Using National Bibliography Numbers as Uniform Resource Names
RFC 8458

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov Yes

Ignas Bagdonas No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2018-06-26)
No email
send info
Thanks for resolving my DISCUSS point.

The current version still has some lower case instances of "must", "should" and "may", but does not use the RFC 8174 boilerplate. Please fix one or the other.

Alissa Cooper No Objection

Comment (2018-06-06 for -01)
No email
send info
I support Ben's DISCUSS. I appreciate that the authors want to tell national libraries what to do, but I don't think it's appropriate to do in the IETF stream.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2018-06-29)
No email
send info
Thank you for the discussion and document updates; my DISCUSS points have been addressed.

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Comment (2018-06-06 for -01)
No email
send info
Support Ben's DISCUSS.

Warren Kumari No Objection

Mirja K├╝hlewind No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2018-06-06 for -01)
No email
send info
I support Ben's DISCUSS.

Adam Roach No Objection

Martin Vigoureux No Objection