Updating the Term Dates of IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) Members
RFC 7691

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Ben Campbell) Yes

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

Comment (2015-09-03)
No email
send info
This is a fine document, even if the need for it makes me discouraged about our ability to get any process right the first time :-)

I would support text changes to accommodate Stephen's #2 and #3 comments.

(Brian Haberman) Yes

(Barry Leiba) Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty) Yes

(Deborah Brungard) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Alissa Cooper) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2015-09-01 for -03)
No email
send info
Three nits, could be worth fixing though:

1. Is "Updates: 4071" correct in the header? I'd have
expected "Updates: BCP 101" or nothing (and that this be
added to BCP101).

2. Section 2 says: "the sentence defining when IOAC
member terms" that seems possibly quite loosely written -
quoting the precise text to be removed would be better
and not hard. (If that were hard, then this point should
be a discuss I guess;-)

3. Section 2 also says "relative to the above mentioned
IAOC meeting" - that's ambiguous and could be interpreted
as meaning that it is ok for the IAOC to decide that
terms will start 11 months after that meeting. (At least
if there's no other text somewhere else that'd prevent
that.) Again, that seems loose and easily improved, just
add a sentence saying "IAOC member terms MUST start/end
close to the time of the 1st IETF meeting."

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Comment (2015-08-31 for -03)
No email
send info

Alvaro Retana No Objection