Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Please expand "Customer Edge (CE)" on first use.

Martin Vigoureux No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

The obvious next comment is "Where is the YANG module?!" :-)

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) Yes

(Adam Roach; former steering group member) No Objection

Thank you for a clearly written document. I have some very editorial corrections
to suggest.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§4.1.2:

>  invalid packets that have been identified.  There are two kind of

"...two kinds..."

>  - The Border Relay (BR) will validates the received packet's source

"...will validate..."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§5:

>      DESCRIPTION
>          "Indicates that the PSID is represented as hexidecimal for
>           clarity."

"...hexadecimal..."
       ^

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

Please consider using the boilerplate from RFC 8174 rather than 2119. There are some lower case instances of normative keywords.

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

(Eric Rescorla; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ignas Bagdonas; former steering group member) No Objection

A nit - maybe adding a paragraph mentioning that from manageability perspective this document specifies only a subset of what corresponding YANG module defined in I-D softwire-yang provides would be suitable.

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection