Active Queue Management (AQM) Based on Proportional Integral Controller Enhanced PIE) for Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications (DOCSIS) Cable Modems
RFC 8034

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Martin Stiemerling; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Barry Leiba; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Joel Jaeggli; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-03-15)
No email
send info
For my own edification I assume that the latency target is expected to fall within

   o  LATENCY_LOW = 5 ms

   o  LATENCY_HIGH = 200 ms.

but presumably it's most usable at the bottom end of that range?

why is the lower bound at 5ms? is it simply unreasonable to target below that or is it bounded by the resource contention of the subscribers.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info