Requirements for a Protocol to Replace the AppleTalk Name Binding Protocol (NBP)
RFC 6760

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from marc@apple.com, cheshire@apple.com, draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp@ietf.org to (None)
2013-02-20
10 (System) RFC published
2013-02-12
10 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48-DONE
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2011-01-12
10 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-10.txt
2010-12-21
10 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2010-12-20
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-12-20
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-12-20
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-12-20
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-12-20
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-12-20
10 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2010-12-20
10 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-16
10 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.
2010-12-16
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-16
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
10 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2010-12-08
10 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Nandita Dukkipati
2010-12-08
10 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Nandita Dukkipati
2010-12-02
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
The rewritten security considerations include two points a) had the protocol been developed with security in mind then it would have been done …
2010-12-02
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
The rewritten security considerations include two points a) had the protocol been developed with security in mind then it would have been done …
2010-12-02
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-02
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-01
10 Ralph Droms Telechat date was changed to 2010-12-16 from 2010-12-02 by Ralph Droms
2010-12-01
10 Ralph Droms Note field has been cleared by Ralph Droms
2010-12-01
10 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-01
10 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-29
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-23
10 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2010-11-13
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Jürgen Schönwälder.
2010-11-01
10 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2010-10-29
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder
2010-10-29
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jürgen Schönwälder
2010-10-26
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-10-26
10 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-10-26
10 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02 by Ralph Droms
2010-10-26
10 Ralph Droms Status Date has been changed to 2010-10-26 from None by Ralph Droms
2010-10-26
10 Ralph Droms Last Call was requested by Ralph Droms
2010-10-26
10 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Ralph Droms
2010-10-26
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2010-10-26
10 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued by Ralph Droms
2010-10-25
09 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-09.txt
2010-09-13
10 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ralph Droms
2010-04-08
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I am picking up Pasi's DISCUSS on this document.

I think the document should be clearer whether these requirements
represent some kind of …
2010-04-08
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-04-03
10 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
[Holding a discuss for IANA]
Section 7 should be clearer about the actions IANA is expected
to take when this document is approved.  …
2010-04-03
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-03-08
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-03-08
08 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-08.txt
2009-04-07
10 Ralph Droms Responsible AD has been changed to Ralph Droms from Mark Townsley
2009-02-06
10 Mark Townsley Sent email to Stuart asking for update
2009-02-06
10 Mark Townsley State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Mark Townsley
2008-12-19
10 Amanda Baber
IANA Evaluation comments/questions:

QUESTION: We understand that the Service Name is a 32-character
ASCII String. Should UTF8 be allowed? If so, would that be 32 …
2008-12-04
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2008-12-04
10 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward
2008-12-04
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2008-12-04
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2008-12-04
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2008-12-04
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2008-12-04
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I find the name of the document and of the page headers completely misleading. IMO the name should be 'Requirements for Replacing AppleTalk …
2008-12-04
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2008-12-04
10 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
I think the document should be clearer whether these requirements
represent some kind of IETF consensus, or just opinions of the
authors.  I'm …
2008-12-03
10 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2008-12-03
10 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
I think the document should be clearer whether these requirements
represent some kind of IETF consensus, or just opinions of the
authors.  I'm …
2008-12-03
10 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2008-12-03
10 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley
2008-12-03
10 Mark Townsley Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley
2008-12-03
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2008-12-03
10 (System) Last call text was added
2008-12-03
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2008-12-02
10 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
I found the security considerations weak, albeit tolerable for this sort
of informational document.

Some discussion of the usability/deployability/security tradeoffs
between a zeroconf …
2008-12-02
10 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
I found the security considerations weak, albeit tolerable for this sort
of informational document.

Right now there are two security options proposed: none …
2008-12-02
10 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2008-12-02
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2008-12-02
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 3.15 (Immediate and Ongoing Information Presentation) describes user interface requirements rather than the underlying protocol requirements.  I suggest revising this
section in …
2008-12-02
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2008-12-01
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2008-12-01
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
This needs a ballot.
2008-12-01
10 Cullen Jennings Created "Approve" ballot
2008-11-27
10 Mark Townsley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation by Mark Townsley
2008-11-27
10 Mark Townsley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-12-04 by Mark Townsley
2008-11-17
07 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-07.txt
2008-09-12
10 Mark Townsley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Mark Townsley
2008-09-12
10 Mark Townsley Draft Added by Mark Townsley in state Publication Requested
2008-09-12
06 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-06.txt
2007-03-01
10 (System) Document has expired
2006-08-28
05 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-05.txt
2005-07-01
04 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-04.txt
2004-02-16
03 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-03.txt
2003-06-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-02.txt
2002-12-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-01.txt
2001-09-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-cheshire-dnsext-nbp-00.txt