An Extension to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Request History Information
RFC 7044

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
12 (System) Notify list changed from sipcore-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis@ietf.org to (None)
2014-02-04
12 (System) RFC published
2014-01-27
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-12-17
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-12-02
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2013-11-26
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on Authors
2013-11-14
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2013-11-04
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2013-11-04
12 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-11-04
12 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2013-11-04
12 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2013-11-03
12 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-11-03
12 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-11-03
12 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-11-03
12 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2013-10-30
12 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

Thanks for handling my discuss points. On reflection it'd be
wrong to try to force the issue of whether TLS is more than ...
2013-10-30
12 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-10-24
12 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2013-10-24
12 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2013-10-21
12 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2013-10-21
12 Mary Barnes New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-12.txt
2013-10-17
11 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2013-10-16
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2013-10-10
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2013-10-10
11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

Added a 4-th discuss point - ignore the previous email (sorry;-)

(1) section 13, last para: I don't understand the REQUIRED
there - ...
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell Ballot discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) section 13, last para: I don't understand the REQUIRED
there - is it saying that if a UAC adds a Privacy header ...
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- The diff from 4244 wasn't that useful for me so please
feel free to tell me something I've commented on hasn't
really ...
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]

(1) section 13, last para: I don't understand the REQUIRED
there - is it saying that if a UAC adds a Privacy header ...
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- The diff from 4244 wasn't that useful for me so please
feel free to tell me something I've commented on hasn't
really ...
2013-10-10
11 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2013-10-09
11 Ted Lemon
[Ballot comment]
Section 5, after the ABNF:
  The ABNF definitions for "generic-param" and "name-addr" are from
  [RFC3261].

I think addr-spec is also from ...
2013-10-09
11 Ted Lemon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon
2013-10-09
11 Dan Romascanu Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Dan Romascanu.
2013-10-09
11 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Section 3, list item 2: The terminology is not what email folks would use. Instead, "Email relaying whereby the recipient obtains a detailed ...
2013-10-09
11 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2013-10-09
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2013-10-09
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2013-10-09
11 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for these 2 sections, which I like very much for a bis document:

  16. Changes from RFC 4244  . . . ...
2013-10-09
11 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2013-10-08
11 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I understand that this header is just like the others except for one thing: isn't it a one stop shop for those that ...
2013-10-08
11 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2013-10-08
11 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2013-10-08
11 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2013-10-08
11 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2013-10-07
11 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2013-10-04
11 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
Thanks to my fellow ADs for helping me clear my Discuss Discuss.

I had one minor comment, which is a comment because I ...
2013-10-04
11 Spencer Dawkins Ballot comment text updated for Spencer Dawkins
2013-10-04
11 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] Position for Spencer Dawkins has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2013-10-04
11 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot discuss]
This is absolutely a Discuss Discuss for the AD(s). I'm a Yes otherwise, and I'll be a Yes after I clear.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-11#section-16 has ...
2013-10-04
11 Spencer Dawkins
[Ballot comment]
I had one minor comment, which is a comment because I think I understand the text. Please let me know if I don't ...
2013-10-04
11 Spencer Dawkins [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins
2013-10-03
11 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2013-10-03
11 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2013-10-02
11 Richard Barnes State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup
2013-10-02
11 Richard Barnes [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes
2013-09-13
11 Richard Barnes Placed on agenda for telechat - 2013-10-10
2013-06-13
11 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein
2013-06-13
11 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein
2013-06-10
11 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2013-03-13
11 Cindy Morgan Shepherding AD changed to Richard Barnes
2013-03-08
11 Robert Sparks Ballot comment text updated for Robert Sparks
2013-03-08
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
testing that email for discusses and comments is still working correctly - please ignore.
2013-03-08
11 Robert Sparks Ballot comment text updated for Robert Sparks
2013-01-11
11 Mary Barnes New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-11.txt
2012-09-27
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-09-27
10 Mary Barnes New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-10.txt
2012-09-20
09 Robert Sparks State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-09-20
09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-09-18
09 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-09 and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are four IANA
actions which must be ...
2012-09-13
09 Dan Romascanu Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready with Issues. Reviewer: Dan Romascanu.
2012-09-07
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2012-09-07
09 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2012-09-06
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2012-09-06
09 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Dan Romascanu
2012-09-06
09 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <sipcore@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-09.txt> (An Extension ...
2012-09-06
09 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Last call was requested
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Ballot approval text was generated
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was changed
2012-09-06
09 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup was generated
2012-09-05
09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-09-05
09 Mary Barnes New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-09.txt
2012-08-24
08 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation
2012-08-20
08 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-08-07
08 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
    Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?

      Proposed Standard

  ...
2012-08-07
08 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Paul Kyzivat (pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu) is the document shepherd.'
2012-08-07
08 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard
2012-08-07
08 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-08-07
08 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis
2012-04-30
08 Shida Schubert New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-08.txt
2012-03-27
07 Shida Schubert New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-07.txt
2011-10-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-06.txt
2011-10-29
06 (System) Document has expired
2011-04-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-05.txt
2011-03-15
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-04.txt
2011-02-14
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-03.txt
2010-10-25
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-02.txt
2010-06-24
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-01.txt
2010-02-13
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-00.txt