Analysis of Failure Cases in IPv6 Roaming Scenarios
RFC 7445

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Joel Jaeggli) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-16 for -06)
No email
send info
Given the content of the document as indicated by the Abstract, it
would be really helpful if the document title also included "failure."
Something like "Analysis of Failure Cases in IPv6 Roaming Scenarios"

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-15 for -06)
No email
send info
Thanks for addressing the SecDir review questions.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05126.html

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

Comment (2014-10-15 for -06)
No email
send info
It seems a bit odd to publish this in the IETF instead of 3GPP or the like, but presuming we're not stepping on any toes and the WG thought this was good information to put out there, I don't see any reason to object.

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection