DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes
RFC 8115
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
(Terry Manderson) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Alia Atlas) No Objection
Deborah Brungard No Objection
(Ben Campbell) No Objection
Alissa Cooper No Objection
(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
Comment (2017-01-31 for -12)
No email
send info
send info
- (nit) section 3: it seems odd to say in the figure that the prefixes are variable length but to then say the lengths of two of them MUST be 96 bits. (I do think having the fields as is is good for futureproofing, but would suggest changing the figure.) - (non-nit:-) section 3: I'm not getting why the unicast-length can be >96? And what if the prefix length is not one of those given in RFC6052? Don't you need to say it needs to be? - (not sure about nittyness:-) section 5: 1st bullet: I'm not following what "matches" means here. Probably my ignorance but is it clear?
(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection
(Suresh Krishnan) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2017-02-03)
No email
send info
send info
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS points.