
decrypted ticket. If decryption shows it to have been modified, the
KRB_AP_ERR_BAD_INTEGRITY error is returned. The name and realm of the client
from the ticket are compared against the same fields in the authenticator.
If they don't match, the KRB_AP_ERR_BADMATCH error is returned; this
normally is caused by a client error or attempted attack. The addresses in
the ticket (if any) are then searched for an address matching the
operating-system reported address of the client. If no match is found or the
server insists on ticket addresses but none are present in the ticket, the
KRB_AP_ERR_BADADDR error is returned. If the local (server) time and the
client time in the authenticator differ by more than the allowable clock
skew (e.g., 5 minutes), the KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW error is returned.
Unless the application server provides its own suitable means to protect
against replay (for example, a challenge-response sequence initiated by the
server after authentication, or use of a server-generated encryption
subkey), the server must utilize a replay cache to remember any
authenticator presented within the allowable clock skew. Careful analysis of
the application protocol and implementation is recommended before
eliminating this cache. The replay cache will store the server name, along
with the client name, time and microsecond fields from the recently-seen
authenticators and if a matching tuple is found, the KRB_AP_ERR_REPEAT error
is returned [3.7]. If a server loses track of authenticators presented
within the allowable clock skew, it must reject all requests until the clock
skew interval has passed, providing assurance that any lost or re-played
authenticators will fall outside the allowable clock skew and can no longer
be successfully replayed[3.8].
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
If a sequence number is provided in the authenticator, the server saves it
for later use in processing KRB_SAFE and/or KRB_PRIV messages. If a subkey
is present, the server either saves it for later use or uses it to help
generate its own choice for a subkey to be returned in a KRB_AP_REP message.
If multiple servers (for example, different services on one machine, or a
single service implemented on multiple machines) share a service principal
(a practice we do not recommend in general, but acknowledge will be used in
some cases), they should also share this replay cache, or the application
protocol should be designed so as to eliminate the need for it. Note that
this applies to all of the services, if any of the application protocols
does not have replay protection built in; an authenticator used with such a
service could later be replayed to a different service with the same service
principal but no replay protection, if the former doesn't record the
authenticator information in the common replay cache.
The server computes the age of the ticket: local (server) time minus the
start time inside the Ticket. If the start time is later than the current
time by more than the allowable clock skew or if the INVALID flag is set in
the ticket, the KRB_AP_ERR_TKT_NYV error is returned. Otherwise, if the
current time is later than end time by more than the allowable clock skew,
the KRB_AP_ERR_TKT_EXPIRED error is returned.
If all these checks succeed without an error, the server is assured that the
client possesses the credentials of the principal named in the ticket and
thus, the client has been authenticated to the server.
Passing these checks provides only authentication of the named principal; it
does not imply authorization to use the named service. Applications must
make a separate authorization decisions based upon the authenticated name of
the user, the requested operation, local access control information such as
that contained in a .k5login or .k5users file, and possibly a separate
distributed authorization service.
3.2.4. Generation of a KRB_AP_REP message
Typically, a client's request will include both the authentication
information and its initial request in the same message, and the server need
not explicitly reply to the KRB_AP_REQ. However, if mutual authentication
(not only authenticating the client to the server, but also the server to
the client) is being performed, the KRB_AP_REQ message will have
MUTUAL-REQUIRED set in its ap-options field, and a KRB_AP_REP message is
required in response. As with the error message, this message may be
encapsulated in the application protocol if its "raw" form is not acceptable
to the application's protocol. The timestamp and microsecond field used in
the reply must be the client's timestamp and microsecond field (as provided
in the authenticator)[3.9]. If a sequence number is to be included, it
should be randomly chosen as described above for the authenticator. A subkey
may be included if the server desires to negotiate a different subkey. The
KRB_AP_REP message is encrypted in the session key extracted from the
ticket.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3.2.5. Receipt of KRB_AP_REP message
If a KRB_AP_REP message is returned, the client uses the session key from
the credentials obtained for the server[3.10] to decrypt the message, and
verifies that the timestamp and microsecond fields match those in the
Authenticator it sent to the server. If they match, then the client is
assured that the server is genuine. The sequence number and subkey (if
present) are retained for later use.
3.2.6. Using the encryption key
[This seems inconsistent with crypto-architecture; we should look at before
publication.]
After the KRB_AP_REQ/KRB_AP_REP exchange has occurred, the client and server
share an encryption key which can be used by the application. In some cases,
the use of this session key will be implicit in the protocol; in others the
method of use must be chosen from several alternatives. The 'true session
key' to be used for KRB_PRIV, KRB_SAFE, or other application-specific uses
may be chosen by the application based on the session key from the ticket
and subkeys in the KRB_AP_REP message and the authenticator[3.11]. To
mitigate the effect of failures in random number generation on the client it
is strongly encouraged that any key derived by an application for subsequent
use include the full key entropy derived from the KDC generated session key
carried in the ticket. We leave the protocol negotiations of how to use the
key (e.g. selecting an encryption or checksum type) to the application
programmer; the Kerberos protocol does not constrain the implementation
options, but an example of how this might be done follows.
One way that an application may choose to negotiate a key to be used for
subsequent integrity and privacy protection is for the client to propose a
key in the subkey field of the authenticator. The server can then choose a
key using the proposed key from the client as input, returning the new
subkey in the subkey field of the application reply. This key could then be
used for subsequent communication.
To make this example more concrete, if the communication patterns of an
application dictates the use of encryption modes of operation incompatible
with the encryption system used for the authenticator, then a key compatible
with the required encryption system may be generated by either the client,
the server, or collaboratively by both and exchanged using the subkey field.
This generation might involve the use of a random number as a pre-key,
initially generated by either party, which could then be encrypted using the
session key from the ticket, and the result exchanged and used for
subsequent encryption. By encrypting the pre-key with the session key from
the ticket, randomness from the KDC generated key is assured of being
present in the negotiated key. Application developers must be careful
however, to use a means of introducing this entropy that does not allow an
attacker to learn the session key from the ticket if it learns the key
generated and used for subsequent communication. The reader should note that
this is only an example, and that an analysis of the particular cryptosystem
to be used, must be made before deciding how to generate values for the
subkey fields, and the key to be used for subsequent communication.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
With both the one-way and mutual authentication exchanges, the peers should
take care not to send sensitive information to each other without proper
assurances. In particular, applications that require privacy or integrity
should use the KRB_AP_REP response from the server to client to assure both
client and server of their peer's identity. If an application protocol
requires privacy of its messages, it can use the KRB_PRIV message (section
3.5). The KRB_SAFE message (section 3.4) can be used to assure integrity.
3.3. The Ticket-Granting Service (TGS) Exchange
Summary
Message direction Message type Section
1. Client to Kerberos KRB_TGS_REQ 5.4.1
2. Kerberos to client KRB_TGS_REP or 5.4.2
KRB_ERROR 5.9.1
The TGS exchange between a client and the Kerberos Ticket-Granting Server is
initiated by a client when it wishes to obtain authentication credentials
for a given server (which might be registered in a remote realm), when it
wishes to renew or validate an existing ticket, or when it wishes to obtain
a proxy ticket. In the first case, the client must already have acquired a
ticket for the Ticket-Granting Service using the AS exchange (the
ticket-granting ticket is usually obtained when a client initially
authenticates to the system, such as when a user logs in). The message
format for the TGS exchange is almost identical to that for the AS exchange.
The primary difference is that encryption and decryption in the TGS exchange
does not take place under the client's key. Instead, the session key from
the ticket-granting ticket or renewable ticket, or sub-session key from an
Authenticator is used. As is the case for all application servers, expired
tickets are not accepted by the TGS, so once a renewable or ticket-granting
ticket expires, the client must use a separate exchange to obtain valid
tickets.
The TGS exchange consists of two messages: A request (KRB_TGS_REQ) from the
client to the Kerberos Ticket-Granting Server, and a reply (KRB_TGS_REP or
KRB_ERROR). The KRB_TGS_REQ message includes information authenticating the
client plus a request for credentials. The authentication information
consists of the authentication header (KRB_AP_REQ) which includes the
client's previously obtained ticket-granting, renewable, or invalid ticket.
In the ticket-granting ticket and proxy cases, the request may include one
or more of: a list of network addresses, a collection of typed authorization
data to be sealed in the ticket for authorization use by the application
server, or additional tickets (the use of which are described later). The
TGS reply (KRB_TGS_REP) contains the requested credentials, encrypted in the
session key from the ticket-granting ticket or renewable ticket, or if
present, in the sub-session key from the Authenticator (part of the
authentication header). The KRB_ERROR message contains an error code and
text explaining what went wrong. The KRB_ERROR message is not encrypted. The
KRB_TGS_REP message contains information which can be used to detect
replays, and to associate it with the message to which it replies. The
KRB_ERROR message also contains information which can be used to associate
it with the message to which it replies. The same comments about integrity
protection of KRB_ERROR messages mentioned in section 3.1 apply to the TGS
exchange.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3.3.1. Generation of KRB_TGS_REQ message
Before sending a request to the ticket-granting service, the client must
determine in which realm the application server is believed to be
registered[3.12]. If the client knows the service principal name and realm
and it does not already possess a ticket-granting ticket for the appropriate
realm, then one must be obtained. This is first attempted by requesting a
ticket-granting ticket for the destination realm from a Kerberos server for
which the client possesses a ticket-granting ticket (using the KRB_TGS_REQ
message recursively). The Kerberos server may return a TGT for the desired
realm in which case one can proceed. Alternatively, the Kerberos server may
return a TGT for a realm which is 'closer' to the desired realm (further
along the standard hierarchical path between the client's realm and the
requested realm server's realm).
Once the client obtains a ticket-granting ticket for the appropriate realm,
it determines which Kerberos servers serve that realm, and contacts one. The
list might be obtained through a configuration file or network service or it
may be generated from the name of the realm; as long as the secret keys
exchanged by realms are kept secret, only denial of service results from
using a false Kerberos server.
As in the AS exchange, the client may specify a number of options in the
KRB_TGS_REQ message. The client prepares the KRB_TGS_REQ message, providing
an authentication header as an element of the padata field, and including
the same fields as used in the KRB_AS_REQ message along with several
optional fields: the enc-authorization-data field for application server use
and additional tickets required by some options.
In preparing the authentication header, the client can select a sub-session
key under which the response from the Kerberos server will be
encrypted[3.13]. If the sub-session key is not specified, the session key
from the ticket-granting ticket will be used. If the enc-authorization-data
is present, it must be encrypted in the sub-session key, if present, from
the authenticator portion of the authentication header, or if not present,
using the session key from the ticket-granting ticket.
Once prepared, the message is sent to a Kerberos server for the destination
realm.
3.3.2. Receipt of KRB_TGS_REQ message
The KRB_TGS_REQ message is processed in a manner similar to the KRB_AS_REQ
message, but there are many additional checks to be performed. First, the
Kerberos server must determine which server the accompanying ticket is for
and it must select the appropriate key to decrypt it. For a normal
KRB_TGS_REQ message, it will be for the ticket granting service, and the
TGS's key will be used. If the TGT was issued by another realm, then the
appropriate inter-realm key must be used. If the accompanying ticket is not
a ticket granting ticket for the current realm, but is for an application
server in the current realm, the RENEW, VALIDATE, or PROXY options are
specified in the request, and the server for which a ticket is requested is
the server named in the accompanying ticket, then the KDC will decrypt the
ticket in the authentication header using the key of the server for which it
was issued. If no ticket can be found in the padata field, the
KDC_ERR_PADATA_TYPE_NOSUPP error is returned.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Once the accompanying ticket has been decrypted, the user-supplied checksum
in the Authenticator must be verified against the contents of the request,
and the message rejected if the checksums do not match (with an error code
of KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED) or if the checksum is not keyed or not
collision-proof (with an error code of KRB_AP_ERR_INAPP_CKSUM). If the
checksum type is not supported, the KDC_ERR_SUMTYPE_NOSUPP error is
returned. If the authorization-data are present, they are decrypted using
the sub-session key from the Authenticator.
If any of the decryptions indicate failed integrity checks, the
KRB_AP_ERR_BAD_INTEGRITY error is returned.
3.3.3. Generation of KRB_TGS_REP message
The KRB_TGS_REP message shares its format with the KRB_AS_REP (KRB_KDC_REP),
but with its type field set to KRB_TGS_REP. The detailed specification is in
section 5.4.2.
The response will include a ticket for the requested server or for a ticket
granting server of an intermediate KDC to be contacted to obtain the
requested ticket. The Kerberos database is queried to retrieve the record
for the appropriate server (including the key with which the ticket will be
encrypted). If the request is for a ticket granting ticket for a remote
realm, and if no key is shared with the requested realm, then the Kerberos
server will select the realm 'closest' to the requested realm with which it
does share a key, and use that realm instead. If the requested server cannot
be found in the TGS database, then a TGT for another trusted realm may be
returned instead of a ticket for the service. This TGT is a referral
mechanism to cause the client to retry the request to the realm of the TGT.
These are the only cases where the response for the KDC will be for a
different server than that requested by the client.
By default, the address field, the client's name and realm, the list of
transited realms, the time of initial authentication, the expiration time,
and the authorization data of the newly-issued ticket will be copied from
the ticket-granting ticket (TGT) or renewable ticket. If the transited field
needs to be updated, but the transited type is not supported, the
KDC_ERR_TRTYPE_NOSUPP error is returned.
If the request specifies an endtime, then the endtime of the new ticket is
set to the minimum of (a) that request, (b) the endtime from the TGT, and
(c) the starttime of the TGT plus the minimum of the maximum life for the
application server and the maximum life for the local realm (the maximum
life for the requesting principal was already applied when the TGT was
issued). If the new ticket is to be a renewal, then the endtime above is
replaced by the minimum of (a) the value of the renew_till field of the
ticket and (b) the starttime for the new ticket plus the life
(endtime-starttime) of the old ticket.
If the FORWARDED option has been requested, then the resulting ticket will
contain the addresses specified by the client. This option will only be
honored if the FORWARDABLE flag is set in the TGT. The PROXY option is
similar; the resulting ticket will contain the addresses specified by the
client. It will be honored only if the PROXIABLE flag in the TGT is set. The
PROXY option will not be honored on requests for additional ticket-granting
tickets.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
If the requested start time is absent, indicates a time in the past, or is
within the window of acceptable clock skew for the KDC and the POSTDATE
option has not been specified, then the start time of the ticket is set to
the authentication server's current time. If it indicates a time in the
future beyond the acceptable clock skew, but the POSTDATED option has not
been specified or the MAY-POSTDATE flag is not set in the TGT, then the
error KDC_ERR_CANNOT_POSTDATE is returned. Otherwise, if the ticket-granting
ticket has the MAY-POSTDATE flag set, then the resulting ticket will be
postdated and the requested starttime is checked against the policy of the
local realm. If acceptable, the ticket's start time is set as requested, and
the INVALID flag is set. The postdated ticket must be validated before use
by presenting it to the KDC after the starttime has been reached. However,
in no case may the starttime, endtime, or renew-till time of a newly-issued
postdated ticket extend beyond the renew-till time of the ticket-granting
ticket.
If the ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY option has been specified and an additional ticket
has been included in the request, the KDC will decrypt the additional ticket
using the key for the server to which the additional ticket was issued and
verify that it is a ticket-granting ticket. If the name of the requested
server is missing from the request, the name of the client in the additional
ticket will be used. Otherwise the name of the requested server will be
compared to the name of the client in the additional ticket and if
different, the request will be rejected. If the request succeeds, the
session key from the additional ticket will be used to encrypt the new
ticket that is issued instead of using the key of the server for which the
new ticket will be used.
If the name of the server in the ticket that is presented to the KDC as part
of the authentication header is not that of the ticket-granting server
itself, the server is registered in the realm of the KDC, and the RENEW
option is requested, then the KDC will verify that the RENEWABLE flag is set
in the ticket, that the INVALID flag is not set in the ticket, and that the
renew_till time is still in the future. If the VALIDATE option is requested,
the KDC will check that the starttime has passed and the INVALID flag is
set. If the PROXY option is requested, then the KDC will check that the
PROXIABLE flag is set in the ticket. If the tests succeed, and the ticket
passes the hotlist check described in the next section, the KDC will issue
the appropriate new ticket.
The ciphertext part of the response in the KRB_TGS_REP message is encrypted
in the sub-session key from the Authenticator, if present, or the session
key key from the ticket-granting ticket. It is not encrypted using the
client's secret key. Furthermore, the client's key's expiration date and the
key version number fields are left out since these values are stored along
with the client's database record, and that record is not needed to satisfy
a request based on a ticket-granting ticket.
3.3.3.1. Checking for revoked tickets
Whenever a request is made to the ticket-granting server, the presented
ticket(s) is(are) checked against a hot-list of tickets which have been
canceled. This hot-list might be implemented by storing a range of issue
timestamps for 'suspect tickets'; if a presented ticket had an authtime in
that range, it would be rejected. In this way, a stolen ticket-granting
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
ticket or renewable ticket cannot be used to gain additional tickets
(renewals or otherwise) once the theft has been reported to the KDC for the
realm in which the server resides. Any normal ticket obtained before it was
reported stolen will still be valid (because they require no interaction
with the KDC), but only until their normal expiration time. If TGT's have
been issued for cross-realm authentication, use of the cross-realm TGT will
not be affected unless the hot-list is propagated to the KDC's for the
realms for which such cross-realm tickets were issued.
3.3.3.2. Encoding the transited field
If the identity of the server in the TGT that is presented to the KDC as
part of the authentication header is that of the ticket-granting service,
but the TGT was issued from another realm, the KDC will look up the
inter-realm key shared with that realm and use that key to decrypt the
ticket. If the ticket is valid, then the KDC will honor the request, subject
to the constraints outlined above in the section describing the AS exchange.
The realm part of the client's identity will be taken from the
ticket-granting ticket. The name of the realm that issued the
ticket-granting ticket will be added to the transited field of the ticket to
be issued. This is accomplished by reading the transited field from the
ticket-granting ticket (which is treated as an unordered set of realm
names), adding the new realm to the set, then constructing and writing out
its encoded (shorthand) form (this may involve a rearrangement of the
existing encoding).
Note that the ticket-granting service does not add the name of its own
realm. Instead, its responsibility is to add the name of the previous realm.
This prevents a malicious Kerberos server from intentionally leaving out its
own name (it could, however, omit other realms' names).
The names of neither the local realm nor the principal's realm are to be
included in the transited field. They appear elsewhere in the ticket and
both are known to have taken part in authenticating the principal. Since the
endpoints are not included, both local and single-hop inter-realm
authentication result in a transited field that is empty.
Because the name of each realm transited is added to this field, it might
potentially be very long. To decrease the length of this field, its contents
are encoded. The initially supported encoding is optimized for the normal
case of inter-realm communication: a hierarchical arrangement of realms
using either domain or X.500 style realm names. This encoding (called
DOMAIN-X500-COMPRESS) is now described.
Realm names in the transited field are separated by a ",". The ",", "\",
trailing "."s, and leading spaces (" ") are special characters, and if they
are part of a realm name, they must be quoted in the transited field by
preceding them with a "\".
A realm name ending with a "." is interpreted as being prepended to the
previous realm. For example, we can encode traversal of EDU, MIT.EDU,
ATHENA.MIT.EDU, WASHINGTON.EDU, and CS.WASHINGTON.EDU as:
"EDU,MIT.,ATHENA.,WASHINGTON.EDU,CS.".
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Note that if ATHENA.MIT.EDU, or CS.WASHINGTON.EDU were end-points, that they
would not be included in this field, and we would have:
"EDU,MIT.,WASHINGTON.EDU"
A realm name beginning with a "/" is interpreted as being appended to the
previous realm[18]. If it is to stand by itself, then it should be preceded
by a space (" "). For example, we can encode traversal of /COM/HP/APOLLO,
/COM/HP, /COM, and /COM/DEC as:
"/COM,/HP,/APOLLO, /COM/DEC".
Like the example above, if /COM/HP/APOLLO and /COM/DEC are endpoints, they
they would not be included in this field, and we would have:
"/COM,/HP"
A null subfield preceding or following a "," indicates that all realms
between the previous realm and the next realm have been traversed[19]. Thus,
"," means that all realms along the path between the client and the server
have been traversed. ",EDU, /COM," means that that all realms from the
client's realm up to EDU (in a domain style hierarchy) have been traversed,
and that everything from /COM down to the server's realm in an X.500 style
has also been traversed. This could occur if the EDU realm in one hierarchy
shares an inter-realm key directly with the /COM realm in another hierarchy.
3.3.4. Receipt of KRB_TGS_REP message
When the KRB_TGS_REP is received by the client, it is processed in the same
manner as the KRB_AS_REP processing described above. The primary difference
is that the ciphertext part of the response must be decrypted using the
session key from the ticket-granting ticket rather than the client's secret
key. The server name returned in the reply is the true principal name of the
service.
3.4. The KRB_SAFE Exchange
The KRB_SAFE message may be used by clients requiring the ability to detect
modifications of messages they exchange. It achieves this by including a
keyed collision-proof checksum of the user data and some control
information. The checksum is keyed with an encryption key (usually the last
key negotiated via subkeys, or the session key if no negotiation has
occurred).
3.4.1. Generation of a KRB_SAFE message
When an application wishes to send a KRB_SAFE message, it collects its data
and the appropriate control information and computes a checksum over them.
The checksum algorithm should be the keyed checksum mandated to be
implemented along with the crypto system used for the sub-session or session
key. The checksum is generated using the sub-session key if present, or the
session key. Some implementations use a different checksum algorithm for
KRB_SAFE messages but doing so in a interoperable manner is impossible.
Implementations should accept any checksum algorithm they implement that
both has adequate security and that has keys compatible with the sub-session
or session key. Unkeyed or non-collision-proof checksums are not suitable
for this use.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
The control information for the KRB_SAFE message includes both a timestamp
and a sequence number. The designer of an application using the KRB_SAFE
message must choose at least one of the two mechanisms. This choice should
be based on the needs of the application protocol.
Sequence numbers are useful when all messages sent will be received by one's
peer. Connection state is presently required to maintain the session key, so
maintaining the next sequence number should not present an additional
problem.
If the application protocol is expected to tolerate lost messages without
them being resent, the use of the timestamp is the appropriate replay
detection mechanism. Using timestamps is also the appropriate mechanism for
multi-cast protocols where all of one's peers share a common sub-session
key, but some messages will be sent to a subset of one's peers.
After computing the checksum, the client then transmits the information and
checksum to the recipient in the message format specified in section 5.6.1.
3.4.2. Receipt of KRB_SAFE message
When an application receives a KRB_SAFE message, it verifies it as follows.
If any error occurs, an error code is reported for use by the application.
The message is first checked by verifying that the protocol version and type
fields match the current version and KRB_SAFE, respectively. A mismatch
generates a KRB_AP_ERR_BADVERSION or KRB_AP_ERR_MSG_TYPE error. The
application verifies that the checksum used is a collision-proof keyed
checksum that uses keys compatible with the sub-session or session key as
appropriate, and if it is not, a KRB_AP_ERR_INAPP_CKSUM error is generated.
If the sender's address was included in the control information, the
recipient verifies that the operating system's report of the sender's
address matches the sender's address in the message, and (if a recipient
address is specified or the recipient requires an address) that one of the
recipient's addresses appears as the recipient's address in the message. A
failed match for either case generates a KRB_AP_ERR_BADADDR error. Then the
timestamp and usec and/or the sequence number fields are checked. If
timestamp and usec are expected and not present, or they are present but not
current, the KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW error is generated. If the server name, along
with the client name, time and microsecond fields from the Authenticator
match any recently-seen (sent or received[20] ) such tuples, the
KRB_AP_ERR_REPEAT error is generated. If an incorrect sequence number is
included, or a sequence number is expected but not present, the
KRB_AP_ERR_BADORDER error is generated. If neither a time-stamp and usec or
a sequence number is present, a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error is generated.
Finally, the checksum is computed over the data and control information, and
if it doesn't match the received checksum, a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error is
generated.
If all the checks succeed, the application is assured that the message was
generated by its peer and was not modified in transit.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3.5. The KRB_PRIV Exchange
The KRB_PRIV message may be used by clients requiring confidentiality and
the ability to detect modifications of exchanged messages. It achieves this
by encrypting the messages and adding control information.
3.5.1. Generation of a KRB_PRIV message
When an application wishes to send a KRB_PRIV message, it collects its data
and the appropriate control information (specified in section 5.7.1) and
encrypts them under an encryption key (usually the last key negotiated via
subkeys, or the session key if no negotiation has occurred). As part of the
control information, the client must choose to use either a timestamp or a
sequence number (or both); see the discussion in section 3.4.1 for
guidelines on which to use. After the user data and control information are
encrypted, the client transmits the ciphertext and some 'envelope'
information to the recipient.
3.5.2. Receipt of KRB_PRIV message
When an application receives a KRB_PRIV message, it verifies it as follows.
If any error occurs, an error code is reported for use by the application.
The message is first checked by verifying that the protocol version and type
fields match the current version and KRB_PRIV, respectively. A mismatch
generates a KRB_AP_ERR_BADVERSION or KRB_AP_ERR_MSG_TYPE error. The
application then decrypts the ciphertext and processes the resultant
plaintext. If decryption shows the data to have been modified, a
KRB_AP_ERR_BAD_INTEGRITY error is generated. If the sender's address was
included in the control information, the recipient verifies that the
operating system's report of the sender's address matches the sender's
address in the message, and (if a recipient address is specified or the
recipient requires an address) that one of the recipient's addresses appears
as the recipient's address in the message. A failed match for either case
generates a KRB_AP_ERR_BADADDR error. Then the timestamp and usec and/or the
sequence number fields are checked. If timestamp and usec are expected and
not present, or they are present but not current, the KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW error
is generated. If the server name, along with the client name, time and
microsecond fields from the Authenticator match any recently-seen such
tuples, the KRB_AP_ERR_REPEAT error is generated. If an incorrect sequence
number is included, or a sequence number is expected but not present, the
KRB_AP_ERR_BADORDER error is generated. If neither a time-stamp and usec or
a sequence number is present, a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error is generated.
If all the checks succeed, the application can assume the message was
generated by its peer, and was securely transmitted (without intruders able
to see the unencrypted contents).
3.6. The KRB_CRED Exchange
The KRB_CRED message may be used by clients requiring the ability to send
Kerberos credentials from one host to another. It achieves this by sending
the tickets together with encrypted data containing the session keys and
other information associated with the tickets.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
3.6.1. Generation of a KRB_CRED message
When an application wishes to send a KRB_CRED message it first (using the
KRB_TGS exchange) obtains credentials to be sent to the remote host. It then
constructs a KRB_CRED message using the ticket or tickets so obtained,
placing the session key needed to use each ticket in the key field of the
corresponding KrbCredInfo sequence of the encrypted part of the the KRB_CRED
message.
Other information associated with each ticket and obtained during the
KRB_TGS exchange is also placed in the corresponding KrbCredInfo sequence in
the encrypted part of the KRB_CRED message. The current time and, if
specifically required by the application the nonce, s-address, and r-address
fields, are placed in the encrypted part of the KRB_CRED message which is
then encrypted under an encryption key previously exchanged in the KRB_AP
exchange (usually the last key negotiated via subkeys, or the session key if
no negotiation has occurred).
Implementation note: [ Regarding unencrypted KRB_CRED messages go here. We
need to make sure we understand what MIT does and reconcile with Microsoft.]
3.6.2. Receipt of KRB_CRED message
When an application receives a KRB_CRED message, it verifies it. If any
error occurs, an error code is reported for use by the application. The
message is verified by checking that the protocol version and type fields
match the current version and KRB_CRED, respectively. A mismatch generates a
KRB_AP_ERR_BADVERSION or KRB_AP_ERR_MSG_TYPE error. The application then
decrypts the ciphertext and processes the resultant plaintext. If decryption
shows the data to have been modified, a KRB_AP_ERR_BAD_INTEGRITY error is
generated.
If present or required, the recipient verifies that the operating system's
report of the sender's address matches the sender's address in the message,
and that one of the recipient's addresses appears as the recipient's address
in the message. A failed match for either case generates a
KRB_AP_ERR_BADADDR error. The timestamp and usec fields (and the nonce field
if required) are checked next. If the timestamp and usec are not present, or
they are present but not current, the KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW error is generated.
If all the checks succeed, the application stores each of the new tickets in
its ticket cache together with the session key and other information in the
corresponding KrbCredInfo sequence from the encrypted part of the KRB_CRED
message.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
4. SECTION HAS BEEN DELETED
5. Message Specifications
NOTE: This section is awaiting update. It is the old text from the Salt Lake
version. It has not been updated and made uniform with the single ASN.1
Module in Appenix A. Appendix A should be considered the authoritative
component of the current state of the draft until this section is update.
NOTE: We are continuing to work on changes to message format extensibility
as discussed at the London meeting. We believe the general form discussed in
London will continue to be a useful strategy for pursuing this goal. We
expect to have additional information by the Salt Lake City meeting. TODO:
TypedData needs to be looked at carefully, particularly with regard to
TD-APP-DEFINED-ERROR, etc. Some significant changes from 1510 to here have
been written up; more proofreading is needed. - tlyu
The Kerberos protocol is defined here in terms of Abstract Syntax Notation
One (ASN.1), which provides a syntax for specifying both the abstract layout
of protocol messages as well as their encodings. Implementors not utilizing
an existing ASN.1 compiler or support library are cautioned to thoroughly
understand the actual ASN.1 specification to ensure correct implementation
behavior, as there is more complexity in the notation than is immediately
obvious, and some tutorials and guides to ASN.1 are misleading or erroneous.
Note that in several places, there have been changes here from RFC 1510 that
change the abstract types. This is in part to address widespread assumptions
that various implementations have made, in some cases unintentionally
violating the ASN.1 standard in various ways. These will be clearly flagged
when they occur. The changes to the abstract types can cause incompatible
encodings to be emitted when certain encoding rules, e.g. the Packed
Encoding Rules (PER) are used. This should not be relevant for Kerberos,
since Kerberos explicitly specifies the use of the Distinguished Encoding
Rules (DER). This might be an issue for protocols wishing to use Kerberos
types with other encoding rules. (This practice is not recommended.) With
very few exceptions (most notably the usages of BIT STRING), the encodings
emitted by the DER, which are the only encodings permitted by this document
and by RFC 1510, remain identical.
The type definitions in this section assume an ASN.1 module definition of
the following form:
Kerberos5 {
iso (1), org(3), dod(6), internet(1), security(5), kerberosV5(2)
} DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
-- rest of definitions here
END
This specifies an explicit non-automatic tagging for the ASN.1 type
definitions.
Note that in some other publications [RFC1510] [RFC1964], the "dod" portion
of the object identifier is erroneously specified as having the value "5".
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Note that elsewhere in this document, nomenclature for various message types
is inconsistent, but seems to largely follow C language conventions,
including use of underscore (_) characters and all-caps spelling of names
intended to be numeric constants. Also, in some places, identifiers
(especially ones refering to constants) are written in all-caps in order to
distinguish them from surrounding explanatory text.
The ASN.1 notation does not permit underscores in identifiers, so in actual
ASN.1 definitions, underscores are replaced with hyphens (-). Additionally,
structure member names and defined values in ASN.1 must begin with a
lowercase letter, while type names must begin with an uppercase letter.
5.1. Specific Compatibility Notes on ASN.1
For compatibility purposes, implementors should heed the following specific
notes regarding the use of ASN.1 in Kerberos. These notes do not describe a
non-standard usage of ASN.1, but rather some historical quirks and
non-compliance of various implementations, as well as historical
ambiguities, which, while being valid ASN.1, can lead to confusion during
implementation.
5.1.1. ASN.1 Distinguished Encoding Rules
The encoding of Kerberos protocol messages shall obey the Distinguished
Encoding Rules (DER) of ASN.1 as described in X.690 (1997). Some
implementations (believed to be primarly ones derived from DCE 1.1 and
earlier) are known to use the more general Basic Encoding Rules (BER); in
particular, these implementations send indefinite encodings of lengths.
Implementations may accept such encodings in the interests of backwards
compatibility, though implementors are warned that decoding fully-general
BER is fraught with peril.
5.1.2. Optional Fields in ASN.1 Sequences
Some implementations behave as if certain default values are equivalent to
omission of an optional value. Implementations should handle this case
gracefully. For example, the seq-number field in an Authenticator is
optional, but some implementations use an internal value of zero to indicate
that the field is to be omitted upon encoding. [While it is possible to use
the DEFAULT qualifier for the ASN.1 notation of a SEQUENCE member in order
to mandate this behavior, the result would be that the member would be
mandatory to omit if the value intended is that specified by the DEFAULT
keyword. This limits the possible semantics of the protocol.]
5.1.3. Zero-length SEQUENCE Types
There are places in the protocol where a message contains a SEQUENCE OF type
as an optional member, or a SEQUENCE type where all members are optional.
This can result in an encoding that contains an zero-length SEQUENCE or
SEQUENCE OF encoding. In general, implementations should not send
zero-length SEQUENCE OF or SEQUENCE encodings that are marked OPTIONAL, but
should accept them. [XXX there may be cases where an empty SEQUENCE type has
useful semantics, though]
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.1.4. Unrecognized Tag Numbers
Future revisions to this protocol may include new message types with
different APPLICATION class tag numbers. Such revisions should protect older
implementations by only sending the message types to parties that are known
to understand them, e.g. by means of a flag bit set by the receiver in a
preceding request. In the interest of robust error handling, implementations
should gracefully handle receiving a message with an unrecognized tag
anyway, and return an error message if appropriate.
5.1.5. Tag Numbers Greater Than 30
A naive implementation of a DER ASN.1 decoder may experience problems with
ASN.1 tag numbers greater than 30, due such tag numbers being encoded using
more than one byte. Future revisions of this protocol may utilize tag
numbers greater than 30, and implementations should be prepared to
gracefully return an error, if appropriate, if they do not recognize the
tag.
5.2. Basic Kerberos Types
This section defines a number of basic types that are potentially used in
multiple Kerberos protocol messages.
5.2.1. KerberosString
[XXX The following paragraphs may need some editing, or maybe they want to
live in a footnote]
The original specification of the Kerberos protocol in RFC 1510 uses
GeneralString in numerous places for human-readable string data. Historical
implementations of Kerberos cannot utilize the full power of GeneralString.
This ASN.1 type requires the use of designation and invocation escape
sequences as specified in ISO 2022 to switch character sets, and the default
character set that is designated for G0 is basically US ASCII, which mostly
works. In practice, many implementations end up treating GeneralStrings as
if they were strings of whatever character set the implementation defaults
to, without regard for correct usage of character set designation escape
sequences.
Also, DER prohibits the invocation of character sets into any but the G0 and
C0 sets, which seems to outright prohibit the encoding of characters with
the high bit set. Unfortunately, this seems to have the side effect of
prohibiting the transmission of Latin-1 characters or any other characters
that belong to a 96-character set, since it is prohibited to invoke them
into G0. Some inconclusive discussion has taken place within the ASN.1
community on this subject. For now, we must assume that the ASN.1
specification of GeneralString as currently published is fundamentally
flawed in several ways.
One method of resolving these myriad difficulties is to constrain the use of
GeneralString to only include IA5String, which is essentially the US-ASCII.
US-ASCII control characters should in general not be used in KerberosString,
except for cases such as newlines in lengthy error messages.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
The new (since RFC 1510) type KerberosString, defined below, is a CHOICE
containing a GeneralString that is constrained to only contain characters in
IA5String (which are US-ASCII). Note that the ASN.1 standard does not permit
the use of escape sequences to change the character sets while encoding an
IA5String.
KerberosString ::= CHOICE {
general GeneralString (IA5String),
...
}
This CHOICE is extensible, so that when an interoperable solution for
internationalization is chosen, it will be easier to specify the changed
types. In the future, changes to this protocol that allow for extensions to
this CHOICE will be specified so that the transmitting party has some way of
knowing whether the receiving party can accept the chosen alternative of the
CHOICE.
Implementations may choose to accept GeneralString values that contain
characters other than those permitted by IA5String, but they should be aware
that character set designation codes will likely be absent, and that the
encoding should probably be treated as locale-specific in almost every way.
Implementations may also choose to emit GeneralString values that are beyond
those permitted by IA5String, but should be aware that doing so is
extraordinarily risky from an interoperability perspective.
Some existing implementations use GeneralString to encode unescaped
locale-specific characters. This is in violation of the ASN.1 standard. Most
of these implementations encode US-ASCII in the left-hand half, so as long
the implementation transmits only US-ASCII, the ASN.1 standard is not
violated in this regard. As soon as such an implementation encodes unescaped
locale-specific characters with the high bit set, it violates the ASN.1
standard.
Other implementations have been known to use GeneralString to contain a
UTF-8 encoding. This also violates the ASN.1 standard, since UTF-8 is a
different encoding, not a 94 or 96 character "G" set as defined by ISO 2022.
It is believed that these implementations do not even use the ISO 2022
escape sequence to change the character encoding. Even if implementations
were to announce the change of encoding by using that escape sequence, the
ASN.1 standard prohibits the use of any escape sequences other than those
used to designate/invoke "G" or "C" sets allowed by GeneralString.
Future revisions to this protocol will almost certainly allow for a more
interoperable representation of principal names, probably including
UTF8String.
Note that both applying a new constraint to a previously unconstrained type
and replacing a type with a CHOICE containing that type constitute creations
of new ASN.1 types. In the case here, the change here does not result in a
changed encoding under DER. Also, note that various text in the ASN.1
standard actually suggests the strategy of replacing a type with a CHOICE
containing that type for certain deprecated types, even though this creates
a new type.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.2.2. Realm and PrincipalName
Realm ::= KerberosString
PrincipalName ::= SEQUENCE {
name-type[0] Int32,
name-string[1] SEQUENCE OF KerberosString
}
Kerberos realm names are encoded as KerberosStrings. Realms shall not
contain a character with the code 0 (the ASCII NUL). Most realms will
usually consist of several components separated by periods (.), in the style
of Internet Domain Names, or separated by slashes (/) in the style of X.500
names. Acceptable forms for realm names are specified in section 7. A
PrincipalName is a typed sequence of components consisting of the following
sub-fields:
name-type
This field specifies the type of name that follows. Pre-defined values
for this field are specified in section 7.2. The name-type should be
treated as a hint. Ignoring the name type, no two names can be the same
(i.e. at least one of the components, or the realm, must be different).
This constraint may be eliminated in the future.
name-string
This field encodes a sequence of components that form a name, each
component encoded as a KerberosString. Taken together, a PrincipalName
and a Realm form a principal identifier. Most PrincipalNames will have
only a few components (typically one or two).
5.2.3. KerberosTime
KerberosTime ::= GeneralizedTime
-- with no fractional seconds
The timestamps used in Kerberos are encoded as GeneralizedTimes. A
KerberosTime value shall not include any fractional portions of the seconds.
As required by the DER, it further shall not include any separators, and it
shall specify the UTC time zone (Z). Example: The only valid format for UTC
time 6 minutes, 27 seconds after 9 pm on 6 November 1985 is 19851106210627Z.
5.2.4. Constrained Integer types
Some integer members of types should be constrained to values representable
in 32 bits, for compatibility with reasonable implementation limits.
Int32 ::= INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)
-- signed values representable in 32 bits
UInt32 :: = INTEGER (0..4294967295)
-- unsigned 32 bit values
Microseconds ::= INTEGER (0..99999)
-- microseconds
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
While this results in changes to the abstract types from the RFC 1510
version, the encoding in DER should be unaltered. Historical implementations
were typically limited to 32-bit integer values anyway, and assigned numbers
should fall in the space of integer values representable in 32 bits in order
to promote interoperability anyway.
There are some members of messages types that are still defined as
unconstrained INTEGER types, but many of these have a (non-ASN.1) constraint
applied in the descriptive text. There are specific cases where more
discussion needs to occur regarding possible constraints, such as for the
nonce fields in various messages.
5.2.5. HostAddress and HostAddresses
HostAddress ::= SEQUENCE {
addr-type[0] Int32,
address[1] OCTET STRING
}
HostAddresses ::= SEQUENCE OF HostAddress
The host address encodings consists of two fields:
addr-type
This field specifies the type of address that follows. Pre-defined
values for this field are specified in section 8.1.
address
This field encodes a single address of type addr-type.
The two forms differ slightly. HostAddress contains exactly one address;
HostAddresses contains a sequence of possibly many addresses.
5.2.6. AuthorizationData
AuthorizationData ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
ad-type[0] Int32,
ad-data[1] OCTET STRING
}
ad-data
This field contains authorization data to be interpreted according to
the value of the corresponding ad-type field.
ad-type
This field specifies the format for the ad-data subfield. All negative
values are reserved for local use. Non-negative values are reserved for
registered use.
Each sequence of type and data is referred to as an authorization element.
Elements may be application specific, however, there is a common set of
recursive elements that should be understood by all implementations. These
elements contain other elements embedded within them, and the interpretation
of the encapsulating element determines which of the embedded elements must
be interpreted, and which may be ignored. Definitions for these common
elements may be found in Appendix B.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.2.7. PA-DATA
Historically, PA-DATA have been known as "pre-authentication data", meaning
that they were used to augment the initial authentication with the KDC.
Since that time, they have also been used as a typed hole with which to
extend protocol exchanges with the KDC.
PA-DATA ::= SEQUENCE {
padata-type[1] Int32,
padata-value[2] OCTET STRING
-- might be encoded AP-REQ
}
padata-type
indicates the way that the padata-value element is to be interpreted.
Negative values of padata-type are reserved for unregistered use;
non-negative values are used for a registered interpretation of the
element type.
padata-value
Usually contains the DER encoding of another type; the padata-type
field identifies which type is encoded here.
padata-type name contents of padata-value
1 pa-tgs-req DER encoding of AP-REQ
2 pa-enc-timestamp DER encoding of PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP
3 pa-pw-salt salt (not ASN.1 encoded)
10 pa-etype-info DER encoding of PA-ETYPE-INFO
20 pa-use-specified-kvno DER encoding of INTEGER
[XXX -- the following paragraph needs discussion, as does the general
concept of authenticating the cleartext pieces of the protocol]
This field may also contain information needed by certain extensions to the
Kerberos protocol. For example, it might be used to initially verify the
identity of a client before any response is returned. When this field is
used to authenticate or pre-authenticate a request, it should contain a
keyed checksum over the KDC-REQ-BODY to bind the pre-authentication data to
rest of the request. The KDC, as a matter of policy, may decide whether to
honor a KDC-REQ which includes any pre-authentication data that does not
contain the checksum field.
It may also be used by the client to specify the version of a key that is
being used for accompanying preauthentication, and/or which should be used
to encrypt the reply from the KDC. [XXX the following paragraph should apply
perhaps to PA-DATA in general]
The padata field can also contain information needed to help the KDC or the
client select the key needed for generating or decrypting the response. This
form of the padata is useful for supporting the use of certain token cards
with Kerberos. The details of such extensions are specified in separate
documents. See [Pat92] for additional uses of this field.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.2.7.1. PA-TGS-REQ
In the case of requests for additional tickets (KRB_TGS_REQ), padata-value
will contain an encoded AP-REQ. The checksum in the authenticator (which
must be collision-proof) is to be computed over the KDC-REQ-BODY encoding.
5.2.7.2. Encrypted Timestamp Pre-authentication
There are pre-authentication types that may be used to pre-authenticate a
client by means of an encrypted timestamp. The original PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP
does not contain a checksum of the KDC-REQ-BODY, while the PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP2
does.
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP ::= EncryptedData -- encrypted PA-ENC-TS-ENC
PA-ENC-TS-ENC ::= SEQUENCE {
patimestamp[0] KerberosTime, -- client's time
pausec[1] Microseconds OPTIONAL
}
-- XXX maybe remove ENC-TIMESTAMP2 for now?
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP2 ::= EncryptedData -- encrypted PA-ENC-TS2-ENC
PA-ENC-TS2-ENC ::= SEQUENCE {
patimestamp[0] KerberosTime, -- client's time
pausec[1] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
pachecksum[2] Checksum OPTIONAL
-- keyed checksum of KDC-REQ-BODY
}
Patimestamp contains the client's time, and pausec contains the
microseconds, which may be omitted if a client will not generate more than
one request per second. The ciphertext (padata-value) consists of the
PA-ENC-TS-ENC or PA-ENC-TS2-ENC encoding, encrypted using the client's
secret key.
This preauthentication type was not present in RFC 1510, but many
implementations support it.
5.2.7.3. PA-PW-SALT
The padata-value for this preauthentication type contains the salt for the
string-to-key to be used by the client to obtain the key for decrypting the
encrypted part of an AS-REP message. Unfortunately, for historical reasons,
the character set to be used is unspecified and probably locale-specific.
This preauthentication type was not present in RFC 1510, but many
implementations support it. It is necessary in any case where the salt for
the string-to-key algorithm is not the default.
In the trivial example, a zero-length salt string is very commonplace for
realms that have converted their principal databases from Kerberos 4.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.2.7.4. PA-ETYPE-INFO
The ETYPE-INFO preauthentication type is sent by the KDC in a KRB-ERROR
indicating a requirement for additional preauthentication. It is usually
used to notify a client of which key to use for the encryption of an
encrypted timestamp for the purposes of sending a PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP
preauthentication value.
ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY ::= SEQUENCE {
etype[0] INTEGER,
salt[1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
}
ETYPE-INFO ::= SEQUENCE OF ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY
The salt, like that of PA-PW-SALT, is also completely unspecified with
respect to character set and is probably locale-specific.
[XXX -- not clear whether ETYPE-INFO or PW-SALT should take precedence if
they conflict]
This preauthentication type was not present in RFC 1510, but many
implementations that support encrypted timestamps for preauthentication need
to support ETYPE-INFO as well.
5.2.7.5. PA-USE-SPECIFIED-KVNO
The KDC should only accept and abide by the value of the use-specified-kvno
preauthentication data field when the specified key is still valid and until
use of a new key is confirmed. This situation is likely to occur primarily
during the period during which an updated key is propagating to other KDC's
in a realm.
5.2.8. KerberosFlags
For several message types, a specific constrained bit string type,
KerberosFlags, is used.
KerberosFlags ::= BIT STRING (SIZE (32..MAX))
Compatibility note: the following paragraphs describe a change from the
RFC1510 description of bit strings that would result in incompatility in the
case of an implementation that strictly conformed to ASN.1 DER and RFC1510.
ASN.1 bit strings have multiple uses. The simplest use of a bit string is to
contain a vector of bits, with no particular meaning attached to individual
bits. This vector of bits is not necessarily a multiple of eight bits long.
The use in Kerberos of a bit string as a compact boolean vector wherein each
element has a distinct meaning poses some problems. The natural notation for
a compact boolean vector is the ASN.1 "NamedBit" notation, and the DER
require that encodings of a bit string using "NamedBit" notation exclude any
trailing zero bits. This truncation is easy to neglect, especially given C
language implementations that may naturally choose to store boolean vectors
as 32 bit integers.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
For example, if the notation for KDCOptions were to include the "NamedBit"
notation, as in RFC 1510, and a KDCOptions value to be encoded had only the
"forwardable" (bit number one) bit set, the DER encoding must only include
two bits: the first reserved bit ("reserved", bit number zero, value zero)
and the one-valued bit (bit number one) for "forwardable".
Most existing implementations of Kerberos unconditionally send 32 bits on
the wire when encoding bit strings used as boolean vectors. This behavior
violates the ASN.1 syntax used for flag values in RFC 1510, but occurs on
such a widely installed base that the protocol description is being modified
to accomodate it.
Consequently, this document removes the "NamedBit" notations for individual
bits, relegating them to comments. The size constraint on the KerberosFlags
type requires that at least 32 bits be encoded at all times, though a
lenient implementation may choose to accept fewer than 32 bits and to treat
the missing bits as set to zero.
Currently, no uses of KerberosFlags specify more than 32 bits worth of
flags, although future revisions of this document may do so. When more than
32 bits are to be transmitted in a KerberosFlags value, future revisions to
this document will likely specify that the smallest number of bits needed to
encode the highest-numbered one-valued bit should be sent. This is somewhat
similar to the DER encoding of a bit string that is declared with the
"NamedBit" notation.
5.2.9. Cryptosystem-related Types
Many Kerberos protocol messages contain an EncryptedData as a container for
arbitrary encrypted data, which is often the encrypted encoding of another
data type. Fields within EncryptedData assist the recipient in selecting a
key with which to decrypt the enclosed data.
EncryptedData ::= SEQUENCE {
etype[0] Int32, -- EncryptionType
kvno[1] INTEGER OPTIONAL,
cipher[2] OCTET STRING -- ciphertext
}
etype
This field identifies which encryption algorithm was used to encipher
the cipher. Detailed specifications for selected encryption types
appear in section 6.
kvno
This field contains the version number of the key under which data is
encrypted. It is only present in messages encrypted under long lasting
keys, such as principals' secret keys.
cipher
This field contains the enciphered text, encoded as an OCTET STRING.
The EncryptionKey type is the means by which cryptographic keys used for
encryption are transfered.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
EncryptionKey ::= SEQUENCE {
keytype[0] Int32, -- actually encryption type
keyvalue[1] OCTET STRING
}
keytype
This field specifies the encryption type of the encryption key that
follows in the keyvalue field. While its name is "keytype", it actually
specifies an encryption type. Previously, multiple cryptosystems that
performed encryption differently but were capable of using keys with
the same characteristics were permitted to share an assigned number to
designate the type of key; this usage is now deprecated.
keyvalue
This field contains the key itself, encoded as an octet string.
All negative values for the encryption key type are reserved for local
use. All non-negative values are reserved for officially assigned type
fields and interpretations.
Messages containing cleartext data to be authenticated will usually do so by
using a member of type Checksum. Most instances of Checksum use a keyed
hash, though exceptions will be noted.
Checksum ::= SEQUENCE {
cksumtype[0] Int32,
checksum[1] OCTET STRING
}
cksumtype
This field indicates the algorithm used to generate the accompanying
checksum.
checksum
This field contains the checksum itself, encoded as an octet string.
Detailed specification of selected checksum types appear in section 6.
Negative values for the checksum type are reserved for local use. All
non-negative values are reserved for officially assigned type fields
and interpretations.
5.3. Tickets and Authenticators
This section describes the format and encryption parameters for tickets and
authenticators. When a ticket or authenticator is included in a protocol
message it is treated as an opaque object.
5.3.1. Tickets
A ticket is a record that helps a client authenticate to a service. A Ticket
contains the following information:
Ticket ::= [APPLICATION 1] SEQUENCE {
tkt-vno[0] INTEGER,
realm[1] Realm,
sname[2] PrincipalName,
enc-part[3] EncryptedData --EncTicketPart
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
-- Encrypted part of ticket
EncTicketPart ::= [APPLICATION 3] SEQUENCE {
flags[0] TicketFlags,
key[1] EncryptionKey,
crealm[2] Realm,
cname[3] PrincipalName,
transited[4] TransitedEncoding,
authtime[5] KerberosTime,
starttime[6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
endtime[7] KerberosTime,
renew-till[8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
caddr[9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
authorization-data[10] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL
}
-- encoded Transited field
TransitedEncoding ::= SEQUENCE {
tr-type[0] Int32, -- must be registered
contents[1] OCTET STRING
}
TicketFlags ::= KerberosFlags
-- reserved(0),
-- forwardable(1),
-- forwarded(2),
-- proxiable(3),
-- proxy(4),
-- may-postdate(5),
-- postdated(6),
-- invalid(7),
-- renewable(8),
-- initial(9),
-- pre-authent(10),
-- hw-authent(11),
-- transited-policy-checked(12),
-- ok-as-delegate(13)
-- anonymous(14)
The encoding of EncTicketPart is encrypted in the key shared by Kerberos and
the end server (the server's secret key). See section 6 for the format of
the ciphertext.
tkt-vno
This field specifies the version number for the ticket format. This
document describes version number 5.
realm
This field specifies the realm that issued a ticket. It also serves to
identify the realm part of the server's principal identifier. Since a
Kerberos server can only issue tickets for servers within its realm,
the two will always be identical.
sname
This field specifies all components of the name part of the server's
identity, including those parts that identify a specific instance of a
service.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
enc-part
This field holds the encrypted encoding of the EncTicketPart sequence.
flags
This field indicates which of various options were used or requested
when the ticket was issued. It is a bit-field, where the selected
options are indicated by the bit being set (1), and the unselected
options and reserved fields being reset (0). [XXX X.690 ref and notes
on pitfalls?] The meanings of the flags are:
Bit(s) Name Description
0 reserved Reserved for future expansion of this
field.
The FORWARDABLE flag is normally only
interpreted by the TGS, and can be
ignored by end servers. When set, this
1 forwardable flag tells the ticket-granting server
that it is OK to issue a new
ticket-granting ticket with a
different network address based on the
presented ticket.
When set, this flag indicates that the
ticket has either been forwarded or
2 forwarded was issued based on authentication
involving a forwarded ticket-granting
ticket.
The PROXIABLE flag is normally only
interpreted by the TGS, and can be
ignored by end servers. The PROXIABLE
flag has an interpretation identical
3 proxiable to that of the FORWARDABLE flag,
except that the PROXIABLE flag tells
the ticket-granting server that only
non-ticket-granting tickets may be
issued with different network
addresses.
4 proxy When set, this flag indicates that a
ticket is a proxy.
The MAY-POSTDATE flag is normally only
interpreted by the TGS, and can be
5 may-postdate ignored by end servers. This flag
tells the ticket-granting server that
a post-dated ticket may be issued
based on this ticket-granting ticket.
This flag indicates that this ticket
has been postdated. The end-service
6 postdated can check the authtime field to see
when the original authentication
occurred.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
This flag indicates that a ticket is
invalid, and it must be validated by
7 invalid the KDC before use. Application
servers must reject tickets which have
this flag set.
The RENEWABLE flag is normally only
interpreted by the TGS, and can
usually be ignored by end servers
8 renewable (some particularly careful servers may
wish to disallow renewable tickets). A
renewable ticket can be used to obtain
a replacement ticket that expires at a
later date.
This flag indicates that this ticket
9 initial was issued using the AS protocol, and
not issued based on a ticket-granting
ticket.
This flag indicates that during
initial authentication, the client was
authenticated by the KDC before a
10 pre-authent ticket was issued. The strength of the
preauthentication method is not
indicated, but is acceptable to the
KDC.
This flag indicates that the protocol
employed for initial authentication
required the use of hardware expected
11 hw-authent to be possessed solely by the named
client. The hardware authentication
method is selected by the KDC and the
strength of the method is not
indicated.
This flag indicates that the KDC for
the realm has checked the transited
field against a realm defined policy
for trusted certifiers. If this flag
is reset (0), then the application
server must check the transited field
itself, and if unable to do so it must
reject the authentication. If the flag
12 transited- is set (1) then the application server
policy-checked
may skip its own validation of the
transited field, relying on the
validation performed by the KDC. At
its option the application server may
still apply its own validation based
on a separate policy for acceptance.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
This flag is new since RFC 1510.
This flag indicates that the server
(not the client) specified in the
ticket has been determined by policy
of the realm to be a suitable
recipient of delegation. A client can
use the presence of this flag to help
it make a decision whether to delegate
credentials (either grant a proxy or a
forwarded ticket granting ticket) to
13 ok-as-delegate this server. The client is free to
ignore the value of this flag. When
setting this flag, an administrator
should consider the Security and
placement of the server on which the
service will run, as well as whether
the service requires the use of
delegated credentials.
This flag is new since RFC 1510.
This flag indicates that the principal
named in the ticket is a generic
principal for the realm and does not
identify the individual using the
ticket. The purpose of the ticket is
only to securely distribute a session
key, and not to identify the user.
14 anonymous Subsequent requests using the same
ticket and session may be considered
as originating from the same user, but
requests with the same username but a
different ticket are likely to
originate from different users.
This flag is new since RFC 1510.
15-31 reserved Reserved for future use.
key
This field exists in the ticket and the KDC response and is used to
pass the session key from Kerberos to the application server and the
client. The field's encoding is described in section 6.2.
crealm
This field contains the name of the realm in which the client is
registered and in which initial authentication took place.
cname
This field contains the name part of the client's principal identifier.
transited
This field lists the names of the Kerberos realms that took part in
authenticating the user to whom this ticket was issued. It does not
specify the order in which the realms were transited. See section
3.3.3.2 for details on how this field encodes the traversed realms.
When the names of CA's are to be embedded in the transited field (as
specified for some extensions to the protocol), the X.500 names of the
CA's should be mapped into items in the transited field using the
mapping defined by RFC2253.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
authtime
This field indicates the time of initial authentication for the named
principal. It is the time of issue for the original ticket on which
this ticket is based. It is included in the ticket to provide
additional information to the end service, and to provide the necessary
information for implementation of a `hot list' service at the KDC. An
end service that is particularly paranoid could refuse to accept
tickets for which the initial authentication occurred "too far" in the
past. This field is also returned as part of the response from the KDC.
When returned as part of the response to initial authentication
(KRB_AS_REP), this is the current time on the Kerberos server[24].
starttime
This field in the ticket specifies the time after which the ticket is
valid. Together with endtime, this field specifies the life of the
ticket. If it is absent from the ticket, its value should be treated as
that of the authtime field.
endtime
This field contains the time after which the ticket will not be honored
(its expiration time). Note that individual services may place their
own limits on the life of a ticket and may reject tickets which have
not yet expired. As such, this is really an upper bound on the
expiration time for the ticket.
renew-till
This field is only present in tickets that have the RENEWABLE flag set
in the flags field. It indicates the maximum endtime that may be
included in a renewal. It can be thought of as the absolute expiration
time for the ticket, including all renewals.
caddr
This field in a ticket contains zero (if omitted) or more (if present)
host addresses. These are the addresses from which the ticket can be
used. If there are no addresses, the ticket can be used from any
location. The decision by the KDC to issue or by the end server to
accept zero-address tickets is a policy decision and is left to the
Kerberos and end-service administrators; they may refuse to issue or
accept such tickets. The suggested and default policy, however, is that
such tickets will only be issued or accepted when additional
information that can be used to restrict the use of the ticket is
included in the authorization_data field. Such a ticket is a
capability.
Network addresses are included in the ticket to make it harder for an
attacker to use stolen credentials. Because the session key is not sent
over the network in cleartext, credentials can't be stolen simply by
listening to the network; an attacker has to gain access to the session
key (perhaps through operating system security breaches or a careless
user's unattended session) to make use of stolen tickets.
It is important to note that the network address from which a
connection is received cannot be reliably determined. Even if it could
be, an attacker who has compromised the client's workstation could use
the credentials from there. Including the network addresses only makes
it more difficult, not impossible, for an attacker to walk off with
stolen credentials and then use them from a "safe" location.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
authorization-data
The authorization-data field is used to pass authorization data from
the principal on whose behalf a ticket was issued to the application
service. If no authorization data is included, this field will be left
out. Experience has shown that the name of this field is confusing, and
that a better name for this field would be restrictions. Unfortunately,
it is not possible to change the name of this field at this time.
This field contains restrictions on any authority obtained on the basis
of authentication using the ticket. It is possible for any principal in
posession of credentials to add entries to the authorization data field
since these entries further restrict what can be done with the ticket.
Such additions can be made by specifying the additional entries when a
new ticket is obtained during the TGS exchange, or they may be added
during chained delegation using the authorization data field of the
authenticator.
Because entries may be added to this field by the holder of
credentials, except when an entry is separately authenticated by
encapsulation in the kdc-issued element, it is not allowable for the
presence of an entry in the authorization data field of a ticket to
amplify the privileges one would obtain from using a ticket.
The data in this field may be specific to the end service; the field
will contain the names of service specific objects, and the rights to
those objects. The format for this field is described in section 5.2.
Although Kerberos is not concerned with the format of the contents of
the sub-fields, it does carry type information (ad-type).
By using the authorization_data field, a principal is able to issue a
proxy that is valid for a specific purpose. For example, a client
wishing to print a file can obtain a file server proxy to be passed to
the print server. By specifying the name of the file in the
authorization_data field, the file server knows that the print server
can only use the client's rights when accessing the particular file to
be printed.
A separate service providing authorization or certifying group
membership may be built using the authorization-data field. In this
case, the entity granting authorization (not the authorized entity),
may obtain a ticket in its own name (e.g. the ticket is issued in the
name of a privilege server), and this entity adds restrictions on its
own authority and delegates the restricted authority through a proxy to
the client. The client would then present this authorization credential
to the application server separately from the authentication exchange.
Alternatively, such authorization credentials may be embedded in the
ticket authenticating the authorized entity, when the authorization is
separately authenticated using the kdc-issued authorization data
element (see B.4).
Similarly, if one specifies the authorization-data field of a proxy and
leaves the host addresses blank, the resulting ticket and session key
can be treated as a capability. See [Neu93] for some suggested uses of
this field.
The authorization-data field is optional and does not have to be
included in a ticket.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.3.2. Authenticators
An authenticator is a record sent with a ticket to a server to certify the
client's knowledge of the encryption key in the ticket, to help the server
detect replays, and to help choose a "true session key" to use with the
particular session. The encoding is encrypted in the ticket's session key
shared by the client and the server:
-- Unencrypted authenticator
Authenticator ::= [APPLICATION 2] SEQUENCE {
authenticator-vno[0] INTEGER,
crealm[1] Realm,
cname[2] PrincipalName,
cksum[3] Checksum OPTIONAL,
cusec[4] Microseconds,
ctime[5] KerberosTime,
subkey[6] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
seq-number[7] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
authorization-data[8] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL
}
authenticator-vno
This field specifies the version number for the format of the
authenticator. This document specifies version 5.
crealm and cname
These fields are the same as those described for the ticket in section
5.3.1.
cksum
This field contains a checksum of the the application data that
accompanies the KRB_AP_REQ.
cusec
This field contains the microsecond part of the client's timestamp. Its
value (before encryption) ranges from 0 to 999999. It often appears
along with ctime. The two fields are used together to specify a
reasonably accurate timestamp.
ctime
This field contains the current time on the client's host.
subkey
This field contains the client's choice for an encryption key which is
to be used to protect this specific application session. Unless an
application specifies otherwise, if this field is left out the session
key from the ticket will be used.
seq-number
This optional field includes the initial sequence number to be used by
the KRB_PRIV or KRB_SAFE messages when sequence numbers are used to
detect replays (It may also be used by application specific messages).
When included in the authenticator this field specifies the initial
sequence number for messages from the client to the server. When
included in the AP-REP message, the initial sequence number is that for
messages from the server to the client. When used in KRB_PRIV or
KRB_SAFE messages, it is incremented by one after each message is sent.
Sequence numbers fall in the range of 0 through 2^32 - 1 and wrap to
zero following the value 2^32 - 1.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
For sequence numbers to adequately support the detection of replays
they should be non-repeating, even across connection boundaries. The
initial sequence number should be random and uniformly distributed
across the full space of possible sequence numbers, so that it cannot
be guessed by an attacker and so that it and the successive sequence
numbers do not repeat other sequences.
authorization-data
This field is the same as described for the ticket in section 5.3.1. It
is optional and will only appear when additional restrictions are to be
placed on the use of a ticket, beyond those carried in the ticket
itself.
5.4. Specifications for the AS and TGS exchanges
This section specifies the format of the messages used in the exchange
between the client and the Kerberos server. The format of possible error
messages appears in section 5.9.1.
5.4.1. KRB_KDC_REQ definition
The KRB_KDC_REQ message has no type of its own. Instead, its type is one of
KRB_AS_REQ or KRB_TGS_REQ depending on whether the request is for an initial
ticket or an additional ticket. In either case, the message is sent from the
client to the Authentication Server to request credentials for a service.
The message fields are:
AS-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 10] KDC-REQ
TGS-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 12] KDC-REQ
KDC-REQ ::= SEQUENCE {
pvno[1] INTEGER,
msg-type[2] INTEGER,
padata[3] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL,
req-body[4] KDC-REQ-BODY
}
KDC-REQ-BODY ::= SEQUENCE {
kdc-options[0] KDCOptions,
cname[1] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
-- Used only in AS-REQ
realm[2] Realm, -- Server's realm
-- Also client's in AS-REQ
sname[3] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
from[4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
till[5] KerberosTime,
rtime[6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
nonce[7] INTEGER,
etype[8] SEQUENCE OF Int32,
-- EncryptionType,
-- in preference order
addresses[9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
enc-authorization-data[10] EncryptedData OPTIONAL,
-- Encrypted AuthorizationData
-- encoding
additional-tickets[11] SEQUENCE OF Ticket OPTIONAL
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
KDCOptions ::= KerberosFlags
-- reserved(0),
-- forwardable(1),
-- forwarded(2),
-- proxiable(3),
-- proxy(4),
-- allow-postdate(5),
-- postdated(6),
-- unused7(7),
-- renewable(8),
-- unused9(9),
-- unused10(10),
-- unused11(11),
-- unused12(12),
-- unused13(13),
-- requestanonymous(14),
-- canonicalize(15),
-- disable-transited-check(26),
-- renewable-ok(27),
-- enc-tkt-in-skey(28),
-- renew(30),
-- validate(31)
The fields in this message are:
pvno
This field is included in each message, and specifies the protocol
version number. This document specifies protocol version 5.
msg-type
This field indicates the type of a protocol message. It will almost
always be the same as the application identifier associated with a
message. It is included to make the identifier more readily accessible
to the application. For the KDC-REQ message, this type will be
KRB_AS_REQ or KRB_TGS_REQ.
padata
Contains pre-authentication data. Requests for additional tickets
(KRB_TGS_REQ) must contain a padata of PA-TGS-REQ.
The padata (pre-authentication data) field contains a sequence of
authentication information which may be needed before credentials can
be issued or decrypted. In most requests for initial authentication
(KRB_AS_REQ) and most replies (KDC-REP), the padata field will be left
out.
req-body
This field is a placeholder delimiting the extent of the remaining
fields. If a checksum is to be calculated over the request, it is
calculated over an encoding of the KDC-REQ-BODY sequence which is
enclosed within the req-body field.
kdc-options
This field appears in the KRB_AS_REQ and KRB_TGS_REQ requests to the
KDC and indicates the flags that the client wants set on the tickets as
well as other information that is to modify the behavior of the KDC.
Where appropriate, the name of an option may be the same as the flag
that is set by that option. Although in most case, the bit in the
options field will be the same as that in the flags field, this is not
guaranteed, so it is not acceptable to simply copy the options field to
the flags field. There are various checks that must be made before
honoring an option anyway.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
The kdc_options field is a bit-field, where the selected options are
indicated by the bit being set (1), and the unselected options and
reserved fields being reset (0). The encoding of the bits is specified
in section 5.2. The options are described in more detail above in
section 2. The meanings of the options are:
Bits Name Description
0 RESERVED Reserved for future expansion of
this field.
The FORWARDABLE option indicates
that the ticket to be issued is to
have its forwardable flag set. It
1 FORWARDABLE may only be set on the initial
request, or in a subsequent request
if the ticket-granting ticket on
which it is based is also
forwardable.
The FORWARDED option is only
specified in a request to the
ticket-granting server and will only
be honored if the ticket-granting
ticket in the request has its
2 FORWARDED FORWARDABLE bit set. This option
indicates that this is a request for
forwarding. The address(es) of the
host from which the resulting ticket
is to be valid are included in the
addresses field of the request.
The PROXIABLE option indicates that
the ticket to be issued is to have
its proxiable flag set. It may only
3 PROXIABLE be set on the initial request, or in
a subsequent request if the
ticket-granting ticket on which it
is based is also proxiable.
The PROXY option indicates that this
is a request for a proxy. This
option will only be honored if the
ticket-granting ticket in the
4 PROXY request has its PROXIABLE bit set.
The address(es) of the host from
which the resulting ticket is to be
valid are included in the addresses
field of the request.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
The ALLOW-POSTDATE option indicates
that the ticket to be issued is to
have its MAY-POSTDATE flag set. It
5 ALLOW-POSTDATE may only be set on the initial
request, or in a subsequent request
if the ticket-granting ticket on
which it is based also has its
MAY-POSTDATE flag set.
The POSTDATED option indicates that
this is a request for a postdated
ticket. This option will only be
honored if the ticket-granting
ticket on which it is based has its
6 POSTDATED MAY-POSTDATE flag set. The resulting
ticket will also have its INVALID
flag set, and that flag may be reset
by a subsequent request to the KDC
after the starttime in the ticket
has been reached.
7 UNUSED This option is presently unused.
The RENEWABLE option indicates that
the ticket to be issued is to have
its RENEWABLE flag set. It may only
be set on the initial request, or
when the ticket-granting ticket on
8 RENEWABLE which the request is based is also
renewable. If this option is
requested, then the rtime field in
the request contains the desired
absolute expiration time for the
ticket.
9 RESERVED Reserved for PK-Cross
10-13 UNUSED These options are presently unused.
The REQUEST-ANONYMOUS option
indicates that the ticket to be
issued is not to identify the user
to which it was issued. Instead, the
principal identifier is to be
generic, as specified by the policy
of the realm (e.g. usually
anonymous@realm). The purpose of the
14 REQUEST-ANONYMOUS ticket is only to securely
distribute a session key, and not to
identify the user. The ANONYMOUS
flag on the ticket to be returned
should be set. If the local realms
policy does not permit anonymous
credentials, the request is to be
rejected.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
This flag is new since RFC 1510
The CANONICALIZE option indicates
that the client will accept the
return of a true server name instead
of the name specified in the
request. In addition the client will
be able to process any TGT referrals
that will direct the client to
another realm to locate the
15 CANONICALIZE requested server. If a KDC does not
support name- canonicalization, the
option is ignored and the
appropriate
KDC_ERR_C_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN or
KDC_ERR_S_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN error is
returned. [JBrezak]
This flag is new since RFC 1510
16-25 RESERVED Reserved for future use.
By default the KDC will check the
transited field of a
ticket-granting-ticket against the
policy of the local realm before it
will issue derivative tickets based
on the ticket granting ticket. If
this flag is set in the request,
checking of the transited field is
disabled. Tickets issued without the
26 DISABLE-TRANSITED-CHECK performance of this check will be
noted by the reset (0) value of the
TRANSITED-POLICY-CHECKED flag,
indicating to the application server
that the tranisted field must be
checked locally. KDC's are
encouraged but not required to honor
the DISABLE-TRANSITED-CHECK option.
This flag is new since RFC 1510
The RENEWABLE-OK option indicates
that a renewable ticket will be
acceptable if a ticket with the
requested life cannot otherwise be
provided. If a ticket with the
requested life cannot be provided,
27 RENEWABLE-OK then a renewable ticket may be
issued with a renew-till equal to
the the requested endtime. The value
of the renew-till field may still be
limited by local limits, or limits
selected by the individual principal
or server.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
This option is used only by the
ticket-granting service. The
ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY option indicates
28 ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY that the ticket for the end server
is to be encrypted in the session
key from the additional
ticket-granting ticket provided.
29 RESERVED Reserved for future use.
This option is used only by the
ticket-granting service. The RENEW
option indicates that the present
request is for a renewal. The ticket
provided is encrypted in the secret
key for the server on which it is
30 RENEW valid. This option will only be
honored if the ticket to be renewed
has its RENEWABLE flag set and if
the time in its renew-till field has
not passed. The ticket to be renewed
is passed in the padata field as
part of the authentication header.
This option is used only by the
ticket-granting service. The
VALIDATE option indicates that the
request is to validate a postdated
ticket. It will only be honored if
the ticket presented is postdated,
presently has its INVALID flag set,
31 VALIDATE and would be otherwise usable at
this time. A ticket cannot be
validated before its starttime. The
ticket presented for validation is
encrypted in the key of the server
for which it is valid and is passed
in the padata field as part of the
authentication header.
cname and sname
These fields are the same as those described for the ticket in section
5.3.1. sname may only be absent when the ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY option is
specified. If absent, the name of the server is taken from the name of
the client in the ticket passed as additional-tickets.
enc-authorization-data
The enc-authorization-data, if present (and it can only be present in
the TGS_REQ form), is an encoding of the desired authorization-data
encrypted under the sub-session key if present in the Authenticator, or
alternatively from the session key in the ticket-granting ticket, both
from the padata field in the KRB_AP_REQ.
realm
This field specifies the realm part of the server's principal
identifier. In the AS exchange, this is also the realm part of the
client's principal identifier. If the CANONICALIZE option is set, the
realm is used as a hint to the KDC for its database lookup.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
from
This field is included in the KRB_AS_REQ and KRB_TGS_REQ ticket
requests when the requested ticket is to be postdated. It specifies the
desired start time for the requested ticket. If this field is omitted
then the KDC should use the current time instead.
till
This field contains the expiration date requested by the client in a
ticket request. [XXX This was optional in kerberos-revisions, but
required in 1510. we should make it required and specify semantics for
19700101000000Z] It is optional and if omitted the requested ticket is
to have the maximum endtime permitted according to KDC policy for the
parties to the authentication exchange as limited by expiration date of
the ticket granting ticket or other preauthentication credentials.
rtime
This field is the requested renew-till time sent from a client to the
KDC in a ticket request. It is optional.
nonce
This field is part of the KDC request and response. It it intended to
hold a random number generated by the client. If the same number is
included in the encrypted response from the KDC, it provides evidence
that the response is fresh and has not been replayed by an attacker.
Nonces must never be re-used. Ideally, it should be generated randomly,
but if the correct time is known, it may suffice[25].
etype
This field specifies the desired encryption algorithm to be used in the
response.
addresses
This field is included in the initial request for tickets, and
optionally included in requests for additional tickets from the
ticket-granting server. It specifies the addresses from which the
requested ticket is to be valid. Normally it includes the addresses for
the client's host. If a proxy is requested, this field will contain
other addresses. The contents of this field are usually copied by the
KDC into the caddr field of the resulting ticket.
additional-tickets
Additional tickets may be optionally included in a request to the
ticket-granting server. If the ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY option has been
specified, then the session key from the additional ticket will be used
in place of the server's key to encrypt the new ticket. When the
ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY option is used for user-to-user authentication, this
addional ticket may be a TGT issued by the local realm or an
inter-realm TGT issued for the current KDC's realm by a remote KDC. If
more than one option which requires additional tickets has been
specified, then the additional tickets are used in the order specified
by the ordering of the options bits (see kdc-options, above).
The application tag number will be either ten (10) or twelve (12) depending
on whether the request is for an initial ticket (AS-REQ) or for an
additional ticket (TGS-REQ).
The optional fields (addresses, authorization-data and additional-tickets)
are only included if necessary to perform the operation specified in the
kdc-options field.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
It should be noted that in KRB_TGS_REQ, the protocol version number appears
twice and two different message types appear: the KRB_TGS_REQ message
contains these fields as does the authentication header (KRB_AP_REQ) that is
passed in the padata field.
5.4.2. KRB_KDC_REP definition
The KRB_KDC_REP message format is used for the reply from the KDC for either
an initial (AS) request or a subsequent (TGS) request. There is no message
type for KRB_KDC_REP. Instead, the type will be either KRB_AS_REP or
KRB_TGS_REP. The key used to encrypt the ciphertext part of the reply
depends on the message type. For KRB_AS_REP, the ciphertext is encrypted in
the client's secret key, and the client's key version number is included in
the key version number for the encrypted data. For KRB_TGS_REP, the
ciphertext is encrypted in the sub-session key from the Authenticator, or if
absent, the session key from the ticket-granting ticket used in the request.
In that case, no version number will be present in the EncryptedData
sequence.
The KRB_KDC_REP message contains the following fields:
AS-REP ::= [APPLICATION 11] KDC-REP
TGS-REP ::= [APPLICATION 13] KDC-REP
KDC-REP ::= SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER,
padata[2] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL,
crealm[3] Realm,
cname[4] PrincipalName,
ticket[5] Ticket,
enc-part[6] EncryptedData
-- EncASREpPart or EncTGSReoOart
}
EncASRepPart ::= [APPLICATION 25] EncKDCRepPart -- note [27]
EncTGSRepPart ::= [APPLICATION 26] EncKDCRepPart
EncKDCRepPart ::= SEQUENCE {
key[0] EncryptionKey,
last-req[1] LastReq,
nonce[2] INTEGER,
key-expiration[3] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
flags[4] TicketFlags,
authtime[5] KerberosTime,
starttime[6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
endtime[7] KerberosTime,
renew-till[8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
srealm[9] Realm,
sname[10] PrincipalName,
caddr[11] HostAddresses OPTIONAL
}
LastReq ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
lr-type[0] Int32,
lr-value[1] KerberosTime
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is either
KRB_AS_REP or KRB_TGS_REP.
padata
This field is described in detail in section 5.4.1. One possible use
for this field is to encode an alternate "mix-in" string to be used
with a string-to-key algorithm (such as is described in section 6.3.2).
This ability is useful to ease transitions if a realm name needs to
change (e.g. when a company is acquired); in such a case all existing
password-derived entries in the KDC database would be flagged as
needing a special mix-in string until the next password change.
crealm, cname, srealm and sname
These fields are the same as those described for the ticket in section
5.3.1.
ticket
The newly-issued ticket, from section 5.3.1.
enc-part
This field is a place holder for the ciphertext and related information
that forms the encrypted part of a message. The description of the
encrypted part of the message follows each appearance of this field.
The encrypted part is encoded as described in section 6.1.
key
This field is the same as described for the ticket in section 5.3.1.
last-req
This field is returned by the KDC and specifies the time(s) of the last
request by a principal. Depending on what information is available,
this might be the last time that a request for a ticket-granting ticket
was made, or the last time that a request based on a ticket-granting
ticket was successful. It also might cover all servers for a realm, or
just the particular server. Some implementations may display this
information to the user to aid in discovering unauthorized use of one's
identity. It is similar in spirit to the last login time displayed when
logging into timesharing systems.
lr-type
This field indicates how the following lr-value field is to be
interpreted. Negative values indicate that the information
pertains only to the responding server. Non-negative values
pertain to all servers for the realm.
If the lr-type field is zero (0), then no information is conveyed
by the lr-value subfield. If the absolute value of the lr-type
field is one (1), then the lr-value subfield is the time of last
initial request for a TGT. If it is two (2), then the lr-value
subfield is the time of last initial request. If it is three (3),
then the lr-value subfield is the time of issue for the newest
ticket-granting ticket used. If it is four (4), then the lr-value
subfield is the time of the last renewal. If it is five (5), then
the lr-value subfield is the time of last request (of any type).
If it is (6), then the lr-value subfield is the time when the
password will expire.
lr-value
This field contains the time of the last request. the time must be
interpreted according to the contents of the accompanying lr-type
subfield.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
nonce
This field is described above in section 5.4.1.
key-expiration
The key-expiration field is part of the response from the KDC and
specifies the time that the client's secret key is due to expire. The
expiration might be the result of password aging or an account
expiration. This field will usually be left out of the TGS reply since
the response to the TGS request is encrypted in a session key and no
client information need be retrieved from the KDC database. It is up to
the application client (usually the login program) to take appropriate
action (such as notifying the user) if the expiration time is imminent.
flags, authtime, starttime, endtime, renew-till and caddr
These fields are duplicates of those found in the encrypted portion of
the attached ticket (see section 5.3.1), provided so the client may
verify they match the intended request and to assist in proper ticket
caching. If the message is of type KRB_TGS_REP, the caddr field will
only be filled in if the request was for a proxy or forwarded ticket,
or if the user is substituting a subset of the addresses from the
ticket granting ticket. If the client-requested addresses are not
present or not used, then the addresses contained in the ticket will be
the same as those included in the ticket-granting ticket.
5.5. Client/Server (CS) message specifications
This section specifies the format of the messages used for the
authentication of the client to the application server.
5.5.1. KRB_AP_REQ definition
The KRB_AP_REQ message contains the Kerberos protocol version number, the
message type KRB_AP_REQ, an options field to indicate any options in use,
and the ticket and authenticator themselves. The KRB_AP_REQ message is often
referred to as the 'authentication header'.
AP-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 14] SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER,
ap-options[2] APOptions,
ticket[3] Ticket,
authenticator[4] EncryptedData
-- Authenticator from 5.3.2
}
APOptions ::= KerberosFlags
-- reserved(0),
-- use-session-key(1),
-- mutual-required(2)
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is
KRB_AP_REQ.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
ap-options
This field appears in the application request (KRB_AP_REQ) and affects
the way the request is processed. It is a bit-field, where the selected
options are indicated by the bit being set (1), and the unselected
options and reserved fields being reset (0). The encoding of the bits
is specified in section 5.2. The meanings of the options are:
Bit(s) Name Description
0 reserved Reserved for future expansion of this field.
The USE-SESSION-KEY option indicates that the
ticket the client is presenting to a server
1 use-session-key is encrypted in the session key from the
server's ticket-granting ticket. When this
option is not specified, the ticket is
encrypted in the server's secret key.
The MUTUAL-REQUIRED option tells the server
2 mutual-required that the client requires mutual
authentication, and that it must respond with
a KRB_AP_REP message.
3-31 reserved Reserved for future use.
ticket
This field is a ticket authenticating the client to the server.
authenticator
This contains the authenticator, which includes the client's choice of
a subkey. Its encoding is described in section 5.3.2.
5.5.2. KRB_AP_REP definition
The KRB_AP_REP message contains the Kerberos protocol version number, the
message type, and an encrypted time- stamp. The message is sent in in
response to an application request (KRB_AP_REQ) where the mutual
authentication option has been selected in the ap-options field.
AP-REP ::= [APPLICATION 15] SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER,
enc-part[2] EncryptedData
-- EncAPRepPart
}
EncAPRepPart ::= [APPLICATION 27] SEQUENCE { -- note [29]
ctime[0] KerberosTime,
cusec[1] Microseconds,
subkey[2] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
seq-number[3] UInt32 OPTIONAL
}
The encoded EncAPRepPart is encrypted in the shared session key of the
ticket. The optional subkey field can be used in an application-arranged
negotiation to choose a per association session key.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is
KRB_AP_REP.
enc-part
This field is described above in section 5.4.2.
ctime
This field contains the current time on the client's host.
cusec
This field contains the microsecond part of the client's timestamp.
subkey
This field contains an encryption key which is to be used to protect
this specific application session. See section 3.2.6 for specifics on
how this field is used to negotiate a key. Unless an application
specifies otherwise, if this field is left out, the sub-session key
from the authenticator, or if also left out, the session key from the
ticket will be used.
seq-number
This field is described above in section 5.3.2.
5.5.3. Error message reply
If an error occurs while processing the application request, the KRB_ERROR
message will be sent in response. See section 5.9.1 for the format of the
error message. The cname and crealm fields may be left out if the server
cannot determine their appropriate values from the corresponding KRB_AP_REQ
message. If the authenticator was decipherable, the ctime and cusec fields
will contain the values from it.
5.6. KRB_SAFE message specification
This section specifies the format of a message that can be used by either
side (client or server) of an application to send a tamper-proof message to
its peer. It presumes that a session key has previously been exchanged (for
example, by using the KRB_AP_REQ/KRB_AP_REP messages).
There are two KRB_SAFE messages; the KRB-SAFE message is the one specified
in RFC 1510. The KRB-SAFE2 message is new with this document, and shares a
number of fields with the old KRB-SAFE message.
5.6.1. KRB_SAFE definition
The KRB_SAFE message contains user data along with a collision-proof
checksum keyed with the last encryption key negotiated via subkeys, or the
session key if no negotiation has occurred. The message fields are:
KRB-SAFE ::= [APPLICATION 20] SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER,
safe-body[2] KRB-SAFE-BODY,
cksum[3] Checksum
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
KRB-SAFE-BODY ::= SEQUENCE {
user-data[0] OCTET STRING,
timestamp[1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
usec[2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
seq-number[3] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
s-address[4] HostAddress,
r-address[5] HostAddress OPTIONAL
}
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is KRB_SAFE
or KRB_SAFE2, respectively, for the KRB-SAFE and KRB-SAFE2 messages.
safe-body
This field is a placeholder for the body of the KRB-SAFE message.
cksum
This field contains the checksum of the application data. Checksum
details are described in section 6.4.
The checksum is computed over the encoding of the KRB-SAFE sequence.
First, the cksum is set to a type zero, zero-length value and the
checksum is computed over the encoding of the KRB-SAFE sequence, then
the checksum is set to the result of that computation, and finally the
KRB-SAFE sequence is encoded again. This method, while different than
the one specified in RFC 1510, corresponds to existing practice.
user-data
This field is part of the KRB_SAFE and KRB_PRIV messages and contain
the application specific data that is being passed from the sender to
the recipient.
timestamp
This field is part of the KRB_SAFE and KRB_PRIV messages. Its contents
are the current time as known by the sender of the message. By checking
the timestamp, the recipient of the message is able to make sure that
it was recently generated, and is not a replay.
usec
This field is part of the KRB_SAFE and KRB_PRIV headers. It contains
the microsecond part of the timestamp.
seq-number
This field is described above in section 5.3.2.
s-address
Sender's address.
This field specifies the address in use by the sender of the message.
It may be omitted if not required by the application protocol.
r-address
This field specifies the address in use by the recipient of the
message. It may be omitted for some uses (such as broadcast protocols),
but the recipient may arbitrarily reject such messages. This field,
along with s-address, can be used to help detect messages which have
been incorrectly or maliciously delivered to the wrong recipient.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.7. KRB_PRIV message specification
This section specifies the format of a message that can be used by either
side (client or server) of an application to securely and privately send a
message to its peer. It presumes that a session key has previously been
exchanged (for example, by using the KRB_AP_REQ/KRB_AP_REP messages).
5.7.1. KRB_PRIV definition
The KRB_PRIV message contains user data encrypted in the Session Key. The
message fields are:
KRB-PRIV ::= [APPLICATION 21] SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER,
enc-part[3] EncryptedData
-- EncKrbPrivPart
}
EncKrbPrivPart ::= [APPLICATION 28] SEQUENCE { --note [31]
user-data[0] OCTET STRING,
timestamp[1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
usec[2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
seq-number[3] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
s-address[4] HostAddress, -- sender's addr
r-address[5] HostAddress OPTIONAL -- recip's addr
}
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is
KRB_PRIV.
enc-part
This field holds an encoding of the EncKrbPrivPart sequence encrypted
under the session key[32]. This encrypted encoding is used for the
enc-part field of the KRB-PRIV message. See section 6 for the format of
the ciphertext.
user-data, timestamp, usec, s-address and r-address
These fields are described above in section 5.6.1.
seq-number
This field is described above in section 5.3.2.
5.8. KRB_CRED message specification
This section specifies the format of a message that can be used to send
Kerberos credentials from one principal to another. It is presented here to
encourage a common mechanism to be used by applications when forwarding
tickets or providing proxies to subordinate servers. It presumes that a
session key has already been exchanged perhaps by using the
KRB_AP_REQ/KRB_AP_REP messages.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.8.1. KRB_CRED definition
The KRB_CRED message contains a sequence of tickets to be sent and
information needed to use the tickets, including the session key from each.
The information needed to use the tickets is encrypted under an encryption
key previously exchanged or transferred alongside the KRB_CRED message. The
message fields are:
KRB-CRED ::= [APPLICATION 22] SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER, -- KRB_CRED
tickets[2] SEQUENCE OF Ticket,
enc-part[3] EncryptedData -- EncKrbCredPart
}
EncKrbCredPart ::= [APPLICATION 29] SEQUENCE {
ticket-info[0] SEQUENCE OF KrbCredInfo,
nonce[1] INTEGER OPTIONAL,
timestamp[2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
usec[3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
s-address[4] HostAddress OPTIONAL,
r-address[5] HostAddress OPTIONAL
}
KrbCredInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
key[0] EncryptionKey,
prealm[1] Realm OPTIONAL,
pname[2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
flags[3] TicketFlags OPTIONAL,
authtime[4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
starttime[5] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
endtime[6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL
renew-till[7] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
srealm[8] Realm OPTIONAL,
sname[9] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
caddr[10] HostAddresses OPTIONAL
}
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is
KRB_CRED.
tickets
These are the tickets obtained from the KDC specifically for use by the
intended recipient. Successive tickets are paired with the
corresponding KrbCredInfo sequence from the enc-part of the KRB-CRED
message.
enc-part
This field holds an encoding of the EncKrbCredPart sequence encrypted
under the session key shared between the sender and the intended
recipient. This encrypted encoding is used for the enc-part field of
the KRB-CRED message. See section 6 for the format of the ciphertext.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
nonce
If practical, an application may require the inclusion of a nonce
generated by the recipient of the message. If the same value is
included as the nonce in the message, it provides evidence that the
message is fresh and has not been replayed by an attacker. A nonce must
never be re-used; it should be generated randomly by the recipient of
the message and provided to the sender of the message in an application
specific manner.
timestamp and usec
These fields specify the time that the KRB-CRED message was generated.
The time is used to provide assurance that the message is fresh.
s-address and r-address
These fields are described above in section 5.6.1. They are used
optionally to provide additional assurance of the integrity of the
KRB-CRED message.
key
This field exists in the corresponding ticket passed by the KRB-CRED
message and is used to pass the session key from the sender to the
intended recipient. The field's encoding is described in section 6.2.
The following fields are optional. If present, they can be associated with
the credentials in the remote ticket file. If left out, then it is assumed
that the recipient of the credentials already knows their value.
prealm and pname
The name and realm of the delegated principal identity.
flags, authtime, starttime, endtime, renew-till, srealm, sname, and caddr
These fields contain the values of the corresponding fields from the
ticket found in the ticket field. Descriptions of the fields are
identical to the descriptions in the KDC-REP message.
5.9. Error message specification
This section specifies the format for the KRB_ERROR message. The fields
included in the message are intended to return as much information as
possible about an error. It is not expected that all the information
required by the fields will be available for all types of errors. If the
appropriate information is not available when the message is composed, the
corresponding field will be left out of the message.
Note that since the KRB_ERROR message is only optionally integrity
protected, it is quite possible for an intruder to synthesize or modify such
a message. In particular, this means that unless appropriate integrity
protection mechanisms have been applied to the KRB_ERROR message, the client
should not use any fields in this message for security-critical purposes,
such as setting a system clock or generating a fresh authenticator. The
message can be useful, however, for advising a user on the reason for some
failure.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.9.1. KRB_ERROR definition
The KRB_ERROR message consists of the following fields:
KRB-ERROR ::= [APPLICATION 30] SEQUENCE {
pvno[0] INTEGER,
msg-type[1] INTEGER,
ctime[2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
cusec[3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
stime[4] KerberosTime,
susec[5] Microseconds,
error-code[6] Int32,
crealm[7] Realm OPTIONAL,
cname[8] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
realm[9] Realm, -- Correct realm
sname[10] PrincipalName, -- Correct name
e-text[11] KerberosString OPTIONAL,
e-data[12] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
}
pvno and msg-type
These fields are described above in section 5.4.1. msg-type is
KRB_ERROR.
ctime
This field is described above in section 5.4.1.
cusec
This field is described above in section 5.5.2.
stime
This field contains the current time on the server. It is of type
KerberosTime.
susec
This field contains the microsecond part of the server's timestamp. Its
value ranges from 0 to 999999. It appears along with stime. The two
fields are used in conjunction to specify a reasonably accurate
timestamp.
error-code
This field contains the error code returned by Kerberos or the server
when a request fails. To interpret the value of this field see the list
of error codes in section 8. Implementations are encouraged to provide
for national language support in the display of error messages.
crealm, cname, srealm and sname
These fields are described above in section 5.3.1.
e-text
This field contains additional text to help explain the error code
associated with the failed request (for example, it might include a
principal name which was unknown).
e-data
This field contains additional data about the error for use by the
application to help it recover from or handle the error. If present,
this field will contain the encoding of a sequence of TypedData
(TYPED-DATA below), unless the errorcode is KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED,
in which case it will contain the encoding of a sequence of of padata
fields (METHOD-DATA below), each corresponding to an acceptable
pre-authentication method and optionally containing data for the
method:
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
TYPED-DATA ::= SEQUENCE of TypedData
METHOD-DATA ::= SEQUENCE of PA-DATA
TypedData ::= SEQUENCE {
data-type[0] Int32,
data-value[1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
}
Note that the padata-type field in the PA-DATA structure and the
data-type field in the TypedData structure share a common range of
allocated values which are coordinated to avoid conflicts. One Kerberos
error message, KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED, embeds elements of type
PA-DATA, while all other error messages embed TypedData.
While preauthentication methods of type PA-DATA should be encapsulated
within a TypedData element of type TD-PADATA, for compatibility with
old clients, the KDC should include PA-DATA types below 22 directly as
method-data. All new implementations interpreting the METHOD-DATA field
for the KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED message must accept a type of
TD-PADATA, extract the typed data field and interpret the use any
elements encapsulated in the TD-PADATA elements as if they were present
in the METHOD-DATA sequence.
Unless otherwise specified, unrecognized TypedData elements within the
KRB-ERROR message MAY be ignored by implementations that do not support
them. Note that all TypedData MAY be bound to the KRB-ERROR message via
the checksum field.
An application may use the TD-APP-DEFINED-ERROR typed data type for
data carried in a Kerberos error message that is specific to the
application. TD-APP-SPECIFIC must set the data-type value of TypedData
to TD-APP-SPECIFIC and the data-value field to
AppSpecificTypedData as follows:
AppSpecificTypedData ::= SEQUENCE {
oid[0] OPTIONAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
-- identifies the application
data-value[1] OCTET STRING
-- application
-- specific data
}
o The TD-REQ-NONCE TypedData MAY be used to bind a KRB-ERROR to a
KDC-REQ. The data-value is an INTEGER that is equivalent to the
nonce in a KDC-REQ.
o The TD-REQ-SEQ TypedData MAY be used for binding a KRB-ERROR to
the sequence number from an authenticator. The data-value is an
INTEGER, and it is identical to sequence number sent in the
authenticator.
o The data-value for TD-KRB-PRINCIPAL is the Kerberos-defined
PrincipalName. The data-value for TD-KRB-REALM is the
Kerberos-defined Realm. These TypedData types MAY be used to
indicate principal and realm name when appropriate.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
5.10. Application Tag Numbers
The following table lists the application class tag numbers used by various
data types defined in this section.
Tag Number(s) Type Name Comments
0 unused
1 Ticket
2 Authenticator
3 EncTicketPart
4-10 unused
10 AS-REQ
11 AS-REP
12 TGS-REQ
13 TGS-REP
14 AP-REQ
15 AP-REP
16 TGT-REQ
17-19 unused
20 KRB-SAFE
21 KRB-PRIV
22 KRB-PRIV
23-24 unused
25 EncASRepPart
26 EncTGSRepPart
27 EncApRepPart
28 EncKrbPrivPart
29 EncKrbCredPart
30 KRB-ERROR
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
6. Encryption and Checksum Specifications
To do:
* Re-synchronize the key usage value list with any changes Tom
makes to the message definitions. KRB-ERROR checksum, for
example, and any new message types.
See end notes for other issues.
-- Ken 2002-01-02
The Kerberos protocols described in this document are designed to encrypt
blocks of arbitrary sizes, using stream or block encryption ciphers.
Encryption is used to prove the identities of the network entities
participating in message exchanges. The Key Distribution Center for each
realm is trusted by all principals registered in that realm to store a
secret key in confidence. Proof of knowledge of this secret key is used to
verify the authenticity of a principal.
The KDC uses the principal's secret key (in the AS exchange) or a shared
session key (in the TGS exchange) to encrypt responses to ticket requests;
the ability to obtain the secret key or session key implies the knowledge of
the appropriate keys and the identity of the KDC. The ability of a principal
to decrypt the KDC response and present a Ticket and a properly formed
Authenticator (generated with the session key from the KDC response) to a
service verifies the identity of the principal; likewise the ability of the
service to extract the session key from the Ticket and prove its knowledge
thereof in a response verifies the identity of the service.
[KCRYPTO] defines a framework for defining encryption and checksum
mechanisms for use with Kerberos. It also defines several such mechanisms,
and more may be added in future updates to that document.
The string-to-key operation provided by [KCRYPTO] is used to produce a
long-term key for a principal (generally for a user). The default salt
string, if none is provided via preauthentication data, is the concatenation
of the principal's realm and name components, in order, with no separators.
Unless otherwise indicated, the default string-to-key opaque parameter set
as defined in [KCRYPTO] is used.
The encryption, decryption, and checksum operations used in this document
use the corresponding encryption, decryption, and get_mic operations
described in [KCRYPTO], with implicit "specific key" generation using the
key usage values outlined in section 6.1. Unless otherwise indicated, no
chaining of cipher state is done from one encryption operation to another.
The EncryptedData object's "etype" and "cipher" fields are the encryption
mechanism type number and encryption operation output. The EncryptionKey
object's "keytype" and "keyvalue" fields are the encryption mechanism type
number and protocol key representation. The Checksum object's "cksumtype"
and "checksum" fields are the checksum mechanism type number and get_mic
operation output.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
6.1. Key Usage Values
The encryption and checksum specifications in [KCRYPTO] require as input a
"key usage number", to alter the encryption key used in any specific
message, to make certain types of cryptographic attack more difficult. This
is a list of key usage number definitions and reserved ranges, including
values for all places keys are used in the Kerberos protocol and associated
section numbers.
1. AS-REQ PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP padata timestamp, encrypted with the
client key (section 5.4.1)
2. AS-REP Ticket and TGS-REP Ticket (includes TGS session key or
application session key), encrypted with the service key
(section 5.4.2)
3. AS-REP encrypted part (includes TGS session key or application
session key), encrypted with the client key (section 5.4.2)
4. TGS-REQ KDC-REQ-BODY AuthorizationData, encrypted with the TGS
session key (section 5.4.1)
5. TGS-REQ KDC-REQ-BODY AuthorizationData, encrypted with the TGS
authenticator subkey (section 5.4.1)
6. TGS-REQ PA-TGS-REQ padata AP-REQ Authenticator cksum, keyed with
the TGS session key (sections 5.3.2, 5.4.1)
7. TGS-REQ PA-TGS-REQ padata AP-REQ Authenticator (includes TGS
authenticator subkey), encrypted with the TGS session key
(section 5.3.2)
8. TGS-REP encrypted part (includes application session key),
encrypted with the TGS session key (section 5.4.2)
9. TGS-REP encrypted part (includes application session key),
encrypted with the TGS authenticator subkey (section 5.4.2)
10. AP-REQ Authenticator cksum, keyed with the application session
key (section 5.3.2)
11. AP-REQ Authenticator (includes application authenticator
subkey), encrypted with the application session key (section
5.3.2)
12. AP-REP encrypted part (includes application session subkey),
encrypted with the application session key (section 5.5.2)
13. KRB-PRIV encrypted part, encrypted with a key chosen by the
application (section 5.7.1)
14. KRB-CRED encrypted part, encrypted with a key chosen by the
application (section 5.6.1)
15. KRB-SAFE cksum, keyed with a key chosen by the application
(section 5.8.1)
18. KRB-ERROR checksum (e-cksum in section 5.9.1)
19. AD-KDCIssued checksum (ad-checksum in appendix B.4)
20. Checksum for Mandatory Ticket Extensions (appendix B.6)
21. Checksum in Authorization Data in Ticket Extensions (appendix
B.7)
22-24. Reserved for use in GSSAPI mechanisms derived from RFC 1964.
(raeburn/MIT)
25-511. Reserved for future use in Kerberos and related protocols.
512-1023. Reserved for uses internal to a Kerberos implementation. [6.1]
A few of these key usages need a little clarification. A service which
receives an AP-REQ has no way to know if the enclosed Ticket was part of an
AS-REP or TGS-REP. Therefore, key usage 2 must always be used for generating
a Ticket, whether it is in response to an AS-REQ or TGS-REQ.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Key usage values between 1024 and 2047 (inclusive) are reserved for
application use. Applications should use even values for encryption and odd
values for checksums within this range.
There might exist other documents which define protocols in terms of the
RFC1510 encryption types or checksum types. Such documents would not know
about key usages. In order that these specifications continue to be
meaningful until they are updated, key usages 1024 and 1025 must be used to
derive keys for encryption and checksums, respectively.[6.2] New protocols
defined in terms of the Kerberos encryption and checksum types should use
their own key usage values. Key usages are unsigned 32 bit integers; zero is
not permitted. Usage numbers may be registered with IANA to avoid conflicts.
6.2. Implementation Notes
While we don't recommend it, undoubtedly some application protocols will
continue to use the key data directly, even if only in some of the currently
existing protocol specifications. An implementation intended to support
general Kerberos applications may therefore need to make the key data
available, as well as the attributes and operations described in [KCRYPTO].
[6.3]
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
7. Naming Constraints
7.1. Realm Names
Although realm names are encoded as GeneralStrings and although a realm can
technically select any name it chooses, interoperability across realm
boundaries requires agreement on how realm names are to be assigned, and
what information they imply.
To enforce these conventions, each realm must conform to the conventions
itself, and it must require that any realms with which inter-realm keys are
shared also conform to the conventions and require the same from its
neighbors.
Kerberos realm names are case sensitive. Realm names that differ only in the
case of the characters are not equivalent. There are presently four styles
of realm names: domain, X500, other, and reserved. Examples of each style
follow:
domain: ATHENA.MIT.EDU (example)
X500: C=US/O=OSF (example)
other: NAMETYPE:rest/of.name=without-restrictions (example)
reserved: reserved, but will not conflict with above
Domain syle realm names must look like domain names: they consist of
components separated by periods (.) and they contain neither colons (:) nor
slashes (/). Though domain names themselves are case insensitive, in order
for realms to match, the case must match as well. When establishing a new
realm name based on an internet domain name it is recommended by convention
that the characters be converted to upper case.
X.500 names contain an equal (=) and cannot contain a colon (:) before the
equal. The realm names for X.500 names will be string representations of the
names with components separated by slashes. Leading and trailing slashes
will not be included. Note that the slash separator is consistent with
Kerberos implementations based on RFC1510, but it is different from the
separator recommended in RFC2253.
Names that fall into the other category must begin with a prefix that
contains no equal (=) or period (.) and the prefix must be followed by a
colon (:) and the rest of the name. All prefixes must be assigned before
they may be used. Presently none are assigned.
The reserved category includes strings which do not fall into the first
three categories. All names in this category are reserved. It is unlikely
that names will be assigned to this category unless there is a very strong
argument for not using the 'other' category.
These rules guarantee that there will be no conflicts between the various
name styles. The following additional constraints apply to the assignment of
realm names in the domain and X.500 categories: the name of a realm for the
domain or X.500 formats must either be used by the organization owning (to
whom it was assigned) an Internet domain name or X.500 name, or in the case
that no such names are registered, authority to use a realm name may be
derived from the authority of the parent realm. For example, if there is no
domain name for E40.MIT.EDU, then the administrator of the MIT.EDU realm can
authorize the creation of a realm with that name.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
This is acceptable because the organization to which the parent is assigned
is presumably the organization authorized to assign names to its children in
the X.500 and domain name systems as well. If the parent assigns a realm
name without also registering it in the domain name or X.500 hierarchy, it
is the parent's responsibility to make sure that there will not in the
future exist a name identical to the realm name of the child unless it is
assigned to the same entity as the realm name.
7.2. Principal Names
As was the case for realm names, conventions are needed to ensure that all
agree on what information is implied by a principal name. The name-type
field that is part of the principal name indicates the kind of information
implied by the name. The name-type should be treated only as a hint to
interpreting the meaning of a name. It is not significant when checking for
equivalence. Principal names that differ only in the name-type identify the
same principal. The name type does not partition the name space. Ignoring
the name type, no two names can be the same (i.e. at least one of the
components, or the realm, must be different). The following name types are
defined:
name-type value meaning
NT-UNKNOWN 0 Name type not known
NT-PRINCIPAL 1 General principal name (e.g. username, or DCE principal)
NT-SRV-INST 2 Service and other unique instance (krbtgt)
NT-SRV-HST 3 Service with host name as instance (telnet, rcommands)
NT-SRV-XHST 4 Service with slash-separated host name components
NT-UID 5 Unique ID
NT-X500-PRINCIPAL 6 Encoded X.509 Distingished name [RFC 1779]
NT-SMTP-NAME 7 Name in form of SMTP email name (e.g. user@foo.com)
NT-ENTERPRISE 10 Enterprise name - may be mapped to principal name
When a name implies no information other than its uniqueness at a particular
time the name type PRINCIPAL should be used. The principal name type should
be used for users, and it might also be used for a unique server. If the
name is a unique machine generated ID that is guaranteed never to be
reassigned then the name type of UID should be used (note that it is
generally a bad idea to reassign names of any type since stale entries might
remain in access control lists).
If the first component of a name identifies a service and the remaining
components identify an instance of the service in a server specified manner,
then the name type of SRV-INST should be used. An example of this name type
is the Kerberos ticket-granting service whose name has a first component of
krbtgt and a second component identifying the realm for which the ticket is
valid.
If instance is a single component following the service name and the
instance identifies the host on which the server is running, then the name
type SRV-HST should be used. This type is typically used for Internet
services such as telnet and the Berkeley R commands. If the separate
components of the host name appear as successive components following the
name of the service, then the name type SRV-XHST should be used. This type
might be used to identify servers on hosts with X.500 names where the slash
(/) might otherwise be ambiguous.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
A name type of NT-X500-PRINCIPAL should be used when a name from an X.509
certificate is translated into a Kerberos name. The encoding of the X.509
name as a Kerberos principal shall conform to the encoding rules specified
in RFC 2253.
A name type of SMTP allows a name to be of a form that resembles a SMTP
email name. This name, including an "@" and a domain name, is used as the
one component of the principal name.
A name type of UNKNOWN should be used when the form of the name is not
known. When comparing names, a name of type UNKNOWN will match principals
authenticated with names of any type. A principal authenticated with a name
of type UNKNOWN, however, will only match other names of type UNKNOWN.
Names of any type with an initial component of 'krbtgt' are reserved for the
Kerberos ticket granting service. See section 8.2.3 for the form of such
names.
7.2.1. Name of server principals
The principal identifier for a server on a host will generally be composed
of two parts: (1) the realm of the KDC with which the server is registered,
and (2) a two-component name of type NT-SRV-HST if the host name is an
Internet domain name or a multi-component name of type NT-SRV-XHST if the
name of the host is of a form such as X.500 that allows slash (/)
separators. The first component of the two- or multi-component name will
identify the service and the latter components will identify the host. Where
the name of the host is not case sensitive (for example, with Internet
domain names) the name of the host must be lower case. If specified by the
application protocol for services such as telnet and the Berkeley R commands
which run with system privileges, the first component may be the string
'host' instead of a service specific identifier. When a host has an official
name and one or more aliases and the official name can be reliably
determined, the official name of the host should be used when constructing
the name of the server principal.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
8. Constants and other defined values
8.1. Host address types
All negative values for the host address type are reserved for local use.
All non-negative values are reserved for officially assigned type fields and
interpretations.
The values of the types for the following addresses are chosen to match the
defined address family constants in the Berkeley Standard Distributions of
Unix. They can be found in with symbolic names AF_xxx (where xxx is an
abbreviation of the address family name).
Internet (IPv4) Addresses
Internet (IPv4) addresses are 32-bit (4-octet) quantities, encoded in MSB
order. The IPv4 loopback address should not appear in a Kerberos packet. The
type of IPv4 addresses is two (2).
Internet (IPv6) Addresses [Westerlund]
IPv6 addresses are 128-bit (16-octet) quantities, encoded in MSB order. The
type of IPv6 addresses is twenty-four (24). [RFC2373]. The following
addresses (see [RFC1884]) MUST not appear in any Kerberos packet:
* the Unspecified Address
* the Loopback Address
* Link-Local addresses
IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses MUST be represented as addresses of type 2.
DECnet Phase IV addresses
DECnet Phase IV addresses are 16-bit addresses, encoded in LSB order. The
type of DECnet Phase IV addresses is twelve (12).
Netbios addresses
Netbios addresses are 16-octet addresses typically composed of 1 to 15
characters, trailing blank (ascii char 20) filled, with a 16th octet of 0x0.
The type of Netbios addresses is 20 (0x14).
8.2. KDC messages
8.2.1. UDP/IP transport
When contacting a Kerberos server (KDC) for a KRB_KDC_REQ request using UDP
IP transport, the client shall send a UDP datagram containing only an
encoding of the request to the KDC at the port and IP address identified
using kdc discovery [separate document]. This port will usually be port 88
(decimal). The KDC will respond with a reply datagram containing only an
encoding of the reply message (either a KRB_ERROR or a KRB_KDC_REP) to the
sending port at the sender's IP address. Kerberos servers supporting IP
transport must accept UDP requests and should listen on port 88 (decimal)
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
unless specifically configured to listed on an alternative UDP port. The
response to a request made through UDP/IP transport must also use UDP/IP
transport. If the response can not be handled using UDP (for example because
it is too large), the KDC must return an error forcing the client to retry
the request using the TCP transport.
8.2.2. TCP/IP transport [Westerlund,Danielsson]
Kerberos servers (KDC's) must accept TCP requests and should listen for such
requests on port 88 (decimal) unless specifically configured to listen on a
different port. Clients must support the sending of TCP requests, but may
choose to intially try a request using the UDP transport. Clients should use
kdc discovery [separate document] to identify the port to which they will
send a request.
Implementation note: Most existing implementations will send requests to
port 88 (decimal), so it is strongly recommended that realms not be
configured to use other than the standard port (88 decimal) for the the
Kerberos server.
When the KRB_KDC_REQ message is sent to the KDC over a TCP stream, a new
connection will be established for each authentication exchange (request and
response). The KRB_KDC_REP or KRB_ERROR message will be returned to the
client on the same TCP stream that was established for the request. The
response to a request made through TCP/IP transport must also use TCP/IP
transport. Implementors should note that some extensions to the Kerberos
protocol will not work if any implementation not supporting the TCP
transport is involved (client or KDC). New implementations are required to
support the TCP transport on both server and the client. The KDC may close
the TCP stream after sending a response, but may leave the stream open if it
expects a followup - in which case it may close the stream at any time if
resource constraints or other factors make it desirable to do so. Care must
be taken in managing TCP/IP connections with the KDC to prevent denial of
service attacks based on the number of TCP/IP connections with the KDC that
remain open. If multiple exchanges with the KDC are needed for certain forms
of preauthentication, multiple TCP connections may be required. A client may
close the stream after receiving response, and should close the stream if it
does not expect to send followup messages. The client must be prepared to
have the stream closed by the KDC at anytime, in which case it must simply
connect again when it is ready to send subsequent messages.
The first four octets of the TCP stream used to transmit the request request
will encode in network byte order the length of the request (KRB_KDC_REQ),
and the length will be followed by the request itself. The response will
similarly be preceded by a 4 octet encoding in network byte order of the
length of the KRB_KDC_REP or the KRB_ERROR message and will be followed by
the KRB_KDC_REP or the KRB_ERROR response. If the sign bit is set on the
integer represented by the first 4 octets, then the next 4 octets will be
read, extending the length of the field by another 4 octets (less the sign
bit of the additional four octets which is reserved for future expansion and
which at present must be zero).
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
8.2.3. OSI transport
During authentication of an OSI client to an OSI server, the mutual
authentication of an OSI server to an OSI client, the transfer of
credentials from an OSI client to an OSI server, or during exchange of
private or integrity checked messages, Kerberos protocol messages may be
treated as opaque objects and the type of the authentication mechanism will
be:
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {iso (1), org(3), dod(6),internet(1), security(5),kerberosv5(2)}
Depending on the situation, the opaque object will be an authentication
header (KRB_AP_REQ), an authentication reply (KRB_AP_REP), a safe message
(KRB_SAFE), a private message (KRB_PRIV), or a credentials message
(KRB_CRED). The opaque data contains an application code as specified in the
ASN.1 description for each message. The application code may be used by
Kerberos to determine the message type.
8.2.4. Name of the TGS
The principal identifier of the ticket-granting service shall be composed of
three parts: (1) the realm of the KDC issuing the TGS ticket (2) a two-part
name of type NT-SRV-INST, with the first part "krbtgt" and the second part
the name of the realm which will accept the ticket-granting ticket. For
example, a ticket-granting ticket issued by the ATHENA.MIT.EDU realm to be
used to get tickets from the ATHENA.MIT.EDU KDC has a principal identifier
of "ATHENA.MIT.EDU" (realm), ("krbtgt", "ATHENA.MIT.EDU") (name). A
ticket-granting ticket issued by the ATHENA.MIT.EDU realm to be used to get
tickets from the MIT.EDU realm has a principal identifier of
"ATHENA.MIT.EDU" (realm), ("krbtgt", "MIT.EDU") (name).
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
8.3. Protocol constants and associated values
The following tables list constants used in the protocol and define their
meanings. Ranges are specified in the "specification" section that limit the
values of constants for which values are defined here. This allows
implementations to make assumptions about the maximum values that will be
received for these constants. Implementation receiving values outside the
range specified in the "specification" section may reject the request, but
they must recover cleanly.
padata and data types padata-type value comment
PA-TGS-REQ 1
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP 2
PA-PW-SALT 3
[reserved] 4
PA-ENC-UNIX-TIME 5 (depricated)
PA-SANDIA-SECUREID 6
PA-SESAME 7
PA-OSF-DCE 8
PA-CYBERSAFE-SECUREID 9
PA-AFS3-SALT 10
PA-ETYPE-INFO 11
PA-SAM-CHALLENGE 12 (sam/otp)
PA-SAM-RESPONSE 13 (sam/otp)
PA-PK-AS-REQ 14 (pkinit)
PA-PK-AS-REP 15 (pkinit)
PA-USE-SPECIFIED-KVNO 20
PA-SAM-REDIRECT 21 (sam/otp)
PA-GET-FROM-TYPED-DATA 22 (embedded in typed data)
TD-PADATA 22 (embeds padata)
PA-SAM-ETYPE-INFO 23 (sam/otp)
PA-ALT-PRINC 24 (crawdad@fnal.gov)
TD-PKINIT-CMS-CERTIFICATES 101 CertificateSet from CMS
TD-KRB-PRINCIPAL 102 PrincipalName (see Sec.5.9.1)
TD-KRB-REALM 103 Realm (see Sec.5.9.1)
TD-TRUSTED-CERTIFIERS 104 from PKINIT
TD-CERTIFICATE-INDEX 105 from PKINIT
TD-APP-DEFINED-ERROR 106 application specific (see Sec.5.9.1)
TD-REQ-NONCE 107 INTEGER (see Sec.5.9.1)
TD-REQ-SEQ 108 INTEGER (see Sec.5.9.1)
PA-PAC-REQUEST 128 (jbrezak@exchange.microsoft.com)
Address type value
IPV4 2
ChaosNet 5
XNS 6
ISO 7
DECNET Phase IV 12
AppleTalk DDP 16
NetBios 20
IPV6 24
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
authorization data type ad-type value
AD-IF-RELEVANT 1
AD-INTENDED-FOR-SERVER 2
AD-INTENDED-FOR-APPLICATION-CLASS 3
AD-KDC-ISSUED 4
AD-OR 5
AD-MANDATORY-TICKET-EXTENSIONS 6
AD-IN-TICKET-EXTENSIONS 7
reserved values 8-63
OSF-DCE 64
SESAME 65
AD-OSF-DCE-PKI-CERTID 66 (hemsath@us.ibm.com)
AD-WIN2K-PAC 128 (jbrezak@exchange.microsoft.com)
Ticket Extension Types
TE-TYPE-NULL 0 Null ticket extension
TE-TYPE-EXTERNAL-ADATA 1 Integrity protected authorization data
[reserved] 2 TE-TYPE-PKCROSS-KDC (I have reservations)
TE-TYPE-PKCROSS-CLIENT 3 PKCROSS cross realm key ticket
TE-TYPE-CYBERSAFE-EXT 4 Assigned to CyberSafe Corp
[reserved] 5 TE-TYPE-DEST-HOST (I have reservations)
transited encoding type tr-type value
DOMAIN-X500-COMPRESS 1
reserved values all others
Label Value Meaning or MIT code
pvno 5 current Kerberos protocol version number
message types (Will be updated to match section 5)
KRB_AS_REQ 10 Request for initial authentication
KRB_AS_REP 11 Response to KRB_AS_REQ request
KRB_TGS_REQ 12 Request for authentication based on TGT
KRB_TGS_REP 13 Response to KRB_TGS_REQ request
KRB_AP_REQ 14 application request to server
KRB_AP_REP 15 Response to KRB_AP_REQ_MUTUAL
KRB_SAFE 20 Safe (checksummed) application message
KRB_PRIV 21 Private (encrypted) application message
KRB_CRED 22 Private (encrypted) message to forward credentials
KRB_ERROR 30 Error response
name types
KRB_NT_UNKNOWN 0 Name type not known
KRB_NT_PRINCIPAL 1 Just the name of the principal as in DCE, or for users
KRB_NT_SRV_INST 2 Service and other unique instance (krbtgt)
KRB_NT_SRV_HST 3 Service with host name as instance (telnet, rcommands)
KRB_NT_SRV_XHST 4 Service with host as remaining components
KRB_NT_UID 5 Unique ID
KRB_NT_X500_PRINCIPAL 6 Encoded X.509 Distingished name [RFC 2253]
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
error codes
KDC_ERR_NONE 0 No error
KDC_ERR_NAME_EXP 1 Client's entry in database has expired
KDC_ERR_SERVICE_EXP 2 Server's entry in database has expired
KDC_ERR_BAD_PVNO 3 Requested protocol version number not supported
KDC_ERR_C_OLD_MAST_KVNO 4 Client's key encrypted in old master key
KDC_ERR_S_OLD_MAST_KVNO 5 Server's key encrypted in old master key
KDC_ERR_C_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN 6 Client not found in Kerberos database
KDC_ERR_S_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN 7 Server not found in Kerberos database
KDC_ERR_PRINCIPAL_NOT_UNIQUE 8 Multiple principal entries in database
KDC_ERR_NULL_KEY 9 The client or server has a null key
KDC_ERR_CANNOT_POSTDATE 10 Ticket not eligible for postdating
KDC_ERR_NEVER_VALID 11 Requested start time is later than end time
KDC_ERR_POLICY 12 KDC policy rejects request
KDC_ERR_BADOPTION 13 KDC cannot accommodate requested option
KDC_ERR_ETYPE_NOSUPP 14 KDC has no support for encryption type
KDC_ERR_SUMTYPE_NOSUPP 15 KDC has no support for checksum type
KDC_ERR_PADATA_TYPE_NOSUPP 16 KDC has no support for padata type
KDC_ERR_TRTYPE_NOSUPP 17 KDC has no support for transited type
KDC_ERR_CLIENT_REVOKED 18 Clients credentials have been revoked
KDC_ERR_SERVICE_REVOKED 19 Credentials for server have been revoked
KDC_ERR_TGT_REVOKED 20 TGT has been revoked
KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NOTYET 21 Client not yet valid - try again later
KDC_ERR_SERVICE_NOTYET 22 Server not yet valid - try again later
KDC_ERR_KEY_EXPIRED 23 Password has expired - change password to reset
KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_FAILED 24 Pre-authentication information was invalid
KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED 25 Additional pre-authenticationrequired [40]
KDC_ERR_SERVER_NOMATCH 26 Requested server and ticket don't match
KDC_ERR_MUST_USE_USER2USER 27 Server principal valid for user2user only
KDC_ERR_PATH_NOT_ACCPETED 28 KDC Policy rejects transited path
KDC_ERR_SVC_UNAVAILABLE 29 A service is not available
KRB_AP_ERR_BAD_INTEGRITY 31 Integrity check on decrypted field failed
KRB_AP_ERR_TKT_EXPIRED 32 Ticket expired
KRB_AP_ERR_TKT_NYV 33 Ticket not yet valid
KRB_AP_ERR_REPEAT 34 Request is a replay
KRB_AP_ERR_NOT_US 35 The ticket isn't for us
KRB_AP_ERR_BADMATCH 36 Ticket and authenticator don't match
KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW 37 Clock skew too great
KRB_AP_ERR_BADADDR 38 Incorrect net address
KRB_AP_ERR_BADVERSION 39 Protocol version mismatch
KRB_AP_ERR_MSG_TYPE 40 Invalid msg type
KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED 41 Message stream modified
KRB_AP_ERR_BADORDER 42 Message out of order
KRB_AP_ERR_BADKEYVER 44 Specified version of key is not available
KRB_AP_ERR_NOKEY 45 Service key not available
KRB_AP_ERR_MUT_FAIL 46 Mutual authentication failed
KRB_AP_ERR_BADDIRECTION 47 Incorrect message direction
KRB_AP_ERR_METHOD 48 Alternative authentication method required
KRB_AP_ERR_BADSEQ 49 Incorrect sequence number in message
KRB_AP_ERR_INAPP_CKSUM 50 Inappropriate type of checksum in message
KRB_AP_PATH_NOT_ACCEPTED 51 Policy rejects transited path
KRB_ERR_RESPONSE_TOO_BIG 52 Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP
KRB_ERR_GENERIC 60 Generic error (description in e-text)
KRB_ERR_FIELD_TOOLONG 61 Field is too long for this implementation
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
KDC_ERROR_CLIENT_NOT_TRUSTED 62 (pkinit)
KDC_ERROR_KDC_NOT_TRUSTED 63 (pkinit)
KDC_ERROR_INVALID_SIG 64 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_KEY_TOO_WEAK 65 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_CERTIFICATE_MISMATCH 66 (pkinit)
KRB_AP_ERR_NO_TGT 67 (user-to-user)
KDC_ERR_WRONG_REALM 68 (user-to-user)
KRB_AP_ERR_USER_TO_USER_REQUIRED 69 (user-to-user)
KDC_ERR_CANT_VERIFY_CERTIFICATE 70 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_INVALID_CERTIFICATE 71 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_REVOKED_CERTIFICATE 72 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_REVOCATION_STATUS_UNKNOWN 73 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_REVOCATION_STATUS_UNAVAILABLE 74 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_CLIENT_NAME_MISMATCH 75 (pkinit)
KDC_ERR_KDC_NAME_MISMATCH 76 (pkinit)
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
9. Interoperability requirements
Version 5 of the Kerberos protocol supports a myriad of options. Among these
are multiple encryption and checksum types, alternative encoding schemes for
the transited field, optional mechanisms for pre-authentication, the
handling of tickets with no addresses, options for mutual authentication,
user to user authentication, support for proxies, forwarding, postdating,
and renewing tickets, the format of realm names, and the handling of
authorization data.
In order to ensure the interoperability of realms, it is necessary to define
a minimal configuration which must be supported by all implementations. This
minimal configuration is subject to change as technology does. For example,
if at some later date it is discovered that one of the required encryption
or checksum algorithms is not secure, it will be replaced.
9.1. Specification 2
This section defines the second specification of these options.
Implementations which are configured in this way can be said to support
Kerberos Version 5 Specification 2 (5.1). Specification 1 (deprecated) may
be found in RFC1510.
Transport
TCP/IP and UDP/IP transport must be supported by clients and KDCs claiming
conformance to specification 2.
Encryption and checksum methods
The following encryption and checksum mechanisms must be supported.
Implementations may support other mechanisms as well, but the additional
mechanisms may only be used when communicating with principals known to also
support them: This list is to be determined and should correspond to section
6.
Encryption: DES-CBC-MD5, DES3-CBC-SHA1-KD, RIJNDAEL(decide identifier)
Checksums: CRC-32, DES-MAC, DES-MAC-K, DES-MD5, HMAC-SHA1-DES3-KD
Realm Names
All implementations must understand hierarchical realms in both the Internet
Domain and the X.500 style. When a ticket granting ticket for an unknown
realm is requested, the KDC must be able to determine the names of the
intermediate realms between the KDCs realm and the requested realm.
Transited field encoding
DOMAIN-X500-COMPRESS (described in section 3.3.3.2) must be supported.
Alternative encodings may be supported, but they may be used only when that
encoding is supported by ALL intermediate realms.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
Pre-authentication methods
The TGS-REQ method must be supported. The TGS-REQ method is not used on the
initial request. The PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP method must be supported by clients
but whether it is enabled by default may be determined on a realm by realm
basis. If not used in the initial request and the error
KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED is returned specifying PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP as an
acceptable method, the client should retry the initial request using the
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP preauthentication method. Servers need not support the
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP method, but if not supported the server should ignore the
presence of PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP pre-authentication in a request.
Mutual authentication
Mutual authentication (via the KRB_AP_REP message) must be supported.
Ticket addresses and flags
All KDC's must pass through tickets that carry no addresses (i.e. if a TGT
contains no addresses, the KDC will return derivative tickets), but each
realm may set its own policy for issuing such tickets, and each application
server will set its own policy with respect to accepting them.
Proxies and forwarded tickets must be supported. Individual realms and
application servers can set their own policy on when such tickets will be
accepted.
All implementations must recognize renewable and postdated tickets, but need
not actually implement them. If these options are not supported, the
starttime and endtime in the ticket shall specify a ticket's entire useful
life. When a postdated ticket is decoded by a server, all implementations
shall make the presence of the postdated flag visible to the calling server.
User-to-user authentication
Support for user to user authentication (via the ENC-TKT-IN-SKEY KDC option)
must be provided by implementations, but individual realms may decide as a
matter of policy to reject such requests on a per-principal or realm-wide
basis.
Authorization data
Implementations must pass all authorization data subfields from
ticket-granting tickets to any derivative tickets unless directed to
suppress a subfield as part of the definition of that registered subfield
type (it is never incorrect to pass on a subfield, and no registered
subfield types presently specify suppression at the KDC).
Implementations must make the contents of any authorization data subfields
available to the server when a ticket is used. Implementations are not
required to allow clients to specify the contents of the authorization data
fields.
Constant ranges
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
All protocol constants are constrained to 32 bit (signed) values unless
further constrained by the protocol definition. This limit is provided to
allow implementations to make assumptions about the maximum values that will
be received for these constants. Implementation receiving values outside
this range may reject the request, but they must recover cleanly.
9.2. Recommended KDC values
Following is a list of recommended values for a KDC implementation, based on
the list of suggested configuration constants (see section 4.4).
minimum lifetime 5 minutes
maximum renewable lifetime 1 week
maximum ticket lifetime 1 day
empty addresses only when suitable restrictions appear
in authorization data
proxiable, etc. Allowed.
10. IANA considerations
Maybe set up an appendix with all the tables that IANA will need to start
maintaining?
* cryptosystem registration
* usage number registration
11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
T.B.S.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
12. REFERENCES
[Blumenthal96]
Blumenthal, U., "A Better Key Schedule for DES-Like Ciphers",
Proceedings of PRAGOCRYPT '96, 1996.
[Bellare98]
Bellare, M., Desai, A., Pointcheval, D., Rogaway, P., "Relations Among
Notions of Security for Public-Key Encryption Schemes". Extended
abstract published in Advances in Cryptology- Crypto 98 Proceedings,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 1462, H. Krawcyzk ed.,
Springer-Verlag, 1998.
[DES77]
National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, "Data
Encryption Standard," Federal Information Processing Standards
Publication 46, Washington, DC (1977).
[DESM80]
National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Com- merce, "DES Modes
of Operation," Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 81,
Springfield, VA (December 1980).
[Dolev91]
Dolev, D., Dwork, C., Naor, M., "Non-malleable cryptography",
Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM,
1991.
[DS81]
Dorothy E. Denning and Giovanni Maria Sacco, "Time- stamps in Key
Distribution Protocols," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24(8), pp.
533-536 (August 1981).
[DS90]
Don Davis and Ralph Swick, "Workstation Services and Kerberos
Authentication at Project Athena," Technical Memorandum TM-424, MIT
Laboratory for Computer Science (February 1990).
[Horowitz96]
Horowitz, M., "Key Derivation for Authentication, Integrity, and
Privacy", draft-horowitz-key-derivation-02.txt, August 1998.
[HorowitzB96]
Horowitz, M., "Key Derivation for Kerberos V5", draft-
horowitz-kerb-key-derivation-01.txt, September 1998.
[IS3309]
International Organization for Standardization, "ISO Information
Processing Systems - Data Communication - High-Level Data Link Control
Procedure - Frame Struc- ture," IS 3309 (October 1984). 3rd Edition.
[KBC96]
H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed- Hashing for
Message Authentication," Working Draft
draft-ietf-ipsec-hmac-md5-01.txt, (August 1996).
[KNT92]
John T. Kohl, B. Clifford Neuman, and Theodore Y. Ts'o, "The Evolution
of the Kerberos Authentication Service," in an IEEE Computer Society
Text soon to be published (June 1992).
[Krawczyk96]
Krawczyk, H., Bellare, and M., Canetti, R., "HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for
Message Authentication", draft-ietf-ipsec-hmac- md5-01.txt, August,
1996.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
[LGDSR87]
P. J. Levine, M. R. Gretzinger, J. M. Diaz, W. E. Som- merfeld, and K.
Raeburn, Section E.1: Service Manage- ment System, M.I.T. Project
Athena, Cambridge, Mas- sachusetts (1987).
[MD4-92]
R. Rivest, "The MD4 Message Digest Algorithm," RFC 1320, MIT Laboratory
for Computer Science (April 1992).
[MD5-92]
R. Rivest, "The MD5 Message Digest Algorithm," RFC 1321, MIT Laboratory
for Computer Science (April 1992).
[MNSS87]
S. P. Miller, B. C. Neuman, J. I. Schiller, and J. H. Saltzer, Section
E.2.1: Kerberos Authentication and Authorization System, M.I.T. Project
Athena, Cambridge, Massachusetts (December 21, 1987).
[Neu93]
B. Clifford Neuman, "Proxy-Based Authorization and Accounting for
Distributed Systems," in Proceedings of the 13th International
Conference on Distributed Com- puting Systems, Pittsburgh, PA (May,
1993).
[NS78]
Roger M. Needham and Michael D. Schroeder, "Using Encryption for
Authentication in Large Networks of Com- puters," Communications of the
ACM, Vol. 21(12), pp. 993-999 (December, 1978).
[NT94]
B. Clifford Neuman and Theodore Y. Ts'o, "An Authenti- cation Service
for Computer Networks," IEEE Communica- tions Magazine, Vol. 32(9), pp.
33-38 (September 1994).
[Pat92].
J. Pato, Using Pre-Authentication to Avoid Password Guessing Attacks,
Open Software Foundation DCE Request for Comments 26 (December 1992).
[SG92]
Stuart G. Stubblebine and Virgil D. Gligor, "On Message Integrity in
Cryptographic Protocols," in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on
Research in Security and Privacy, Oakland, California (May 1992).
[SNS88]
J. G. Steiner, B. C. Neuman, and J. I. Schiller, "Ker- beros: An
Authentication Service for Open Network Sys- tems," pp. 191-202 in
Usenix Conference Proceedings, Dallas, Texas (February, 1988).
[X509-88]
CCITT, Recommendation X.509: The Directory Authentica- tion Framework,
December 1988.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
[TM] Project Athena, Athena, and Kerberos are trademarks of the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). No commercial use of these
trademarks may be made without prior written permission of MIT.
[1.1] Note, however, that many applications use Kerberos' functions only
upon the initiation of a stream-based network connection. Unless an
application subsequently provides integrity protection for the data stream,
the identity verification applies only to the initiation of the connection,
and does not guarantee that subsequent messages on the connection originate
from the same principal.
[1.2] Secret and private are often used interchangeably in the literature.
In our usage, it takes two (or more) to share a secret, thus a shared DES
key is a secret key. Something is only private when no one but its owner
knows it. Thus, in public key cryptosystems, one has a public and a private
key.
[1.3] Of course, with appropriate permission the client could arrange
registration of a separately-named principal in a remote realm, and engage
in normal exchanges with that realm's services. However, for even small
numbers of clients this becomes cumbersome, and more automatic methods as
described here are necessary.
[2.1] Though it is permissible to request or issue tickets with no network
addresses specified.
[2.2] It is important that the KDC be sent the name as typed by the user,
and not only the canonical form of the name. If the domain name system was
used to find the canonical name on the client side, the mapping is
vulnerable. [3.1] The password-changing request must not be honored unless
the requester can provide the old password (the user's current secret key).
Otherwise, it would be possible for someone to walk up to an unattended
session and change another user's password.
[3.2] To authenticate a user logging on to a local system, the credentials
obtained in the AS exchange may first be used in a TGS exchange to obtain
credentials for a local server. Those credentials must then be verified by a
local server through successful completion of the Client/Server exchange.
[3.3] "Random" means that, among other things, it should be impossible to
guess the next session key based on knowledge of past session keys. This can
only be achieved in a pseudo-random number generator if it is based on
cryptographic principles. It is more desirable to use a truly random number
generator, such as one based on measurements of random physical phenomena.
[3.4] Tickets contain both an encrypted and unencrypted portion, so
cleartext here refers to the entire unit, which can be copied from one
message and replayed in another without any cryptographic skill.
[3.5] Note that this can make applications based on unreliable transports
difficult to code correctly. If the transport might deliver duplicated
messages, either a new authenticator must be generated for each retry, or
the application server must match requests and replies and replay the first
reply in response to a detected duplicate.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
[3.6] This allows easy implementation of user-to-user authentication [8],
which uses ticket-granting ticket session keys in lieu of secret server keys
in situations where such secret keys could be easily compromised.
[3.7]Note also that the rejection here is restricted to authenticators from
the same principal to the same server. Other client principals communicating
with the same server principal should not be have their authenticators
rejected if the time and microsecond fields happen to match some other
client's authenticator.
[3.8] If this is not done, an attacker could subvert the authentication by
recording the ticket and authenticator sent over the network to a server and
replaying them following an event that caused the server to lose track of
recently seen authenticators.
[3.9] In the Kerberos version 4 protocol, the timestamp in the reply was the
client's timestamp plus one. This is not necessary in version 5 because
version 5 messages are formatted in such a way that it is not possible to
create the reply by judicious message surgery (even in encrypted form)
without knowledge of the appropriate encryption keys.
[3.10] Note that for encrypting the KRB_AP_REP message, the sub-session key
is not used, even if present in the Authenticator.
[3.11] Implementations of the protocol may wish to provide routines to
choose subkeys based on session keys and random numbers and to generate a
negotiated key to be returned in the KRB_AP_REP message.
[3.12]This can be accomplished in several ways. It might be known beforehand
(since the realm is part of the principal identifier), it might be stored in
a nameserver, or it might be obtained from a configuration file. If the
realm to be used is obtained from a nameserver, there is a danger of being
spoofed if the nameservice providing the realm name is not authenticated.
This might result in the use of a realm which has been compromised, and
would result in an attacker's ability to compromise the authentication of
the application server to the client.
[3.13] If the client selects a sub-session key, care must be taken to ensure
the randomness of the selected sub-session key. One approach would be to
generate a random number and XOR it with the session key from the
ticket-granting ticket.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
[6.1] For example, a pseudo-random number generator may be seeded with a
session key, but to protect the original key from any accidental weakness in
the PRNG, use possibly-known data encrypted or checksummed using the key
rather than using the key directly. Usage numbers in this reserved range
should help avoid accidentally seeding the PRNG with a value also computed
and perhaps exposed to an attacker elsewhere.
[6.2] Of course, this does not
apply to protocols that do their own encryption independent of this
framework, directly using the key resulting from the Kerberos authentication
exchange.
[6.3] Perhaps one of the more common reasons for directly
performing encryption is direct control over the negotiation and to select a
"sufficiently strong" encryption algorithm (whatever that means in the
context of a given application). While Kerberos directly provides no
facility for negotiating encryption types between the application client and
server, there are other means for accomplishing similar goals. For example,
requesting only "strong" session key types from the KDC, and assuming that
the type actually returned by the KDC will be understood and supported by
the application server.
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
A. ASN.1 module
Note: This module is currently not aligned with Section 5. This will be
addressed in a future revision. The Pseudocode appendix has been dropped.
This appendix is replacing the pseudocode as appendix A.
Kerberos5 {
iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) kerberosV5(2)
} DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
Int32 ::= INTEGER (-2147483648..2147483647)
-- signed values representable in 32 bits
UInt32 ::= INTEGER (0..4294967295)
-- unsigned 32 bit values
Microseconds ::= INTEGER (0..999999)
-- microseconds
KerberosString ::= GeneralString (IA5String)
Realm ::= KerberosString
PrincipalName ::= SEQUENCE {
name-type [0] Int32,
name-string [1] SEQUENCE OF KerberosString
}
KerberosTime ::= GeneralizedTime -- with no fractional seconds
HostAddress ::= SEQUENCE {
addr-type [0] Int32,
address [1] OCTET STRING
}
-- XXX HostAddresses is always used as an OPTIONAL field and can be
-- zero-length.
HostAddresses -- XXX subtly different from rfc1510,
-- but has a value mapping and encodes the same
::= SEQUENCE OF HostAddress
-- XXX AuthorizationData is always used as an OPTIONAL field and can
-- be zero-length.
AuthorizationData ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
ad-type [0] Int32,
ad-data [1] OCTET STRING
}
PA-DATA ::= SEQUENCE {
padata-type [1] Int32 -- first tag is [1], not [0] --,
padata-value [2] OCTET STRING -- might be encoded AP-REQ
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
KerberosFlags ::= BIT STRING (SIZE (32..MAX)) -- minimum number of bits
-- shall be sent, but no fewer than 32
EncryptedData ::= SEQUENCE {
etype [0] Int32 -- EncryptionType --,
kvno [1] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
cipher [2] OCTET STRING -- ciphertext
}
EncryptionKey ::= SEQUENCE {
keytype [0] Int32 -- actually encryption type --,
keyvalue [1] OCTET STRING
}
Checksum ::= SEQUENCE {
cksumtype [0] Int32,
checksum [1] OCTET STRING
}
Ticket ::= [APPLICATION 1] SEQUENCE {
tkt-vno [0] INTEGER (5),
realm [1] Realm,
sname [2] PrincipalName,
enc-part [3] EncryptedData -- EncTicketPart
}
-- Encrypted part of ticket
EncTicketPart ::= [APPLICATION 3] SEQUENCE {
flags [0] TicketFlags,
key [1] EncryptionKey,
crealm [2] Realm,
cname [3] PrincipalName,
transited [4] TransitedEncoding,
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
caddr [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
authorization-data [10] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL
}
-- encoded Transited field
TransitedEncoding ::= SEQUENCE {
tr-type [0] Int32 -- must be registered --,
contents [1] OCTET STRING
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
TicketFlags ::= KerberosFlags
-- reserved(0),
-- forwardable(1),
-- forwarded(2),
-- proxiable(3),
-- proxy(4),
-- may-postdate(5),
-- postdated(6),
-- invalid(7),
-- renewable(8),
-- initial(9),
-- pre-authent(10),
-- hw-authent(11),
-- the following are new since 1510; maybe remove from krb-clarifications?
-- transited-policy-checked(12),
-- ok-as-delegate(13),
-- anonymous(14),
-- cksummed-ticket(15)
AS-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 10] KDC-REQ
TGS-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 12] KDC-REQ
KDC-REQ ::= SEQUENCE {
pvno [1] INTEGER (5) -- first tag is [1], not [0] --,
msg-type [2] INTEGER (10 -- AS -- | 12 -- TGS --),
padata [3] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL
-- XXX may be zero-length --,
req-body [4] KDC-REQ-BODY
}
KDC-REQ-BODY ::= SEQUENCE {
kdc-options [0] KDCOptions,
cname [1] PrincipalName OPTIONAL
-- Used only in AS-REQ --,
realm [2] Realm
-- Server's realm
-- Also client's in AS-REQ --,
sname [3] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
from [4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
till [5] KerberosTime,
rtime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
nonce [7] UInt32,
etype [8] SEQUENCE OF Int32 -- EncryptionType
-- in preference order --,
addresses [9] HostAddresses OPTIONAL,
enc-authorization-data [10] EncryptedData -- AuthorizationData --,
additional-tickets [11] SEQUENCE OF Ticket OPTIONAL
-- XXX may be zero-length
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
KDCOptions ::= KerberosFlags
-- reserved(0),
-- forwardable(1),
-- forwarded(2),
-- proxiable(3),
-- proxy(4),
-- allow-postdate(5),
-- postdated(6),
-- unused7(7),
-- renewable(8),
-- unused9(9),
-- unused10(10),
-- unused11(11),
-- unused12(12),
-- unused13(13),
-- 14 through 26 were unused in 1510
-- requestanonymous(14),
-- canonicalize(15),
-- disable-transited-check(26),
--
-- renewable-ok(27),
-- enc-tkt-in-skey(28),
-- renew(30),
-- validate(31)
AS-REP ::= [APPLICATION 11] KDC-REP
TGS-REP ::= [APPLICATION 13] KDC-REP
KDC-REP ::= SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (11 -- AS -- | 13 -- TGS --),
padata [2] SEQUENCE OF PA-DATA OPTIONAL
-- XXX may be zero length --,
crealm [3] Realm,
cname [4] PrincipalName,
ticket [5] Ticket,
enc-part [6] EncryptedData
-- EncASRepPart or EncTGSRepPart,
-- as appropriate
}
EncASRepPart ::= [APPLICATION 25] EncKDCRepPart
EncTGSRepPart ::= [APPLICATION 26] EncKDCRepPart
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
EncKDCRepPart ::= SEQUENCE {
key [0] EncryptionKey,
last-req [1] LastReq,
nonce [2] UInt32,
key-expiration [3] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
flags [4] TicketFlags,
authtime [5] KerberosTime,
starttime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
endtime [7] KerberosTime,
renew-till [8] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
srealm [9] Realm,
sname [10] PrincipalName,
caddr [11] HostAddresses OPTIONAL
}
LastReq ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE {
lr-type [0] Int32,
lr-value [1] KerberosTime
}
AP-REQ ::= [APPLICATION 14] SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (14),
ap-options [2] APOptions,
ticket [3] Ticket,
authenticator [4] EncryptedData -- Authenticator
}
APOptions ::= KerberosFlags
-- reserved(0),
-- use-session-key(1),
-- mutual-required(2)
-- Unencrypted authenticator
Authenticator ::= [APPLICATION 2] SEQUENCE {
authenticator-vno [0] INTEGER (5),
crealm [1] Realm,
cname [2] PrincipalName,
cksum [3] Checksum OPTIONAL,
cusec [4] Microseconds,
ctime [5] KerberosTime,
subkey [6] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
seq-number [7] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
authorization-data [8] AuthorizationData OPTIONAL
}
AP-REP ::= [APPLICATION 15] SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (15),
enc-part [2] EncryptedData -- EncAPRepPart
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
EncAPRepPart ::= [APPLICATION 27] SEQUENCE {
ctime [0] KerberosTime,
cusec [1] Microseconds,
subkey [2] EncryptionKey OPTIONAL,
seq-number [3] UInt32 OPTIONAL
}
KRB-SAFE ::= [APPLICATION 20] SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (20),
safe-body [2] KRB-SAFE-BODY,
cksum [3] Checksum
}
KRB-SAFE-BODY ::= SEQUENCE {
user-data [0] OCTET STRING,
timestamp [1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
usec [2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
seq-number [3] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
s-address [4] HostAddress,
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL
}
KRB-PRIV ::= [APPLICATION 21] SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (21),
-- there is no [2] tag
enc-part [3] EncryptedData -- EncKrbPrivPart
}
EncKrbPrivPart ::= [APPLICATION 28] SEQUENCE {
user-data [0] OCTET STRING,
timestamp [1] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
usec [2] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
seq-number [3] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
s-address [4] HostAddress -- sender's addr --,
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL -- recip's addr
}
KRB-CRED ::= [APPLICATION 22] SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (22),
tickets [2] SEQUENCE OF Ticket,
enc-part [3] EncryptedData -- EncKrbCredPart
}
EncKrbCredPart ::= [APPLICATION 29] SEQUENCE {
ticket-info [0] SEQUENCE OF KrbCredInfo,
nonce [1] UInt32 OPTIONAL,
timestamp [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
usec [3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
s-address [4] HostAddress OPTIONAL,
r-address [5] HostAddress OPTIONAL
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
KrbCredInfo ::= SEQUENCE {
key [0] EncryptionKey,
prealm [1] Realm OPTIONAL,
pname [2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
flags [3] TicketFlags OPTIONAL,
authtime [4] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
starttime [5] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
endtime [6] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
renew-till [7] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
srealm [8] Realm OPTIONAL,
sname [9] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
caddr [10] HostAddresses OPTIONAL
}
KRB-ERROR ::= [APPLICATION 30] SEQUENCE {
pvno [0] INTEGER (5),
msg-type [1] INTEGER (30),
ctime [2] KerberosTime OPTIONAL,
cusec [3] Microseconds OPTIONAL,
stime [4] KerberosTime,
susec [5] Microseconds,
error-code [6] Int32,
crealm [7] Realm OPTIONAL,
cname [8] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
realm [9] Realm -- Correct realm --,
sname [10] PrincipalName -- Correct name --,
e-text [11] KerberosString OPTIONAL,
e-data [12] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
}
-- preauth stuff follows
PA-ENC-TIMESTAMP ::= EncryptedData -- PA-ENC-TS-ENC
PA-ENC-TS-ENC ::= SEQUENCE {
patimestamp [0] KerberosTime -- client's time --,
pausec [1] Microseconds OPTIONAL
}
ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY ::= SEQUENCE {
etype [0] Int32,
salt [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
}
ETYPE-INFO ::= SEQUENCE OF ETYPE-INFO-ENTRY
END
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
B. Definition of common authorization data elements
This appendix contains the definitions of basic authorization data elements
that must be understood by all implementations. These common authorization
data elements are recursivly defined, meaning the ad-data for these types
will itself contain a sequence of authorization data whose interpretation is
affected by the encapsulating element. Depending on the meaning of the
encapsulating element, the encapsulated elements may be ignored, might be
interpreted as issued directly by the KDC, or they might be stored in a
separate plaintext part of the ticket. The types of the encapsulating
elements are specified as part of the Kerberos specification because the
behavior based on these values should be understood across implementations
whereas other elements need only be understood by the applications which
they affect.
Authorization data elements are considered critical if present in a ticket
or authenticator. Unless encapsulated in a known authorization data element
amending the criticality of the elements it contains, if an unknown
authorization data element type is received by a server either in an AP-REQ
or in a ticket contained in an AP-REQ, then authentication SHOULD fail.
Authorization data is intended to restrict the use of a ticket. If the
service cannot determine whether the restriction applies to that service
then a security weakness may result if the ticket can be used for that
service. Authorization elements that are optional can be enclosed in
AD-IF-RELEVANT element.
In the definitions that follow, the value of the ad-type for the element
will be specified in the subsection number, and the value of the ad-data
will be as shown in the ASN.1 structure that follows the subsection heading.
B.1. If relevant
AD-IF-RELEVANT AuthorizationData
AD elements encapsulated within the if-relevant element are intended for
interpretation only by application servers that understand the particular
ad-type of the embedded element. Application servers that do not understand
the type of an element embedded within the if-relevant element may ignore
the uninterpretable element. This element promotes interoperability across
implementations which may have local extensions for authorization.
B.4. KDC Issued
AD-KDCIssued SEQUENCE {
ad-checksum[0] Checksum,
i-realm[1] Realm OPTIONAL,
i-sname[2] PrincipalName OPTIONAL,
elements[3] AuthorizationData.
}
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00 Expires 22 August 2002
ad-checksum
A checksum over the elements field using a cryptographic checksum
method that is identical to the checksum used to protect the ticket
itself (i.e. using the same hash function and the same encryption
algorithm used to encrypt the ticket) and using a key derived from the
same key used to protect the ticket.
i-realm, i-sname
The name of the issuing principal if different from the KDC itself.
This field would be used when the KDC can verify the authenticity of
elements signed by the issuing principal and it allows this KDC to
notify the application server of the validity of those elements.
elements
A sequence of authorization data elements issued by the KDC.
The KDC-issued ad-data field is intended to provide a means for Kerberos
principal credentials to embed within themselves privilege attributes and
other mechanisms for positive authorization, amplifying the priveleges of
the principal beyond what can be done using a credentials without such an
a-data element.
This can not be provided without this element because the definition of the
authorization-data field allows elements to be added at will by the bearer
of a TGT at the time that they request service tickets and elements may also
be added to a delegated ticket by inclusion in the authenticator.
For KDC-issued elements this is prevented because the elements are signed by
the KDC by including a checksum encrypted using the server's key (the same
key used to encrypt the ticket - or a key derived from that key). Elements
encapsulated with in the KDC-issued element will be ignored by the
application server if this "signature" is not present. Further, elements
encapsulated within this element from a ticket granting ticket may be
interpreted by the KDC, and used as a basis according to policy for
including new signed elements within derivative tickets, but they will not
be copied to a derivative ticket directly. If they are copied directly to a
derivative ticket by a KDC that is not aware of this element, the signature
will not be correct for the application ticket elements, and the field will
be ignored by the application server.
This element and the elements it encapulates may be safely ignored by
applications, application servers, and KDCs that do not implement this
element.
B.5. And-Or
AD-AND-OR SEQUENCE {
condition-count[0] INTEGER,
elements[1] AuthorizationData
}
When restrictive AD elements are encapsulated within the and-or element are
encountered, only the number specified in condition-count of the
encapsulated conditions must be met in order to satisfy this element. This
element may be used to implement an "or" operation by setting the
condition-count field to 1, and it may specify an "and" operation by setting
the condition count to the number of embedded elements. Application servers
that do not implement this element must reject tickets that contain
authorization data elements of this type.
Datatracker
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-00
Internet-Draft
