Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension
RFC 8003

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Terry Manderson; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2016-08-05)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and comments.

(Alia Atlas; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Alissa Cooper; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Ben Campbell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-07-05 for -10)
No email
send info
I agree with Alexey's discuss comment.

(Benoît Claise; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Deborah Brungard; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Kathleen Moriarty; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Mirja Kühlewind; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info

(Spencer Dawkins; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2016-07-06 for -10)
No email
send info
This bis draft was an improvement. I did have one question.

I'm trying to visualize why 

   The registrar indicates the minimum and maximum registration lifetime
   that it is willing to offer to a requester.  A requester SHOULD NOT
   request registration with lifetime greater than the maximum
   registration lifetime or smaller than the minimum registration
   lifetime.
   
is a SHOULD NOT - why would a requester choose to disregard the SHOULD and send a request registration with (for example) a lifetime greater than the maximum registration lifetime?

Is the intention for the requester to allow this, and then (for example) cap the lifetime at the maximum registration lifetime? Or is something else supposed to happen?

Whatever the intention is, it might be helpful to provide an explanation about that.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2016-08-05)
No email
send info
Thanks for handling my discuss point.

(Suresh Krishnan; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -10)
No email
send info