Deprecation of BGP Path Attributes: DPA, ADVERTISER, and RCID_PATH / CLUSTER_ID
RFC 6938

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.

(Stewart Bryant) Yes

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

Comment (2013-02-18)
No email
send info
I am very supportive of this action, but completely confused by process.

AFAICS, the registry is "Standards Action process or the Early IANA Allocation process". From where I stand, that means that action to change the registry must be in a Standards Track RFC or (for new allocations) in an I-D that is intended for Standards Track publication.

This would be a minor pain in this case since the I-D was last called as Informational. However, we have lived a number of years with these stray values in the registry, so I doubt a couple more weeks will kill anyone. I'll leave it to the responsible AD to work out what needs to be done.

(Brian Haberman) Yes

Barry Leiba Yes

Comment (2013-02-12)
No email
send info
No action required here, other than, perhaps, further generic discussion within the IESG:

We should absolutely do this.

I would have preferred to do it by last-calling the action and then handling it as a management item by the IESG.  The significant expense of publishing an RFC for it seems excessive.

(Sean Turner) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection