IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Paging Dispatch
RFC 8025

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-09-27 for -04)
No email
send info
I found this text 

   A Page (say Page N) is said to be active once the Page N Paging
   Dispatch is parsed, and as long as no other Paging Dispatch is
   parsed.
   
somewhat unclear. Is it saying

   A Page (say Page N) is said to be active once the Page N Paging
   Dispatch is parsed, and remains active until another Paging 
   Dispatch is parsed.
   
?

I wasn't quite sure what "so far" meant in this text (and temporal references in RFCs that live forever are somewhat confusing, anyway).

      As a result, there is no need so far for restoring the Page 0
      parsing context after a context was switched to Page 1, so the
      value for the Page 0 Paging Dispatch of 11110000 may not actually
      occur in those packets that adhere to 6LoWPAN specifications
      available at the time of writing this specification.
      
Would this be just as correct with "so far" deleted, or am I not understanding the point you're making?

Thanks for explaining why you're choosing "Specification Required" as your IANA policy.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -04)
No email
send info