NSA's Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key Management Attributes
RFC 7906
| Document | Type |
RFC - Informational
(June 2016; Errata)
Was draft-turner-km-attributes (individual)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Timmel , Russ Housley , Sean Turner | ||
| Last updated | 2021-06-02 | ||
| Stream | Independent Submission | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized with errata bibtex | ||
| IETF conflict review | conflict-review-turner-km-attributes | ||
| Stream | ISE state | Published RFC | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Document shepherd | Adrian Farrel | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2016-03-30) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 7906 (Informational) | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | "Nevil Brownlee" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | IANA OK - No Actions Needed | |
| IANA action state | No IANA Actions | ||
Independent Submission P. Timmel
Request for Comments: 7906 National Security Agency
Category: Informational R. Housley
ISSN: 2070-1721 Vigil Security
S. Turner
IECA
June 2016
NSA's Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key Management Attributes
Abstract
This document defines key management attributes used by the National
Security Agency (NSA). The attributes can appear in asymmetric
and/or symmetric key packages as well as the Cryptographic Message
Syntax (CMS) content types that subsequently envelope the key
packages. Key packages described in RFCs 5958 and 6031 are examples
of where these attributes can be used.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other
RFC stream. The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at
its discretion and makes no statement about its value for
implementation or deployment. Documents approved for publication by
the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7906.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 1]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................3
1.1. Attribute Locations ........................................3
1.2. ASN.1 Notation .............................................4
1.3. Terminology ................................................5
2. CMS-Defined Attributes ..........................................6
3. Community Identifiers ...........................................7
4. Key Province Attribute ..........................................8
5. Binary Signing Time .............................................8
6. Manifest ........................................................9
7. Key Algorithm ...................................................9
8. User Certificate ...............................................11
9. Key Package Receivers ..........................................11
10. TSEC Nomenclature .............................................13
11. Key Purpose ...................................................16
12. Key Use .......................................................17
13. Transport Key .................................................20
14. Key Distribution Period .......................................20
15. Key Validity Period ...........................................22
16. Key Duration ..................................................23
17. Classification ................................................24
17.1. Security Label ...........................................25
18. Split Key Identifier ..........................................29
19. Key Package Type ..............................................30
20. Signature Usage ...............................................30
21. Other Certificate Format ......................................33
22. PKI Path ......................................................34
23. Useful Certificates ...........................................35
24. Key Wrap Algorithm ............................................35
25. Content Decryption Key Identifier .............................36
25.1. Content Decryption Key Identifier: Symmetric Key
and Symmetric ............................................36
25.2. Content Decryption Key Identifier: Unprotected ...........37
26. Certificate Pointers ..........................................37
27. CRL Pointers ..................................................38
28. Key Package Identifier and Receipt Request ....................38
29. Additional Error Codes ........................................39
30. Processing Key Package Attribute Values and CMS
Content Constraints ...........................................39
31. Attribute Scope ...............................................41
32. Security Considerations .......................................48
33. References ....................................................48
33.1. Normative References .....................................48
33.2. Informative References ...................................51
Appendix A. ASN.1 Module ..........................................52
Authors' Addresses ................................................68
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 2]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
1. Introduction
This document defines key management attributes used by the National
Security Agency (NSA). The attributes can appear in asymmetric
and/or symmetric key packages as well as the Cryptographic Message
Syntax (CMS) content types that subsequently envelope the key
packages.
This document contains definitions for new attributes as well as
previously defined attributes. References are provided to the
previously defined attributes; however, their definitions are
included herein for convenience.
CMS allows for arbitrary nesting of content types. Attributes are
also supported in various locations in content types and key
packages, which are themselves content types (see Section 1.1). An
implementation that supports all of the possibilities would be
extremely complex. Instead of implementing the full flexibility
supported by this document, some devices may choose to support one or
more templates, which is a profile for a combination of CMS content
type(s), key package, and attribute(s); see Section 19.
1.1. Attribute Locations
There are a number of CMS content types that support attributes
SignedData [RFC5652], EnvelopedData [RFC5652], EncryptedData
[RFC5652], AuthenticatedData [RFC5652], and AuthEnvelopedData
[RFC5083] as well as ContentWithAttributes [RFC4073]. There are also
a number of other content types defined with CONTENT-TYPE [RFC6268]
that support attributes including AsymmetricKeyPackage [RFC5958] and
SymmetricKeyPackage [RFC6031].
CMS defines a number of "protecting content types" -- SignedData
[RFC5652], EnvelopedData [RFC5652], EncryptedData [RFC5652],
AuthenticatedData [RFC5652], and AuthEnvelopedData [RFC5083] -- that
provide some type of security service. There are also other CMS
content types -- Data [RFC5652], ContentWithAttributes [RFC4073], and
ContentCollection [RFC4073] -- that provide no security service.
There are also different kinds of attributes in these content types:
o SignedData supports two kinds of attributes: signed and
unsigned attributes in the signedAttrs and unsignedAttrs
fields, respectively.
o EnvelopedData and EncryptedData each support one kind of
attribute: unprotected attributes in the unprotectedAttrs
field.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 3]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
o AuthEnvelopedData supports two kinds of attributes:
authenticated and unauthenticated attributes in the authAttrs
and unauthAttrs fields, respectively. Both of these attributes
are also unprotected (i.e., they are not encrypted); therefore,
when referring to AuthEnvelopedData attributes, they are
authenticated&unprotected and unauthenticated&unprotected. For
this specification, unauthenticated attributes MUST NOT be
included.
o AuthenticatedData supports two kinds of attributes:
authenticated and unauthenticated attributes in the authAttrs
and unauthAttrs fields, respectively. For this specification,
unauthenticated attributes MUST NOT be included.
o ContentWithAttributes supports one kind of attribute: content
attributes in the attrs field.
o AsymmetricKeyPackage supports one kind of attribute: asymmetric
key attributes in the attributes field. If an attribute
appears as part of an asymmetric key package, it SHOULD appear
in the attributes field of the AsymmetricKeyPackage.
o SymmetricKeyPackage supports two kinds of attributes: symmetric
key and symmetric key package attributes in the sKeyAttrs and
sKeyPkgAttrs fields, respectively. Note that [RFC6031]
prohibits the same attribute from appearing in both locations
in the same SymmetricKeyPackage.
Note that this specification updates the following information object
sets SignedAttributesSet, UnsignedAttributes,
UnprotectedEnvAttributes, UnprotectedEncAttributes, AuthAttributeSet,
UnauthAttributeSet, AuthEnvDataAttributeSet,
UnauthEnvDataAttributeSet, and ContentAttributeSet from [RFC6268] as
well as OneAsymmetricKeyAttributes from [RFC5958], SKeyPkgAttributes
from [RFC6031], and SKeyAttributes from [RFC6031] to constrain the
permissible locations for attributes. See Appendix A for the ASN.1
for the information object sets.
1.2. ASN.1 Notation
The attributes defined in this document use 2002 ASN.1 [X.680]
[X.681] [X.682] [X.683]. The attributes MUST be DER [X.690] encoded.
Each of the attributes has a single attribute value instance in the
values set. Even though the syntax is defined as a set, there MUST
be exactly one instance of AttributeValue present. Further, the
SignedAttributes, UnsignedAttributes, UnprotectedAttributes,
AuthAttributes, and UnauthAttributes are also defined as a set, and
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 4]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
this set MUST include only one instance of any particular type of
attribute. That is, any object identifier appearing in AttributeType
MUST only appear one time in the set of attributes.
SignedData, EnvelopedData, EncryptedData, AuthenticatedData,
AuthEnvelopedData, and ContentWithAttributes were originally defined
using the 1988 version of ASN.1. These definitions were updated to
the 2008 version of ASN.1 by [RFC6268]. None of the new 2008 ASN.1
tokens are used; this allows 2002 compilers to compile 2008 ASN.1.
AsymmetricKeyPackage and SymmetricKeyPackage are defined using the
2002 ASN.1.
[RFC5652] and [RFC2634] define generally useful attributes for CMS
using the 1988 version of ASN.1. These definitions were updated to
the 2008 version of ASN.1 by [RFC6268] and the 2002 version of ASN.1
by [RFC5911], respectively. [RFC4108] and [RFC6019] also defined
attributes using the 1988 version of ASN.1, which this document uses.
Both were updated by [RFC5911] to the 2002 ASN.1. Refer to
[RFC2634], [RFC4108], [RFC5652], and [RFC6019] for the attribute's
semantics, but refer to [RFC5911] or [RFC6268] for the attribute's
ASN.1 syntax.
1.3. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC
2119 [RFC2119].
Attribute Scope: The scope of an attribute is the compilation of
keying material to which the attribute value is assigned. The scope
of each attribute is determined by its placement within the key
package or content collection. See Section 31.
SIR: Source Intermediary Receiver is a model with three entities:
o A source initiates the delivery of a key to one or more
receivers. It may wrap or encrypt the key for delivery. This
is expected to be the common case, since a cleartext key is
vulnerable to exposure and compromise. If the sender is to
encrypt the key for delivery, it must know how to encrypt the
key so that the receiver(s) can decrypt it. A sender may also
carry out any of the functions of an intermediary.
* The original key package creators are sometimes referred to
as key source authorities. These entities create the
symmetric and/or asymmetric key package and apply the
initial CMS protecting layer, which is normally a SignedData
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 5]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
but sometimes an AuthenticatedData. This initial CMS
protecting layer is maintained through any intermediary for
the receivers of the key package to ensure that receivers
can validate the key source authority.
o An intermediary does not have access to the cleartext key. An
intermediary may perform source authentication on key packages
and may append or remove management information related to the
package. It may encapsulate the encrypted key packages in
larger packages that contain other user data destined for later
intermediaries or receivers.
o A receiver has access to the cleartext key. If the received key
package is encrypted, it can unwrap or decrypt the encrypted
key to obtain the cleartext key. A receiver may be the final
destination of the cryptographic product. An element that acts
as a receiver and is not the final destination of the key
package may also act as a sender or as an intermediary. After
receiving a key, a receiver may encrypt the received key for
local storage.
NOTE: As noted in Section 1, a receiver can be tailored to support a
particular combination of CMS content type(s), key package, and
attribute(s) resulting in less-complex implementations. All of these
tailored receivers can be supported by a common key management
infrastructure that uses this specification; this also can yield
efficiencies in generation and provisioning. Senders and
intermediaries that have to understand multiple tailored receivers
get the efficiency of a common specification language and modular
implementation, as opposed to needing stove-piped processing for each
different receiver.
2. CMS-Defined Attributes
The following attributes are defined for [RFC5652]:
o content-type [RFC5652] [RFC5911] [RFC6268] uniquely specifies
the CMS content type. This attribute MUST be included as a
signed, authenticated, or authenticated&unprotected attribute.
o message-digest [RFC5652] [RFC5911] [RFC6268] is the message
digest of the encapsulated content calculated using the
signer's message digest algorithm. As specified in [RFC5652],
it must be included as a signed attribute and an authenticated
attribute; as specified in [RFC5652], it must not be an
unsigned attribute, unauthenticated attribute, or unprotected
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 6]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
attribute; as specified in [RFC5083], it should not be included
as an authenticated&unprotected attribute in AuthEnvelopedData.
This attribute MUST NOT be included elsewhere.
o content-hints [RFC2634] [RFC5911] [RFC6268] identifies the
innermost content when multiple layers of encapsulation have
been applied. Every instance of SignedData, AuthenticatedData,
and AuthEnvelopedData that does not directly encapsulate a
SymmetricKeyPackage, an AsymmetricKeyPackage, or an
EncryptedKeyPackage [RFC6032] MUST include this attribute.
3. Community Identifiers
The community-identifiers attribute, defined in [RFC4108] and
[RFC5911], lists the communities that are authorized recipients of
the signed content. It can appear as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. This attribute MUST
be supported.
The 2002 ASN.1 syntax for the community-identifiers attribute is
included for convenience:
aa-communityIdentifiers ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE CommunityIdentifiers
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-communityIdentifiers }
id-aa-communityIdentifiers OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9)
smime(16) aa(2) 40 }
CommunityIdentifiers ::= SEQUENCE OF CommunityIdentifier
CommunityIdentifier ::= CHOICE {
communityOID OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
hwModuleList HardwareModules }
HardwareModules ::= SEQUENCE {
hwType OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
hwSerialEntries SEQUENCE OF HardwareSerialEntry }
HardwareSerialEntry ::= CHOICE {
all NULL,
single OCTET STRING,
block SEQUENCE {
low OCTET STRING,
high OCTET STRING } }
Consult [RFC4108] for the attribute's semantics.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 7]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
4. Key Province Attribute
The key-province-v2 attribute identifies the scope, range, or
jurisdiction in which the key is to be used. The key-province-v2
attribute MUST be present as a signed attribute or an authenticated
attribute in the innermost CMS protection content type that provides
authentication (i.e., SignedData, AuthEnvelopedData, or
AuthenticatedData) and encapsulates a symmetric key package or an
asymmetric key package.
The key-province attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyProvince-v2 ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyProvinceV2
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-keyProvinceV2 }
id-aa-KP-keyProvinceV2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 71 }
KeyProvinceV2 ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
5. Binary Signing Time
The binary-signing-time attribute, defined in [RFC6019] and
[RFC6268], specifies the time at which the signature or the Message
Authentication Code (MAC) was applied to the encapsulated content.
It can appear as a signed, authenticated, or
authenticated&unprotected attribute.
The 2002 ASN.1 syntax is included for convenience:
aa-binarySigningTime ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE BinarySigningTime
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-binarySigningTime }
id-aa-binarySigningTime OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9)
smime(16) aa(2) 46 }
BinarySigningTime ::= BinaryTime
BinaryTime ::= INTEGER (0..MAX)
Consult [RFC6019] for the binary-signing-time attribute's semantics.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 8]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
6. Manifest
The manifest attribute lists the short titles of all the Transmission
Security Nomenclature (TSEC-Nomenclature) attributes from inner key
packages. It MUST only appear as an outermost signed, authenticated,
or authenticated&unprotected attribute. If a short title is repeated
in inner packages, it need only appear once in the manifest
attribute. The manifest attribute MUST NOT appear in the same level
as the TSEC-Nomenclature from Section 10.
The manifest attribute has the following syntax:
aa-manifest ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE Manifest
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-manifest }
id-aa-KP-manifest OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1)
gov(101) dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 72 }
Manifest ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF ShortTitle
7. Key Algorithm
The key-algorithm attribute indirectly specifies the size and format
of the keying material in the skey field of a symmetric key package,
which is defined in [RFC6031]. It can appear as a symmetric key,
symmetric key package, signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. If this attribute
appears as a signed attribute, then all of the keying material within
the SignedData content MUST be associated with the same algorithm.
If this attribute appears as an authenticated or
authenticated&unprotected attribute, then all of the keying material
within the AuthenticatedData or AuthEnvelopedData content type MUST
be associated with the same algorithm. If this attribute appears as
a content attribute, then all of the keying material within the
collection MUST be associated with the same algorithm. If both the
key-wrap-algorithm (Section 24) and key-algorithm attributes apply to
an sKey, then the key-algorithm attribute refers to the decrypted
value of sKey rather than to the content of sKey itself. This
attribute MUST be supported.
The key-algorithm attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyAlgorithm ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyAlgorithm
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyAlgorithm }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 9]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
id-kma-keyAlgorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1)
gov(101) dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 1 }
KeyAlgorithm ::= SEQUENCE {
keyAlg OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
checkWordAlg [1] OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL,
crcAlg [2] OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL }
The fields in the key-algorithm attribute have the following
semantics:
o keyAlg specifies the size and format of the keying material.
o If the particular key format supports more than one check-word
algorithm, then the OPTIONAL checkWordAlg identifier indicates
which check-word algorithm was used to generate the check word
that is present. If the check-word algorithm is implied by the
key algorithm, then the checkWordAlg field SHOULD be omitted.
o If the particular key format supports more than one Cyclic
Redundancy Check (CRC) algorithm, then the OPTIONAL crcAlg
identifier indicates which CRC algorithm was used to generate
the value that is present. If the CRC algorithm is implied by
the key algorithm, then the crcAlg field SHOULD be omitted.
The keyAlg identifier, the checkWordAlg identifier, and the crcAlg
identifier are object identifiers. The use of an object identifier
accommodates any algorithm from any registry.
The format of the keying material in the skey field of a symmetric
key package will not match this attribute if the keying material is
split (see Section 18 for a discussion of the split-identifier
attribute). In this situation, this attribute identifies the format
of the keying material once the two splits are combined.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-algorithm attribute can appear in more than one
location in the overall key package. When there are multiple
occurrences of the key-algorithm attribute within the same scope, the
keyAlg field MUST match in all instances. The OPTIONAL checkWordAlg
and crcAlg fields can be omitted in the key-algorithm attribute when
it appears as a signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or
content attribute. However, if these optional fields are present,
they MUST also match the other occurrences within the same scope.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that fails these consistency
checks.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 10]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
8. User Certificate
The user-certificate attribute specifies the type, format, and value
of an X.509 certificate and is used in asymmetric key package's
attributes field. This attribute can appear as an asymmetric key
attribute. This attribute MUST NOT appear in an asymmetric key
package attributes field that includes the other-certificate-formats
attribute. Symmetric key packages do not contain any certificates,
so the user-certificate attribute MUST NOT appear in a symmetric key
package. The user-certificate attribute MUST NOT appear as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. This
attribute MUST be supported.
The syntax is taken from [X.509] but redefined using the ATTRIBUTE
CLASS from [RFC5912]. The user-certificate attribute has the
following syntax:
aa-userCertificate ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE Certificate
EQUALITY MATCHING RULE certificateExactMatch
IDENTIFIED BY id-at-userCertificate }
id-at-userCertificate OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) ds(5) attributes(4) 36 }
Since the user-certificate attribute MUST NOT appear as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, an
asymmetric key package cannot include multiple occurrences of the
user-certificate attribute within the same scope. Receivers MUST
reject any asymmetric key package in which the user-certificate
attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
9. Key Package Receivers
The key-package-receivers-v2 attribute indicates the intended
audience for the key package. The key-package-receivers-v2 attribute
is not intended for access control decisions; rather, intermediate
systems may use this attribute to make routing and relaying
decisions. If the receiver is not listed, it will not be able to
decrypt the package; therefore, the receiver SHOULD reject the key
package if the key-package-receivers-v2 attribute is present and they
are not listed as an intended receiver. The key-package-receivers-v2
attribute can be used as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. If the key-package-
receivers-v2 attribute is associated with a collection, then the
named receivers MUST be able to receive all of the key packages
within the collection. This attribute MUST be supported.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 11]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
The key-package-receivers-v2 attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyPackageReceivers-v2 ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyPkgReceiversV2
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyPkgReceiversV2 }
id-kma-keyPkgReceiversV2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 16 }
KeyPkgReceiversV2 ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF KeyPkgReceiver
KeyPkgReceiver ::= CHOICE {
sirEntity [0] SIREntityName,
community [1] CommunityIdentifier }
The key-package-receivers-v2 attribute contains a list of receiver
identifiers. The receiver identifier is either a SIREntityName
[RFC7191] or a CommunityIdentifier (see Section 3). The
SIREntityName syntax does not impose any particular structure on the
receiver identifier, but it does require registration of receiver
identifier types. The nameType ensures that two receiver identifiers
of different types that contain the same values are not interpreted
as equivalent. Name types are expected to be defined that represent
several different granularities. For example, one name type will
represent the receiver organization. At a finer granularity, the
name type will identify a specific cryptographic device, perhaps
using a manufacturer identifier and serial number.
If a receiver does not recognize a particular nameType or a community
identifier, then keying material within the scope of the unrecognized
nameType or community identifier MUST NOT be used in any manner.
However, the receiver need not discard the associated key package.
Since many cryptographic devices are programmable, a different
firmware load may recognize the nameType. Likewise, a change in the
configuration may lead to the recognition of a previously
unrecognized community identifier. Therefore, the receiver may
retain the key package, but refuse to use it for anything with a
firmware load that does not recognize the nameType or a configuration
that does not recognize the community identifier.
Whenever a key package is saved for later processing due to an
unrecognized nameType or community identifier, subsequent processing
MUST NOT rely on any checks that were made the first time the key
package processing was attempted. That is, the subsequent processing
MUST include the full complement of checks. Further, a receipt for
the packages MUST NOT be generated unless all of these checks are
successfully completed.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 12]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-package-receivers-v2 attribute can appear in
more than one location in the overall key package. When that
happens, each occurrence is evaluated independently.
In a content collection, each member of the collection might contain
its own signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute that includes a key-package-receivers-v2 attribute. In
this situation, each member of the collection is evaluated
separately, and any member that includes an acceptable receiver
SHOULD be retained. Other members can be rejected or retained for
later processing with a different firmware load.
10. TSEC Nomenclature
The Telecommunications Security Nomenclature (TSEC-Nomenclature)
attribute provides the name for a piece of keying material, which
always includes a printable string called a "short title" (see
below). The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute also contains other
identifiers when the shortTitle is insufficient to uniquely name a
particular piece of keying material. This attribute can appear as a
symmetric key, symmetric key package, asymmetric key, signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. If
this attribute appears in the sKeyAttrs field, the editionID,
registerID, and segmentID attribute fields MUST NOT be ranges. If
this attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, all of the keying
material within the associated content MUST have the same shortTitle,
and the attribute value MUST contain only a shortTitle. That is,
when this attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, all of the optional
fields MUST be absent. If this attribute is associated with a
collection, all of the keying material within the collection MUST
have the same shortTitle; however, the editionID, registerID, and
segmentID will be different for each key package in the collection.
This attribute MUST be supported.
The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute has the following syntax:
aa-tsecNomenclature ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE TSECNomenclature
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-TSECNomenclature }
id-kma-TSECNomenclature OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 3 }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 13]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
TSECNomenclature ::= SEQUENCE {
shortTitle ShortTitle,
editionID EditionID OPTIONAL,
registerID RegisterID OPTIONAL,
segmentID SegmentID OPTIONAL }
ShortTitle ::= PrintableString
EditionID ::= CHOICE {
char CHOICE {
charEdition [1] CharEdition,
charEditionRange [2] CharEditionRange }
num CHOICE {
numEdition [3] NumEdition,
numEditionRange [4] NumEditionRange } }
CharEdition ::= PrintableString
CharEditionRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstCharEdition CharEdition,
lastCharEdition CharEdition }
NumEdition ::= INTEGER (0..308915776)
NumEditionRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstNumEdition NumEdition,
lastNumEdition NumEdition }
RegisterID ::= CHOICE {
register [5] Register,
registerRange [6] RegisterRange }
Register ::= INTEGER (0..2147483647)
RegisterRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstRegister Register,
lastRegister Register }
SegmentID ::= CHOICE {
segmentNumber [7] SegmentNumber,
segmentRange [8] SegmentRange }
SegmentNumber ::= INTEGER (1..127)
SegmentRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstSegment SegmentNumber,
lastSegment SegmentNumber }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 14]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
The fields in the TSEC-Nomenclature attribute have the following
semantics:
o The shortTitle consists of up to 32 alphanumeric characters.
shortTitle processing always uses the value in its entirety.
o The editionID is OPTIONAL, and the editionIdentifier is used to
distinguish accountable items. The editionID consists of
either six alphanumeric characters or an integer. When
present, the editionID is either a single value or a range.
The integer encoding should be used when it is important to
keep key package size to a minimum.
o The registerID is OPTIONAL. For electronic keying material,
the registerID is usually omitted. The registerID is an
accounting number assigned to identify Communications Security
(COMSEC) material. The registerID is either a single value or
a range.
o The segmentID is OPTIONAL, and it distinguishes the individual
symmetric keys delivered in one edition. A unique
segmentNumber is assigned to each key in an edition. The
segmentNumber is set to one for the first item in each edition,
and it is incremented by one for each additional item within
that edition. The segmentID is either a single value or a
range.
The order that the keying material will appear in the key package is
illustrated by the following example: a cryptographic device may
require fresh keying material every day, an edition represents the
keying material for a single month, and the segments represent the
keying material for a day within that month. Consider a key package
that contains the keying material for July and August; it will
contain keying material for 62 days. The keying material will appear
in the following order: Edition 1, Segment 1; Edition 1, Segment 2;
Edition 1, Segment 3; ...; Edition 1, Segment 31; Edition 2,
Segment 1; Edition 2, Segment 2; Edition 2, Segment 3; ...;
Edition 2, Segment 31.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the TSEC-Nomenclature attribute can appear in more than
one location in the overall key package. When there are multiple
occurrences of the TSEC-Nomenclature attribute within the same scope,
the shortTitle field MUST match in all instances. Receivers MUST
reject any key package that fails these consistency checks.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 15]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
When the manifest attribute from Section 6 is included in an outer
layer, the ShortTitle field values present in TSEC-Nomenclature
attributes MUST be one of the values in the manifest attribute.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that fails this consistency
check.
11. Key Purpose
The key-purpose attribute specifies the intended purpose of the key
material. It can appear as a symmetric key, symmetric key package,
asymmetric key, signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or
content attribute. If the key-purpose attribute appears as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, then
all of the keying material within the associated content MUST have
the same key purpose value.
The key-purpose attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyPurpose ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyPurpose
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyPurpose }
id-kma-keyPurpose OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 13 }
KeyPurpose ::= ENUMERATED {
n-a (0), -- Not Applicable
A (65), -- Operational
B (66), -- Compatible Multiple Key
L (76), -- Logistics Combinations
M (77), -- Maintenance
R (82), -- Reference
S (83), -- Sample
T (84), -- Training
V (86), -- Developmental
X (88), -- Exercise
Z (90), -- "On the Air" Testing
... -- Expect additional key purpose values -- }
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-purpose attribute can appear in more than one
location in the overall key package. When there are multiple
occurrences of the key-purpose attribute within the same scope, all
fields within the attribute MUST contain exactly the same values.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that fails these consistency
checks.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 16]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
12. Key Use
The key-use attribute specifies the intended use of the key material.
It can appear as a symmetric key, symmetric key package, asymmetric,
signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute. If the key-use attribute appears as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, then
all of the keying material within the associated content MUST have
the same key use value.
The key-use attribute has the following syntax:
aa-key-Use ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyUse
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyUse }
id-kma-keyUse OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 14 }
KeyUse ::= ENUMERATED {
n-a (0), -- Not applicable
ffk (1), -- FIREFLY/CROSSTALK Key (Basic Format)
kek (2), -- Key Encryption Key
kpk (3), -- Key Production Key
msk (4), -- Message Signature Key
qkek (5), -- QUADRANT Key Encryption Key
tek (6), -- Traffic Encryption Key
tsk (7), -- Transmission Security Key
trkek (8), -- Transfer Key Encryption Key
nfk (9), -- Netted FIREFLY Key
effk (10), -- FIREFLY Key (Enhanced Format)
ebfk (11), -- FIREFLY Key (Enhanceable Basic Format)
aek (12), -- Algorithm Encryption Key
wod (13), -- Word of Day
kesk (246), -- Key Establishment Key
eik (247), -- Entity Identification Key
ask (248), -- Authority Signature Key
kmk (249), -- Key Modifier Key
rsk (250), -- Revocation Signature Key
csk (251), -- Certificate Signature Key
sak (252), -- Symmetric Authentication Key
rgk (253), -- Random Generation Key
cek (254), -- Certificate Encryption Key
exk (255), -- Exclusion Key
... -- Expect additional key use values -- }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 17]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
The values for the key-use attribute have the following semantics:
o ffk: A FIREFLY/CROSSTALK key is used to establish a Key
Establishment Key (KEK) or a Transmission Encryption Key (TEK)
between two parties. The KEK or TEK generated from the
exchange is used with a symmetric encryption algorithm. This
key use value is associated with keys in the basic format.
o kek: A Key Encryption Key is used to encrypt or decrypt other
keys for transmission or storage.
o kpk: A Key Production Key is used to initialize a keystream
generator for the production of other electronically generated
keys.
o msk: A Message Signature Key is used in a digital signature
process that operates on a message to assure message source
authentication, message integrity, and non-repudiation.
o qkek: QUADRANT Key Encryption Key is one part of a tamper-
resistance solution.
o tek: A Traffic Encryption Key is used to encrypt plaintext, to
superencrypt previously encrypted data, and/or to decrypt
ciphertext.
o tsk: A Transmission Security Key is used to protect
transmissions from interception and exploitation by means other
than cryptanalysis.
o trkek: Transfer Key Encryption Key. The keys used to protect
communications with an intermediary.
o nfk: A Netted FIREFLY Key is a FIREFLY key that has an edition
number associated with it. When rekeyed, it is incremented,
preventing communications with FIREFLY key of previous
editions. This edition number is maintained within a universal
edition.
o effk: Enhanced FIREFLY Key is used to establish a KEK or a TEK
between two parties. The KEK or TEK generated from an exchange
is used with a symmetric encryption algorithm. This key use
value is associated with keys in the enhanced format.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 18]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
o ebfk: Enhanceable Basic FIREFLY Key is used to establish a KEK
or a TEK between two parties. The KEK or TEK generated from an
exchange is used with a symmetric encryption algorithm. This
key use value is associated with keys in the enhanceable basic
format.
o aek: An Algorithm Encryption Key is used to encrypt or decrypt
an algorithm implementation as well as other functionality in
the implementation.
o wod: A key used to generate the Word of the Day (WOD).
o kesk: A Key Establishment Key is an asymmetric key set (e.g.,
public/private/parameters) used to enable the establishment of
symmetric key(s) between entities.
o eik: An Entity Identification Key is an asymmetric key set
(e.g., public/private/parameters) used to identify one entity
to another for access control and other similar purposes.
o ask: An Authority Signature Key is an asymmetric key set (e.g.,
public/private/parameters) used by designated authorities to
sign objects such as Trust Anchor Management Protocol (TAMP)
messages and firmware packages.
o kmk: A Key Modifier Key is a symmetric key used to modify the
results of the process that forms a symmetric key from a public
key exchange process.
o rsk: A Revocation Signature Key is an asymmetric key set (e.g.,
public/private/parameters) used to sign and authenticate
revocation lists and compromised key lists.
o csk: A Certificate Signature Key is an asymmetric key set
(e.g., public/private/parameters) used to sign and authenticate
public key certificates.
o sak: A Symmetric Authentication Key is used in a MAC algorithm
to provide message integrity. Differs from a Message Signature
Key in that it is symmetric key material and it does not
provide source authentication or non-repudiation.
o rgk: Random Generation Key is a key used to seed a
deterministic pseudorandom number generator.
o cek: A Certificate Encryption Key is used to encrypt public key
certificates to support privacy.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 19]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
o exk: An Exclusion Key is a symmetric key used to
cryptographically subdivide a single large security domain into
smaller segregated domains.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-use attribute can appear in more than one
location in the overall key package. When there are multiple
occurrences of the key-use attribute within the same scope, all
fields within the attribute MUST contain exactly the same values.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that fails these consistency
checks.
13. Transport Key
The transport-key attribute identifies whether an asymmetric key is a
transport key or an operational key (i.e., whether or not the key can
be used as is). It can appear as an asymmetric key, signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. If
the transport-key attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, then all of the
keying material within the associated content MUST have the same
operational/transport key material.
aa-transportKey ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE TransOp
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-transportKey }
id-kma-transportKey OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 15 }
TransOp ::= ENUMERATED {
transport (1),
operational (2) }
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the transport-key attribute can appear in more than one
location in the overall key package. When there are multiple
occurrences of the transport-key attribute within the same scope, all
fields within the attribute MUST contain exactly the same values.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that fails these consistency
checks.
14. Key Distribution Period
The key-distribution-period attribute indicates the period of time
that the keying material is intended for distribution. Keying
material is often distributed before it is intended to be used. Time
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 20]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
of day must be represented in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). It
can appear as a symmetric key, symmetric key package, asymmetric key,
signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute. If the key-distribution-period attribute appears as a
signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute, then all of the keying material within the content MUST
have the same key distribution period.
The key-distribution-period attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyDistributionPeriod ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyDistPeriod
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyDistPeriod }
id-kma-keyDistPeriod OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 5 }
KeyDistPeriod ::= SEQUENCE {
doNotDistBefore [0] BinaryTime OPTIONAL,
doNotDistAfter BinaryTime }
BinaryTime ::= INTEGER
The fields in the key-distribution-period attribute have the
following semantics:
o The doNotDistBefore field is OPTIONAL, and when it is present,
the keying material SHOULD NOT be distributed before the date
and time provided.
o The doNotDistAfter field is REQUIRED, and the keying material
SHOULD NOT be distributed after the date and time provided.
When the key-distribution-period attribute is associated with a
collection of keying material, the distribution period applies to all
of the keys in the collection. None of the keying material in the
collection SHOULD be distributed outside the indicated period.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-distribution-period attribute can appear in more
than one location in the overall key package. When there are
multiple occurrences of the key-distribution-period attribute within
the same scope, all of the included attribute fields MUST contain
exactly the same value. However, if the doNotDistBefore field is
absent in an inner layer, a value MAY appear in an outer layer
because the outer layer constrains the inner layer. Receivers MUST
reject any key package that fails these consistency checks.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 21]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
15. Key Validity Period
The key-validity-period attribute indicates the period of time that
the keying material is intended for use. Time of day MUST be
represented in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). It can appear as a
symmetric key, symmetric key package, asymmetric key, signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. If
the key-validity-period attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, then all of the
keying material within the content MUST have the same key validity
period.
The key-validity-period attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyValidityPeriod ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyValidityPeriod
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyValidityPeriod }
id-kma-keyValidityPeriod OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 6 }
KeyValidityPeriod ::= SEQUENCE {
doNotUseBefore BinaryTime,
doNotUseAfter BinaryTime OPTIONAL }
BinaryTime ::= INTEGER
The fields in the key-validity-period attribute have the following
semantics:
o The doNotUseBefore field is REQUIRED, and the keying material
SHOULD NOT be used before the date and time provided.
o The doNotUseAfter field is OPTIONAL, and when it is present,
the keying material SHOULD NOT be used after the date and time
provided.
For a key package that is being used for rekey, the doNotUseAfter
field MAY be required by some templates even though the syntax is
OPTIONAL.
When the key-validity-period attribute is associated with a
collection of keying material, the validity period applies to all of
the keys in the collection. None of the keying material in the
collection SHOULD be used outside the indicated period.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 22]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
The key-validity-period attribute described in this section and the
key-duration attribute described in the next section provide
complementary functions. The key-validity-period attribute provides
explicit date and time values, which indicate the beginning and
ending of the keying material usage period. The key-duration
attribute provides the maximum length of time that the keying
material SHOULD be used. If both attributes are provided, this
duration MAY occur at any time within the specified period, but the
limits imposed by both attributes SHOULD be honored.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-validity-period attribute can appear in more
than one location in the overall key package. When there are
multiple occurrences of the key-validity-period attribute within the
same scope, all of the included attribute fields MUST contain exactly
the same value. However, if the doNotUseAfter field is absent in an
inner layer, a value MAY appear in an outer layer. Receivers MUST
reject any key package that fails these consistency checks.
16. Key Duration
The key-duration attribute indicates the maximum period of time that
the keying material is intended for use. The date and time that the
duration begins is not specified, but the maximum amount of time that
the keying material can be used to provide security services is
specified. It can appear as a symmetric key, symmetric key package,
asymmetric key, signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or
content attribute. If the key-duration attribute appears as a
signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute, then all of the keying material within the content MUST
have the same key duration.
The key-duration attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyDurationPeriod ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyDuration
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyDuration }
id-kma-keyDuration OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 7 }
KeyDuration ::= CHOICE {
hours [0] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-hours),
days INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-days),
weeks [1] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-weeks),
months [2] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-months),
years [3] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-years) }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 23]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
ub-KeyDuration-hours INTEGER ::= 96
ub-KeyDuration-days INTEGER ::= 732
ub-KeyDuration-weeks INTEGER ::= 104
ub-KeyDuration-months INTEGER ::= 72
ub-KeyDuration-years INTEGER ::= 100
The key-validity-period attribute described in the previous section
and the key-duration attribute described in this section provide a
complementary function. The relationship between these attributes is
described in the previous section.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-duration attribute can appear in more than one
location in the overall key package. When there are multiple
occurrences of the key-duration attribute within the same scope, all
of the included attribute fields MUST contain exactly the same value.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that fails these consistency
checks.
17. Classification
The classification attribute indicates level of classification. The
classification attribute specifies the aggregate classification of
the package content. It can appear as a symmetric key, symmetric key
package, asymmetric key, signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. If the
classification attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, then the value MUST
represent the classification of all of the keying material within the
content. Encrypted layers MAY contain content at a higher
classification that will be revealed once they are decrypted. If the
classification attribute is associated with a collection, then the
sensitivity of all the data within the collection MUST be dominated
by the classification carried in this attribute.
The classification attribute makes use of the ESSSecurityLabel
defined in Section 17.1 as well as [RFC2634] and [RFC5911]. The term
"classification" is used in this document, but the term "security
label" is used in [RFC2634]. The two terms have the same meaning.
[RFC2634] and [RFC5911] specify an object identifier and syntax for
the security label attribute. The same values are used for the
classification attribute:
aa-classificationAttribute ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE Classification
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-classification }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 24]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
id-aa-KP-classification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= id-aa-securityLabel
-- id-aa-securityLabel OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
-- iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1)
-- pkcs-9(9) smime(16) id-aa(2) 2 }
Classification ::= ESSSecurityLabel
The syntax of ESSSecurityLabel is not repeated here; however, see
Section 17.1 for security label conventions that MUST be followed by
implementations of this specification. See [RFC2634] for a complete
discussion of the semantics and syntax.
When the classification attribute appears in more than one location
in the overall key package, each occurrence is evaluated
independently. The content originator MUST ensure that the
classification attribute represents the sensitivity of the plaintext
within the content. That is, the classification MUST dominate any
other plaintext classification attribute value that is present
elsewhere in the overall key package. Note that the classification
attribute value may exceed these other plaintext classification
attribute values if the other attribute values within the SignerInfo,
AuthEnvelopedData, or AuthenticatedData are themselves classified and
warrant the higher-security label value.
When the classification attribute appears in more than one location
in the overall key package, each security label might be associated
with a different security policy. Content originators SHOULD avoid
mixing multiple security policies in the same key package whenever
possible, since this requires that receivers and intermediaries that
check the classification attribute values include support for the
union of the security policies that are present. Failure to
recognize an included security policy MUST result in rejection of the
key package.
Receivers MUST reject any key package that includes a classification
for which the receiver's processing environment is not authorized.
17.1. Security Label
The ESSSecurityLabel ASN.1 type is used to represent the
classification. The ESSSecurityLabel is defined in Section 3.2 of
[RFC2634]. The syntax definition is repeated here to facilitate
discussion:
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 25]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
ESSSecurityLabel ::= SET {
security-policy-identifier SecurityPolicyIdentifier,
security-classification SecurityClassification OPTIONAL,
privacy-mark ESSPrivacyMark OPTIONAL,
security-categories SecurityCategories OPTIONAL }
ESSPrivacyMark ::= CHOICE {
pString PrintableString (SIZE (1..ub-privacy-mark-length)),
utf8String UTF8String (SIZE (1..MAX)) }
A security policy is a set of criteria for the provision of security
services. The security-policy-identifier, which is an object
identifier, is used to identify the security policy associated with
the security label. It indicates the semantics of the other security
label components.
If the key package receiver does not recognize the object identifier
in the security-policy-identifier field and the security label
includes a security-categories field, then the key package contents
MUST NOT be accepted and the enclosed keying material MUST NOT be
used. If the key package receiver does not recognize the object
identifier in the security-policy-identifier field and the security
label does not include a security-categories field, then the key
package contents MAY be accepted only if the security-classification
field is present and it contains a value from the basic hierarchy as
described below.
This specification defines the use of the SecurityClassification
field exactly as is it specified in the 1988 edition of ITU-T
Recommendation X.411 [X.411], which states in part:
If present, a security-classification may have one of a
hierarchical list of values. The basic security-classification
hierarchy is defined in this Recommendation, but the use of these
values is defined by the security-policy in force. Additional
values of security-classification, and their position in the
hierarchy, may also be defined by a security-policy as a local
matter or by bilateral agreement. The basic security-
classification hierarchy is, in ascending order: unmarked,
unclassified, restricted, confidential, secret, top-secret.
Implementations MUST support the basic security classification
hierarchy. Such implementations MAY also support other security-
classification values; however, the placement of additional values in
the hierarchy MUST be specified by the security policy.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 26]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Implementations MUST NOT make access control decisions based on the
privacy-mark. However, information in the privacy-mark can be
displayed to human users by devices that have displays to do so. The
privacy-mark length MUST NOT exceed 128 characters. The privacy-mark
SHALL use the PrintableString choice if all of the characters in the
privacy-mark are members of the printable string character set.
If present, security-categories provide further granularity for the
keying material. The security policy in force indicates the
permitted syntaxes of any entries in the set of security categories.
At most, 64 security categories may be present. The security-
categories have ASN.1 type SecurityCategories and further
SecurityCategory [RFC5912], which are both repeated here to
facilitate discussion:
SecurityCategories ::= SET SIZE (1..ub-security-categories) OF
SecurityCategory
{{SupportedSecurityCategories}}
SecurityCategory {SECURITY-CATEGORY:Supported} ::= SEQUENCE {
type [0] IMPLICIT SECURITY-CATEGORY.
&id({Supported}),
value [1] EXPLICIT SECURITY-CATEGORY.
&Type({Supported}{@type})
}
Four security categories are defined and are referred to as the
Restrictive Tag, the Enumerated Tag, the Permissive Tag, and the
Informative Tag. Only the Enumerated Tag and Informative Tag are
permitted in the classification attribute.
The Enumerated Tag is composed of one or more non-negative integers.
Each non-negative integer represents a non-hierarchical security
attribute that applies to the labeled content. A security policy
might define a large set of security categories attributes, but a
particular key package generally contains only a few security
categories attributes. In this case, use of the integer
representation is intended to minimize the size of the label.
Security attributes enumerated by tags of this type could be
restrictive (such as compartments) or permissive (such as release
permissions). Two object identifiers for the SecurityCategory type
field have been defined, one for restrictive and one for permissive.
The object identifiers are:
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 27]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
id-enumeratedRestrictiveAttributes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
2 16 840 1 101 2 1 8 3 4 }
id-enumeratedPermissiveAttributes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
2 16 840 1 101 2 1 8 3 1 }
With both the restrictive and permissive security category types, the
corresponding SecurityCategory value has the following ASN.1
definition:
EnumeratedTag ::= SEQUENCE {
tagName OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
attributeList SET OF SecurityAttribute }
SecurityAttribute ::= INTEGER (0..MAX)
Any security policy that makes use of security categories MUST assign
object identifiers for each tagName, assign the set of integer values
associated with each tagName, and specify the semantic meaning for
each integer value. Restrictive security attributes and permissive
security attributes SHOULD be associated with different tagName
object identifiers.
The Informative Tag is composed of either a) one or more non-negative
integers or b) a bit string. Only the integer choice is allowed in
this specification. Each non-negative integer represents a non-
hierarchical security attribute that applies to the labeled content.
Use of the integer representation is intended to minimize the size of
the label since a particular key package generally contains only a
few security categories attributes, even though a security policy
might define a large set of security categories attributes. Security
attributes enumerated by tags of this type are informative (i.e., no
access control is performed). One object identifier for the
SecurityCategory type field has been defined and is as follows:
id-informativeAttributes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
2 16 840 1 101 2 1 8 3 3 }
The corresponding SecurityCategory value has the following ASN.1
definition:
InformativeTag ::= SEQUENCE {
tagName OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
attributes FreeFormField }
FreeFormField ::= CHOICE {
bitSetAttributes BIT STRING,
securityAttributes SET OF SecurityAttribute }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 28]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Any security policy that makes use of security categories MUST assign
object identifiers for each tagName, assign the set of integer values
associated with each tagName, and specify the semantic meaning for
each integer value.
18. Split Identifier
The key package originator may include a split-identifier attribute
to designate that the keying material contains a split rather than a
complete key. It may appear as a symmetric and asymmetric key
attribute. The split-identifier attribute MUST NOT appear as a
symmetric key package, signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. Split keys have two
halves, which are called "A" and "B". The split-identifier attribute
indicates which half is included in the key package, and it
optionally indicates the algorithm that is needed to combine the two
halves. The combine algorithm is OPTIONAL since each key algorithm
has a default mechanism for this purpose, and the combine algorithm
is present only if the default mechanism is not employed.
The split-identifier attribute has the following syntax:
aa-splitIdentifier ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE SplitID
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-splitID }
id-kma-splitID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 11 }
SplitID ::= SEQUENCE {
ENUMERATED { a(0), b(1) },
combineAlg AlgorithmIdentifier
{COMBINE-ALGORITHM, {CombineAlgorithms}} OPTIONAL }
In most cases, the default combine algorithm will be employed; it
makes this attribute a simple constant that identifies either the "A"
or "B" half of the split key. This supports implementation of some
key distribution policies.
Note that each split might have its own CRC, but the key and the
check word are both recovered when the two splits are combined.
Since the split-identifier attribute MUST NOT appear as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, a key
package cannot include multiple occurrences of the split-identifier
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 29]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
attribute within the same scope. Receivers MUST reject any key
package in which the split-identifier attribute appears as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
19. Key Package Type
The key-package-type attribute is a shorthand method for specifying
all aspects of the key package format, including which attributes are
present and the structure of the encapsulated content or collection.
The key-package-type attribute can be used as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
Rather than implementing the full flexibility of this specification,
some devices may implement support for one or more specific key
package formats instantiating this specification. Those specific
formats are called templates and can be identified using a key-
package-type attribute.
The key-package-type attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyPackageType ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyPkgType
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyPkgType }
id-kma-keyPkgType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 12 }
KeyPkgType ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the key-package-type attribute can appear in more than
one location in the overall key package. When that happens, each
occurrence is used independently. Since the receiver is likely to
use the key-package-type attribute value as a decoding aid, any error
will most likely lead to parsing problems, and these problems could
result in many different errors being reported.
20. Signature Usage
The signature-usage attribute identifies the CMS content types that
this key can be used to sign, or that are permitted to be signed by
the end-entity key in a cert path validated by this key. Symmetric
key packages do not contain signature generation or signature
validation keying material, so the signature-usage attribute MUST NOT
appear in a symmetric key package. For an asymmetric key package,
the signature-usage attribute indicates the kind of objects that are
to be signed with the private key in the package. However, if the
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 30]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
asymmetric key package contains a Certificate Signature Key, then the
signature-usage attribute also indicates what signed objects can be
validated using certificates that are signed by the private key in
the asymmetric key package. Therefore, the signature-usage attribute
also indicates what kind of objects can be signed by the private keys
associated with these certificates. The signature-usage attribute
MUST NOT appear as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
The signature-usage attribute has the following syntax:
aa-signatureUsage-v3 ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE SignatureUsage
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-sigUsageV3 }
id-kma-sigUsageV3 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 22 }
SignatureUsage ::= CMSContentConstraints
The SignatureUsage structure has the same syntax as the
CMSContentConstraints structure from [RFC6010], and it is repeated
here for convenience.
CMSContentConstraints ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF
ContentTypeConstraint
ContentTypeGeneration ::= ENUMERATED {
canSource(0),
cannotSource(1)}
ContentTypeConstraint ::= SEQUENCE {
contentType CONTENT-TYPE.&id ({ContentSet|ct-Any,...}),
canSource ContentTypeGeneration DEFAULT canSource,
attrConstraints AttrConstraintList OPTIONAL }
Constraint { ATTRIBUTE:ConstraintList } ::= SEQUENCE {
attrType ATTRIBUTE.&id({ConstraintList}),
attrValues SET SIZE (1..MAX) OF ATTRIBUTE.
&Type({ConstraintList}{@attrType}) }
SupportedConstraints ATTRIBUTE ::= {SignedAttributesSet, ... }
AttrConstraintList ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF
Constraint {{ SupportedConstraints }}
NOTE: SignedAttributesSet is updated by this specification.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 31]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
The SignatureUsage contains a type of CMSContentConstraints. One or
more ContentTypeConstraint MUST appear in CMSContentConstraints.
Within ContentTypeConstraint, the contentType field indicates the
encapsulated content type identifier that can be signed with the
signature key. A particular content type MUST NOT appear more than
once in the list. The CMS protecting content types need not be
included in the list of permitted content types as the use of CMS is
always authorized (see [RFC6010]).
Within ContentTypeConstraint, the canSource enumeration indicates
whether the signature key can be used to directly sign the indicated
content type. If the ContentTypeConstraint is canSource (the default
value), then the signature key can be used to directly sign the
specified content type. If the ContentTypeConstraint is
cannotSource, then the signature key can only be used with the
specified content type if it encapsulates a signature that was
generated by an originator with a ContentTypeConstraint that is
canSource.
Within ContentTypeList, the attrConstraints OPTIONAL field contains a
sequence of constraints specific to the content type. If the
attrConstraints field is absent, the signature key can be used to
sign the specified content type, without any further checking. If
the attrConstraints field is present, then the signature key can only
be used to sign the specified content type if all of the constraints
for that content type are satisfied. Content type constraints are
checked by matching the attribute values in the attrConstraint field
against the attribute value in the content. The constraints succeed
if the attribute is not present; they fail if the attribute is
present and the value is not one of the values provided in
attrConstraint.
The fields of attrConstraints implement constraints specific to the
content type. The attrType field is an AttributeType, which is an
object identifier of a signed attribute carried in the SignerInfo of
the content. The attrValues field provides one or more acceptable
signed attribute values. It is a set of AttributeValue. For a
signed content to satisfy the constraint, the SignerInfo MUST include
a signed attribute of the type identified in the attrType field, and
the signed attribute MUST contain one of the values in the set
carried in attrValues.
Since the signature-usage attribute MUST NOT appear as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, an
asymmetric key package cannot include multiple occurrences of the
signature-usage attribute within the same scope. Receivers MUST
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 32]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
reject any asymmetric key package in which the signature-usage
attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
21. Other Certificate Format
The other-certificate-formats attribute specifies the type, format,
and value of certificates that are not X.509 public key certificates.
Symmetric key packages do not contain any certificates, so the other-
certificate-formats attribute MUST NOT appear in a symmetric key
package. It SHOULD appear in the attributes field, when the
publicKey field is absent and the certificate format is not X.509.
This attribute MUST NOT appear in an attributes field that includes
the user-certificate attribute from Section 8. The other-
certificate-formats attribute MUST NOT appear as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
The other-certificate-formats attribute has the following syntax:
aa-otherCertificateFormats ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE CertificateChoices
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-otherCertFormats }
id-kma-otherCertFormats OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 19 }
CertificateChoices ::= CHOICE {
certificate Certificate,
extendedCertificate [0] IMPLICIT ExtendedCertificate,
-- Obsolete
v1AttrCert [1] IMPLICIT AttributeCertificateV1,
-- Obsolete
v2AttrCert [2] IMPLICIT AttributeCertificateV2,
other [3] IMPLICIT OtherCertificateFormat }
OtherCertificateFormat ::= SEQUENCE {
otherCertFormat OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
otherCert ANY DEFINED BY otherCertFormat }
The other-certificate-formats attribute makes use of the
CertificateChoices field defined in Section 10.2.2 of [RFC5652]. The
certificate, extendedCertificate, and v1AttrCert fields MUST be
omitted. The v2AttrCert field can include Version 2 Attribute
Certificates. The other field can include Enhanced FIREFLY
certificates and other as yet undefined certificate formats.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 33]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Since the other-certificate-formats attribute MUST NOT appear as a
signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute, an asymmetric key package cannot include multiple
occurrences of the other-certificate-formats attribute within the
same scope. Receivers MUST reject any asymmetric key package in
which the other-certificate-formats attribute appears as a signed,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
22. PKI Path
The pki-path attribute includes certificates that can aid in the
validation of the certificate carried in the user-certificate
attribute. Symmetric key packages do not contain any certificates,
so the pkiPath attribute MUST NOT appear in a symmetric key package.
It can appear as an asymmetric key, signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute. It can appear in
the attributes field, when the publicKey field is absent and the
certificate format is X.509. This attribute MUST NOT appear in an
AsymmetricKeyPackage that has an other-certificate-formats attribute
in the attributes field. If the pki-path attribute appears as a
signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content
attribute, then the value includes certificates that can be used to
construct a certification path to all of the keying material within
the content. This attribute MUST be supported.
The syntax is taken from [X.509] but redefined using the ATTRIBUTE
CLASS from [RFC5912]. The pki-path attribute has the following
syntax:
aa-pkiPath ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE PkiPath
IDENTIFIED BY id-at-pkiPath }
id-at-pkiPath OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) ds(5) attributes(4) 70 }
PkiPath ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF Certificate
The first certificate in the sequence is the subject's parent
Certification Authority (CA). The next certificate is that CA's
parent, and so on. The end-entity and trust anchor are not included
in this attribute.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the pki-path attribute can appear in more than one
location in the overall key package. When that happens, each
occurrence is evaluated independently.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 34]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
23. Useful Certificates
The useful-certificates attribute includes certificates that can aid
in the validation of certificates associated with other parties with
whom secure communications are anticipated. It can appear as an
asymmetric key, signed, authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or
content attribute. For an asymmetric key that has an other-
certificate-formats attribute (Section 21) in the attributes field,
the useful-certificates attribute MUST NOT appear. If the useful-
certificates attribute appears as a signed, authenticated,
authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute, then the value
includes certificates that may be used to validate certificates of
others with whom the receiver communicates. This attribute MUST be
supported.
The useful-certificates attribute has the following syntax:
aa-usefulCertificates ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE CertificateSet
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-usefulCerts }
id-kma-usefulCerts OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 20 }
CertificateSet ::= SET OF CertificateChoices
The useful-certificates attribute makes use of the CertificateSet
field defined in Section 10.2.3 of [RFC5652]. Within the
CertificateChoices field, the extendedCertificate and v1AttrCert
fields MUST always be omitted. If the userCertificate attribute from
Section 8 is included, the other field MUST NOT be present. If the
other-certificate-formats attribute (Section 21) is included, the
certificate field MUST NOT be present.
Due to multiple layers of encapsulation or the use of content
collections, the useful-certificates attribute can appear in more
than one location in the overall key package. When the useful-
certificates attribute appears in more than one location in the
overall key package, each occurrence is evaluated independently.
24. Key Wrap Algorithm
The key-wrap-algorithm attribute identifies a key wrap algorithm with
an algorithm identifier. It can appear as a symmetric key or
symmetric key package attribute. When this attribute is present in
sKeyAttrs, it indicates that the associated sKey field contains a
black key, which is an encrypted key, that was wrapped by the
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 35]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
identified algorithm. When this attribute is present in
sKeyPkgAttrs, it indicates that every sKey field in that symmetric
key package contains a black key and that all keys are wrapped by the
same designated algorithm.
The key-wrap-algorithm attribute has the following syntax:
aa-keyWrapAlgorithm ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE AlgorithmIdentifier{KEY-WRAP, {KeyEncryptionAlgorithmSet}}
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyWrapAlgorithm }
id-kma-keyWrapAlgorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 21 }
KeyEncryptionAlgorithmSet KEY-WRAP ::= { ... }
25. Content Decryption Key Identifier
The content-decryption-key-identifier attribute can appear as an
unprotected attribute as well as a symmetric and symmetric key
package attribute. The attribute's semantics differ based on the
location.
25.1. Content Decryption Key Identifier: Symmetric Key and Symmetric
Key Package
The content-decryption-key-identifier attribute [RFC6032] identifies
the keying material needed to decrypt the sKey. It can appear as a
symmetric key and symmetric key package attribute. If the key-wrap-
algorithm attribute appears in sKeyPkgAttrs, then the corresponding
content-decryption-identifier attribute can appear in either
sKeyPkgAttrs or sKeyAttrs. If the key-wrap-algorithm attribute
(Section 24) appears in sKeyAttrs, then the corresponding content-
decryption-identifier attribute MUST appear in sKeyAttrs.
The content-decryption-key-identifier attribute in included for
convenience:
aa-contentDecryptKeyIdentifier ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE ContentDecryptKeyID
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-contentDecryptKeyID }
id-aa-KP-contentDecryptKeyID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 66 }
ContentDecryptKeyID ::= OCTET STRING
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 36]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
The content decryption key identifier contains an octet string, and
this syntax does not impose any particular structure on the
identifier value.
25.2. Content Decryption Key Identifier: Unprotected
The content-decryption-key-identifier attribute can be used to
identify the keying material that is needed for decryption of the
EncryptedData content if there is any ambiguity.
The content-decryption-key-identifier attribute syntax is found in
Section 25.1. The content decryption key identifier contains an
octet string, and this syntax does not impose any particular
structure on the identifier value.
Due to multiple layers of encryption, the content-decryption-key-
identifier attribute can appear in more than one location in the
overall key package. When that happens, each occurrence is evaluated
independently. Each one is used to identify the needed keying
material for that layer of encryption.
26. Certificate Pointers
The certificate-pointers attribute can be used to reference one or
more certificates that may be helpful in the processing of the
content once it is decrypted. Sometimes certificates are omitted if
they can be easily fetched. However, an intermediary may have better
facilities to perform the fetching than the receiver. The
certificate-pointers attribute may be useful in some environments.
This attribute can appear as an unprotected and an
unauthenticated&unprotected attribute.
The certificate-pointers attribute uses the same syntax and semantics
as the subject information access certificate extension [RFC5280].
The certificate-pointers attribute has the following syntax:
aa-certificatePointers ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE SubjectInfoAccessSyntax
IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-subjectInfoAccess }
id-pe-subjectInfoAccess OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) pe(1) 11 }
SubjectInfoAccessSyntax ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF
AccessDescription
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 37]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
AccessDescription ::= SEQUENCE {
accessMethod OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
accessLocation GeneralName }
As specified in [RFC5280], the id-ad-caRepository access method can
be used to point to a repository where a Certification Authority
publishes certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs). In
this case, the accessLocation field tells how to access the
repository. Where the information is available via HTTP, FTP, or the
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), accessLocation contains
a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI). Where the information is
available via the Directory Access Protocol (DAP), accessLocation
contains a directory name.
27. CRL Pointers
The CRL-pointers attribute can be used to reference one or more CRLs
that may be helpful in the processing of the content once it is
decrypted. Sometimes CRLs are omitted to conserve space or to ensure
that the most recent CRL is obtained when the certificate is
validated. However, an intermediary may have better facilities to
perform the fetching than the receiver. The CRL-pointers attribute
may be useful in some environments. This attribute can appear as an
unprotected and unauthenticated&unprotected attribute.
The CRL-pointers attribute has the following syntax:
aa-crlPointers ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE GeneralNames
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-crlPointers }
id-aa-KP-crlPointers OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 70 }
The CRL-pointers attribute uses the GeneralNames syntax from
[RFC5280]. Each name describes a different mechanism to obtain the
same CRL. Where the information is available via HTTP, FTP, or LDAP,
GeneralNames contains a URI. Where the information is available via
DAP, GeneralNames contains a directory name.
28. Key Package Identifier and Receipt Request
The key-package-identifier-and-receipt-request attribute from
[RFC7191] is also supported. It can appear as a signed attribute,
authenticated, authenticated&unprotected, or content attribute.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 38]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
29. Additional Error Codes
This specification also defines three additional extended
ErrorCodeChoice object identifiers for the oid field [RFC7191]:
id-errorCodes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) errorCodes(22) }
id-missingKeyType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 1 }
id-privacyMarkTooLong OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 2 }
id-unrecognizedSecurityPolicy OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 3 }
id-incorrectKeyProvince OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 4 }
missingKeyType indicates that all keying material within a package is
of the same type; however, the key-package-type attribute is not
specified in sKeyPkgAttrs [RFC6031].
privacyMarkTooLong indicates that a classification attribute includes
a privacy-mark that exceeds 128 characters in length.
unrecognizedSecurityPolicy indicates that a security-policy-
identifier is not supported.
incorrectKeyProvince indicates that the value of the key-province-v2
attribute in a key package does not match the key province constraint
of the trust anchor used to validate the key package.
30. Processing Key Package Attribute Values and CMS Content Constraints
Trust anchors may contain constraints for any content type [RFC5934].
When the trust anchor contains constraints for the symmetric key
package content type or the asymmetric key package content type, then
the constraints provide default values for key package attributes
that are not present in the key package and define the set of
acceptable values for key package attributes that are present.
When a trust anchor delegates authority by issuing an X.509
certificate, the CMS content constraints certificate extension
[RFC6010] may be included to constrain the authorizations. The trust
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 39]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
anchor and the X.509 certification path provide default values for
key package attributes that are not present in the key package and
define the set of acceptable of values for key package attributes
that are present.
Constraints on content type usage are represented as attributes.
The processing procedures for the CMS content constraints certificate
extension [RFC6010] are part of the validation of a signed or
authenticated object, and the procedures yield three output values:
cms_constraints, cms_effective_attributes, and
cms_default_attributes. Object validation MUST be performed before
processing the key package contents, and these output values are used
as part of key package processing. These same output values are
easily generated directly from a trust anchor and the key package
when no X.509 certification path is involved in validation.
The cms_effective_attributes provides the set of acceptable values
for attributes. Each attribute present in the key package that
corresponds to an entry in cms_effective_attributes MUST contain a
value that appears in cms_effective_attributes entry. Attributes
that do not correspond to an entry in cms_effective_attributes are
unconstrained and may contain any value. Correspondence between
attributes and cms_effective_attributes is determined by comparing
the attribute object identifier to object identifier for each entry
in cms_effective_attributes.
The cms_default_attributes provides values for attributes that do not
appear in the key package. If cms_default_attributes includes only
one attribute value for a particular attribute, then that value is
used as if it were included in the key package itself. However, if
cms_default_attributes includes more than one value for a particular
attribute, then the appropriate value remains ambiguous and the key
package should be rejected.
Some attributes can appear in more than one place in the key package,
and for this reason, the attribute definitions include consistency
checks. These checks are independent of constraints checking. In
addition to the consistency checks, each instance of the attribute
MUST be checked against the set of cms_effective_attributes, and the
key package MUST be rejected if any of the attributes values are not
in the set of authorized set of values.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 40]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
31. Attribute Scope
This section provides an example symmetric key package in order to
provide a discussion of the scope of attributes. This is an
informative section; it is not a normative portion of this
specification. Figure 1 provides the example. All of the concepts
apply to either a symmetric key package or an asymmetric key package,
with the exception of the key-algorithm attribute, which is only
applicable to a symmetric key package. Each of the components is
labeled with a number inside parentheses for easy reference:
(1) is the ContentInfo that must be present as the outermost layer
of encapsulation. It contains no attributes. It is shown for
completeness.
(2) is a SignedData content type, which includes six signed
attributes. Four of the signed attributes are keying material
attributes.
(3) is a ContentCollection that includes two encapsulated content
types: a ContentWithAttributes and an EncryptedKeyPackage.
This content type does not provide any attributes.
(4) is a ContentWithAttributes content type. It encapsulates a
SignedData content type. Four key material attributes are
provided.
(5) is a SignedData content type. It encapsulates a
SymmetricKeyPackage content type. Six signed attributes are
provided. Four attributes are key material attributes.
(6) is a SymmetricKeyPackage content type, and it includes three
key material attributes. Note that the contents of this key
package are not encrypted, but the contents are covered by two
digital signatures.
(7) is an EncryptedKeyPackage content type. It encapsulates a
SignedData content type. This content type provides one
unprotected attribute.
(8) is a SignedData content type. It encapsulates a
SymmetricKeyPackage content type. Six signed attributes are
provided. Four attributes are key material attributes.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 41]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
(9) is a SymmetricKeyPackage content type, and it includes three
key material attributes. Note that the contents of this key
package are encrypted; the plaintext keying material is
covered by one digital signature, and the ciphertext keying
material is covered by another digital signature.
SignedData content type (2) includes six signed attributes:
o The content-type attribute contains id-ct-contentCollection to
indicate the type of the encapsulated content, and it has no
further scope.
o The message-digest attribute contains the one-way hash value of
the encapsulated content; it is needed to validate the digital
signature. It has no further scope.
o The classification attribute contains the security label for
all of the plaintext in the encapsulated content. Each
classification attribute is evaluated separately; it has no
further scope. In general, the values of this attribute will
match or dominate the security label values in (4), (5), and
(6). The value of this attribute might not match or dominate
the security label values in (8) and (9) since they are
encrypted. It is possible that these various security label
values are associated with different security policies. To
avoid the processing complexity associated with policy mapping,
comparison is not required.
o The key-package-receivers-v2 attribute indicates the authorized
key package receivers, and it has no further scope. The
additional instances of key-package-receivers-v2 attribute
embedded in (4) are evaluated without regard to the value of
the instance in (2).
o The key-distribution-period attribute contains two date values:
doNotDistBefore and doNotDistAfter. These values must match
all others within the same scope, which in this example is the
key-distribution-period within (4).
o The key-package-type attributes indicates the format of the key
package, and it has no further scope. The key-package-type
attributes values within (5) and (8) are evaluated without
regard to the value of this attribute.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 42]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
ContentWithAttributes content type (4) includes four attributes:
o The classification attribute contains the security label for
all of the plaintext in the encapsulated content. Each
classification attribute is evaluated separately; it has no
further scope.
o The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute includes only the shortTitle
field, and the value must match all other instances within the
same scope, which appear in (5) and (6). Note that the TSEC-
Nomenclature attribute values in (8) and (9) are not in the
same scope as the TSEC-Nomenclature attribute that appears in
(4).
o The key-package-receivers-v2 attribute indicates the authorized
key package receivers, and it has no further scope. The
enveloping instance of key-package-receivers-v2 attribute value
in (2) is evaluated without regard to the value of this
instance in (4), and has no effect on the value of this
instance in (4).
o The key-distribution-period attribute contains two date values:
doNotDistBefore and doNotDistAfter. These values must match
all others within the same scope, which in this example is the
key-distribution-period within (2).
SignedData content type (5) includes six signed attributes:
o The content-type attribute contains id-ct-KP-skeyPackage to
indicate the type of the encapsulated content, and it has no
further scope.
o The message-digest attribute contains the one-way hash value of
the encapsulated content; it is needed to validate the digital
signature. It has no further scope.
o The classification attribute contains the security label for
all of the plaintext in the encapsulated content. Each
classification attribute is evaluated separately; it has no
further scope.
o The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute includes only the shortTitle
field, and the value must match all other instances within the
same scope, which appear in (6). Since this is within the
scope of (4), these shortTitle field values must match as well.
Note that the TSEC-Nomenclature attribute values in (8) and (9)
are not in the same scope.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 43]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
o The key-purpose attribute specifies the purpose of the key
material. All occurrences within the scope must have the same
value; however, in this example, there are no other occurrences
within the scope. The key-purpose attribute value within (8)
is evaluated without regard to the value of this attribute.
o The key-package-type attribute indicates the format of the key
package, and it has no further scope. The key-package-type
attribute values within (2) and (8) are evaluated without
regard to the value of this attribute.
SymmetricKeyPackage content type (6) includes three keying material
attributes, which could appear in the sKeyPkgAttrs or sKeyAttrs
fields:
o The key-algorithm attribute includes only the keyAlg field, and
it must match all other occurrences within the same scope.
However, there are no other key-algorithm attribute occurrences
in the same scope; the key-algorithm attribute value in (9) is
not in the same scope.
o The classification attribute contains the security label for
all of the plaintext in the key package. Each classification
attribute is evaluated separately; it has no further scope.
o The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute includes the shortTitle field
as well as some of the optional fields. The shortTitle field
value must match the values in (4) and (5), since this content
type is within their scope. Note that the TSEC-Nomenclature
attribute values in (8) and (9) are not in the same scope.
EncryptedKeyPackage content type (7) includes one unprotected
attribute, and the encryption will prevent any intermediary that does
not have the ability to decrypt the content from making any
consistency checks on (8) and (9):
o The content-decryption-key-identifier attribute identifies the
key that is needed to decrypt the encapsulated content; it has
no further scope.
SignedData content type (8) includes six signed attributes:
o The content-type attribute contains id-ct-KP-skeyPackage to
indicate the type of the encapsulated content, and it has no
further scope.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 44]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
o The message-digest attribute contains the one-way hash value of
the encapsulated content; it is needed to validate the digital
signature. It has no further scope.
o The classification attribute contains the security label for
content. Each classification attribute is evaluated
separately; it has no further scope.
o The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute includes only the shortTitle
field, and the value must match all other instances within the
same scope, which appear in (9). Note that the TSEC-
Nomenclature attribute values in (4), (5), and (6) are not in
the same scope.
o The key-purpose attribute specifies the purpose of the key
material. All occurrences within the scope must have the same
value; however, in this example, there are no other occurrences
within the scope. The key-purpose attribute value within (5)
is evaluated without regard to the value of this attribute.
o The key-package-type attribute indicates the format of the key
package, and it has no further scope. The key-package-type
attribute values within (2) and (5) are evaluated without
regard to the value of this attribute.
SymmetricKeyPackage content type (9) includes three keying material
attributes, which could appear in the sKeyPkgAttrs or sKeyAttrs
fields:
o The key-algorithm attribute includes only the keyAlg field, and
it must match all other occurrences within the same scope.
However, there are no other key-algorithm attribute occurrences
in the same scope; the key-algorithm attribute value in (6) is
not in the same scope.
o The classification attribute contains the security label for
all of the plaintext in the key package. Each classification
attribute is evaluated separately; it has no further scope.
o The TSEC-Nomenclature attribute includes the shortTitle field
as well as some of the optional fields. The shortTitle field
value must match the values in (8), since this content type is
within its scope. Note that the TSEC-Nomenclature attributes
values in (4), (5), and (6) are not in the same scope.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 45]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
In summary, the scope of an attribute includes the encapsulated
content of the CMS content type in which it appears, and some
attributes also require consistency checks with other instances that
appear within the encapsulated content. Proper recognition of scope
is required to accurately perform attribute processing.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 46]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ContentInfo (1) |
|+----------------------------------------------------------------+|
|| SignedData (2) ||
||+--------------------------------------------------------------+||
||| ContentCollection (3) |||
|||+-----------------------------++-----------------------------+|||
|||| ContentWithAttributes (4) || EncryptedKeyPackage (7) ||||
||||+---------------------------+||+---------------------------+||||
||||| SignedData (5) |||| SignedData (8) |||||
|||||+-------------------------+||||+-------------------------+|||||
|||||| SymmetricKeyPackage (6) |||||| SymmetricKeyPackage (9) ||||||
|||||| Attributes: |||||| Attributes: ||||||
|||||| Key Algorithm |||||| Key Algorithm ||||||
|||||| Classification |||||| Classification ||||||
|||||| TSEC-Nomenclature |||||| TSEC-Nomenclature ||||||
|||||+-------------------------+||||+-------------------------+|||||
||||| Attributes: |||| Attributes: |||||
||||| Content Type |||| Content Type |||||
||||| Message Digest |||| Message Digest |||||
||||| Classification |||| Classification |||||
||||| TSEC-Nomenclature |||| TSEC-Nomenclature |||||
||||| Key Purpose |||| Key Purpose |||||
||||| Key Package Type |||| Key Package Type |||||
||||+-------------------------- +||+---------------------------+||||
|||| Attributes: || Unprotect Attributes: ||||
|||| Classification || Content Decrypt Key ID ||||
|||| TSEC-Nomenclature |+-----------------------------+|||
|||| Key Package Receivers | |||
|||| Key Distribution Period | |||
|||+-----------------------------+ |||
||+--------------------------------------------------------------+||
|| Attributes: ||
|| Content Type ||
|| Message Digest ||
|| Classification ||
|| Key Package Receivers ||
|| Key Distribution Period ||
|| Key Package Type ||
|+----------------------------------------------------------------+|
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Figure 1: Example Illustrating Scope of Attributes
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 47]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
32. Security Considerations
The majority of this specification is devoted to the syntax and
semantics of key package attributes. It relies on other
specifications, especially [RFC2634], [RFC4073], [RFC4108],
[RFC5652], [RFC5911], [RFC5912], [RFC5958], [RFC6010], and [RFC6031];
their security considerations apply here. Additionally,
cryptographic algorithms are used with CMS protecting content types
as specified in [RFC5959], [RFC6160], [RFC6161], and [RFC6162]; the
security considerations from those documents apply here as well.
This specification also relies upon [RFC5280] for the syntax and
semantics of X.509 certificates. Digital signatures provide data
integrity or data origin authentication, and encryption provides
confidentiality.
Security factors outside the scope of this specification greatly
affect the assurance provided. The procedures used by Certification
Authorities (CAs) to validate the binding of the subject identity to
their public key greatly affect the assurance that ought to be placed
in the certificate. This is particularly important when issuing
certificates to other CAs.
The CMS AuthenticatedData content type MUST be used with care since a
Message Authentication Code (MAC) is used. The same key is needed to
generate the MAC or validate the MAC. Thus, any party with access to
the key needed to validate the MAC can generate a replacement that
will be acceptable to other recipients.
In some situations, returning very detailed error information can
provide an attacker with insight into the security processing. Where
this is a concern, the implementation should return the most generic
error code that is appropriate. However, detailed error codes are
very helpful during development, debugging, and interoperability
testing. For this reason, implementations may want to have a way to
configure the use of generic or detailed error codes.
33. References
33.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 48]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
[RFC2634] Hoffman, P., Ed., "Enhanced Security Services for S/MIME",
RFC 2634, DOI 10.17487/RFC2634, June 1999,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2634>.
[RFC4073] Housley, R., "Protecting Multiple Contents with the
Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 4073,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4073, May 2005,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4073>.
[RFC4108] Housley, R., "Using Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) to
Protect Firmware Packages", RFC 4108,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4108, August 2005,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4108>.
[RFC5083] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Authenticated-Enveloped-Data Content Type", RFC 5083,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5083, November 2007,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5083>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70,
RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>.
[RFC5911] Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for
Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and S/MIME", RFC 5911,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5911, June 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5911>.
[RFC5912] Hoffman, P. and J. Schaad, "New ASN.1 Modules for the
Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 5912,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5912, June 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5912>.
[RFC5958] Turner, S., "Asymmetric Key Packages", RFC 5958,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5958, August 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5958>.
[RFC5959] Turner, S., "Algorithms for Asymmetric Key Package Content
Type", RFC 5959, DOI 10.17487/RFC5959, August 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5959>.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 49]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
[RFC6010] Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Cryptographic
Message Syntax (CMS) Content Constraints Extension",
RFC 6010, DOI 10.17487/RFC6010, September 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6010>.
[RFC6019] Housley, R., "BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for
Representing Date and Time in ASN.1", RFC 6019,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6019, September 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6019>.
[RFC6031] Turner, S. and R. Housley, "Cryptographic Message Syntax
(CMS) Symmetric Key Package Content Type", RFC 6031,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6031, December 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6031>.
[RFC6032] Turner, S. and R. Housley, "Cryptographic Message Syntax
(CMS) Encrypted Key Package Content Type", RFC 6032,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6032, December 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6032>.
[RFC6160] Turner, S., "Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax
(CMS) Protection of Symmetric Key Package Content Types",
RFC 6160, DOI 10.17487/RFC6160, April 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6160>.
[RFC6162] Turner, S., "Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic
Message Syntax (CMS) Asymmetric Key Package Content Type",
RFC 6162, DOI 10.17487/RFC6162, April 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6162>.
[RFC6268] Schaad, J. and S. Turner, "Additional New ASN.1 Modules
for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public
Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 6268,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6268, July 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6268>.
[RFC7191] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Key
Package Receipt and Error Content Types", RFC 7191,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7191, April 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7191>.
[X.509] ITU-T, "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - The Directory: Public-key and attribute
certificate frameworks", ITU-T Recommendation X.509 |
ISO/IEC 9594-8:2005, 2005.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 50]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
[X.680] ITU-T, "Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation
One", ITU-T Recommendation X.680 | ISO/IEC 8824-1:2002,
2002.
[X.681] ITU-T, "Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation
One: Information Object Specification", ITU-T
Recommendation X.681 | ISO/IEC 8824-2:2002, 2002.
[X.682] ITU-T, "Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation
One: Constraint Specification", ITU-T Recommendation X.682
| ISO/IEC 8824-3:2002, 2002.
[X.683] ITU-T, "Information Technology - Abstract Syntax Notation
One: Parameterization of ASN.1 Specifications", ITU-T
Recommendation X.683 | ISO/IEC 8824-4:2002, 2002.
[X.690] ITU-T, "Information Technology - ASN.1 encoding rules:
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical
Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules
(DER)", ITU-T Recommendation X.690 | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2002,
2002.
33.2. Informative References
[RFC5934] Housley, R., Ashmore, S., and C. Wallace, "Trust Anchor
Management Protocol (TAMP)", RFC 5934,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5934, August 2010,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5934>.
[X.411] ITU-T, "Information technology - Message Handling Systems
(MHS): Message Transfer System: Abstract Service
Definition and Procedures", ITU-T Recommendation X.411 |
ISO/IEC 10021-4:1999, 1999.
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 51]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Appendix A. ASN.1 Module
KMAttributes2012
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1)
gov(101) dod(2) infosec(1) modules(0) 39 }
DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::=
BEGIN
-- EXPORT ALL
IMPORTS
-- From [RFC5911]
aa-communityIdentifiers, CommunityIdentifier
FROM CMSFirmwareWrapper-2009
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9)
smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-firmware-wrap-02(40) }
-- From [RFC5911]
aa-contentHint, ESSSecurityLabel, id-aa-securityLabel
FROM ExtendedSecurityServices-2009
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9)
smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-ess-2006-02(42) }
-- From [RFC5911] [RFC5912]
AlgorithmIdentifier{}, SMIME-CAPS, ParamOptions, KEY-WRAP
FROM AlgorithmInformation-2009
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
id-mod-algorithmInformation-02(58) }
-- From [RFC5912]
Name, Certificate
FROM PKIX1Explicit-2009
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
id-mod-pkix1-explicit-02(51) }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 52]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- From [RFC5912]
GeneralNames, SubjectInfoAccessSyntax, id-pe-subjectInfoAccess
FROM PKIX1Implicit-2009
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
id-mod-pkix1-implicit-02(59) }
-- FROM [RFC5912]
ATTRIBUTE
FROM PKIX-CommonTypes-2009
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
id-mod-pkixCommon-02(57) }
-- From [RFC6010]
CMSContentConstraints
FROM CMSContentConstraintsCertExtn
{ iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1)
security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0)
cmsContentConstr-93(42) }
-- From [RFC6268]
aa-binarySigningTime, BinaryTime
FROM BinarySigningTimeModule-2010
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9)
smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-binSigningTime-2009(55) }
-- From [RFC6268]
CertificateChoices, CertificateSet, Attribute {},
aa-contentType, aa-messageDigest
FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax-2010
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9)
smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-2009(58) }
-- From [RFC7191]
aa-keyPackageIdentifierAndReceiptRequest, SIREntityName
FROM KeyPackageReceiptAndErrorModuleV2
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9)
smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-keyPkgReceiptAndErrV2(63) }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 53]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- From [X.509]
certificateExactMatch
FROM CertificateExtensions
{ joint-iso-itu-t ds(5) module(1) certificateExtensions(26) 4 }
;
-- ATTRIBUTES
-- Replaces SignedAttributesSet information object set from
-- [RFC6268].
SignedAttributesSet ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-contentType |
aa-messageDigest |
aa-contentHint |
aa-communityIdentifiers |
aa-binarySigningTime |
aa-keyProvince-v2 |
aa-keyPackageIdentifierAndReceiptRequest |
aa-manifest |
aa-keyAlgorithm |
aa-userCertificate |
aa-keyPackageReceivers-v2 |
aa-tsecNomenclature |
aa-keyPurpose |
aa-keyUse |
aa-transportKey |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-keyValidityPeriod |
aa-keyDurationPeriod |
aa-classificationAttribute |
aa-keyPackageType |
aa-pkiPath |
aa-usefulCertificates,
... }
-- Replaces UnsignedAttributes from [RFC6268].
UnsignedAttributes ATTRIBUTE ::= {
...
}
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 54]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- Replaces UnprotectedEnvAttributes from [RFC6268].
UnprotectedEnvAttributes ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-contentDecryptKeyIdentifier |
aa-certificatePointers |
aa-cRLDistributionPoints,
...
}
-- Replaces UnprotectedEncAttributes from [RFC6268].
UnprotectedEncAttributes ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-certificatePointers |
aa-cRLDistributionPoints,
...
}
-- Replaces AuthAttributeSet from [RFC6268]
AuthAttributeSet ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-contentType |
aa-messageDigest |
aa-contentHint |
aa-communityIdentifiers |
aa-keyProvince-v2 |
aa-binarySigningTime |
aa-keyPackageIdentifierAndReceiptRequest |
aa-manifest |
aa-keyAlgorithm |
aa-userCertificate |
aa-keyPackageReceivers-v2 |
aa-tsecNomenclature |
aa-keyPurpose |
aa-keyUse |
aa-transportKey |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-keyValidityPeriod |
aa-keyDurationPeriod |
aa-classificationAttribute |
aa-keyPackageType |
aa-pkiPath |
aa-usefulCertificates,
... }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 55]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- Replaces UnauthAttributeSet from [RFC6268]
UnauthAttributeSet ATTRIBUTE ::= {
...
}
-- Replaces AuthEnvDataAttributeSet from [RFC6268]
AuthEnvDataAttributeSet ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-certificatePointers |
aa-cRLDistributionPoints,
...
}
-- Replaces UnauthEnvDataAttributeSet from [RFC6268]
UnauthEnvDataAttributeSet ATTRIBUTE ::= {
...
}
-- Replaces OneAsymmetricKeyAttributes from [RFC5958]
OneAsymmetricKeyAttributes ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-userCertificate |
aa-tsecNomenclature |
aa-keyPurpose |
aa-keyUse |
aa-transportKey |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-keyValidityPeriod |
aa-keyDurationPeriod |
aa-classificationAttribute |
aa-splitIdentifier |
aa-signatureUsage-v3 |
aa-otherCertificateFormats |
aa-pkiPath |
aa-usefulCertificates,
... }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 56]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- Replaces SKeyPkgAttributes from [RFC6031]
SKeyPkgAttributes ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-keyAlgorithm |
aa-tsecNomenclature |
aa-keyPurpose |
aa-keyUse |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-keyValidityPeriod |
aa-keyDurationPeriod |
aa-classificationAttribute |
aa-keyWrapAlgorithm |
aa-contentDecryptKeyIdentifier,
... }
-- Replaces SKeyAttributes from [RFC6031]
SKeyAttributes ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-keyAlgorithm |
aa-tsecNomenclature |
aa-keyPurpose |
aa-keyUse |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-keyValidityPeriod |
aa-keyDurationPeriod |
aa-classificationAttribute |
aa-splitIdentifier |
aa-keyWrapAlgorithm |
aa-contentDecryptKeyIdentifier,
... }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 57]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- Replaces ContentAttributeSet from [RFC6268]
ContentAttributeSet ATTRIBUTE ::= {
aa-communityIdentifiers |
aa-keyPackageIdentifierAndReceiptRequest |
aa-keyAlgorithm |
aa-keyPackageReceivers-v2 |
aa-tsecNomenclature |
aa-keyPurpose |
aa-keyUse |
aa-transportKey |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-transportKey |
aa-keyDistributionPeriod |
aa-keyValidityPeriod |
aa-keyDurationPeriod |
aa-classificationAttribute |
aa-keyPackageType |
aa-pkiPath |
aa-usefulCertificates,
... }
-- Content Type, Message Digest, Content Hint, and Binary Signing
-- Time are imported from [RFC6268].
-- Community Identifiers is imported from [RFC5911].
-- Key Province
aa-keyProvince-v2 ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyProvinceV2
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-keyProvinceV2 }
id-aa-KP-keyProvinceV2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 71 }
KeyProvinceV2 ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
-- Manifest Attribute
aa-manifest ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE Manifest
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-manifest }
id-aa-KP-manifest OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 72 }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 58]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Manifest ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF ShortTitle
-- Key Algorithm Attribute
aa-keyAlgorithm ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyAlgorithm
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyAlgorithm }
id-kma-keyAlgorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 1 }
KeyAlgorithm ::= SEQUENCE {
keyAlg OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
checkWordAlg [1] OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL,
crcAlg [2] OBJECT IDENTIFIER OPTIONAL }
-- User Certificate Attribute
aa-userCertificate ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE Certificate
EQUALITY MATCHING RULE certificateExactMatch
IDENTIFIED BY id-at-userCertificate }
id-at-userCertificate OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) ds(5) attributes(4) 36 }
-- Key Package Receivers Attribute
aa-keyPackageReceivers-v2 ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyPkgReceiversV2
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyPkgReceiversV2 }
id-kma-keyPkgReceiversV2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 16 }
KeyPkgReceiversV2 ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF KeyPkgReceiver
KeyPkgReceiver ::= CHOICE {
sirEntity [0] SIREntityName,
community [1] CommunityIdentifier }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 59]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- TSEC Nomenclature Attribute
aa-tsecNomenclature ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE TSECNomenclature
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-TSECNomenclature }
id-kma-TSECNomenclature OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 3 }
TSECNomenclature ::= SEQUENCE {
shortTitle ShortTitle,
editionID EditionID OPTIONAL,
registerID RegisterID OPTIONAL,
segmentID SegmentID OPTIONAL }
ShortTitle ::= PrintableString
EditionID ::= CHOICE {
char CHOICE {
charEdition [1] CharEdition,
charEditionRange [2] CharEditionRange },
num CHOICE {
numEdition [3] NumEdition,
numEditionRange [4] NumEditionRange } }
CharEdition ::= PrintableString
CharEditionRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstCharEdition CharEdition,
lastCharEdition CharEdition }
NumEdition ::= INTEGER (0..308915776)
NumEditionRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstNumEdition NumEdition,
lastNumEdition NumEdition }
RegisterID ::= CHOICE {
register [5] Register,
registerRange [6] RegisterRange }
Register ::= INTEGER (0..2147483647)
RegisterRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstRegister Register,
lastRegister Register }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 60]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
SegmentID ::= CHOICE {
segmentNumber [7] SegmentNumber,
segmentRange [8] SegmentRange }
SegmentNumber ::= INTEGER (1..127)
SegmentRange ::= SEQUENCE {
firstSegment SegmentNumber,
lastSegment SegmentNumber }
-- Key Purpose Attribute
aa-keyPurpose ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyPurpose
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyPurpose }
id-kma-keyPurpose OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 13 }
KeyPurpose ::= ENUMERATED {
n-a (0), -- Not Applicable
a (65), -- Operational
b (66), -- Compatible Multiple Key
l (76), -- Logistics Combinations
m (77), -- Maintenance
r (82), -- Reference
s (83), -- Sample
t (84), -- Training
v (86), -- Developmental
x (88), -- Exercise
z (90), -- "On the Air" Testing
... -- Expect additional key purpose values -- }
-- Key Use Attribute
aa-keyUse ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyUse
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyUse }
id-kma-keyUse OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 14 }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 61]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
KeyUse ::= ENUMERATED {
n-a (0), -- Not Applicable
ffk (1), -- FIREFLY/CROSSTALK Key (Basic Format)
kek (2), -- Key Encryption Key
kpk (3), -- Key Production Key
msk (4), -- Message Signature Key
qkek (5), -- QUADRANT Key Encryption Key
tek (6), -- Traffic Encryption Key
tsk (7), -- Transmission Security Key
trkek (8), -- Transfer Key Encryption Key
nfk (9), -- Netted FIREFLY Key
effk (10), -- FIREFLY Key (Enhanced Format)
ebfk (11), -- FIREFLY Key (Enhanceable Basic Format)
aek (12), -- Algorithm Encryption Key
wod (13), -- Word of Day
kesk (246), -- Key Establishment Key
eik (247), -- Entity Identification Key
ask (248), -- Authority Signature Key
kmk (249), -- Key Modifier Key
rsk (250), -- Revocation Signature Key
csk (251), -- Certificate Signature Key
sak (252), -- Symmetric Authentication Key
rgk (253), -- Random Generation Key
cek (254), -- Certificate Encryption Key
exk (255), -- Exclusion Key
... -- Expect additional key use values -- }
-- Transport Key Attribute
aa-transportKey ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE TransOp
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-transportKey }
id-kma-transportKey OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 15 }
TransOp ::= ENUMERATED {
transport (1),
operational (2) }
-- Key Distribution Period Attribute
aa-keyDistributionPeriod ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyDistPeriod
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyDistPeriod }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 62]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
id-kma-keyDistPeriod OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 5 }
KeyDistPeriod ::= SEQUENCE {
doNotDistBefore [0] BinaryTime OPTIONAL,
doNotDistAfter BinaryTime }
-- Key Validity Period Attribute
aa-keyValidityPeriod ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyValidityPeriod
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyValidityPeriod }
id-kma-keyValidityPeriod OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 6 }
KeyValidityPeriod ::= SEQUENCE {
doNotUseBefore BinaryTime,
doNotUseAfter BinaryTime OPTIONAL }
-- Key Duration Attribute
aa-keyDurationPeriod ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyDuration
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyDuration }
id-kma-keyDuration OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 7 }
KeyDuration ::= CHOICE {
hours [0] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-hours),
days INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-days),
weeks [1] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-weeks),
months [2] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-months),
years [3] INTEGER (1..ub-KeyDuration-years) }
ub-KeyDuration-hours INTEGER ::= 96
ub-KeyDuration-days INTEGER ::= 732
ub-KeyDuration-weeks INTEGER ::= 104
ub-KeyDuration-months INTEGER ::= 72
ub-KeyDuration-years INTEGER ::= 100
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 63]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- Classification Attribute
-- The attribute syntax is imported from [RFC6268]. The term
-- "classification" is used in this document, but the term "security
-- label" is used in [RFC2634]. The terms have the same meaning.
aa-classificationAttribute ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE Classification
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-classification }
id-aa-KP-classification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= id-aa-securityLabel
Classification ::= ESSSecurityLabel
id-enumeratedRestrictiveAttributes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ 2 16 840 1 101 2 1 8 3 4 }
id-enumeratedPermissiveAttributes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ 2 16 840 1 101 2 1 8 3 1 }
EnumeratedTag ::= SEQUENCE {
tagName OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
attributeList SET OF SecurityAttribute }
SecurityAttribute ::= INTEGER (0..MAX)
-- Split Identifier Attribute
aa-splitIdentifier ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE SplitID
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-splitID }
id-kma-splitID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 11 }
SplitID ::= SEQUENCE {
half ENUMERATED { a(0), b(1) },
combineAlg AlgorithmIdentifier
{COMBINE-ALGORITHM, {CombineAlgorithms}} OPTIONAL }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 64]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
COMBINE-ALGORITHM ::= CLASS {
&id OBJECT IDENTIFIER UNIQUE,
&Params OPTIONAL,
¶mPresence ParamOptions DEFAULT absent,
&smimeCaps SMIME-CAPS OPTIONAL
}
WITH SYNTAX {
IDENTIFIER &id
[PARAMS [TYPE &Params] ARE ¶mPresence]
[SMIME-CAPS &smimeCaps]
}
CombineAlgorithms COMBINE-ALGORITHM ::= {
...
}
-- Key Package Type Attribute
aa-keyPackageType ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE KeyPkgType
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyPkgType }
id-kma-keyPkgType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 12 }
KeyPkgType ::= OBJECT IDENTIFIER
-- Signature Usage Attribute
aa-signatureUsage-v3 ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE SignatureUsage
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-sigUsageV3 }
id-kma-sigUsageV3 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 22 }
SignatureUsage ::= CMSContentConstraints
-- Other Certificate Format Attribute
aa-otherCertificateFormats ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE CertificateChoices
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-otherCertFormats }
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 65]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
id-kma-otherCertFormats OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 19 }
-- PKI Path Attribute
aa-pkiPath ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE PkiPath
IDENTIFIED BY id-at-pkiPath }
id-at-pkiPath OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) ds(5) attributes(4) 70 }
PkiPath ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF Certificate
-- Useful Certificates Attribute
aa-usefulCertificates ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE CertificateSet
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-usefulCerts }
id-kma-usefulCerts OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 20 }
-- Key Wrap Attribute
aa-keyWrapAlgorithm ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE AlgorithmIdentifier{KEY-WRAP, {KeyEncryptionAlgorithmSet}}
IDENTIFIED BY id-kma-keyWrapAlgorithm }
id-kma-keyWrapAlgorithm OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) keying-material-attributes(13) 21 }
KeyEncryptionAlgorithmSet KEY-WRAP ::= { ... }
-- Content Decryption Key Identifier Attribute
aa-contentDecryptKeyIdentifier ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE ContentDecryptKeyID
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-contentDecryptKeyID }
id-aa-KP-contentDecryptKeyID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes(5) 66 }
ContentDecryptKeyID::= OCTET STRING
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 66]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
-- Certificate Pointers Attribute
aa-certificatePointers ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE SubjectInfoAccessSyntax
IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-subjectInfoAccess }
-- CRL Pointers Attribute
aa-cRLDistributionPoints ATTRIBUTE ::= {
TYPE GeneralNames
IDENTIFIED BY id-aa-KP-crlPointers }
id-aa-KP-crlPointers OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) attributes (5) 70 }
-- ExtendedErrorCodes
id-errorCodes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ joint-iso-itu-t(2) country(16) us(840) organization(1) gov(101)
dod(2) infosec(1) errorCodes(22) }
id-missingKeyType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 1 }
id-privacyMarkTooLong OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 2 }
id-unrecognizedSecurityPolicy OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {
id-errorCodes 3 }
END
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 67]
RFC 7906 NSA's CMS Key Management Attributes June 2016
Authors' Addresses
Paul Timmel
National Information Assurance Research Laboratory
National Security Agency
Email: pstimme@nsa.gov
Russ Housley
Vigil Security, LLC
918 Spring Knoll Drive
Herndon, VA 20170
United States
Email: housley@vigilsec.com
Sean Turner
IECA, Inc.
3057 Nutley Street, Suite 106
Fairfax, VA 22031
United States
Email: turners@ieca.com
Timmel, et al. Informational [Page 68]