Virtual Subnet: A BGP/MPLS IP VPN-Based Subnet Extension Solution
RFC 7814

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2015-12-14)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing my concerns on ttl handling and loop.

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2015-12-02 for -06)
No email
send info
Just a couple of editorial comments:

- section 1, first paragraph, 2nd sentence:
The sentence is confusing, and may suffer from an editing or copy-paste error.  I'm not sure what "costly at the risk" of means. 
Also, who "generally admits" this to be true?

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

Comment (2015-12-03 for -06)
No email
send info
I support Alia's Discuss. I see that there's proposed text to resolve that position. 

I will remain a No-Objection if that proposed text is adopted, but I would be more comfortable if the proposed text was more specific than "may not work properly" - is there anything else that can go wrong, besides unbounded looping?

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2016-01-10)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing the discuss by adding more text on protection
of inter-DC traffic.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2015-11-30 for -06)
No email
send info
Jouni Korhonen performed the opsdir review.

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2015-12-02 for -06)
No email
send info
Thank you for addressing the SecDir comments and expanding the Security considerations section.