Stateless Source Address Mapping for ICMPv6 Packets
RFC 6791

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address@ietf.org to (None)
2012-11-14
07 (System) RFC published
2012-10-22
07 Francis Dupont Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2012-10-18
07 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tina Tsou.
2012-10-16
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-10-15
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-10-15
07 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-10-15
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-10-15
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-10-15
07 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-10-15
07 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-10-12
07 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2012-10-12
07 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-10-12
07 Xing Li New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-07.txt
2012-10-11
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-10-11
06 Pete Resnick Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-10-11
06 Ron Bonica Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from Best Current Practice
2012-10-11
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
I've cleared under the understanding that this will move to PS
2012-10-11
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-10-11
06 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I have cleared my DISCUSS based on Ron's promise to add clarifying text on what constitutes a translatable address.
2012-10-11
06 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-10-11
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I understand that the third paragraph of section 3.1 states that the
address translation should provide additional information about the
source address, and ...
2012-10-11
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-10-11
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-10-10
06 Wesley Eddy [Ballot comment]
It seems like "Updates: 6145" might be considered, and I support Robert's question regarding BCP vs PS in that respect.
2012-10-10
06 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-10-10
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
Agree with Robert's DISCUSS.
2012-10-10
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-10-10
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-10-10
06 Martin Stiemerling
[Ballot comment]
A nit:

Section 5., paragraph 1:

>    If a pool of public IPv4 addresses is configured on the translator,
>    it ...
2012-10-10
06 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-10-08
06 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
No objection to the publication of this document, but a few points anyway

1.
OLD:

[RFC6145] section 5.2 of the "IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm" ...
2012-10-08
06 Benoît Claise Ballot comment text updated for Benoit Claise
2012-10-08
06 Benoît Claise
[Ballot comment]
No objection to the publication of this document, but a few points anyway

1.
OLD:

[RFC6145] section 5.2 of the "IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm" ...
2012-10-08
06 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-10-08
06 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
Question for the sponsoring AD: Why is the intended status BCP instead of PS? Code would have to be written to implement this, ...
2012-10-08
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-10-08
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-10-08
06 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]
What constitutes a non-translatable address?  That term is used multiple times in this specification and in RFC 6145 without any definition.  How does ...
2012-10-08
06 Brian Haberman [Ballot comment]
I am not sure what assistance Henrik gave on this document, but I doubt he needs to be in the Acknowledgements section twice.
2012-10-08
06 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-10-08
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-10-04
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-10-04
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-10-04
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
1) s1: r/document. states/document states

2) s2: The nits checker is complaining.  I believe it's because the keywords aren't in quotes.

3) s3.1: ...
2012-10-04
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-10-04
06 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-10-04
06 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued
2012-10-04
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-10-04
06 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2012-09-27
06 Francis Dupont Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Francis Dupont.
2012-09-25
06 Ron Bonica State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-09-25
06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-09-22
06 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-10-11
2012-09-18
06 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-06, which is
currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...
2012-09-14
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-09-14
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Francis Dupont
2012-09-14
06 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2012-09-14
06 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2012-09-11
06 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <v6ops@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-06.txt> (Stateless Source ...
2012-09-11
06 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-09-11
06 Ron Bonica Last call was requested
2012-09-11
06 Ron Bonica Ballot approval text was generated
2012-09-11
06 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-09-11
06 Ron Bonica Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-11
06 Ron Bonica Last call announcement was generated
2012-09-10
06 Xing Li New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-06.txt
2012-09-06
05 Xing Li New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-05.txt
2012-09-05
04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-09-05
04 Xing Li New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-04.txt
2012-08-21
03 Ron Bonica State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation
2012-07-12
03 Ron Bonica State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-07-12
03 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-07-12
03 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was generated
2012-07-11
03 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? ...
2012-07-11
03 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Fred Baker (fred@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-07-11
03 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Best Current Practice
2012-07-11
03 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-07-11
03 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address
2012-07-11
03 Fred Baker IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2012-07-11
03 Fred Baker Forwarded to AD 11 July 2012
2012-07-11
03 Fred Baker Changed shepherd to Fred Baker
2012-07-10
03 Xing Li New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-03.txt
2012-07-03
02 Xing Li New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-02.txt
2012-02-24
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-01.txt
2011-11-14
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address-00.txt