Reclassifying ICMPv6 (RFC4443) and DNS Extensions for IPv6 (RFC3596) to Internet Standard
status-change-icmpv6-dns-ipv6-to-internet-standard-02
Yes
Warren Kumari
(Alia Atlas)
(Suresh Krishnan)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Eric Rescorla)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve these RFC status changes?"
Warren Kumari
Yes
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-04-07 for -01)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-04-12 for -01)
Unknown
I was alsoconfused by the two-in-one request, but there is no point in changing it now.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Eric Rescorla Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-04-11 for -01)
Unknown
I agree that two independent requests would be clearer but as long as noone has an objection against one of them, I guess it's fine.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown