RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for De-Jitter Buffer Metric Reporting
RFC 7005
| Document | Type | RFC - Proposed Standard (September 2013; No errata) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Alan Clark , Varun Singh , Qin Wu | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
| Reviews | |||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | Dan Romascanu | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show (last changed 2013-05-17) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 7005 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Gonzalo Camarillo | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed | |
| IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack | ||
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) A. Clark
Request for Comments: 7005 Telchemy
Category: Standards Track V. Singh
ISSN: 2070-1721 Aalto University
Q. Wu
Huawei
September 2013
RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block
for De-Jitter Buffer Metric Reporting
Abstract
This document defines an RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report
(XR) block that allows the reporting of de-jitter buffer metrics for
a range of RTP applications.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7005.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. RTCP and RTCP Extended Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3. Performance Metrics Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.4. Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Standards Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. De-Jitter Buffer Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Idealized De-Jitter Buffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Fixed De-Jitter Buffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Adaptive De-Jitter Buffer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.1. Report Block Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. Definition of Fields in De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block . . 6
5. SDP Signaling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.2. Offer/Answer Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.1. New RTCP XR Block Type Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
6.3. Contact Information for Registrations . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
8. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Appendix A. Metrics Represented Using the Template from
RFC 6390 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
1. Introduction
1.1. De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block
This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in
[RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP applications.
The new block type provides information on de-jitter buffer
configuration and performance.
The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end-system
metrics defined in [RFC6792].
Instances of this metrics block refer by synchronization source
(SSRC) to the separate auxiliary Measurement Information Block
[RFC6776], which contains information such as the SSRC of the
measured stream, and RTP sequence numbers and time intervals
indicating the span of the report.
1.2. RTCP and RTCP Extended Reports
The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550]. [RFC3611]
defines an extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended
Report (XR). This document defines a new Extended Report block for
use with [RFC3550] and [RFC3611].
1.3. Performance Metrics Framework
"Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development"
[RFC6390] provides guidance on the definition and specification of
performance metrics. "Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring
Framework" [RFC6792] provides guidance on the reporting block format
using RTCP XR. Metrics described in this document are in accordance
with the guidelines in [RFC6390]and [RFC6792].
1.4. Applicability
Real-time applications employ a de-jitter buffer [RFC5481] to absorb
jitter introduced on the path from source to destination. These
metrics are used to report how the de-jitter buffer at the receiving
end of the RTP stream behaves as a result of jitter in the network;
they are applicable to a range of RTP applications.
These metrics correspond to terminal-related factors that affect
real-time application quality and are useful for providing a better
end-user quality of experience (QoE) when these terminal-related
factors are used as inputs to calculate QoE metrics [QMB].
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
2. Standards Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
3. De-Jitter Buffer Operation
A de-jitter buffer is required to absorb delay variation in the
network delivery of media packets. A de-jitter buffer works by
holding media data for a period of time after it is received and
before it is played out. Packets that arrive early are held in the
de-jitter buffer longer. If packets arrive too early, they may be
discarded if there is no available de-jitter buffer space. If
packets are delayed excessively by the network, they may be discarded
if they miss their playout time.
The de-jitter buffer can be considered a time window with the early
edge aligned with the delay corresponding to the earliest arriving
packet and the late edge representing the maximum permissible delay
before a late arriving packet would be discarded. The delay applied
to packets that arrive on time or at their expected arrival time is
known as the nominal delay, and this is equivalent to the time
difference/buffer size difference between the insertion point of the
on-time packets and the point at which the packets are read out.
The reference for the expected arrival time may be, for example, the
first packet in the session or the running average delay. If all
packets arrived at their expected arrival time, then every packet
would be held in the de-jitter buffer exactly the nominal delay.
The de-jitter buffer maximum delay is the delay that is applied to
the earliest arriving packet that is not discarded and corresponds to
the early edge of the de-jitter buffer time window.
3.1. Idealized De-Jitter Buffer
In practice, de-jitter buffer implementations vary considerably;
however, they should behave in a manner conceptually consistent with
an idealized de-jitter buffer, which is described as follows:
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
(i) Receive the first packet and delay playout by D ms. Keep the
RTP timestamp (TS) and receive time as a reference.
RTP TS[1]
receive time[1]
Assume that both are normalized in ticks (there are 10,000
ticks in a millisecond).
(ii) Receive the next packet.
(iii) Calculate r = RTP TS[n] - RTP TS[1] and t = receive time[n] -
receive time[1]. If r == t, then the packet arrived on time.
If r < t, then the packet arrived late, and if r > t, then the
packet arrived early.
(iv) Delay playout of packet by D + (r-t).
(v) Go back to (ii).
Note that this idealized implementation assumes that the sender's RTP
clock is synchronized to the clock in the receiver, which is used to
timestamp packet arrivals. If there is no such inherent
synchronization, the system may need to use an adaptive de-jitter
buffer or other techniques to ensure reliable reception.
3.2. Fixed De-Jitter Buffer
A fixed de-jitter buffer lacks provision to track the condition of
the network and has a fixed size, and packets leaving the de-jitter
buffer have a constant delay. For fixed de-jitter buffer
implementation, the nominal delay is set to a constant value
corresponding to the packets that arrive at their expected arrival
time, while the maximum delay is set to a constant value
corresponding to the fixed size of the de-jitter buffer.
3.3. Adaptive De-Jitter Buffer
An adaptive de-jitter buffer can adapt to the change in the network's
delay and has variable size or variable delay. It allows the nominal
delay to be set to a low value initially to minimize user perceived
delay; however, it can automatically extend the late edge (and
possibly also retract the early edge) of a buffer window if a
significant proportion of the packets are arriving late (and hence
being discarded).
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
4. De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block
This block describes the configuration and operating parameters of
the de-jitter buffer in the receiver of the RTP end system or RTP
mixer that sends the report. Instances of this metrics block use the
SSRC to refer to the separate auxiliary Measurement Information Block
[RFC6776], which describes the measurement periods in use (see
[RFC6776], Section 4.2). This metrics block relies on the
measurement interval in the Measurement Information Block indicating
the span of the report and MUST be sent in the same compound RTCP
packet as the Measurement Information Block. If the measurement
interval is not received in the same compound RTCP packet as this
metrics block, this metrics block MUST be discarded.
4.1. Report Block Structure
De-Jitter Buffer (DJB) Metrics Block
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| BT=23 | I |C| resv | Block Length=3 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SSRC of Source |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| DJB nominal | DJB maximum |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| DJB high-water mark | DJB low-water mark |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Report Block Structure
4.2. Definition of Fields in De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block
Block Type (BT): 8 bits
A De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Report Block is identified by the
constant 23.
Interval Metric flag (I): 2 bits
This field is used to indicate whether the de-jitter buffer
metrics are Sampled, Interval, or Cumulative metrics:
I=01: Sampled Value - the reported value is a sampled
instantaneous value.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
I=10: Interval Duration - the reported value applies to the
most recent measurement interval duration between successive
metrics reports.
I=11: Cumulative Duration - the reported value applies to the
accumulation period characteristic of cumulative measurements.
In this document, de-jitter buffer metrics can only be sampled and
cannot be measured over definite intervals. Also, the value I=00
is reserved for future use. Senders MUST NOT use the values I=00,
I=10, or I=11. If a block is received with I=00, I=10, or I=11,
the receiver MUST discard the block.
Jitter Buffer Configuration (C): 1 bit
This field is used to identify the de-jitter buffer method in use
at the receiver, according to the following code:
0 = Fixed de-jitter buffer
1 = Adaptive de-jitter buffer
Reserved (resv): 5 bits
These bits are reserved. They MUST be set to zero by senders and
ignored by receivers (see [RFC6709], Section 4.2).
Block Length: 16 bits
The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one, in
accordance with the definition in [RFC3611]. This field MUST be
set to 3 to match the fixed length of the report block.
SSRC of Source: 32 bits
As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611].
De-jitter buffer nominal delay (DJB nominal): 16 bits
This is the current nominal de-jitter buffer delay (in
milliseconds) that corresponds to the nominal de-jitter buffer
delay for packets that arrive exactly on time. It is calculated
based on the time spent in the de-jitter buffer for the packet
that arrives exactly on time. This parameter MUST be provided for
both fixed and adaptive de-jitter buffer implementations.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
The measured value is an unsigned value. If the measured value
exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an
over-range measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the
value 0xFFFF MUST be reported.
De-jitter buffer maximum delay (DJB maximum): 16 bits
This is the current maximum de-jitter buffer delay (in
milliseconds) that corresponds to the earliest arriving packet
that would not be discarded. It is calculated based on the time
spent in the de-jitter buffer for the earliest arriving packet.
In simple queue implementations, this may correspond to the size
of the de-jitter buffer. In adaptive de-jitter buffer
implementations, this value may vary dynamically. This parameter
MUST be provided for both fixed and adaptive de-jitter buffer
implementations.
The measured value is an unsigned value. If the measured value
exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an
over-range measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the
value 0xFFFF MUST be reported.
De-jitter buffer high-water mark (DJB high-water mark): 16 bits
This is the highest value of the de-jitter buffer nominal delay
(in milliseconds) that occurred at any time during the reporting
interval. This parameter MUST be provided for adaptive de-jitter
buffer implementations, and its value MUST be set to DJB maximum
for fixed de-jitter buffer implementations.
The measured value is an unsigned value. If the measured value
exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an
over-range measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the
value 0xFFFF MUST be reported.
De-jitter buffer low-water mark (DJB low-water mark): 16 bits
This is the lowest value of the de-jitter buffer nominal delay (in
milliseconds) that occurred at any time during the reporting
interval. This parameter MUST be provided for adaptive de-jitter
buffer implementations, and its value MUST be set to DJB maximum
for fixed de-jitter buffer implementations.
The measured value is an unsigned value. If the measured value
exceeds 0xFFFD, the value 0xFFFE MUST be reported to indicate an
over-range measurement. If the measurement is unavailable, the
value 0xFFFF MUST be reported.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
5. SDP Signaling
[RFC3611] defines the use of the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
[RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks. However, XR blocks MAY
be used without prior signaling (see Section 5 of RFC 3611).
5.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension
This section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined
in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to
signal the use of the report block defined in this document.
xr-format =/ xr-djb-block
xr-djb-block = "de-jitter-buffer"
5.2. Offer/Answer Usage
When SDP is used in Offer/Answer context [RFC3264], the SDP Offer/
Answer usage defined in [RFC3611] for unilateral "rtcp-xr" attribute
parameters applies. For detailed usage of Offer/Answer for
unilateral parameters, refer to Section 5.2 of [RFC3611].
6. IANA Considerations
New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For
general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to
[RFC3611].
6.1. New RTCP XR Block Type Value
This document assigns the block type value 23 in the IANA "RTP
Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry" to
the "De-Jitter Buffer Metrics Block".
6.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter
This document also registers a new parameter "de-jitter-buffer" in
the "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session
Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry".
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 9]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
6.3. Contact Information for Registrations
The contact information for registrations is:
Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
China
7. Security Considerations
It is believed that this RTCP XR block introduces no new security
considerations beyond those described in [RFC3611]. This block does
not provide per-packet statistics, so the risk to confidentiality
documented in Section 7, paragraph 3 of [RFC3611] does not apply.
8. Contributors
Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document.
9. Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by
Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Claire Bi, Bob Biskner, Benoit
Claise, Kevin Connor, Claus Dahm, Spencer Dawkins, Randy Ethier, Roni
Even, Jim Frauenthal, Kevin Gross, Albert Higashi, Tom Hock, Shane
Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith Lantz, Mohamed Mostafa, Amy
Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi Raviraj, Dan Romascanu,
Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, Hideaki Yamada, and Glen Zorn.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3264] Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model
with Session Description Protocol (SDP)", RFC 3264,
June 2002.
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.
[RFC3611] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control
Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", RFC 3611,
November 2003.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 10]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
[RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.
[RFC6776] Clark, A. and Q. Wu, "Measurement Identity and Information
Reporting Using a Source Description (SDES) Item and an
RTCP Extended Report (XR) Block", RFC 6776, October 2012.
10.2. Informative References
[QMB] Clark, A., "RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report
(XR) Blocks for QoE Metric Reporting", Work in Progress,
May 2013.
[RFC5481] Morton, A. and B. Claise, "Packet Delay Variation
Applicability Statement", RFC 5481, March 2009.
[RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Guidelines for Considering New
Performance Metric Development", BCP 170, RFC 6390,
October 2011.
[RFC6709] Carpenter, B., Aboba, B., and S. Cheshire, "Design
Considerations for Protocol Extensions", RFC 6709,
September 2012.
[RFC6792] Wu, Q., Hunt, G., and P. Arden, "Guidelines for Use of the
RTP Monitoring Framework", RFC 6792, November 2012.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 11]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
Appendix A. Metrics Represented Using the Template from RFC 6390
a. De-Jitter Buffer Nominal Delay Metric
* Metric Name: De-jitter buffer nominal delay in RTP
* Metric Description: The "expected arrival time" is the time
that an RTP packet would arrive if there was no delay
variation. The delay applied to packets that arrive at their
expected time is known as the Nominal Delay.
* Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 4.2,
de-jitter buffer nominal delay definition.
* Units of Measurement: See Section 4.2, de-jitter buffer
nominal delay definition.
* Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
Section 4.
* Measurement Timing: See Section 4 for measurement timing and
Section 4.2 for Interval Metric flag.
* Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
* Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.
b. De-Jitter Buffer Maximum Delay Metric
* Metric Name: De-jitter buffer maximum delay in RTP.
* Metric Description: It is the current maximum de-jitter buffer
delay for RTP traffic that corresponds to the earliest
arriving packet that would not be discarded.
* Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 4.2,
de-jitter buffer maximum delay definition and Section 3, the
last paragraph.
* Units of Measurement: See Section 4.2, de-jitter buffer
maximum delay definition.
* Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
Section 4.
* Measurement Timing: See Section 4 for measurement timing and
Section 4.2 for Interval Metric flag.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 12]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
* Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
* Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.
c. De-Jitter Buffer High-Water Mark Metric
* Metric Name: De-jitter buffer high-water mark in RTP.
* Metric Description: It is the highest value of the de-jitter
buffer nominal delay for RTP traffic which occurred at any
time during the reporting interval.
* Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 4.2,
de-jitter buffer high-water mark definition.
* Units of Measurement: See Section 4.2, de-jitter buffer
nominal delay definition.
* Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
Section 4.
* Measurement Timing: See Section 4 for measurement timing and
Section 4.2 for Interval Metric flag.
* Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
* Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.
d. De-Jitter Buffer Low-Water Mark Metric
* Metric Name: De-jitter buffer low-water mark in RTP.
* Metric Description: It is the lowest value of the de-jitter
buffer nominal delay (for RTP traffic) that occurred at any
time during the reporting interval.
* Method of Measurement or Calculation: See Section 4.2,
de-jitter buffer low-water mark definition.
* Units of Measurement: See Section 4.2, de-jitter buffer low
water mark definition.
* Measurement Point(s) with Potential Measurement Domain: See
Section 4, 1st paragraph.
* Measurement Timing: See Section 4 for measurement timing and
Section 4.2 for Interval Metric flag.
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 13]
RFC 7005 RTCP XR Jitter Buffer September 2013
* Use and Applications: See Section 1.4.
* Reporting Model: See RFC 3611.
Authors' Addresses
Alan Clark
Telchemy Incorporated
2905 Premiere Parkway, Suite 280
Duluth, GA 30097
USA
EMail: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com
Varun Singh
Aalto University
School of Electrical Engineering
Otakaari 5 A
Espoo, FIN 02150
Finland
EMail: varun@comnet.tkk.fi
Qin Wu
Huawei
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
China
EMail: sunseawq@huawei.com
Clark, et al. Standards Track [Page 14]