Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Terry Manderson) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

- (nit) section 3: it seems odd to say in the
figure that the prefixes are variable length but to
then say the lengths of two of them MUST be 96
bits. (I do think having the fields as is is good
for futureproofing, but would suggest changing the
figure.)

- (non-nit:-) section 3: I'm not getting why the
unicast-length can be >96? And what if the prefix
length is not one of those given in RFC6052? Don't
you need to say it needs to be?

- (not sure about nittyness:-) section 5: 1st
bullet: I'm not following what "matches" means
here. Probably my ignorance but is it clear?

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Suresh Krishnan (was Discuss) No Objection

Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS points.

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection