Locator/ID Separation Protocol Delegated Database Tree (LISP-DDT)
RFC 8111

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Deborah Brungard Yes

(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2017-01-20)
No email
send info
Thanks for handling the sig alg issue.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2016-10-26 for -08)
No email
send info
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> performed the opsdir review

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

Comment (2016-10-27 for -08)
No email
send info
Would it be worth it to potentially think about/document potential attacks against this system? I didn't think myself about how such an attack could look like but given that location and identity are potential sensitive data it might be worth it...

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2016-10-24 for -08)
No email
send info
I have no objections to the publication of this document.  However, I do wonder why an extension to the DNS infrastructure wasn't used instead.  The Gen-ART review provided a significant set of good comments that should be taken into consideration.