Entertainment Identifier Registry (EIDR) URN Namespace Definition
RFC 7972

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Alexey Melnikov) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Deborah Brungard) No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2016-07-04 for -01)
No email
send info
My initial comment: I guess that the Appendix A1 and, as a consequence, section 7.3, will disappear.

Discussing some more with Pierre-Anthony,  I was puzzled by the URIs section 7.3. I was thinking that this section would disappear, and that it was the reason for having this specific URIs section, as opposed to having an extra informative reference.

Pierre-Anthony's answer:
Yes, I was equally puzzled with xml2rfc creating a dedicated "URL"
section when referencing a URL, instead of merely adding the URL to
the informative reference.

<eref target="https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/">rfcdiff</eref>

I assumed it was by design. It would be simply to create an
informative reference.

So whatever, the RFC-editor will take of this, if some changes are required.

(Alissa Cooper) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Suresh Krishnan) No Objection

(Mirja Kühlewind) No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Comment (2016-07-07 for -02)
No email
send info
Just a nit..  For the sake of clarity: s/This document revises...7302 /This document obsoletes...7302