Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) to Historic
status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic-05

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce" 
Cc: diffserv-chairs@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-pr@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-sppi@ietf.org,
    kmn@mountainfog.com,
    draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@ietf.org,
    rap-chairs@ietf.org,
    bclaise@cisco.com,
    "The IESG" ,
    draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib@ietf.org,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@ietf.org,
    ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: Document Action: Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy Information Base to Historic

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy Information Base
  (rfc3317) to Historic

This document action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3317/

Status Change Details:

  This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
  and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, as well as

  three Policy Information Bases (RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571) to
  Historic status. 

  The procedure 2 in
  http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html
  has been followed.

  The justification for doing so can be found in, which was initially in

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04,
  is copied over here.

==============================================================
Network Working Group                                  J. Schoenwaelder
Internet-Draft                                  Jacobs University Bremen
Intended status: Informational                            April 13, 2016
Expires: October 15, 2016


            Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic
              draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04.txt

Abstract

  This memo requests the reclassification of RFC 3084, COPS Usage for
  Policy Provisioning, RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning
  Information, RFC 3317, Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base, RFC 3318, Framework Policy Information Base,
  and RFC 3571, Framework Policy Information Base for Usage, Feedback,
  to Historic status.

Status of This Memo

  This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
  provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
  Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
  working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
  Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
  time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
  material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

  This Internet-Draft will expire on October 15, 2016.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of




Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 1]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Reclassification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

1.  Introduction

  The purpose of this document is to request and explain the
  reclassification of the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)
  [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)
  [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information
  Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
  Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status.

2.  Reclassification

  The COPS-PR protocol was designed to provision policy information
  from a Policy Decision Point (PDP) to a Policy Enforcement Point
  (PEP).  The SPPI data modeling language supports COPS-PR by providing
  a data modeling language for specifying Policy Information Bases
  (PIBs).

  The COPS-PR / SPPI technology has seen limited deployment.  The
  Quality of Service (QoS) provisioning data models created within the
  IETF [RFC3317], [RFC3318], [RFC3571] did not reach IETF consensus for
  publication on the standards-track and have since then been
  Informational documents.

  An IAB Network Management Workshop held in 2002 [RFC3535] led to the
  creation of the XML-based Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
  [RFC6241] and an associated data modeling language called YANG
  [RFC6020].  These new protocols are specifically designed to match
  the needs of network operators.  Configuration management related
  efforts in the IETF Operations and Management Area are now centered
  on NETCONF and YANG.

  It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to
  Historic status, as described in [RFC2026].  Along with this action,



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 2]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and
  published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are requested to be
  reclassified to Historic status as well.

3.  Security Considerations

  Reclassifying RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571
  has no security implications.

4.  IANA Considerations

  The IANA rules for registering PIB modules defined in [RFC3159]
  remain in force.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
              3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
              .

  [RFC3084]  Chan, K., Seligson, J., Durham, D., Gai, S., McCloghrie,
              K., Herzog, S., Reichmeyer, F., Yavatkar, R., and A.
              Smith, "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)", RFC
              3084, DOI 10.17487/RFC3084, March 2001,
              .

  [RFC3159]  McCloghrie, K., Fine, M., Seligson, J., Chan, K., Hahn,
              S., Sahita, R., Smith, A., and F. Reichmeyer, "Structure
              of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)", RFC 3159, DOI
              10.17487/RFC3159, August 2001,
              .

  [RFC3317]  Chan, K., Sahita, R., Hahn, S., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy
              Information Base", RFC 3317, DOI 10.17487/RFC3317, March
              2003, .

  [RFC3318]  Sahita, R., Ed., Hahn, S., Chan, K., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Framework Policy Information Base", RFC 3318, DOI 10
              .17487/RFC3318, March 2003,
              .

  [RFC3571]  Rawlins, D., Kulkarni, A., Ho Chan, K., Bokaemper, M., and
              D. Dutt, "Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
              Feedback", RFC 3571, DOI 10.17487/RFC3571, August 2003,
              .



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 3]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


5.2.  Informative References

  [RFC3535]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Overview of the 2002 IAB Network
              Management Workshop", RFC 3535, DOI 10.17487/RFC3535, May
              2003, .

  [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              .

  [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              .

Author's Address

  Juergen Schoenwaelder
  Jacobs University Bremen
  Campus Ring 1
  28725 Bremen
  Germany

  Email: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de




Personnel

  Benoit Claise is the responsible Area Director.

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce" 
Cc: diffserv-chairs@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-pr@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-sppi@ietf.org,
    kmn@mountainfog.com,
    draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@ietf.org,
    rap-chairs@ietf.org,
    bclaise@cisco.com,
    "The IESG" ,
    draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib@ietf.org,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@ietf.org,
    ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: Document Action: Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback to Historic

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- Framework Policy Information Base for Usage Feedback
  (rfc3571) to Historic

This document action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3571/

Status Change Details:

  This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
  and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, as well as

  three Policy Information Bases (RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571) to
  Historic status. 

  The procedure 2 in
  http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html
  has been followed.

  The justification for doing so can be found in, which was initially in

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04,
  is copied over here.

==============================================================
Network Working Group                                  J. Schoenwaelder
Internet-Draft                                  Jacobs University Bremen
Intended status: Informational                            April 13, 2016
Expires: October 15, 2016


            Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic
              draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04.txt

Abstract

  This memo requests the reclassification of RFC 3084, COPS Usage for
  Policy Provisioning, RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning
  Information, RFC 3317, Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base, RFC 3318, Framework Policy Information Base,
  and RFC 3571, Framework Policy Information Base for Usage, Feedback,
  to Historic status.

Status of This Memo

  This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
  provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
  Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
  working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
  Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
  time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
  material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

  This Internet-Draft will expire on October 15, 2016.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of




Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 1]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Reclassification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

1.  Introduction

  The purpose of this document is to request and explain the
  reclassification of the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)
  [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)
  [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information
  Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
  Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status.

2.  Reclassification

  The COPS-PR protocol was designed to provision policy information
  from a Policy Decision Point (PDP) to a Policy Enforcement Point
  (PEP).  The SPPI data modeling language supports COPS-PR by providing
  a data modeling language for specifying Policy Information Bases
  (PIBs).

  The COPS-PR / SPPI technology has seen limited deployment.  The
  Quality of Service (QoS) provisioning data models created within the
  IETF [RFC3317], [RFC3318], [RFC3571] did not reach IETF consensus for
  publication on the standards-track and have since then been
  Informational documents.

  An IAB Network Management Workshop held in 2002 [RFC3535] led to the
  creation of the XML-based Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
  [RFC6241] and an associated data modeling language called YANG
  [RFC6020].  These new protocols are specifically designed to match
  the needs of network operators.  Configuration management related
  efforts in the IETF Operations and Management Area are now centered
  on NETCONF and YANG.

  It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to
  Historic status, as described in [RFC2026].  Along with this action,



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 2]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and
  published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are requested to be
  reclassified to Historic status as well.

3.  Security Considerations

  Reclassifying RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571
  has no security implications.

4.  IANA Considerations

  The IANA rules for registering PIB modules defined in [RFC3159]
  remain in force.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
              3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
              .

  [RFC3084]  Chan, K., Seligson, J., Durham, D., Gai, S., McCloghrie,
              K., Herzog, S., Reichmeyer, F., Yavatkar, R., and A.
              Smith, "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)", RFC
              3084, DOI 10.17487/RFC3084, March 2001,
              .

  [RFC3159]  McCloghrie, K., Fine, M., Seligson, J., Chan, K., Hahn,
              S., Sahita, R., Smith, A., and F. Reichmeyer, "Structure
              of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)", RFC 3159, DOI
              10.17487/RFC3159, August 2001,
              .

  [RFC3317]  Chan, K., Sahita, R., Hahn, S., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy
              Information Base", RFC 3317, DOI 10.17487/RFC3317, March
              2003, .

  [RFC3318]  Sahita, R., Ed., Hahn, S., Chan, K., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Framework Policy Information Base", RFC 3318, DOI 10
              .17487/RFC3318, March 2003,
              .

  [RFC3571]  Rawlins, D., Kulkarni, A., Ho Chan, K., Bokaemper, M., and
              D. Dutt, "Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
              Feedback", RFC 3571, DOI 10.17487/RFC3571, August 2003,
              .



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 3]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


5.2.  Informative References

  [RFC3535]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Overview of the 2002 IAB Network
              Management Workshop", RFC 3535, DOI 10.17487/RFC3535, May
              2003, .

  [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              .

  [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              .

Author's Address

  Juergen Schoenwaelder
  Jacobs University Bremen
  Campus Ring 1
  28725 Bremen
  Germany

  Email: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de




Personnel

  Benoit Claise is the responsible Area Director.

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce" 
Cc: diffserv-chairs@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-pr@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-sppi@ietf.org,
    kmn@mountainfog.com,
    draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@ietf.org,
    rap-chairs@ietf.org,
    bclaise@cisco.com,
    "The IESG" ,
    draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib@ietf.org,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@ietf.org,
    ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: Protocol Action: COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR) to Historic

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)
  (rfc3084) to Historic

This protocol action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3084/

Status Change Details:

  This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
  and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, as well as

  three Policy Information Bases (RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571) to
  Historic status. 

  The procedure 2 in
  http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html
  has been followed.

  The justification for doing so can be found in, which was initially in

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04,
  is copied over here.

==============================================================
Network Working Group                                  J. Schoenwaelder
Internet-Draft                                  Jacobs University Bremen
Intended status: Informational                            April 13, 2016
Expires: October 15, 2016


            Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic
              draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04.txt

Abstract

  This memo requests the reclassification of RFC 3084, COPS Usage for
  Policy Provisioning, RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning
  Information, RFC 3317, Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base, RFC 3318, Framework Policy Information Base,
  and RFC 3571, Framework Policy Information Base for Usage, Feedback,
  to Historic status.

Status of This Memo

  This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
  provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
  Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
  working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
  Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
  time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
  material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

  This Internet-Draft will expire on October 15, 2016.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of




Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 1]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Reclassification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

1.  Introduction

  The purpose of this document is to request and explain the
  reclassification of the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)
  [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)
  [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information
  Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
  Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status.

2.  Reclassification

  The COPS-PR protocol was designed to provision policy information
  from a Policy Decision Point (PDP) to a Policy Enforcement Point
  (PEP).  The SPPI data modeling language supports COPS-PR by providing
  a data modeling language for specifying Policy Information Bases
  (PIBs).

  The COPS-PR / SPPI technology has seen limited deployment.  The
  Quality of Service (QoS) provisioning data models created within the
  IETF [RFC3317], [RFC3318], [RFC3571] did not reach IETF consensus for
  publication on the standards-track and have since then been
  Informational documents.

  An IAB Network Management Workshop held in 2002 [RFC3535] led to the
  creation of the XML-based Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
  [RFC6241] and an associated data modeling language called YANG
  [RFC6020].  These new protocols are specifically designed to match
  the needs of network operators.  Configuration management related
  efforts in the IETF Operations and Management Area are now centered
  on NETCONF and YANG.

  It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to
  Historic status, as described in [RFC2026].  Along with this action,



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 2]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and
  published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are requested to be
  reclassified to Historic status as well.

3.  Security Considerations

  Reclassifying RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571
  has no security implications.

4.  IANA Considerations

  The IANA rules for registering PIB modules defined in [RFC3159]
  remain in force.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
              3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
              .

  [RFC3084]  Chan, K., Seligson, J., Durham, D., Gai, S., McCloghrie,
              K., Herzog, S., Reichmeyer, F., Yavatkar, R., and A.
              Smith, "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)", RFC
              3084, DOI 10.17487/RFC3084, March 2001,
              .

  [RFC3159]  McCloghrie, K., Fine, M., Seligson, J., Chan, K., Hahn,
              S., Sahita, R., Smith, A., and F. Reichmeyer, "Structure
              of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)", RFC 3159, DOI
              10.17487/RFC3159, August 2001,
              .

  [RFC3317]  Chan, K., Sahita, R., Hahn, S., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy
              Information Base", RFC 3317, DOI 10.17487/RFC3317, March
              2003, .

  [RFC3318]  Sahita, R., Ed., Hahn, S., Chan, K., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Framework Policy Information Base", RFC 3318, DOI 10
              .17487/RFC3318, March 2003,
              .

  [RFC3571]  Rawlins, D., Kulkarni, A., Ho Chan, K., Bokaemper, M., and
              D. Dutt, "Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
              Feedback", RFC 3571, DOI 10.17487/RFC3571, August 2003,
              .



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 3]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


5.2.  Informative References

  [RFC3535]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Overview of the 2002 IAB Network
              Management Workshop", RFC 3535, DOI 10.17487/RFC3535, May
              2003, .

  [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              .

  [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              .

Author's Address

  Juergen Schoenwaelder
  Jacobs University Bremen
  Campus Ring 1
  28725 Bremen
  Germany

  Email: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de




Personnel

  Benoit Claise is the responsible Area Director.

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce" 
Cc: diffserv-chairs@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-pr@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-sppi@ietf.org,
    kmn@mountainfog.com,
    draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@ietf.org,
    rap-chairs@ietf.org,
    bclaise@cisco.com,
    "The IESG" ,
    draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib@ietf.org,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@ietf.org,
    ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: Protocol Action: Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI) to Historic

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)
  (rfc3159) to Historic

This protocol action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3159/

Status Change Details:

  This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
  and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, as well as

  three Policy Information Bases (RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571) to
  Historic status. 

  The procedure 2 in
  http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html
  has been followed.

  The justification for doing so can be found in, which was initially in

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04,
  is copied over here.

==============================================================
Network Working Group                                  J. Schoenwaelder
Internet-Draft                                  Jacobs University Bremen
Intended status: Informational                            April 13, 2016
Expires: October 15, 2016


            Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic
              draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04.txt

Abstract

  This memo requests the reclassification of RFC 3084, COPS Usage for
  Policy Provisioning, RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning
  Information, RFC 3317, Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base, RFC 3318, Framework Policy Information Base,
  and RFC 3571, Framework Policy Information Base for Usage, Feedback,
  to Historic status.

Status of This Memo

  This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
  provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
  Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
  working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
  Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
  time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
  material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

  This Internet-Draft will expire on October 15, 2016.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of




Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 1]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Reclassification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

1.  Introduction

  The purpose of this document is to request and explain the
  reclassification of the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)
  [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)
  [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information
  Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
  Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status.

2.  Reclassification

  The COPS-PR protocol was designed to provision policy information
  from a Policy Decision Point (PDP) to a Policy Enforcement Point
  (PEP).  The SPPI data modeling language supports COPS-PR by providing
  a data modeling language for specifying Policy Information Bases
  (PIBs).

  The COPS-PR / SPPI technology has seen limited deployment.  The
  Quality of Service (QoS) provisioning data models created within the
  IETF [RFC3317], [RFC3318], [RFC3571] did not reach IETF consensus for
  publication on the standards-track and have since then been
  Informational documents.

  An IAB Network Management Workshop held in 2002 [RFC3535] led to the
  creation of the XML-based Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
  [RFC6241] and an associated data modeling language called YANG
  [RFC6020].  These new protocols are specifically designed to match
  the needs of network operators.  Configuration management related
  efforts in the IETF Operations and Management Area are now centered
  on NETCONF and YANG.

  It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to
  Historic status, as described in [RFC2026].  Along with this action,



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 2]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and
  published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are requested to be
  reclassified to Historic status as well.

3.  Security Considerations

  Reclassifying RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571
  has no security implications.

4.  IANA Considerations

  The IANA rules for registering PIB modules defined in [RFC3159]
  remain in force.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
              3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
              .

  [RFC3084]  Chan, K., Seligson, J., Durham, D., Gai, S., McCloghrie,
              K., Herzog, S., Reichmeyer, F., Yavatkar, R., and A.
              Smith, "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)", RFC
              3084, DOI 10.17487/RFC3084, March 2001,
              .

  [RFC3159]  McCloghrie, K., Fine, M., Seligson, J., Chan, K., Hahn,
              S., Sahita, R., Smith, A., and F. Reichmeyer, "Structure
              of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)", RFC 3159, DOI
              10.17487/RFC3159, August 2001,
              .

  [RFC3317]  Chan, K., Sahita, R., Hahn, S., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy
              Information Base", RFC 3317, DOI 10.17487/RFC3317, March
              2003, .

  [RFC3318]  Sahita, R., Ed., Hahn, S., Chan, K., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Framework Policy Information Base", RFC 3318, DOI 10
              .17487/RFC3318, March 2003,
              .

  [RFC3571]  Rawlins, D., Kulkarni, A., Ho Chan, K., Bokaemper, M., and
              D. Dutt, "Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
              Feedback", RFC 3571, DOI 10.17487/RFC3571, August 2003,
              .



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 3]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


5.2.  Informative References

  [RFC3535]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Overview of the 2002 IAB Network
              Management Workshop", RFC 3535, DOI 10.17487/RFC3535, May
              2003, .

  [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              .

  [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              .

Author's Address

  Juergen Schoenwaelder
  Jacobs University Bremen
  Campus Ring 1
  28725 Bremen
  Germany

  Email: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de




Personnel

  Benoit Claise is the responsible Area Director.

The following approval message was sent
From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce" 
Cc: diffserv-chairs@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-pr@ietf.org,
    draft-ietf-rap-sppi@ietf.org,
    kmn@mountainfog.com,
    draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@ietf.org,
    rap-chairs@ietf.org,
    bclaise@cisco.com,
    "The IESG" ,
    draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib@ietf.org,
    rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org,
    draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@ietf.org,
    ops-area@ietf.org
Subject: Document Action: Framework Policy Information Base to Historic

The IESG has approved changing the status of the following document:
- Framework Policy Information Base
  (rfc3318) to Historic

This document action is documented at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/

A URL of the affected document is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3318/

Status Change Details:

  This memo reclassifies RFC 3084, COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning,
  and RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning Information, as well as

  three Policy Information Bases (RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571) to
  Historic status. 

  The procedure 2 in
  http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/designating-rfcs-as-historic.html
  has been followed.

  The justification for doing so can be found in, which was initially in

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04,
  is copied over here.

==============================================================
Network Working Group                                  J. Schoenwaelder
Internet-Draft                                  Jacobs University Bremen
Intended status: Informational                            April 13, 2016
Expires: October 15, 2016


            Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic
              draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-04.txt

Abstract

  This memo requests the reclassification of RFC 3084, COPS Usage for
  Policy Provisioning, RFC 3159, Structure of Policy Provisioning
  Information, RFC 3317, Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base, RFC 3318, Framework Policy Information Base,
  and RFC 3571, Framework Policy Information Base for Usage, Feedback,
  to Historic status.

Status of This Memo

  This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
  provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

  Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
  Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
  working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
  Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

  Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
  and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
  time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
  material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

  This Internet-Draft will expire on October 15, 2016.

Copyright Notice

  Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
  document authors.  All rights reserved.

  This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
  Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
  (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
  publication of this document.  Please review these documents
  carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
  to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
  include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of




Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 1]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
  described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

  1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  2.  Reclassification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  2
  3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
  5.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
    5.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
  Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4

1.  Introduction

  The purpose of this document is to request and explain the
  reclassification of the COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)
  [RFC3084] and the Structure of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)
  [RFC3159] along with the Differentiated Services Quality of Service
  Policy Information Base [RFC3317], the Framework Policy Information
  Base [RFC3318], and the Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
  Feedback [RFC3571] to Historic status.

2.  Reclassification

  The COPS-PR protocol was designed to provision policy information
  from a Policy Decision Point (PDP) to a Policy Enforcement Point
  (PEP).  The SPPI data modeling language supports COPS-PR by providing
  a data modeling language for specifying Policy Information Bases
  (PIBs).

  The COPS-PR / SPPI technology has seen limited deployment.  The
  Quality of Service (QoS) provisioning data models created within the
  IETF [RFC3317], [RFC3318], [RFC3571] did not reach IETF consensus for
  publication on the standards-track and have since then been
  Informational documents.

  An IAB Network Management Workshop held in 2002 [RFC3535] led to the
  creation of the XML-based Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
  [RFC6241] and an associated data modeling language called YANG
  [RFC6020].  These new protocols are specifically designed to match
  the needs of network operators.  Configuration management related
  efforts in the IETF Operations and Management Area are now centered
  on NETCONF and YANG.

  It is therefore appropriate to reclassify COPS-PR and SPPI to
  Historic status, as described in [RFC2026].  Along with this action,



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 2]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


  the QoS provisioning data models written in the SPPI language and
  published in [RFC3317], [RFC3318], and [RFC3571] are requested to be
  reclassified to Historic status as well.

3.  Security Considerations

  Reclassifying RFC 3084, RFC 3159, RFC 3317, RFC 3318, and RFC 3571
  has no security implications.

4.  IANA Considerations

  The IANA rules for registering PIB modules defined in [RFC3159]
  remain in force.

5.  References

5.1.  Normative References

  [RFC2026]  Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision
              3", BCP 9, RFC 2026, DOI 10.17487/RFC2026, October 1996,
              .

  [RFC3084]  Chan, K., Seligson, J., Durham, D., Gai, S., McCloghrie,
              K., Herzog, S., Reichmeyer, F., Yavatkar, R., and A.
              Smith, "COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)", RFC
              3084, DOI 10.17487/RFC3084, March 2001,
              .

  [RFC3159]  McCloghrie, K., Fine, M., Seligson, J., Chan, K., Hahn,
              S., Sahita, R., Smith, A., and F. Reichmeyer, "Structure
              of Policy Provisioning Information (SPPI)", RFC 3159, DOI
              10.17487/RFC3159, August 2001,
              .

  [RFC3317]  Chan, K., Sahita, R., Hahn, S., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Differentiated Services Quality of Service Policy
              Information Base", RFC 3317, DOI 10.17487/RFC3317, March
              2003, .

  [RFC3318]  Sahita, R., Ed., Hahn, S., Chan, K., and K. McCloghrie,
              "Framework Policy Information Base", RFC 3318, DOI 10
              .17487/RFC3318, March 2003,
              .

  [RFC3571]  Rawlins, D., Kulkarni, A., Ho Chan, K., Bokaemper, M., and
              D. Dutt, "Framework Policy Information Base for Usage
              Feedback", RFC 3571, DOI 10.17487/RFC3571, August 2003,
              .



Schoenwaelder          Expires October 15, 2016                [Page 3]
?
Internet-Draft        COPS-PR and SPPI to Historic            April 2016


5.2.  Informative References

  [RFC3535]  Schoenwaelder, J., "Overview of the 2002 IAB Network
              Management Workshop", RFC 3535, DOI 10.17487/RFC3535, May
              2003, .

  [RFC6020]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
              the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
              .

  [RFC6241]  Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
              and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
              (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
              .

Author's Address

  Juergen Schoenwaelder
  Jacobs University Bremen
  Campus Ring 1
  28725 Bremen
  Germany

  Email: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de




Personnel

  Benoit Claise is the responsible Area Director.

[Ballot comment]
Does "The COPS-PR / SPPI technology has seen limited deployment" (see draft-schoenw-opsawg-copspr-historic-03)  mean, it is still used somewhere (but not the Internet) or it has been used in the past and is not used anymore?

The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: "IETF-Announce"
CC: diffserv-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rap-pr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rap-sppi@ietf.org, kmn@mountainfog.com, draft-ietf-rap-frameworkpib@ietf.org, rap-chairs@ietf.org, bclaise@cisco.com, draft-ietf-rap-feedback-fr-pib@ietf.org, draft-ietf-diffserv-pib@ietf.org, ops-area@ietf.org
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Sender:
Subject: Last Call:  (Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and 3571) to Historic) to Historic


The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
- 'Reclassification of COPS-PR and SPPI (RFC 3084, 3159, 3317, 3318, and
  3571) to Historic'
  as Historic

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-02-10. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract






The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-copspr-sppi-to-historic/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.