DHC                                                              B. Volz
Internet-Draft                                       Cisco Systems, Inc.
Intended status: Informational                            April 19, 2007
Expires: October 21, 2007


           Status of Reclassifying DHCPv4 Options (RFC 3942)
                  <draft-volz-dhc-3942-status-00.txt>

Status of this Memo

   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
   Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

   This Internet-Draft will expire on October 21, 2007.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

Abstract

   This document provides a status report as of April 2007 for the
   effort to reclassify Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol options 128
   to 223 as managed by IANA in accordance with RFC 3942.  This document
   further recommends actions to be taken by IANA to update this
   reclassification effort.






Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 1]


Internet-Draft           RFC 3942 Status Report               April 2007


Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Summary of Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements  . . . . . . . . . . 7







































Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 2]


Internet-Draft           RFC 3942 Status Report               April 2007


1.  Introduction

   This document provides a status report as of March 2007 for the
   effort to reclassify Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4) [2]
   options 128 to 223 as managed by IANA in accordance with RFC 3942
   [1].  This document further recommends actions to be taken by IANA to
   finalize this reclassification effort.

   RFC 3942 was published in November 2004 and stipulated a process and
   time table for vendors using options in the 128 to 223 range to
   request IANA to assign those options to the vendors' use.  The time
   table for the process has elapsed.


2.  Summary of Activity

   After the publication of RFC 3942, several vendors and other uses of
   DHCPv4 options 128 to 223 were reported and IANA placed the following
   options in the tentatively assigned state in June 2005:

   128  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4], Etherboot (etherboot
        signature of octets e4:45:74:68:00:00), Cablelabs (DOCSIS "full
        security" server IP address), and Mitel (IP phone software load
        TFTP server IP address) [5].
   129  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4], Etherboot (kernel options),
        and Mitel (call server IP address) [5].
   130  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4], Etherboot (ethernet
        interface), and Mitel (discrimination string - identifies
        vendor) [5].
   131  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4] and Mitel (remote statistics
        server IP address) [5].
   132  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4] and Mitel (802.1P VLAN id)
        [5].
   133  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4] and Mitel (802.1Q L2
        priority) [5].
   134  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4] and Mitel (diffserv code
        point) [5].
   134  Reported as used by Intel's PXE [4] and Mitel (HTTP proxy for
        phone-specific applications) [5].
   150  Reported as used by Cisco (TFTP server address) [6], Etherboot
        (usage unknown), and GNU Grub (GRUB configuration path name).
   175  Reported as used by Etherboot (usage unknown).
   176  Reported as used by Avaya (IP telephone).
   177  Reported as used by Etherboot (usage unknown) and by Cablelabs
        (though that use has been deprecated in favor of option 122
        [3]).





Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 3]


Internet-Draft           RFC 3942 Status Report               April 2007


   208  Reported as used by PXELINUX (MAGIC) [7].
   209  Reported as used by PXELINUX (ConfigFile) [7].
   210  Reported as used by PXELINUX (Pathprefix) [7].
   211  Reported as used by PXELINUX (Reboottime) [7].
   220  Reported as used by Cisco (subnet allocation) [8].
   221  Reported as used by Cisco (virtual subnet selection option) [9].

   For those options where multiple uses were demonstrated to be in
   reasonably wide usage, RFC 3942 stipulated that none of the users
   would be allowed to retain that option number.  However, this assumed
   that each of these users would follow through on the process.

   Since that time:
   o  The Mitel draft [5] expired in November 2005.
   o  The PXELINUX draft [7] expired in November 2006.  And, an updated
      draft has just been published.
   o  The Cisco TFTP server draft [6] expired in December 2005.  And, an
      updated draft is expected to be published shortly.
   o  The Cisco subnet allocation draft [8] is presently active.
   o  The Cisco virtual subnet selection option [9] expired in December
      2005.  And, an updated draft has just been published.
   o  No internet-draft was ever published for options used by
      Etherboot, GRUB, or Avaya.


3.  Recommendations

   Based on the process and time table specified by RFC 3942, the
   following actions are recommended:

   128  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   129  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   130  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   131  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   132  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   133  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   134  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   134  Assign to Intel's PXE [4].
   150  Leave tentatively assigned to Cisco (TFTP server address)
        pending republication and continued forward process on [6].
   175  Move to "Unassigned" (thus available for assignment).
   176  Move to "Unassigned" (thus available for assignment).
   177  Move to "Unassigned" (thus available for assignment).
   208  Leave tentatively assigned to PXELINUX (MAGIC) pending
        republication and continued forward process on [7].






Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 4]


Internet-Draft           RFC 3942 Status Report               April 2007


   209  Leave tentatively assigned to PXELINUX (ConfigFile) pending
        republication and continued forward process on [7].
   210  Leave tentatively assigned to PXELINUX (Pathprefix) pending
        republication and continued forward process on [7].
   211  Leave tentatively assigned to PXELINUX (Reboottime) pending
        republication and continued forward process on [7].
   220  Leave tentatively assigned to Cisco (subnet allocation) pending
        republication and continued forward process on [8].
   221  Leave tentatively assigned to Cisco (virtual subnet selection
        option) pending republication and continued forward process on
        [9].


4.  Security Considerations

   This document has no security considerations.


5.  IANA Considerations

   IANA is requested to update
   http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters for options
   128-135, 150, 175-177, 208-211, 220, and 221 as follows based on the
   above recommendations:

128  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
129  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
130  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
131  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
132  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
133  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
134  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
135  PXE - undefined (vendor specific)                         [RFC4578]
150  TFTP server address (Tentatively Assigned - 23 Jun 2005 -
          DRAFT-RAJ-DHC-TFTP-ADDR-OPTION-01.TXT)
175-177 Unassigned                                             [RFC3942]
208  pxelinux.magic (string) = F1:00:74:7E (241.0.116.126) (Tentatively
          Assigned - 23 Jun 2005 - DRAFT-IETF-DHC-PXELINUX-01.TXT)
209  pxelinux.configfile (text) (Tentatively Assigned - 23 Jun 2005 -
          DRAFT-IETF-DHC-PXELINUX-01.TXT)
210  pxelinux.pathprefix (text) (Tentatively Assigned - 23 Jun 2005 -
          DRAFT-IETF-DHC-PXELINUX-01.TXT)
211  pxelinux.reboottime (unsigned integer 32 bits) (Tentatively
          Assigned - 23 Jun 2005 - DRAFT-IETF-DHC-PXELINUX-01.TXT)
220  Subnet Allocation Option (Tentatively Assigned - 23 Jun 2005 -
          DRAFT-IETF-DHC-SUBNET-ALLOC-04.TXT)
221  Virtual Subnet Selection Option    (Tentatively Assigned - 23 Jun
          2005 - DRAFT-IETF-DHC-VPN-OPTION-06.TXT)



Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 5]


Internet-Draft           RFC 3942 Status Report               April 2007


6.  References

6.1.  Normative References

   [1]  Volz, B., "Reclassifying Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
        version 4 (DHCPv4) Options", RFC 3942, November 2004.

6.2.  Informative References

   [2]  Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131,
        March 1997.

   [3]  Beser, B. and P. Duffy, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
        (DHCP) Option for CableLabs Client Configuration", RFC 3495,
        March 2003.

   [4]  Johnston, M. and S. Venaas, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
        (DHCP) Options for the Intel Preboot eXecution Environment
        (PXE)", RFC 4578, November 2006.

   [5]  Blatherwick, P., "Mitel Usage of DHCPv4 Vendor Options 128 -
        135", draft-blatherwick-dhc-mitel-site-options-usage-00 (work in
        progress), May 2005.

   [6]  Johnson, R., "TFTP Server Address DHCP Option",
        draft-raj-dhc-tftp-addr-option-01 (work in progress), June 2005.

   [7]  Hankins, D., "PXELINUX Use of 'Site Local' Option Space",
        draft-ietf-dhc-pxelinux-01 (work in progress), April 2007.

   [8]  Johnson, R., "Subnet Allocation Option",
        draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-04 (work in progress), October 2006.

   [9]  Johnson, R., "Virtual Subnet Selection Option",
        draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-06 (work in progress), April 2007.


Author's Address

   Bernard Volz
   Cisco Systems, Inc.
   1414 Massachusetts Ave.
   Boxborough, MA  01719
   USA

   Phone: +1 978 936 0000
   Email: volz@cisco.com




Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 6]


Internet-Draft           RFC 3942 Status Report               April 2007


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.


Acknowledgment

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).





Volz                    Expires October 21, 2007                [Page 7]