Explicit Subscriptions for the REFER Method
RFC 7614

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

(Ben Campbell) Yes

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

Comment (2015-06-22 for -02)
No email
send info
I'm a Yes, and this specification was mostly clear, but one sentence in the text was hard for me to parse:

   If it is important that the UA
   be able to subscribe to any refer state generated by accepting this
   request, the request needs to be formed to limit the number of places
   that it will be accepted to one.
   
Is there a phrasing that's not passive English, says directly who is responsible for doing this, and uses "one" as an adjective?

For example, would be be correct to say:

   If it is important that the UA
   be able to subscribe to any refer state generated by accepting this
   request, the UA needs to form the request so that it will obly be 
   accepted in one place.
   
?

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Alissa Cooper No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2015-06-24 for -02)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review comments.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=secdir

Alvaro Retana No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection