A YANG Data Model for the Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)
RFC 8916
|
| Document |
Type |
|
RFC - Proposed Standard
(October 2020; No errata)
|
|
Authors |
|
Xufeng Liu
,
Zheng Zhang
,
Anish Peter
,
Mahesh Sivakumar
,
Feng Guo
,
Pete McAllister
|
|
Last updated |
|
2020-10-31
|
|
Replaces |
|
draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang
|
|
Stream |
|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
html
xml
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
|
Yang Validation |
|
☯
0 errors, 0 warnings.
draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-18.txt:
xym 0.4.8:
Extracting 'ietf-msdp@2020-04-15.yang'
Removed 0 empty lines
ietf-msdp@2020-04-15.yang:
pyang 2.3.2: pyang --verbose --ietf -p {libs} {model}:
# module search path: a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/:/a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/draftmod/:/a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/ianamod/:/a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/catalogmod/:.:/var/lib/wwwrun/yang/modules:/a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules
# read ietf-msdp@2020-04-15.yang (CL)
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-yang-types.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/draftmod/ietf-yang-types@2020-07-06.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-inet-types.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/draftmod/ietf-inet-types@2020-07-06.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-routing.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-routing@2018-03-13.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-interfaces.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-interfaces@2018-02-20.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-ip.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-ip@2018-02-22.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-key-chain.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-key-chain@2017-06-15.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-netconf-acm.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-netconf-acm@2018-02-14.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-routing-types.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-routing-types@2017-12-04.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-access-control-list.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-access-control-list@2019-03-04.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-packet-fields.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-packet-fields@2019-03-04.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-datatracker/7.21.0/env/share/yang/modules/ietf/ietf-ethertypes.yang
# read /a/www/ietf-ftp/yang/rfcmod/ietf-ethertypes@2019-03-04.yang
yanglint SO 1.6.7: yanglint --verbose -p {tmplib} -p {rfclib} -p {draftlib} -p {ianalib} -p {cataloglib} {model} -i:
No validation errors
|
|
Reviews |
|
|
|
Additional Resources |
|
|
| Stream |
WG state
|
|
Submitted to IESG for Publication
|
|
Document shepherd |
|
Stig Venaas
|
|
Shepherd write-up |
|
Show
(last changed 2019-11-08)
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
RFC 8916 (Proposed Standard)
|
|
Action Holders |
|
(None)
|
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Yes
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
Alvaro Retana
|
|
Send notices to |
|
Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
|
| IANA |
IANA review state |
|
IANA OK - Actions Needed
|
|
IANA action state |
|
RFC-Ed-Ack
|
|
IANA expert review state |
|
Expert Reviews OK
|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) X. Liu
Request for Comments: 8916 Volta Networks
Category: Standards Track Z. Zhang, Ed.
ISSN: 2070-1721 ZTE Corporation
A. Peter
Individual Contributor
M. Sivakumar
Juniper Networks
F. Guo
Huawei Technologies
P. McAllister
Metaswitch Networks
October 2020
A YANG Data Model for the Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)
Abstract
This document defines a YANG data model for the configuration and
management of Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) protocol
operations.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8916.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Terminology
1.2. Conventions Used in This Document
1.3. Tree Diagrams
1.4. Prefixes in Data Node Names
2. Design of the Data Model
2.1. Scope of Model
2.2. Specification
3. Module Structure
3.1. MSDP Configuration
3.2. MSDP States
4. MSDP YANG Data Model
5. Security Considerations
6. IANA Considerations
7. References
7.1. Normative References
7.2. Informative References
Appendix A. Data Tree Example
A.1. The Global and Peer Configuration Example
A.2. The State Example
A.3. The Actions Example
Acknowledgements
Contributors
Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
[RFC3618] introduces the protocol definition of the Multicast Source
Discovery Protocol (MSDP). This document defines a YANG data model
that can be used to configure and manage MSDP protocol operations.
The operational state data and statistics can also be retrieved by
this model.
This model is designed to be used along with other multicast YANG
data models such as PIM [PIM-YANG], which are not covered in this
document.
1.1. Terminology
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC6020]
and [RFC7950], including:
* action
* augment
* choice
* container
* data model
* data node
* grouping
* identity
* leaf
* list
* module
* uses
The following abbreviations are used in this document and the defined
model:
MSDP: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol [RFC3618]
RP: Rendezvous Point [RFC7761]
RPF: Reverse Path Forwarding [RFC7761]
SA: Source-Active [RFC3618]
1.2. Conventions Used in This Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
1.3. Tree Diagrams
Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in
[RFC8340].
1.4. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model
objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from
the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise,
names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.
+===========+==========================+===========+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+===========+==========================+===========+
| yang | ietf-yang-types | [RFC6991] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| rt | ietf-routing | [RFC8349] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| if | ietf-interfaces | [RFC8343] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| ip | ietf-ip | [RFC8344] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| key-chain | ietf-key-chain | [RFC8177] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
| acl | ietf-access-control-list | [RFC8519] |
+-----------+--------------------------+-----------+
Table 1
2. Design of the Data Model
2.1. Scope of Model
The model covers MSDP [RFC3618].
This model can be used to configure and manage MSDP protocol
operations. The operational state data and statistics can be
retrieved by this model. Even though no protocol-specific
notifications are defined in this model, the subscription and push
mechanisms, as defined in [RFC8639] and [RFC8641], can be implemented
by the user to subscribe to notifications on the data nodes in this
model.
The model contains all the basic configuration parameters to operate
the protocol. Depending on the implementation choices, some systems
may not allow some of the advanced parameters to be configurable.
The occasionally implemented parameters are modeled as optional
features in this model. This model can be extended, and it has been
structured in a way that such extensions can be conveniently made.
2.2. Specification
The configuration data nodes cover global configuration attributes
and per-peer configuration attributes. The state data nodes include
global, per-peer, and SA information. The container "msdp" is the
top-level container in this data model. The presence of this
container is expected to enable MSDP protocol functionality. No
notification is defined in this model.
3. Module Structure
This model imports and augments the "ietf-routing" YANG data model
defined in [RFC8349]. Both configuration data nodes and state data
nodes as mentioned in [RFC8349] are augmented.
The YANG data model defined in this document conforms to the Network
Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. The operational
state data is combined with the associated configuration data in the
same hierarchy [RFC8407].
module: ietf-msdp
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol:
+--rw msdp
+--rw global
| +--rw tcp-connection-source? if:interface-ref
| +--rw default-peer* [peer-addr prefix-policy]
{filter-policy}?
| | +--rw peer-addr -> ../../../peers/peer/address
| | +--rw prefix-policy -> /acl:acls/acl/name
| +--rw originating-rp
| | +--rw interface? if:interface-ref
| +--rw sa-filter
| | +--rw in? -> /acl:acls/acl/name
| | +--rw out? -> /acl:acls/acl/name
| +--rw sa-limit? uint32
| +--rw ttl-threshold? uint8
+--rw peers
| +--rw peer* [address]
| +--rw address inet:ipv4-address
| +---x clear-peer
| +--rw authentication {peer-authentication}?
| | +--rw (authentication-type)?
| | +--:(key-chain)
| | | +--rw key-chain?
key-chain:key-chain-ref
| | +--:(password)
| | +--rw key? string
| | +--rw crypto-algorithm? identityref
| +--rw enabled? boolean
| +--rw tcp-connection-source? if:interface-ref
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw mesh-group? string
| +--rw peer-as? inet:as-number
{peer-as-verification}?
| +--rw sa-filter
| | +--rw in? -> /acl:acls/acl/name
| | +--rw out? -> /acl:acls/acl/name
| +--rw sa-limit? uint32
| +--rw timer
| | +--rw connect-retry-interval? uint16
| | +--rw holdtime-interval? uint16
| | +--rw keepalive-interval? uint16
| +--rw ttl-threshold? uint8
| +--ro session-state? enumeration
| +--ro elapsed-time? yang:gauge32
| +--ro connect-retry-expire? uint32
| +--ro hold-expire? uint16
| +--ro is-default-peer? boolean
| +--ro keepalive-expire? uint16
| +--ro reset-count? yang:zero-based-counter32
| +--ro statistics
| +--ro discontinuity-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro error
| | +--ro rpf-failure? uint32
| +--ro queue
| | +--ro size-in? uint32
| | +--ro size-out? uint32
| +--ro received
| | +--ro keepalive? yang:counter64
| | +--ro notification? yang:counter64
| | +--ro sa-message? yang:counter64
| | +--ro sa-response? yang:counter64
| | +--ro sa-request? yang:counter64
| | +--ro total? yang:counter64
| +--ro sent
| +--ro keepalive? yang:counter64
| +--ro notification? yang:counter64
| +--ro sa-message? yang:counter64
| +--ro sa-response? yang:counter64
| +--ro sa-request? yang:counter64
| +--ro total? yang:counter64
+---x clear-all-peers
+--ro sa-cache
+--ro entry* [group source-addr]
| +--ro group
rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address
| +--ro source-addr
rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address
| +--ro origin-rp* [rp-address]
| | +--ro rp-address inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro is-local-rp? boolean
| | +--ro sa-adv-expire? uint32
| +--ro state-attributes
| +--ro up-time? yang:gauge32
| +--ro expire? yang:gauge32
| +--ro holddown-interval? uint32
| +--ro peer-learned-from? inet:ipv4-address
| +--ro rpf-peer? inet:ipv4-address
+---x clear
+---w input
+---w entry!
| +---w group
rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address
| +---w source-addr?
rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address
+---w peer-address? inet:ipv4-address
+---w peer-as? inet:as-number
3.1. MSDP Configuration
MSDP operation requires configuration information that is distributed
amongst several peers. Several peers may be configured in a mesh-
group. The SA information may be filtered by peers.
The configuration modeling branch is composed of MSDP global and peer
configurations. These two parts are the most important parts of
MSDP.
Besides the fundamental features of MSDP, several optional features
are included in the model. These features help the control of MSDP.
The peer features and SA features make the deployment and control
easier. The connection parameters can be used to control the TCP
connection because MSDP is based on TCP. The authentication features
make the protocol more secure. The filter features selectively allow
operators to prevent SA information from being forwarded to peers.
3.2. MSDP States
MSDP states are composed of the MSDP global state, the MSDP peer
state, statistics information, and SA cache information. The
statistics information and SA cache information help the operator
retrieve data regarding the protocol's condition.
YANG actions are defined to clear the connection of one specific MSDP
peer, clear the connections of all MSDP peers, or clear some or all
of the SA caches.
4. MSDP YANG Data Model
This module references [RFC3618], [RFC4271], [RFC5925], [RFC6991],
[RFC7761], [RFC8177], [RFC8294], [RFC8343], [RFC8344], [RFC8349], and
[RFC8519].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-msdp@2020-10-31.yang"
module ietf-msdp {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-msdp";
prefix msdp;
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix "yang";
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
reference
"RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing Management
(NMDA Version)";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
reference
"RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management";
}
import ietf-ip {
prefix "ip";
reference
"RFC 8344: A YANG Data Model for IP Management";
}
import ietf-key-chain {
prefix "key-chain";
reference
"RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
import ietf-routing-types {
prefix "rt-types";
reference
"RFC 8294: Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area";
}
import ietf-access-control-list {
prefix acl;
reference
"RFC 8519: YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists
(ACLs)";
}
organization
"IETF Protocols for IP Multicast (pim) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pim/>
WG List: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
Editor: Xufeng Liu
<mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Zheng Zhang
<mailto:zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn>
Editor: Anish Peter
<mailto:anish.ietf@gmail.com>
Editor: Mahesh Sivakumar
<mailto:sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>
Editor: Feng Guo
<mailto:guofeng@huawei.com>
Editor: Pete McAllister
<mailto:pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com>";
description
"This module defines the YANG data model definitions for the
Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED',
'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when,
they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8916; see the
RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2020-10-31 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC 8916: A YANG Data Model for the Multicast Source
Discovery Protocol (MSDP)";
}
/*
* Features
*/
feature filter-policy {
description
"Support policy configuration of peer/message filtering.";
reference
"RFC 8519: YANG Data Model for Network Access Control
Lists (ACLs)";
}
feature peer-as-verification {
description
"Support configuration of a peer's Autonomous System Number
(ASN).";
reference
"RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
}
feature peer-authentication {
description
"Support configuration of peer authentication.";
reference
"RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
/*
* Identities
*/
identity msdp {
base rt:control-plane-protocol;
description
"Identity for the Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP).";
reference
"RFC 3618: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)";
}
/*
* Groupings
*/
grouping authentication-container {
description
"Authentication attributes.";
container authentication {
if-feature peer-authentication;
description
"A container defining authentication attributes.";
choice authentication-type {
case key-chain {
leaf key-chain {
type key-chain:key-chain-ref;
description
"Reference to a key-chain.";
reference
"RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
}
case password {
leaf key {
type string;
description
"This leaf specifies the authentication key.";
}
leaf crypto-algorithm {
type identityref {
base key-chain:crypto-algorithm;
}
must "derived-from-or-self(., 'key-chain:md5')" {
error-message
"Only the md5 algorithm can be used for MSDP.";
description
"Check for crypto-algorithm.";
}
description
"Cryptographic algorithm associated with a key.
Only the md5 algorithm can be used for MSDP.
When 'md5' is specified, MSDP control messages
are secured by TCP MD5 signatures as described
in RFCs 3618 and 5925. Both peers of a
connection SHOULD be configured to the same
algorithm for the connection to be established.
When this leaf is not configured, unauthenticated
TCP is used.";
reference
"RFC 3618: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP)
RFC 5925: The TCP Authentication Option
RFC 8177: YANG Data Model for Key Chains";
}
}
description
"Choice of authentication.";
}
}
} // authentication-container
grouping tcp-connect-source {
description
"Attribute to configure a peer TCP connection source.";
leaf tcp-connection-source {
type if:interface-ref;
must "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name = current()]/"
+ "ip:ipv4/ip:enabled != 'false'" {
error-message
"The interface must have IPv4 enabled.";
description
"The interface must have IPv4 enabled.";
reference
"RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management";
}
description
"The interface is to be the source for the TCP
connection. It is a reference to an entry in the global
interface list.";
}
} // tcp-connect-source
grouping global-config-attributes {
description
"Global MSDP configuration.";
uses tcp-connect-source;
list default-peer {
if-feature filter-policy;
key "peer-addr prefix-policy";
description
"The default peer accepts all MSDP Source-Active (SA)
messages. A default peer is needed in topologies where
MSDP peers do not coexist with BGP peers. The Reverse Path
Forwarding (RPF) check on SA messages will fail, and no
SA messages will be accepted. In these cases, you can
configure the peer as a default peer and bypass
RPF checks.";
leaf peer-addr {
type leafref {
path "../../../peers/peer/address";
}
mandatory true;
description
"Reference to a peer that is in the peer list.";
}
leaf prefix-policy {
type leafref {
path "/acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:name";
}
description
"If specified, only those SA entries whose Rendezvous
Point (RP) is permitted in the prefix list are allowed;
if not specified, all SA messages from the default
peer are accepted.";
reference
"RFC 7761: Protocol Independent Multicast - Sparse Mode
(PIM-SM): Protocol Specification (Revised)
RFC 8519: YANG Data Model for Network Access Control
Lists (ACLs)";
}
} // default-peer
container originating-rp {
description
"The container of the originating RP.";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
must "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name = current()]/"
+ "ip:ipv4/ip:enabled != 'false'" {
error-message
"The interface must have IPv4 enabled.";
description
"The interface must have IPv4 enabled.";
reference
"RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface Management";
}
description
"Reference to an entry in the global interface list.
The IP address of the interface used in the RP field of
an SA message entry. When anycast RPs are used, all RPs
use the same IP address. This parameter can be used to
define a unique IP address for the RP of each MSDP peer.
By default, the software uses the RP address of the
local system.";
}
} // originating-rp
uses sa-filter-container;
leaf sa-limit {
type uint32;
description
"A limit on the number of SA entries accepted.
If not configured or the value is 0, there is no limit.";
}
uses ttl-threshold;
} // global-config-attributes
grouping peer-config-attributes {
description
"Per-peer configuration for MSDP.";
uses authentication-container;
leaf enabled {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the peer is enabled;
'false' if the peer is disabled.";
}
uses tcp-connect-source;
leaf description {
type string;
description
"The peer description.";
}
leaf mesh-group {
type string;
description
"The name of the mesh-group to which this peer belongs.";
reference
"RFC 3618: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP),
Section 10.2";
}
leaf peer-as {
if-feature peer-as-verification;
type inet:as-number;
description
"The peer's ASN. Using peer-as to perform the verification
can provide more controlled ability. The value can be
compared with the BGP peer's ASN. If they are different,
the SA information that comes from this peer may be
rejected. If the ASN is the same as the local ASN, then
the peer is within the same domain; otherwise, this peer
is external to the domain. This is comparable to the
definition and usage in BGP; see RFC 4271.";
reference
"RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)";
}
uses sa-filter-container;
leaf sa-limit {
type uint32;
description
"A limit on the number of SA entries accepted from this
peer.
If not configured or the value is 0, there is no limit.";
}
container timer {
description
"Timer attributes.";
reference
"RFC 3618: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP),
Section 5";
leaf connect-retry-interval {
type uint16;
units seconds;
default 30;
description
"The peer timer for connect-retry. By default, MSDP peers
wait 30 seconds after the session is reset.";
}
leaf holdtime-interval {
type uint16 {
range "3..65535";
}
units seconds;
default 75;
description
"The SA hold-down period of this MSDP peer.";
}
leaf keepalive-interval {
type uint16 {
range "1..65535";
}
units seconds;
must '. < ../holdtime-interval' {
error-message
"The keepalive interval must be smaller than the "
+ "hold-time interval.";
}
default 60;
description
"The keepalive timer of this MSDP peer.";
}
} // timer
uses ttl-threshold;
} // peer-config-attributes
grouping peer-state-attributes {
description
"Per-peer state attributes for MSDP.";
leaf session-state {
type enumeration {
enum disabled {
description
"Disabled.";
}
enum inactive {
description
"Inactive.";
}
enum listen {
description
"Listen.";
}
enum connecting {
description
"Connecting.";
}
enum established {
description
"Established.";
}
}
config false;
description
"The peer's session state.";
reference
"RFC 3618: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP),
Section 11";
}
leaf elapsed-time {
type yang:gauge32;
units seconds;
config false;
description
"Elapsed time for being in a state.";
}
leaf connect-retry-expire {
type uint32;
units seconds;
config false;
description
"Connect retry expire time of a peer connection.";
}
leaf hold-expire {
type uint16;
units seconds;
config false;
description
"Hold expire time of a peer connection.";
}
leaf is-default-peer {
type boolean;
config false;
description
"'true' if this peer is one of the default peers.";
}
leaf keepalive-expire {
type uint16;
units seconds;
config false;
description
"Keepalive expire time of this peer.";
}
leaf reset-count {
type yang:zero-based-counter32;
config false;
description
"The reset count of this peer.";
}
container statistics {
config false;
description
"A container defining statistics attributes.";
leaf discontinuity-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"The time on the most recent occasion at which any one
or more of the statistics counters suffered a
discontinuity. If no such discontinuities have occurred
since the last re-initialization of the local
management subsystem, then this node contains the time
the local management subsystem re-initialized itself.";
}
container error {
description
"A grouping defining error statistics attributes.";
leaf rpf-failure {
type uint32;
description
"The number of RPF failures.";
}
}
container queue {
description
"A container that includes queue statistics attributes.";
leaf size-in {
type uint32;
description
"The number of messages received from the peer
currently queued.";
}
leaf size-out {
type uint32;
description
"The number of messages queued to be sent to the peer.";
}
}
container received {
description
"Received message counters.";
uses statistics-sent-received;
}
container sent {
description
"Sent message counters.";
uses statistics-sent-received;
}
} // statistics
} // peer-state-attributes
grouping sa-filter-container {
description
"A container defining SA filters.";
container sa-filter {
description
"Specifies an Access Control List (ACL) to filter SA messages
coming into or going out of the peer.";
leaf in {
type leafref {
path "/acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:name";
}
description
"Filters incoming SA messages only.
The value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more rules used to
accept or reject MSDP SA messages.
If the policy is not specified, all MSDP SA messages are
accepted.";
reference
"RFC 8519: YANG Data Model for Network Access Control
Lists (ACLs)";
}
leaf out {
type leafref {
path "/acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:name";
}
description
"Filters outgoing SA messages only.
The value is the name to uniquely identify a
policy that contains one or more rules used to
accept or reject MSDP SA messages.
If the policy is not specified, all MSDP SA messages are
sent.";
reference
"RFC 8519: YANG Data Model for Network Access Control
Lists (ACLs)";
}
} // sa-filter
} // sa-filter-container
grouping ttl-threshold {
description
"Attribute to configure the TTL threshold.";
leaf ttl-threshold {
type uint8 {
range 1..255;
}
description
"The maximum number of hops data packets can traverse
before being dropped.";
}
} // ttl-threshold
grouping statistics-sent-received {
description
"A grouping defining sent and received statistics attributes.";
leaf keepalive {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of keepalive messages.";
}
leaf notification {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of notification messages.";
}
leaf sa-message {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of SA messages.";
}
leaf sa-response {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of SA response messages.";
}
leaf sa-request {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of SA request messages.";
}
leaf total {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of total messages.";
}
} // statistics-sent-received
/*
* Data nodes
*/
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol" {
when "derived-from-or-self(rt:type, 'msdp:msdp')" {
description
"This augmentation is only valid for a routing protocol
instance of MSDP.";
}
description
"MSDP augmentation to routing control-plane protocol
configuration and state.";
container msdp {
description
"MSDP configuration and operational state data.";
container global {
description
"Global attributes.";
uses global-config-attributes;
}
container peers {
description
"Contains a list of peers.";
list peer {
key "address";
description
"A list of MSDP peers.";
leaf address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address of the peer.";
}
action clear-peer {
description
"Clears the TCP connection to the peer.";
}
uses peer-config-attributes;
uses peer-state-attributes;
}
}
action clear-all-peers {
description
"All peers' TCP connections are cleared.";
}
container sa-cache {
config false;
description
"The SA cache information.";
list entry {
key "group source-addr";
description
"A list of SA cache entries.";
leaf group {
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address;
description
"The group address of this SA cache.";
}
leaf source-addr {
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address;
description
"Source IPv4 address.";
}
list origin-rp {
key "rp-address";
description
"Information regarding the originating RP.";
leaf rp-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The RP address. This is the IP address used in the
RP field of an SA message entry.";
}
leaf is-local-rp {
type boolean;
description
"'true' if the RP is local;
'false' if the RP is not local.";
}
leaf sa-adv-expire {
type uint32;
units seconds;
description
"The remaining time duration before expiration
of the periodic SA advertisement timer on a
local RP.";
}
}
container state-attributes {
description
"SA cache state attributes for MSDP.";
leaf up-time {
type yang:gauge32;
units seconds;
description
"Indicates the duration time when this SA entry is
created in the cache. MSDP is a periodic protocol;
the value can be used to check the state of the
SA cache.";
}
leaf expire {
type yang:gauge32;
units seconds;
description
"Indicates the duration time when this SA entry in
the cache times out. MSDP is a periodic protocol;
the value can be used to check the state of the
SA cache.";
}
leaf holddown-interval {
type uint32;
units seconds;
description
"Hold-down timer value for SA forwarding.";
reference
"RFC 3618: Multicast Source Discovery Protocol
(MSDP), Section 5.3";
}
leaf peer-learned-from {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address of the peer from which we learned this
SA information.";
}
leaf rpf-peer {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The address is the SA's originating RP.";
}
} // state-attributes
} // entry
action clear {
description
"Clears MSDP SA cache entries.";
input {
container entry {
presence "If a particular entry is cleared.";
description
"The SA cache (S,G) or (*,G) entry to be cleared.
If this is not provided, all entries are cleared.";
leaf group {
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-group-address;
mandatory true;
description
"The group address.";
}
leaf source-addr {
type rt-types:ipv4-multicast-source-address;
description
"The address of the multicast source to be cleared.
If this is not provided, then all entries related
to the given group are cleared.";
}
}
leaf peer-address {
type inet:ipv4-address;
description
"The peer IP address from which MSDP SA cache entries
have been learned. If this is not provided, entries
learned from all peers are cleared.";
}
leaf peer-as {
type inet:as-number;
description
"The ASN from which MSDP SA cache entries have been
learned. If this is not provided, entries learned
from all ASes are cleared.";
}
}
} // clear
} // sa-cache
} // msdp
} // augment
}
<CODE ENDS>
5. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
Under /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/msdp:
msdp:global
This subtree specifies the configuration for the MSDP
attributes at the global level. Modifying the configuration
can cause MSDP default peers to be deleted or the connection to
be rebuilt and can also cause unexpected filtering of the SA.
msdp:peers
This subtree specifies the configuration for the MSDP
attributes at the peer level. Modifying the configuration will
allow unexpected MSDP peer establishment and unexpected SA
information learning and advertisement.
The writability of the "key" field should be strictly
controlled. Misoperation of the key will break the existing
MSDP connection, and the associated SA caches will also be
deleted.
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data
nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/msdp:
Unauthorized access to any data node of the above subtree can
disclose the operational state information of MSDP on this device.
For example, disclosure of the peer information may lead to a
forged connection attack, and uncorrected modification of the ACL
nodes may lead to filter errors.
The "key" field is also a sensitive readable configuration.
Unauthorized reading of this field may lead to leaking of the
password. Modification will allow the unexpected rebuilding of
connected peers.
Authentication configuration is supported via the specification of
key-chains [RFC8177] or the direct specification of the key and the
authentication algorithm. Hence, authentication configuration in the
"authentication" container inherits the security considerations
discussed in [RFC8177]. This includes the considerations with
respect to the local storage and handling of authentication keys.
Some of the RPC operations in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control access to these operations. These are the
operations and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/msdp:clear-peer
/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/msdp:clear-sa-cache
Unauthorized access to either of the above action operations can
lead to rebuilding of the MSDP peers' connections or deletion of
SA records on this device.
6. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within
the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-msdp
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module
Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" registry:
Name: ietf-msdp
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-msdp
Prefix: msdp
Reference: RFC 8916
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3618] Fenner, B., Ed. and D. Meyer, Ed., "Multicast Source
Discovery Protocol (MSDP)", RFC 3618,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3618, October 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3618>.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC5925] Touch, J., Mankin, A., and R. Bonica, "The TCP
Authentication Option", RFC 5925, DOI 10.17487/RFC5925,
June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5925>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG",
RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7951>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8177] Lindem, A., Ed., Qu, Y., Yeung, D., Chen, I., and J.
Zhang, "YANG Data Model for Key Chains", RFC 8177,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8177, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8177>.
[RFC8294] Liu, X., Qu, Y., Lindem, A., Hopps, C., and L. Berger,
"Common YANG Data Types for the Routing Area", RFC 8294,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8294, December 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8294>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343>.
[RFC8344] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management",
RFC 8344, DOI 10.17487/RFC8344, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8344>.
[RFC8349] Lhotka, L., Lindem, A., and Y. Qu, "A YANG Data Model for
Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8349>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8519] Jethanandani, M., Agarwal, S., Huang, L., and D. Blair,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)",
RFC 8519, DOI 10.17487/RFC8519, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8519>.
7.2. Informative References
[PIM-YANG] Liu, X., McAllister, P., Peter, A., Sivakumar, M., Liu,
Y., and F. Hu, "A YANG Data Model for Protocol Independent
Multicast (PIM)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
ietf-pim-yang-17, 19 May 2018,
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pim-yang-17>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC7761] Fenner, B., Handley, M., Holbrook, H., Kouvelas, I.,
Parekh, R., Zhang, Z., and L. Zheng, "Protocol Independent
Multicast - Sparse Mode (PIM-SM): Protocol Specification
(Revised)", STD 83, RFC 7761, DOI 10.17487/RFC7761, March
2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7761>.
[RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of
Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8407>.
[RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
Appendix A. Data Tree Example
This appendix contains an example of an instance data tree in JSON
encoding [RFC7951], containing configuration data.
A.1. The Global and Peer Configuration Example
{
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "eth1",
"description": "An interface with MSDP enabled.",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"ietf-ip:ipv4": {
"forwarding": true,
"address": [
{
"ip": "192.0.2.1",
"prefix-length": 24
}
]
}
}
]
},
"ietf-access-control-list:acls": {
"acl": [
{
"name": "msdp-default-peer-policy",
"type": "ietf-access-control-list:ipv4-acl-type",
"aces": {
"ace": [
{
"name": "accept",
"actions": {
"forwarding": "ietf-access-control-list:accept"
}
}
]
}
}
]
},
"ietf-routing:routing": {
"router-id": "203.0.113.1",
"control-plane-protocols": {
"control-plane-protocol": [
{
"type": "ietf-msdp:msdp",
"name": "msdp-1",
"ietf-msdp:msdp": {
"global": {
"tcp-connection-source": "eth1",
"default-peer": [
{
"peer-addr": "198.51.100.8",
"prefix-policy": "msdp-default-peer-policy"
}
],
"originating-rp": {
"interface": "eth1"
},
"sa-limit": 0,
"ttl-threshold": 1
},
"peers": {
"peer": [
{
"address": "198.51.100.8",
"enabled": true,
"tcp-connection-source": "eth1",
"description": "x",
"mesh-group": "x",
"peer-as": 100,
"sa-limit": 0,
"timer": {
"connect-retry-interval": 0,
"holdtime-interval": 3,
"keepalive-interval": 1
},
"ttl-threshold": 1
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
A.2. The State Example
{
"ietf-interfaces:interfaces": {
"interface": [
{
"name": "eth1",
"description": "An interface with MSDP enabled.",
"type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd",
"phys-address": "00:00:5e:00:53:01",
"oper-status": "up",
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2020-02-22T11:22:33+02:00"
},
"ietf-ip:ipv4": {
"forwarding": true,
"mtu": 1500,
"address": [
{
"ip": "192.0.2.1",
"prefix-length": 24,
"origin": "static"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"ietf-access-control-list:acls": {
"acl": [
{
"name": "msdp-default-peer-policy",
"type": "ietf-access-control-list:ipv4-acl-type",
"aces": {
"ace": [
{
"name": "accept",
"actions": {
"forwarding": "ietf-access-control-list:accept"
}
}
]
}
}
]
},
"ietf-routing:routing": {
"router-id": "203.0.113.1",
"control-plane-protocols": {
"control-plane-protocol": [
{
"type": "ietf-msdp:msdp",
"name": "msdp-1",
"ietf-msdp:msdp": {
"global": {
"tcp-connection-source": "eth1",
"default-peer": [
{
"peer-addr": "198.51.100.8",
"prefix-policy": "msdp-default-peer-policy"
}
],
"originating-rp": {
"interface": "eth1"
},
"sa-limit": 0,
"ttl-threshold": 1
},
"peers": {
"peer": [
{
"address": "198.51.100.8",
"enabled": true,
"tcp-connection-source": "eth1",
"description": "x",
"mesh-group": "x",
"peer-as": 100,
"sa-limit": 0,
"timer": {
"connect-retry-interval": 0,
"holdtime-interval": 3,
"keepalive-interval": 1
},
"ttl-threshold": 1,
"session-state": "established",
"elapsed-time": 5,
"is-default-peer": true,
"keepalive-expire": 1,
"reset-count": 1,
"statistics": {
"discontinuity-time": "2020-02-22T12:22:33+02:00"
}
}
]
},
"sa-cache": {
"entry": [
{
"group": "233.252.0.23",
"source-addr": "192.0.2.50",
"origin-rp": [
{
"rp-address": "203.0.113.10",
"is-local-rp": false,
"sa-adv-expire": 50
}
],
"state-attributes": {
"up-time": 1000,
"expire": 120,
"holddown-interval": 150,
"peer-learned-from": "198.51.100.8",
"rpf-peer": "198.51.100.8"
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
A.3. The Actions Example
This example shows the input data (in JSON) for executing an
"sa-cache clear" action to clear the cache of all entries that match
the group address of 233.252.0.23.
{
"ietf-msdp:sa-cache": {
"input": {
"entry": {
"group": "233.252.0.23"
}
}
}
}
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Stig Venaas and Jake Holland for
their valuable comments and suggestions.
Contributors
The authors would like to thank the following people for their
valuable contributions.
Yisong Liu
Email: liuyisong@chinamobile.com
Benchong Xu
Email: xu.benchong@zte.com.cn
Tanmoy Kundu
Email: tanmoy.kundu@alcatel-lucent.com
Authors' Addresses
Xufeng Liu
Volta Networks
Email: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com
Zheng Zhang (editor)
ZTE Corporation
No. 50 Software Avenue, Yuhuatai District
Nanjing
China
Email: zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn
Anish Peter
Individual Contributor
Email: anish.ietf@gmail.com
Mahesh Sivakumar
Juniper Networks
1133 Innovation Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
United States of America
Email: sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com
Feng Guo
Huawei Technologies
Huawei Bldg., No. 156 Beiqing Rd.
Beijing
100095
China
Email: guofeng@huawei.com
Pete McAllister
Metaswitch Networks
100 Church Street
Enfield
EN2 6BQ
United Kingdom
Email: pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com