Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Terry Manderson) Yes

(Ignas Bagdonas) No Objection

A nit - maybe adding a paragraph mentioning that from manageability perspective this document specifies only a subset of what corresponding YANG module defined in I-D softwire-yang provides would be suitable.

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Please consider using the boilerplate from RFC 8174 rather than 2119. There are some lower case instances of normative keywords.

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Benjamin Kaduk No Objection

Please expand "Customer Edge (CE)" on first use.

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

The obvious next comment is "Where is the YANG module?!" :-)

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

(Eric Rescorla) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Adam Roach) No Objection

Thank you for a clearly written document. I have some very editorial corrections
to suggest.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§4.1.2:

>  invalid packets that have been identified.  There are two kind of

"...two kinds..."

>  - The Border Relay (BR) will validates the received packet's source

"...will validate..."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

§5:

>      DESCRIPTION
>          "Indicates that the PSID is represented as hexidecimal for
>           clarity."

"...hexadecimal..."
       ^

Martin Vigoureux No Objection