Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks
RFC 6571

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Adrian Farrel
2012-06-12
06 (System) RFC published
2012-01-19
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2012-01-18
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-01-18
06 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2012-01-18
06 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-01-18
06 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-01-18
06 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2012-01-18
06 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-18
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-06.txt
2012-01-11
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-05.txt
2012-01-06
06 Suresh Krishnan Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan.
2012-01-05
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Shawn Emery.
2012-01-05
06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2012-01-05
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation.
2012-01-05
06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I would normally enter a DISCUSS on these two issues if the document was standards track. As it is informational I will just ...
2012-01-05
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-05
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot comment]
I agree wholeheartedly with Peter's comments.
2012-01-05
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-05
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Security Considerations say: " This document does not introduce
  any new security considerations."  I am sure this is true, but it ...
2012-01-05
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
Nice doc!
2012-01-05
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-04
06 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Personally I found this document to be nearly impenetrable, but that's probably because the air is so thin up here at the application ...
2012-01-04
06 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Personally I found this document to be nearly impenetrable, but that's probably because the air is so thin up here at the application ...
2012-01-04
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-04
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-04
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have cleared my Discuss and moved to a Yes ballot.

Thanks for addressing some of my comments.

I still wish the I-D ...
2012-01-04
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-01-04
06 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-04
06 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup text changed
2012-01-03
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Security Considerations say: " This document does not introduce
  any new security considerations."  I am sure this is true, but it ...
2012-01-03
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-03
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-02
06 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
In Section 3.8, under "Intra Area Destinations", the Node Protection evaluations use "Full" rather than "yes", which is inconsistent with the explanation of ...
2012-01-02
06 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-02
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2012-01-02
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Please show "(LFA)" as the acronym for "LoopFree Alternate" at the top
of the Introduction.

---
              ...
2012-01-02
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to ballot "Yes" on this document, but I think the Security
Considerations are lacking. Although, of course, this document cannot ...
2012-01-02
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2012-01-01
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-12-30
06 Mary Barnes Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Suresh Krishnan
2011-12-30
06 Mary Barnes Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Suresh Krishnan
2011-12-30
06 Stewart Bryant State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-22
06 Stewart Bryant Ballot has been issued
2011-12-21
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2011-12-21
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Shawn Emery
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-01-05
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant Ballot has been issued
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant Created "Approve" ballot
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from Last Call Requested.
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant Last Call was requested
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-21
06 Stewart Bryant Last Call text changed
2011-12-08
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-08
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-04.txt
2011-10-20
06 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from In Last Call.
2011-10-07
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-10-07
06 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant Last Call was requested
2011-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested.
2011-10-07
06 Stewart Bryant Last Call text changed
2011-10-07
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-07
06 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-07
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-09-27
06 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does he ...
2011-09-27
06 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-09-27
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Alvaro Retana (alvaro.retana@hp.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-09-27
06 Alvaro Retana Changed protocol writeup
2011-09-27
06 Alvaro Retana Document Write-Up sent to AD and iesg-secretary.
2011-09-27
06 Alvaro Retana IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2011-09-27
06 Alvaro Retana Document Write-Up sent to AD and iesg-secretary.
2011-09-27
06 Alvaro Retana Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-Up Underway cleared.
2011-09-20
06 Alvaro Retana IETF state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from WG Document
2011-09-20
06 Alvaro Retana Official Process Start for RFC publication
2011-09-20
06 Alvaro Retana Annotation tag Doc Shepherd Follow-Up Underway set.
2011-08-17
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-03.txt
2011-05-04
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-02.txt
2011-03-12
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-01.txt
2011-03-03
06 (System) Document has expired
2010-08-30
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-00.txt