GMPLS OSPF-TE Extensions in Support of Flexi-Grid Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Networks
RFC 8363

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Deborah Brungard) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

Comment (2017-02-10 for -08)
No email
send info
1) Is it really necessary to define a sub-TLV to a sub-TLV? The Interface Switching Capability Descriptor is already a sub-TLV of the Link TLV and now you define another sub-sub-TVL for the Frequency availability bitmap. Is it really necessary to have another sub-TLV system here and a new/own registry, given you only define one (!) sub-sub-TLV? I would say you should remove this sub-sub-TLV system and the registry and simply define the bitmap as fixed part of the new Flexi-Grid-LSC sub-TLV. And if you every need another sub-sub-TLV you simply define another ISCD sub-TLV instead. I really don't think the additional complexity of this sub-sub-TLV system and the registry is justified!

2) The Port Label Restriction field as specified in RFC7579 is not a sub-TLV but a field; see section 4.2:
"The Port Label Restriction sub-TLV is defined in [RFC7579]. "

3) Section 3 does not specify any requirements (as the title indicates) but only given some quite extensive background information. I don't think this is needed (anymore) for the final published document and could be completely removed or compressed to a few paragraphs in the intro.

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2017-02-14 for -08)
No email
send info
Thanks for your work on this draft. 

I don't see a response to the SecDir review that asks for more clarity in the draft on OSPF Opaque LSAs, mentioned in the security considerations section, but not elsewhere.

Could some text be added to help with this request?

Alvaro Retana No Objection