North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP
RFC 7752

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Alia Atlas) Yes

Alvaro Retana Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Ben Campbell) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-14 for -12)
No email
send info
-section 5: "The SAFI assignment does
   NOT need to be out of the range 1-63 and MAY come out of the "First
   Come First Served" range 128-240."

I suspect the all-caps terms don't really apply (especially the free-floating NOT).

- section 5.1: "available for review by the IDR working group,"

What if that group concludes?

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-15 for -12)
No email
send info
Thanks for the Manageability Considerations section.
Hopefully draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model covers the BGP-LS specifics

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-14 for -12)
No email
send info
Carlos Pignator did the ops dire review. I think I was ok with version 10.

Barry Leiba No Objection

Comment (2015-10-14 for -12)
No email
send info
Nicely written; thanks.  And a particular thanks for the clear guidance to the DEs in Section 5.1.  I might want to point to this from 5226bis, which means this might get me off my bum on that.

A minor editorial thing in the Introduction:

   The contents of a Link State Database (LSDB) or a Traffic Engineering
   Database (TED) has the scope of an IGP area.

I don't know what that means.  Might it be this (and might this be a clearer way to say it)?:

NEW
   The contents of a Link State Database (LSDB) or a Traffic Engineering
   Database (TED) are only visible within their IGP area.
END

(Terry Manderson) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2015-10-13 for -12)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review comments.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05619.html

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection