Stringprep Revision and Problem Statement for the Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings (PRECIS)
RFC 6885

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
09 (System) Notify list changed from precis-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement@ietf.org, stpeter@stpeter.im to stpeter@stpeter.im
2013-03-14
09 (System) RFC published
2013-03-14
09 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-03-13
09 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from AUTH48-DONE
2013-03-12
09 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-03-04
09 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR
2013-01-23
09 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-01-22
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2013-01-22
09 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2013-01-22
09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-01-22
09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-01-22
09 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-01-22
09 Pete Resnick
WRITEUP for draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement

The following comments were received during IESG evaluation and IETF calls and responses are included within <AUTHORS>. To note, of all of …
2013-01-22
09 Marc Blanchet New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-09.txt
2012-10-25
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Issues. Reviewer: Scott Kelly.
2012-10-25
08 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-10-25
08 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-10-24
08 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-10-24
08 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-10-24
08 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-10-24
08 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-10-23
08 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
No objection to the publication of this document, but I would like to have the following points discussed

- Why do you have …
2012-10-23
08 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-10-23
08 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-10-22
08 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
The list of Known IETF Specifications in the introduction is presented as a complete list. I believe it is already a little stale …
2012-10-22
08 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-10-22
08 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-10-22
08 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-10-22
08 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- 5.2.2 might have been a good place to explain what
normalization means. You can sort of get it from the
text, but …
2012-10-22
08 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-10-22
08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-10-20
08 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
Well done.  I've a number of non-blocking comments:

The shepherd writeup says this:
  Given that the document itself is informative, no normative …
2012-10-20
08 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-10-19
08 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-10-19
08 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-08, which is
currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are …
2012-10-19
08 Pete Resnick Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-10-25
2012-10-19
08 Pete Resnick Ballot has been issued
2012-10-19
08 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-10-19
08 Pete Resnick Created "Approve" ballot
2012-10-19
08 Pete Resnick Ballot writeup was changed
2012-10-16
08 Vijay Gurbani Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani.
2012-10-11
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani
2012-10-11
08 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Vijay Gurbani
2012-10-11
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2012-10-11
08 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Scott Kelly
2012-10-09
08 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <precis@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-08.txt> (Stringprep Revision …
2012-10-09
08 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-10-09
08 Amy Vezza Last call announcement was changed
2012-10-08
08 Pete Resnick Last call was requested
2012-10-08
08 Pete Resnick State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-10-08
08 Pete Resnick Last call announcement was generated
2012-10-03
08 Pete Resnick State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-09-20
08 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Peter Saint-Andre (stpeter@stpeter.im) is the document shepherd.'
2012-09-20
08 Cindy Morgan State Change Notice email list changed to precis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org, stpeter@stpeter.im from precis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org
2012-09-20
08 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard,
Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)?

  Informational.

Why is this the proper type …
2012-09-20
08 Pete Resnick State changed to Publication Requested from AD is watching
2012-09-19
08 Marc Blanchet New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-08.txt
2012-08-03
07 Marc Blanchet New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-07.txt
2012-07-09
06 Andrew Sullivan New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-06.txt
2012-03-12
05 Andrew Sullivan New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-05.txt
2012-01-13
04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2012-01-13
04 (System) Last call text was added
2012-01-13
04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2012-01-13
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-04.txt
2012-01-12
04 (System) Document has expired
2012-01-12
04 (System) State changed to Dead from AD is watching.
2011-07-11
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-03.txt
2011-06-10
04 Pete Resnick Intended Status has been changed to Informational from None
2011-04-06
04 Amy Vezza Responsible AD has been changed to Pete Resnick from Peter Saint-Andre
2011-03-31
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-02.txt
2010-12-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-01.txt
2010-10-22
04 Peter Saint-Andre Draft Added by Peter Saint-Andre in state AD is watching
2010-10-18
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-precis-problem-statement-00.txt