Using LDP Multipoint Extensions on Targeted LDP Sessions
RFC 7060

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

Comment (2013-09-11)
No email
send info
I see Section 1.3 manageability in RFC 6388. Good.
Please add a sentence/a new section such as this one:

    Section 1.3 "manageability" in RFC 6388 stresses the need to develop an additional MIB module, next to RFC3815, 
    to support P2MP in LDP.  LDP multipoint extension for targeted LDP should also be covered by this MIB module.

(Spencer Dawkins) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2013-09-12)
No email
send info
- The write-up says an implementation poll was sent out
and results would be in "soon" - are they in?

- The security considerations just says "nothing new here"
which is always a bit offputting for a SEC AD:-) Can you
explain why there is nothing new here? (I didn't have time
to trace all the references sorry, and I'm not asking that
you put in new text but do wonder if there's an easy
answer to the question.)

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection