Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
RFC 7150
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-20 |
11 | (System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) is used to convey path computation requests and responses ... Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) is used to convey path computation requests and responses both between Path Computation Clients (PCCs) and Path Computation Elements (PCEs) and between cooperating PCEs. In PCEP, the path computation requests carry details of the constraints and objective functions that the PCC wishes the PCE to apply in its computation. This document defines a facility to carry vendor-specific information in PCEP using a dedicated object and a new Type-Length-Variable that can be carried in any existing PCEP object.') |
2015-10-14 |
11 | (System) | Notify list changed from pce-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints@ietf.org to (None) |
2014-03-04 |
11 | (System) | RFC published |
2014-03-03 |
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2014-02-27 |
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from EDIT |
2014-01-24 |
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2014-01-24 |
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress |
2014-01-24 |
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors |
2014-01-23 |
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2014-01-17 |
11 | Amy Vezza | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2014-01-17 |
11 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2014-01-17 |
11 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2014-01-16 |
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2014-01-16 |
11 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2014-01-16 |
11 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2014-01-16 |
11 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-01-16 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-12-19 |
11 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2013-12-19 |
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Susan Hares. |
2013-12-19 |
11 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot comment] Thanks for the Management Considerations section. Regards, the OPS AD. |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2013-12-18 |
11 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2013-12-17 |
11 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2013-12-17 |
11 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2013-12-17 |
11 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] For what it is worth, I agree with Robert Spark's Gen-ART review comment that some highlighting of the interoperability challenges of vendor-specific options ... [Ballot comment] For what it is worth, I agree with Robert Spark's Gen-ART review comment that some highlighting of the interoperability challenges of vendor-specific options might have been useful. I don't think it is a big problem in this case (and this seems to be confirmed by Adrian's reply) but some similar RFCs have talked about it. If you want to take a look at what has been done in the past, there's text in RFC 5094 Section 1 last two paragraphs, RFC 4243 Section 3 last paragraph, RFC 3588 Section 11.1.1 two last sentences, for instance. The general thrust is emphasising the local applicability of vendor information, encouraging documentation of vendor's information elements, and recommending standardisation when there's more general interest for the information in question. |
2013-12-17 |
11 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Recuse from Abstain |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-12-19 |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Ballot has been issued |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Created "Approve" ballot |
2013-12-11 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Ballot writeup was changed |
2013-12-09 |
11 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2013-12-09 |
11 | Pearl Liang | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon ... IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11. Authors should review the comments and/or questions below. Please report any inaccuracies and respond to any questions as soon as possible. IANA's reviewer has the following comments/questions: IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are two actions which must be completed. First, in the PCEP Objects sub-registry of the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers registry located at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep IANA is requested to allocate a new Object-Class Value described as follows: Object-Class Value Name Reference TBD1 VENDOR-INFORMATION [RFC-to-be] Object-Type 0: Unassigned 1: Vendor-Specific Constraints [RFC-to-be] 2-255: Unassigned Second, in the PCEP TLV Type Indicators sub-registry of the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers registry located at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep IANA is requested to register the following new PCEP TLV: Value: TBD2 Description: VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV Reference: [RFC-to-be] IANA understands that these are the only actions required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. |
2013-12-09 |
11 | (System) | State changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call (ends 2013-12-09) |
2013-12-05 |
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Warren Kumari. |
2013-11-28 |
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Susan Hares |
2013-11-28 |
11 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Susan Hares |
2013-11-28 |
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari |
2013-11-28 |
11 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari |
2013-11-26 |
11 | Robert Sparks | Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Robert Sparks. |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Robert Sparks |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Robert Sparks |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Cindy Morgan | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Cindy Morgan | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> CC: <pce@ietf.org> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11.txt> ... The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> CC: <pce@ietf.org> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11.txt> (Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation Element communication Protocol) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG (pce) to consider the following document: - 'Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the Path Computation Element communication Protocol' <draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11.txt> as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-12-09. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP) is used to convey path computation requests and responses between Path Computation Clients (PCCs) and Path Computation Elements (PCEs), and also between cooperating PCEs. In PCEP the path computation requests carry details of the constraints and objective functions that the PCC wishes the PCE to apply in its computation. This document defines a facility to carry vendor-specific information in PCEP using a dedicated object and a new Type-Length-Variable that can be carried in any existing PCEP object. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Last call was requested |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Ballot approval text was generated |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Ballot writeup was generated |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested |
2013-11-25 |
11 | Stewart Bryant | Last call announcement was generated |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Adrian Farrel | Shepherding AD changed to Stewart Bryant |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | State Change Notice email list changed to pce-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints@tools.ietf.org |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | Responsible AD changed to Adrian Farrel |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | IESG state set to Publication Requested |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2013-10-31 |
11 | Julien Meuric | Changed document writeup |
2013-10-17 |
11 | Adrian Farrel | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11.txt |
2013-09-24 |
10 | Julien Meuric | Changed document writeup |
2013-09-24 |
10 | Julien Meuric | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2013-09-23 |
10 | Julien Meuric | Changed document writeup |
2013-09-23 |
10 | Julien Meuric | Document shepherd changed to Julien Meuric |
2013-07-03 |
10 | Julien Meuric | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2013-06-12 |
10 | Julien Meuric | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2013-04-22 |
10 | Adrian Farrel | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-10.txt |
2013-04-16 |
09 | Adrian Farrel | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-09.txt |
2012-08-30 |
08 | Fatai Zhang | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-08.txt |
2012-08-26 |
07 | Fatai Zhang | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-07.txt |
2012-07-08 |
06 | Fatai Zhang | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-06.txt |
2011-12-01 |
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-05.txt |
2011-11-14 |
05 | (System) | Document has expired |
2011-05-04 |
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-04.txt |
2010-09-29 |
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-03.txt |
2010-09-16 |
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-02.txt |
2010-03-01 |
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-01.txt |
2009-07-27 |
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-00.txt |