Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension
RFC 8003

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

(Terry Manderson) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2016-07-05 for -10)
No email
send info
I agree with Alexey's discuss comment.

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2016-07-06 for -10)
No email
send info
This bis draft was an improvement. I did have one question.

I'm trying to visualize why 

   The registrar indicates the minimum and maximum registration lifetime
   that it is willing to offer to a requester.  A requester SHOULD NOT
   request registration with lifetime greater than the maximum
   registration lifetime or smaller than the minimum registration
   lifetime.
   
is a SHOULD NOT - why would a requester choose to disregard the SHOULD and send a request registration with (for example) a lifetime greater than the maximum registration lifetime?

Is the intention for the requester to allow this, and then (for example) cap the lifetime at the maximum registration lifetime? Or is something else supposed to happen?

Whatever the intention is, it might be helpful to provide an explanation about that.

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2016-08-05)
No email
send info
Thanks for handling my discuss point.

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Mirja Kühlewind No Objection

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2016-08-05)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS and comments.

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection