Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Header Extension
RFC 7179

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from trill-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension@ietf.org to (None)
2014-05-14
05 (System) IANA registries were updated to include RFC7179
2014-05-07
05 (System) RFC published
2014-05-05
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2014-04-14
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2014-04-07
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from REF
2014-03-12
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to REF from EDIT
2014-02-03
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT from MISSREF
2012-08-10
05 Ben Campbell Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Ben Campbell.
2012-07-10
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-07-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2012-07-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-07-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-06-27
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-06-27
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-06-27
05 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-06-27
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-06-27
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-06-27
05 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-06-27
05 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-06-27
05 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-06-20
05 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
[*** This was addressed in the -05 version; thanks. ***]

-- 5 --
Please explain (briefly -- a sentence or two will surely ...
2012-06-20
05 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] Position for Barry Leiba has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-20
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-06-20
05 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-05.txt
2012-06-20
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ronald Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-20
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
[Updated on 20 June]

-- 5 --
Please explain (briefly -- a sentence or two will surely do) the reason for selecting Standards ...
2012-06-20
04 Barry Leiba Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Barry Leiba
2012-06-07
04 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-06-07
04 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

This used to be a discuss but since I'm told that
the folks in the WG who care already know I'm
making it ...
2012-06-07
04 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-06-07
04 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-06-07
04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-06-06
04 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-06-06
04 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
Could you provide use-cases for this extension mechanism? What extensions do you intend to define? How do these extensions fit into your current ...
2012-06-06
04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-06-06
04 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-06-06
04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-06-06
04 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-06-05
04 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

I don't understand the security model for the
ingress-to-egress extensions. Given that hop-by-hop
extensions can be modified/dropped, there can be no
ingress-to-egress cryptographic ...
2012-06-05
04 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- Pure opinion from a TRILL-ignoramus: this seems over
complex to me.

- I don't get how the TLVs are encoded, and associated ...
2012-06-05
04 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-06-05
04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-06-05
04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-06-05
04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-06-05
04 Barry Leiba
[Ballot discuss]
-- 5 --
Please explain (briefly -- a sentence or two will surely do) the reason for selecting Standards Action for this registry. ...
2012-06-05
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot comment]
What Adrian said....
2012-06-05
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-06-04
04 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
I had questions that overlapped a subset of Adrian's COMMENT, so would encourage the authors and AD to pay attention to his ballot.
2012-06-04
04 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-06-04
04 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-04 and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single IANA action which much ...
2012-06-04
04 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-06-04
04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document.

I have a number of questions and issues you might want to look ...
2012-06-04
04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-01
04 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-05-31
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2012-05-31
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2012-05-25
04 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2012-05-25
04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-05-25
04 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2012-05-24
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2012-05-24
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2012-05-23
04 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <trill@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-04.txt> (TRILL: Header ...
2012-05-23
04 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-06-07
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms Last call was requested
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms Ballot approval text was generated
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms Last call announcement was generated
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-23
04 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup was generated
2012-05-21
04 Donald Eastlake IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2012-05-14
04 Donald Eastlake Submitted for publication
2012-05-14
04 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-05-14
04 Ralph Droms State changed to Publication Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-05-14
04 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-05-11
04 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why
is this the proper type of RFC? ...
2012-05-11
04 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Erik Nordmark (nordmark@acm.org) is the document shepherd.'
2012-05-11
04 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-05-11
04 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-05-02
04 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-04.txt
2012-04-27
03 Donald Eastlake IETF state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2012-03-14
03 Donald Eastlake IETF state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2012-03-02
03 Donald Eastlake Has WG consensus.
2012-03-02
03 Donald Eastlake Has actually been in WG LC for a while.
2012-03-02
03 Donald Eastlake New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-03.txt
2012-01-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-02.txt
2011-12-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-01.txt
2011-10-24
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-extension-00.txt